As a response to the guiding question: “If the United Nations was fully funded why would we need the Arc or social enterprise?” many thoughts of the effects of smaller initiatives compared to global initiatives like the United Nations came to mind. The Arc initiative, and similar projects provide more hands on experience, as well as deeper change into a specific community, while organizations like the United Nations focus on issues in a more global sense. Even if the United Nations were to be fully funded, the outcomes they could provide would not be as personal, or effective as providing help to certain groups or areas in need.
As the United Nations is a global government group, who aims to provide positive change in our society, many decisions and mutual agreement must be decided upon; a long and tedious process in which change may not be brought for many months or possibly years to come. Initiatives like the Arc do not require this kind of process, as they aim to focus on one specific issue in a localized area. The United Nations, even with all the resources in the world could not possibly provide the localized and specialized effects initiatives like the Arc provides.