School Budget Season Opens with Projected Deficits and Cutting

Vancouver School District faces yet another potential deficit budget for the 2006-2007 school year. VSB district management projects a budget shortfall of between $3.22 and $10+ million in their presentation before the VSB’s standing committee on finances (Committee V). VSB Budget documents:
1. 2005/2006 Holdback Funds
2. 2005/2006 Amended Annual Operating Budget
3. Proposed 2006/2007 Budget Process/Timeline
4. Preliminary Projection 2006/2007 Base Budget

In every year the provincial treasury holds back a percentage of the total district budget. VSB has received its 2005-2006 hold back funds with an additional sum of $540,000. Due to the projected budget deficit for next year VSB senior management recommends not spending the money on children now. They would rather put the money aside to cover upcoming 2006/2007 costs. The projected budget deficit could have very serious impacts of students in the VSB next year. It remains to be seen how the new center-right NPA school board will respond. The previous center-left COPE board managed cuts and services withdraws over the previous three years by focusing all available funds to the front lines and directing service cuts to non-enrolling areas of the district budget.

The budget deficit figures are ‘worst case projections’ and assume that there won’t be another $1.99 million in 2006/2007 (the VSB hasn’t received written assurance yet from Shirley Bond, but all the other roundtable stakeholders have. If the $1.99 is funded for next year that would mean that the underfunding could be as low as $1.23 million).

The big column is “Potential Costs of Outstanding Issues” (ranging from $3.7 – $7.5 million!) These costs are mostly pension and benefits, and could be nailed down much more precisely (and should be before decisions are made). For example, estimates to harmonize salary grids vary from $2 to $4 million, which is not acceptable for effective planning.

The final numbers come down from on March 10, 2006. So until then we’re speculating. The majority of the board decided they will refer the issue of spending holdback funds to the next board meeting. Some of the NPA trustees were recommending that we wait until March 10th to decide whether to spend the holdback funds – which leaves it pretty late in the year for hiring supervision aides and other people that contribute to the learning environment of our children. Other NPA trustees thought we should just put the money in the bank for next year. The COPE trustees thought we should spend the money budgeted for this fiscal year in this fiscal year.

The first public budget hearing is Thursday March 9th at 7 pm (a day before we actually know how much we have to spend?!). The second set of public hearings is Monday April 10th and April 11th (if needed) at 7 pm. Stakeholder meetings will be conducted separately from parent consultation, which means we won’t get to hear each other’s concerns and perspectives.

Here’s what was budgeted in the holdback funds

$90,000 Secondary Enrollment Teacher Support
$216,000 Student Support Workers
$56,000 Supervision Aides
$190,000 Student Information System – Hardware

Prepared from report by Claudia Ferris (Van DPAC)

Education and the BC Government’s Throne Speech

photo_campagnola_sm.jpg
Iona Campagnolo, BC’s Lieutenant Governor, opened the provincial legislature today (Febraury 14, 2006) with a speech that places a heavy emphasis upon edcuation. The speech builds upon the neo-Liberal provincial government’s four and one half years of radical transformation with promises of continued change. In language evocative of early 20th century political experiments and great leaps forward, the Lietenant Governor promised that: “British Columbia’s great transformation has just begun.”Edcuation segment of the throne speech (full text here)
Download in pdf format

Harnessing the Power of New Knowledge and Creativity

The transformational force of knowledge and technology is reinventing our world. The new world is a truly global economy, driven by information, ideas, and discoveries.

It is a creative economy, where art and culture are the building blocks of innovation, invention, and understanding. Your government wants to unleash the talent, creativity, and skills of all who live here.

Education is the key to that endeavour.

Over the coming months, the Premier and Education Minister will visit every school district in B.C. They will meet with educators, parents, and students to seek their ideas for positive change in education.

Your government wants to hear from teachers in their staffrooms and from students in their classrooms. It ran on a pledge to communicate directly with all teachers in B.C. – and it will act to make that possible. It wants to listen and learn at the community level, at the new Learning Roundtable, and at a first-ever Teachers’ Congress, to be held later this year.

Although the education budget will go up again this year, we must ask ourselves how we can use that funding to best serve students.

The information your government has recently collected and published on class sizes gives us new data for discussion. It points to the need for legislative changes that will ensure all school districts live within the current class size limits established in law.

If there are variations that make sense for students, parents should have a say in those decisions. While superintendents should be required to approve those decisions, school boards must ultimately be accountable.

The issue of class composition is even more challenging and demands a rational discussion. What more can we do to help all students in every classroom?

How can we better help those with special needs, in public schools and independent schools alike?

Are there ways to better maximize the benefit of our capital investments in education?

What more can we do to ensure greater accountability to taxpayers? What is the appropriate mix of local autonomy and flexibility in decision-making?

How might we modernize our curriculum to ensure it offers relevant instruction for the modern world? What changes might be made to give our students a better understanding of our province’s rich, colourful history and a fuller appreciation of our Aboriginal heritage and culture?

What new content should be taught about the importance of forestry, mining, energy, agriculture, and sustainable stewardship to our communities and our economy?

How can we foster a culture of excellence in teaching and learning that builds upon individual strengths and celebrates achievement?

All of these questions oblige us to open our minds to new possibilities for improving public education. We will not succeed in providing our children the best education if we fail to ask the critical questions and refuse to consider changes that will make our education system the best it can be.

We must aspire to make public education more relevant to students’ needs and more accountable at every level. We must aspire to excellence in teaching and learning, through greater choice and flexibility, and new opportunities for parental involvement.

This is your government’s vision for education and literacy.

It is an agenda of transformative change that looks at the new world through new eyes, with new intent to act.

The Internet offers incredible potential in that regard. This year, your government will initiate a new “virtual” school to provide B.C. students a new option for learning that is accessible from their local schools and within their homes.

Supported by Network BC, it will offer a full range of courses that will especially benefit students in rural communities. It will enable students to construct high quality programs of instruction that are more relevant to their individual interests and that are open for learning at any time, at any pace, and from any place.

The virtual school will also provide free, on-line tutoring to help secondary school students successfully complete their studies. That tutoring service will be extended to earlier grades in coming years. Several jurisdictions have successfully developed cyber schools and British Columbia will not allow our students to be left behind.

All British Columbians will have equal opportunity to benefit from the knowledge economy.

In 2006, your government will fulfill its commitment to bridge the digital divide by bringing high-speed Internet access to 366 communities across B.C. that previously lacked broadband access. New steps will be taken to extend that access to First Nations communities, working in partnership with the federal government.

Your government will continue to encourage the full participation of parents in their children’s education. Parents will be critical drivers as we transform education services across our province to meet the needs of their children.

This year, a new province-wide Parents’ Education Network will be launched to provide parents with up-to-date information on programs and research that can help their children excel in school. The Parents’ Education Network will help parents answer questions and engage in discussions about the challenges, opportunities, and possible solutions they see in education.

Parents want greater access to information in education. Your government committed to publish annual reports for all public schools on the key statistics relating to class size, class composition, and teacher hirings, terminations, disciplinary actions, and professional development. That commitment will be fully realized this year.

It will also act on its pledge to establish a teacher employment registry that is administered by the College of Teachers, to publicly report the names of teachers disciplined for misconduct involving emotional, physical, or sexual abuse.

New investments will be made to give all British Columbians new options and better access to higher learning. Your government is creating 25,000 new post-secondary spaces – the largest expansion in advanced education in 40 years.

Additional steps will be taken to allow new transferability of credits for students attending accredited private post-secondary institutes.

All of these measures will help British Columbians gain the education and skills they need to successfully compete in the new knowledge economy.

We will need more skilled workers in energy, construction and related trades, forestry, mining, agriculture, engineering, and technology. Filling all of those jobs requires us to expand training for British Columbians and to compete for more foreign-trained workers.

There is no place for parochialism or provincialism in the new world. Your government will work with other provinces and the federal government on a national action plan for skills development.

It will act this year to further expand the provincial nominee program. It will act to expedite the flow and credentialing of foreign-trained workers who are needed now to meet domestic demands.

The Industry Training Authority will expand its programs in trades training and apprenticeships. New initiatives will be launched to encourage employers to renew their efforts and investments in skills training.

The new global economy is ultimately driven not just by mastering what we have learned, but by the pursuit of new knowledge. As such, more will be invested this year in new research aimed at leading discoveries and commercializing their potential.

Your government will work with B.C.’s technology industry to pursue its vision for a comprehensive technology strategy. The BC Hub strategy will transform our approach to technology research, commercialization, and capital expansion, with new efforts to integrate science, technology, and knowledge into our resource industries, agriculture industry, and manufacturing economy.

British Columbia is becoming world-renowned in life sciences and biotechnology. We led the world in fighting SARS and continue to lead in genome research. Both are critical tools as we prepare for the next global pandemic.

Genome British Columbia is producing ground-breaking discoveries that will benefit our natural resource industries, our environment, our agricultural industry, and the future health of our population.

Major new research investments will be made this year to support the work of Genome BC and to accelerate discovery in spinal cord research through the Rick Hansen Man in Motion Foundation.

Your government will work with the Canadian Cancer Society, B.C. and Yukon Division, to establish a research chair in primary prevention of cancer.

A new B.C. Foundation for Natural Resources and Engineering Research will also be launched this year. It will support advanced training, research and development, technology transfer, and commercialization in natural resources, engineering, and applied sciences.

This will help keep our resource sector competitive and sustainable in the face of challenges like the mountain pine beetle, while growing new sectors and fueling economic growth.

Alternative energy will form an integral part of your government’s expanded energy vision. It is a critical part of your government’s goal to improve air and water quality, and fisheries management.

That goal also obliges us to set new goals in conservation. The updated energy vision will include new conservation targets to help make British Columbia electricity self-sufficient within the decade ahead.

Your government will also provide the financial thrust to create a leading edge new digital media centre at Great Northern Way, through a collaborative partnership of UBC, SFU, BCIT, the Emily Carr Institute of Art and Design, and the private sector.

This will confirm B.C.’s global reputation as a leader in digital media and will further stimulate opportunities for growth in digital entertainment.

Teachers’ strike paying off for city schools

By Naoibh O’Connor- Vancouver Couier Staff writer

Millions of dollars in unpaid wages saved during last year’s teachers’ strike are being given to B.C.’s schools.

During the October 2005 strike, the B.C. Ministry of Education reduced operating grants to schools as teachers walked picket lines. Now the ministry has decided to put the money saved back into the education system.

Source: Vancouver Courier, 01/20/2006 (Read Story on Courier.com)

Download pdf copy of article

Provincial Math Exams: Online tutors to help students prepare

Here’s another project being done ostensibly with money ‘saved’ by the teachers’ strike. Am I being too cynical if i imply that the government seems bent on showing how much better our education system would be if we paid teachers’ less? or are they campaigning for a shorter school year with enforced furloughs? If I were I teacher I think that by now -if I weren’t already- I’d be getting rather frustrated by the way the government is throwing money and then telling everyone that they got it from me. As a parent I stand with many others who are getting tired of fund raising for essential learning resources and having budgets as large of the principals’ to distribute. Something’s not working. I can see the teachers working; I can see my fellow parents working. Perhaps the government isn’t working? Not a new thought of course.

Here’s the press release on online tutors for Provincial Math exam prep.

VICTORIA – B.C. students enrolled in Principles of Math 12 will be able to get help from online tutors to prepare for the Feb. 8 provincial exam, Education Minister Shirley Bond announced today.

“We want to maximize opportunities that allow our students to reach their full potential,” said Bond. “That’s why we’re introducing a pilot online tutoring program that will give students writing the Principles of Math 12 exam the extra help they need to achieve their best.”Any Principles of Math 12 student in B.C. can use the tutoring service by visiting www.bcedonline.com/tutor online. Students will have access to online lessons, practice exams and tutoring sessions with B.C.-certified teachers. Between Jan. 18 and Feb. 7, teachers will be available in an online classroom Monday through Thursday from 7-9 p.m. Tutoring will also be offered from 1-5 p.m. on Saturday, Feb. 4 and Sunday, Feb. 5.

“Today’s students are as comfortable using a computer as they are using a pen and paper,” said Bond. “This online tutoring program is recognition of that fact, and is an exciting opportunity for all students – no matter where they live in B.C.”

The program will be offered through BCEd Online, an e-learning consortium made up of 41 school districts that partner with post-secondary institutions, online learning organizations, teacher groups, private
industry and government. BCEd Online supports online learning for students who learn in the classroom and at a distance.

“The Ministry of Education and BCEd Online are using interactive technology to provide students – particularly in rural communities – with more options,” said Barry Carbol, executive director of BCEd Online. “The tutoring program is one of the many ways our member school districts are using technology to help students do better on exams and in school.”

The online tutoring program will cost $13,000, with funds coming from the $126 million in savings reported by school districts due to the teachers’ job action. The Province has also adjusted the provincial exam schedule to allow students more time to study and prepare for their January exams. The exams will start one week later, on Feb. 6.

Over the last year, the Province has provided more than $6 million to improve technology in B.C. classrooms. The funding includes $1 million to put almost 12,000 additional computers in schools, and $2.1 million to launch pilot laptop computer projects in 12 school districts and support electronic learning in rural schools.
-30-

Southland PAC Comments on “Parachute” Funding

Extract from letter to Colin Hansen from Southlands PAC. The bulk of the letter is a follow-up to Colin Hansen’s visit with the PAC. The section quoted is only that dealing with the one time funding.

“Since our meeting, we do note that the Minister is honouring her commitment to keep the school strike savings in the education system. We certainly agree this is where the funds belong but have, frankly, scrambled to meet the requirement for consultation among parents and others within the confines of an extremely tight deadline.

This type of “parachute” funding is an example of a critical flaw that seems to have become routine for public education in British Columbia. [emphasis added] A series of special funding “announcements” does not reflect our stated concern that it is difficult, if not impossible, to conceive and implement long-term plans and goals without, on balance, long-term, stable funding. One-time grants and “saved” funds may ease certain deficiencies in classrooms but do little to eradicate the systemic problems leading to these deficiencies. After years of eroded services and resources, combined with higher costs, many children’s needs are still unable to be met.

Please reiterate to the Minister that we need the Government and Ministry staff to allocate, on a long-term basis, adequate, sustainable and proactive funding because we know funding reactively does not serve our children well. While all of us are committed to investing in the future of British Columbia, we will not be making good decisions if we see public education, and our children, as short-term expenditures.

We look forward to seeing a willingness on the part of Government to make this investment, at which point we will happily assure concerned parents that their stated commitment to a quality public education system is well founded and their tax dollars are well spent.”

Download full text of letter.

One time funding and how it’s being spent

As the deadline for submitting proposals for the one time funding draws to a close a number of differnt approaches to spending are emerging. Many of the various parents that I have spoken with have assumed a collective or big picture approach to the spending of this money. That is, identify clear school community needs and gaps in resources and pool funds to meet those needs. A variant of this approach has been to look to the various teacher ‘wish lists’ that PACs recieve all the time and to try and use those to guide the spending plans.

A different approach has emerged that takes a very different tack. This appraoch rationalizes the spending plan by highlighting the fact that the funds have been made possible in this particular context via the lost wages of teachers and other unionized support workers during the October Strike of 2005. At University Hill Secondary, for example, the teachers met last Wed with the school principal and proposed that the funds should be allocated to each teacher to spend based upon the FTE (Full Time Equivilent) of their particular job. This works aout to about 1400 per teacher with a full time contract.

Here’s a quote from the School Principal’s note to the parent community explaining the decision and reason:
MINISTRY MONEY UPDATE….
Teachers met today at lunch to discuss how to spend the Ministry money discussed in previous e-bulletins. We began by brainstorming items that teachers wished to purchase – they included: Atlases, dictionaries, musical instruments, text books – French, Skills, Geography, PE equipment, maps, field trip subsidies, microscopes for science, lighting equipment for theatre, ESL grammar workbooks, computers.

It soon became apparent that we had more wishes than money and the thought of coming to agreement as to who should be the “lucky ones” that get the money would be difficult, if not impossible, to determine especially given the tight time line that we were working under.

We then acknowledged that the source of this money was from teachers’ lost wages during the job action and based on that, the teachers agreed that every teacher should have some access to at least a portion of the money. We decided we would like to spend the money in the following manner:
$11,625 will go to the library to upgrade technology.
$39,287 will be divided amongst the staff equitably and each teacher either on their own or by pooling their money as a department, will decide how to spend their portion. Given the unique nature of the origin and dispersal of this money, I feel that the staff has come up with an equitable and creative way to spend it.

Parents also met tonight to discuss the spending of this money. We had a lively discussion about addressing the needs of the “big picture” as well as addressing the needs of individual teachers. Several parents voiced particular support for field trips and science resources and also supplementing this money with PAC money for text books if needed. Two students (from SPC) were also at the meeting and contributed support and opinions. A motion was passed to support the teachers’ spending plan proposal.

Here’s a slightly different approach:

A PAC parent from an interior school district reports attending “an elementary planning meeting in their community with staff (all K-7 grade levels were represented), PAC parents, SPC parents, and school admin … wish lists had been compiled and existing school resources had been inventoried … needs were brought to attention using this data and group discussion … subject topics (math, science, socials, etc) were posted around the room … all participants were given 3 stickers to choose priority focus areas … the stickers were placed and tallied to determine top 3 focus areas … the participants were then given 3 more stickers and a directive to be specific (ex: science became gr 7 texts/resources etc) … following 2nd round of sticker placement and tallies the top 3 priority focus areas were crystal clear and consensus for spending was determined … the one-time funding will be added to school’s existing learning resource budget and PAC will likely round up the funding to attain targets … the entire process was informative, consultative, and productive …

Putting spending plans together to meet the MoE application deadline isn’t the biggest issue (even though more planning time would have been appreciated) … with orders pending from public schools all over BC many partners have more serious concerns that publishers/suppliers can deliver/invoice all texts/resources before the MoE spending deadline at the end of March … “

A Third Example:

Dear Members of our Kitsilano Community,

I believe the above quotes demonstrate the attitude and effort with which the Kitsilano staff, committees and PAC had last week on return from our holidays. It is only with a “can do” and positive attitudes that we were able to consult widely within departments and committees to thoughtfully spend the funds allocated to us by the Ministry of Education saved by the teacher job action last October. Thank you for your involvement with the Kitsilano PAC concerning your thoughts on spending this funding.

In spite of the timeline being so short, collectively, we made solid, equitable decisions that will benefit all students and teachers. In brief, all departments will be allocated their requests in full with the exception of the Information Technology Department which still benefited by the generosity of other departments by almost $24,000.00. The Finance Committee will work to ensure that there is an additional $6,000.00 to refurbish Lab 320 to give IT the $30,000.00 needed and ensure that other labs and teachers desktops benefit from this grant as well.

Since my last e-bulletin, Kits was allocated a further $21,210.00 for the library ($9,000 for computer upgrade and the remainder for print material) and $37,000.00 for learning resources such as textbooks, novels, maps, DVD’s, videos, etc. We have overspent in this area by approximately $5,000.00 which will come from the school earning resources, but we have also spent approximately $10,000.00 of the one-time grant of $68,950.00 on learning resources and the remainder is to update in classroom technology such as LCD’s, DVD, VCR, TV monitors. There is no doubt that this infusion of funds will benefit the learning and teaching environment of our students and teachers.

————————————————————-
It would be interesting to learn how other schools and districts are deciding on their spending plan. What are the underlying principles that are being used to generate the spending plans?

Of course, the real problem of ongoing and appropriate funds is completely overlooked by this rush to spend approach that the Ministry of Educaiton has unleashed. Through out the process that I have been part of in Vancovuer I remain impressed by the civility and fair mindedness of parents, administrators and teachers involved in putting these plans into effect in a very very limited timeframe.

Approaching the End of Public Education

Quoted from: Vista. Vista exists to acknowledge the multi-faceted nature of political opinion. We are economically and social left and right, sometimes mixing in the middle, finding common ground in some places and differing in others.

Unions–especially public sector unions–are a stain for advocates of neoliberal globalization efforts to maximize free markets, minimize government social programs and spending, and commodify the commons.

Unions posit that human beings–after a century and a half of human rights advances–deserve basic rights such as the right to collectively organize into unions to negotiate wages and working conditions…which are symbiotically learning conditions for students in the education “industry”.

Unions are dangerous threats to “global competitiveness” and the race to the bottom of wages, social legislation and regulatory efforts to protect people, culture and the environment.

Continue reading ‘Approaching the end of public education.’

Increased funding for independent schools.

The Charter for Public Education Network urges public dialogue and consultation on increasing public funding for independent schools.

Vancouver, BC December 15, 2005: The Charter for Public Education Network (CPEN) advocates for free, universal, accessible, quality public education. While recognizing the right and responsibility of parents to ensure the best possible education for their children, CPEN expects government to be responsible for fully funding all aspects of a quality public education. We also expect that the public education system will provide all students with an education which is second to none.In British Columbia there has been a recent and dramatic increase in the provision of public funds to support private, independent schools, leading to increasing enrollments in those schools while public school enrollments are in decline. According to Ministry of Education Budget Information, Schedule A of the 2005/06 Estimates, public school operating grants will increase by only 4.8% between 2004-5 and 2007-8 while independent school grants will increase by more than 18.9% over the same period. Between 2002-03 and 2007-08 government documents show 34% more has been budgeted for independent school funding but only 5.8% more for public school funding. These figures are based on a 4% annual growth rate in independent school enrolments. Last year public school enrolments dropped in 54 out of 60 school districts. In the current year, more than 17% of school age children in Vancouver (School District #39) were enrolled in independent schools.

On September 18th, shortly after the budget estimates were announced, the government also announced new full funding for special needs students in independent schools, providing an additional $8.3 million to independent schools.

The combination of government funding to independent schools, publication of provincial assessments, the ranking of schools and the persistent under funding of public education is leading to a subtle but ongoing weakening of the public education system. By providing public funding to private schools, the government is subsidizing parents who already have the means to provide socio-economic support to their children and to give them an advantage in society. At the same time, the drift away from the public schools of children who enjoy these social advantages leads to an imbalance in social and economic demographics for neighborhood public schools and a potential downward spiral in assessment results for public schools. Funding of independent schools does not lead to “choice” for all. It is, however, consistent with the provision of a “two tiered” social system which is not supported by the majority of Canadians or British Columbians. CPEN encourages public dialogue on this and other issues consistent with the principles outlined in The Charter for Public Education.