Parting Words from Adrienne Montani, Former Vancouver School Board Chair

For those of you who are Vancouverites, I thought I’d let you know that at the final meeting of the 2002-2005 school board, Adrienne Montani gave an amazing, detailed and eloquent report that summed up the goals, vision and accomplishments of the trustees. She thanked parents, teachers and others for their contributions and talked about how the trustees had advocated for public education funding and for the needs of different kinds of students. I found it an incredibly moving moment. I think many people did, for people rose to their feet to clap as she closed her comments.

Ken Denike was elected chair. Whatever his strengths, his speaking style is markedly different. He thanked the board, asked people’s patience for the sharp learning curve that the new trustees would have to undergo, and then announced that committee appointments would be next Monday, when we can “expect big changes,” he said as he ended his very brief talk. We have to wait until next week to find out whether the ‘big changes” refers to the elimination of some of the committees, to the vision of the board (he didn’t describe the trustees’ vision), or merely to the changeover of the trustees sitting on the committees.

From Maureen Bayless from sos-talk list serve December 5, 2005.

Adrienne Montani, VSB Chairperson, Year-End Report to the Board, Dec. 5, 2005

A quick review of the past year’s events highlights that the Vancouver School Board never rests! I want to acknowledge at the outset of this report that this Board of Trustees has been one of the hardest working, most engaged boards this district has ever had. It has been a true privilege to work with such a talented and dedicated team.One of the things a board is tasked with is leadership. The report out from the provincial District Review team this past June gave the District the highest marks for leadership and teamwork. They noted that leadership was notable at all levels of the organization, including among students, teachers, parents, principals and vice principals, and other staff. They also noted that school staff recognize the District leaders for their support, connection to schools and commitment to best practice and innovation. The leadership of our Superintendent of Schools, Chris Kelly, deserves particular mention, as recognized by the distinguished service award he received from the BC School Superintendents’ Association in May of this year.

This is the fruit of our efforts over the past three years to build and maintain respectful relationships within the district so that together we may all focus more effectively on the quality of the learning experience we offer to every student. It is reflected in the transformation of our Leadership Development Program from a more traditional principal preparation program to an inclusive opportunity for the district to value and strengthen the leadership potential of employees in a variety of roles. Thanks to our collective work on this key district emphasis, we were able to come through the recent teacher job action with relationships intact throughout the district.

This board has placed a high priority, as promised, on advocacy: advocacy drawing attention to the excellent educational opportunities present in Vancouver schools; advocacy to secure the necessary funding and resources to meet the needs of all of our diverse learners, and advocacy in defense of good educational practice and public education as an essential public good in a democratic society.

To the extent that we have been successful in mobilizing and supporting more voices to speak up for our children’s educational rights, to the extent we have helped strengthen all of these voices, — we are proud. Among the many messages we have received in recent days, one parent wrote: “To welcome parents to the budget process was an eye opening learning curve for all of us. The chance to actually see how much funding there was and how thinly it had to be spread helped to understand your position and to move parents on to becoming public school advocates.”

With the broad support of parents, teachers and many others, our advocacy for adequate funding contributed to the provincial government’s decision to increase education funding in this budget year. This was a tangible accomplishment, achieved through unity with partner groups, through courage, through lots of hard work and through never losing our outrage that our children’s schools have suffered so many cuts and losses.

The Minister of Education recently recognized the work of this board in the Legislature, referring to the extra funding we were given this year, saying, “Vancouver school board has really made some significant decisions around the money that they’ve been given…..we are seeing the resources that have been added to the system making a difference.” We appreciate the Minister’s recognition of the value to students that extra funding has brought. We are reminded that we should never lower our expectations around the priority our children’s education should have in provincial budgets. This is why for the third year in a row we submitted a 3R’s (Reinvest, Rebuild and Renew) budget to the Ministry along with our compliance budget, providing both the government and our community with a reference document that outlines the outstanding needs of our students.

We did put the additional funds to good use this year. We were able to lower class size in the intermediate grades, expand access to All Day Kindergarten, restore some teacher librarian, ESL and other non-enrolling positions, as well as restore some student support worker, clerical and other administrative positions. We invested in a team of people and teacher release time to support teaching, learning and development in key focus areas such as Aboriginal education. Our class size and composition committee will be able to address those classroom situations most in need of remediation.

Beyond budget advocacy, our forum on public education last March, sponsored jointly with the deans of education from UBC and SFU, brought people (including students) together to listen and discuss key questions about the value of public education as an investment in the economy, in democracy and in the self. We supported parent advocacy opposing Grade 10 exams as poor educational practice. We provided briefings to candidates in the provincial election to make sure they were well informed about our district and we wrote regularly to all levels of government on behalf of our students and our community concerning a wide range of public policy issues.

To quote again from the District Review report, “The Vancouver School District programs and services address extraordinary combinations of challenge, need, opportunity and potential in an environment rich in diversity.” Being very aware of the challenges and opportunities afforded by our diverse communities and learners, and our responsibility to help them achieve equity of outcome, the Board has continued to make strong representation to provincial and federal governments about the needs of our ESL and immigrant and refugee student populations and their families. We worked hard to engage with volunteers and organizations in the Sikh community to better support youth at risk.

Over the past year, again breathing life into our goals around equity, we have seen the work of the Pride Committee blossom, making our schools safer places for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning youth, and more welcoming places for all types of families. Our community school teams have done amazing work, bringing new academic and social supports to vulnerable children and youth across the district.

On the learning front, our focused literacy programming can be found in more and more schools. Our recent special education forum was well attended and well received. Our district abounds in fine arts programming, science fairs, programs for students who are over- and under-achieving, programs for adult learners, athletic activities and language immersion choices.
Education for social responsibility is broadly embedded in curriculum at all grade levels. We can be justifiably proud of the teaching and learning that goes on every day in all of our schools.

From the leadership shown by the members of the Vancouver District Student Council to the Live on the Drive student-led project involving students from several secondary schools; from the students responding to the Massive Change exhibit at the Vancouver Art Gallery to the Sister Schools initiative, we continue to be impressed by the contributions our students are making in their schools and in the broader community to dialogue on important issues affecting them and all of us. Their insight and engagement give us hope for the future.

Reflecting on the past year, there are so many other areas of progress and achievement deserving of mention. With the provincial commitment won to speed up the seismic upgrading of our schools, our Facilities department has been incredibly busy. In spite of that extra workload, our staff managed to complete an extraordinary number of renovations, space reviews, maintenance projects, and energy saving initiatives.

Our continuing education programming continues to respond to the needs and interests of our diverse population of life-long learners with skill and creativity, while earning much-need revenue for the district.

The richness of our connections and partnerships with the City, Parks Board, the two universities, local businesses, the Health Authority, the Public Library, arts groups, non-profit services, and many other partners, serves our students well. We are grateful to all these partners for their support of our children’s learning and development.

It goes without saying that the District is still challenged by a lack of staff and resources in many areas resulting from over a decade of cuts to services. As highlighted in our recent submission to the provincial Finance Committee, we are severely under-funded in the area of services for students with special needs, as well as for ESL students and Aboriginal students.
Class size and composition issues are real and need urgent attention. Many of our schools are old and costly to operate. Schools need funding restored to their learning resources budgets. Parents need relief from ever-increasing fees and fundraising demands.

We also know that our community will continue to raise these issues on behalf of our students and families, and that this is welcome advocacy.

On behalf of myself and my fellow trustees, I want to express our deep appreciation to our community of parents have been so engaged with this board in decision-making and standing up for our schools over the past three years. Similarly, we are grateful for the support, expert advice and commitment of teachers, principals and vice principals and other staff throughout the district. The level of cooperation and good will brought to our working committees and our public deliberations has been remarkable, making change and progress possible. A special thank you is due to our district management team for their unflagging commitment, hard work and leadership. It has been a pleasure to work with all of you.

Those of us who are leaving the board, as well as those who remain, would also like to acknowledge the many expressions of appreciation and kind words received over the past two weeks, as we have not been able to respond to everyone individually.

It has truly been our privilege to serve this incredibly vibrant educational community. On behalf of the outgoing board, our best wishes to the new and returning trustees for the important work ahead.

How can we afford to bring the Olympics to town but cannot afford textbooks, library books and soap for our children?

Westside Parent letter to the editor on inadequate education funding.

November 18, 2005

To The Editor:

On Thursday night I participated in a meeting of parents representing elementary school PACs in the constituency of Vancouver-Quilchena. We met with our MLA, Colin Hansen, and welcomed the opportunity to discuss education matters of importance to parents and students at our different schools.

Every concern raised at the meeting boiled down to inadequate funding for public education. The standard government line that education funding has never been higher fell flat because we know that education costs are even higher. Some of these costs are a direct result of unfunded legislated mandates. There is still disparity to the detriment of the system and, more importantly, to the detriment of our children.

Parents made it very clear to Mr. Hansen that we want more of our tax dollars spent on public education. He used a term – “the highest of the high” – pertaining to prioritizing seismic upgrading of schools. We asked him to relay our request to the government to make funding of public education their “highest of the high” priority.

I shared the information that our PAC, over seven years, has contributed an annual amount of $20,000 to our school. This is money spent to supplement math, library and fine arts resources and other “extras” that enrich every child’s educational experience. Our school budget last year was $29,000. Parents agreed that these are shocking figures.

It was also disgraceful to learn that one of the schools represented cannot afford enough soap for the entire school year. The custodian has watered down the soap and now staff has given up theirs for the benefit of the students.

I wonder when we, as a society, decided that we can afford to bring the Olympics to town but cannot afford textbooks, library books and soap for our children. What, indeed, is this government’s “highest of the high” priority?

Imagine my shock coming home from this meeting to the even more disgraceful news that MLAs had just voted themselves a significant raise. I guess that answers my question.

Yours truly,

Deborah Broadley

The Teachers’ Strike: Two upcoming Events

(1) Hosted by Left Turn: The B.C. Teachers Strike: A Dress Rehearsal for The General Strike Of 2006? November 22, 2005.

(2) Hosted by the Vancouver & District labour Council: Lessons Learned from Teachers’ Dispute. November 15, 2005.Event 1: The B.C. Teachers Strike: A Dress Rehearsal for The General Strike Of 2006?

Last month’s illegal strike may well have been a watershed for the B.C. labour movement. Despite a vicious campaign by the Liberal government, court rulings that included the largest fine against a union in Canadian history, and lukewarm support from the BC Fed, teachers seem to have emerged not only undefeated, but more militant and united than ever.

How did this happen? What went down in the back rooms? What impact is this having on the rest of the labour movement? How about community support? And of great importance for all activists fighting the Liberals’ privatizing and union-busting, what does this mean for next spring’s looming public sector confrontations? Will there be a general strike, or a general demobilization? Will the spring sizzle, or fizzle?

SFU Harbour Centre
Room 1900
Tuesday, November 22
7:30 PM

Speakers: Lisa Descary, Richmond Teachers Association; Gretchen Dulmage, HEU vice-chair, Children and Women’s Hospital; Will Offley, B.C. Nurses Union; Lawrence Boxall, CEP Local 2000.
(Organizations are listed for identification purposes only.)

For more info contact info@leftturn.ca

Event 2. VDLC Pizza Educational: Lessons Learned from Teachers’ Dispute

Presentations from the BC Teachers’ Federation, CUPE, and the Vancouver and District Labour Council, each will provide their perspective from their role in the dispute.

November 15, 2005 at 5:30 pm (Followed by regular VDLC meeting at 7:30 PM Maritime Labour Centre 1880 Triumph Street)

Keziah McCrystal Rothlin, Executive Asst.
Vancouver and District Labour Council
#140 – 111 Victoria Drive
Vancouver, BC V5L 4C4
604-254-0703 Phone
604-254-0701 Fax
vdlc@telus.net Email

Roundtable on Public Education

75 plus people -parents, unioninsts, academics, teachers, community members- found their way to the obscure room in the Chemistry Building to hear Jinny Sims, president BCTF, Catherine Evans, president BCSPE, Paul Orlowski, Vancouver teacher, Kevin Millsip, Vancouver trustee, Wayne Ross, Curriculum Studies UBC and myself (Charles Menzies) speak on the significance of the teachers strike. After the presentations the floor was opened for discussion and questions and a further hour of commentary followed.

We will be uploading a webcast of the event shortly in this space. We will also be publishing online the proceedings of the event in printed form.

In the meantime you can find the text to two commentarites, Stephen Petrina’s welcome and my own, here. Please note that these are unedited draft comments and will be revised and expanded for the online publication to follow.

Download Petrina’s welcome
Download Menzies’ comments

Roundtable on the BC Teacher’s Strike being held at UBC

A roundtable discussion on the Teachers’ strike is now being planned by Charles Menzies, Steve Petrina and Wayne Ross.

WHEN: Wednesday November 9th at 4:30 pm
WHERE: Chemistry Building, room 126. CHEMISTRY BUILDING EAST WING; Also called Building C(Wayfinding at UBC).
View meeting room locater map customized for our event

Speakers:
Jinny Sims, President BCTF.
Catherine Evans, President BC Society for Public Education.
Paul Orlowski, Vancouver Secondary Teacher.
Kevin Millsip, Trustee Vancouver School Board.
Larry Kuehn, Director of Research and Technology, BCTF.
Charles Menzies, Parent Advisory Council member and Associate Professor of Anthropology, UBC.
E. Wayne Ross, Professor Dept. of Curriculum Studies, UBC

THEME: A roundtable discussion on the significance of the teachers’ strike and struggle for public education in British Columbia.

FORMAT: A panel of presenters representing teachers, parents, and researchers will each speaker for 5 to 10 minutes each. This will be followed by a moderated discussion of the significance of the teachers’ strike.

SPONSORS:
Department of Anthropology and Sociology, UBC
Department of Curriculum Studies, UBC
Canadian Studies Programme, Faculty of Arts, UBC
Department of Political Science, UBC
Centre for Research in Women’s Studies and Gender Relations
First Nations House of Learning, UBC
Workplace: A journal for academic labor
New Proposals Publishing Society

PDF event poster (revised Nov 8, 2005): Download file

Roudtable

The following letter was sent to the Roundtable reps and raises several critical issues regarding the crisis in education that has existed long before October 7th, 2005.

Dear Education Roundtable representatives,

In 1999, the province commissioned an independent Review of Special Education in reaction to widespread concerns that special education was in crisis at that time. That review received numerous submissions, including one from BCCPAC that highlighted provincial underfunding of special ed and the threat this posed to inclusive education, with local school boards and their staff ill-equipped and failing to live up to provincial special education policies. In 2001, the report of this Review was almost entirely ignored by the incoming government, which instituted far reaching changes, including funding policies that forced deep cuts at the local level, greatly aggravating the existing challenges in special education. As the BC Association for Community Living (BCACL) memo copied below illustrates, those changes have taken things from bad to worse, threatening inclusion and posing a very real crisis for children with developmental disabilities and other special needs.

Successive NPA and COPE School Boards in Vancouver have repeatedly documented how this funding gap forces them to divert millions intended for general education, thus hurting all students. The BCTF has consistently highlighted this concern, making it a focal point of the recent job action. And while BCCPAC has been less vocal in recent years, its members have continued to pass numerous resolutions expressing concern about underfunding of special education and other special learning needs. In 2004, even MLAs representing the current government urged their leaders to restore funding for special education in the report of their budget review committee. That the crisis identified by special education advocates in the late 1990s has deepened, becoming chronic and systemic and ever more daunting does not make it any less a crisis!

Regrettably, the Minister has seen fit to selectively represent the provincial parent voice at the new roundtable, and to exclude any voices that can speak purely for students with special learning needs at a table where this is clearly a central issue. This places an added responsibility on those appointed to the roundtable to represent all students in our education system, regardless of your organizational goals and policies or member priorities. You have been given an opportunity to stop the appalling betrayal of our most vulnerable students by acknowledging and addressing the central and undeniable role of consistent provincial underfunding in the crisis that faces so many of our students with special learning needs, including ESL and Aboriginal students and other children with unique needs today. As the parent of a child with special needs and advocate who has accompanied many other parents through their own children’s individual school crises, I urge that you seek outside support and input if necessary to accomplish this, so that we can address this crisis promptly and restore the promise of inclusive education once and for all.

Dawn Steele

Parent of a child with special needs, David Livingstone Elementary (a non-BCCPAC member), Vancouver.

CC: Vancouver DPAC; SOS; BCSPE; BCACL; Opposition Education Critic John Horgan;

UBC Faculty Association Sends $5000.00 to the Feed the Teacher Fund

UBC faculty from UBC-Vancouver and UBC-Okanagan, meeting via video link passed overwhelmingly passed a motion to contribute $5000.00 to the Federation of Post-Secondary Educators Feed the Teachers Fund. Moved by Stephen Petrina and seconded by Charles Menzies the motion recognized the important work that BC teachers have been doing in standing up to an intransigent government.

A member from UBC-O, speaking in favour of the motion, reminded us that in Kelowna they understand what it is like to be on strike and “this motion is the least that we can do.” Others speaking in favour of the motion made reference to the important human rights issues involved.

One member who spoke against the motion raised the issue of ‘fiscal responsibility’ and questioned whether this was a wise investment of faculty association dollars. The other speaker opposed to the motion read excerpts from the purpose of the association as stated in the bylaws and constitution of the faculty association and rhetorically asked where the words political could be found in our mandate suggesting that the motion was a political act and our purpose was simply to look after the interests of our membership.

However, the overwhelming vote of support (by a margin of two to one, clearly demonstrates the associations’ recognition of the significance of the action taken by the teachers and the inappropriate behaviour of the government in this struggle.

End of Strike

Teachers across British Columbia have voted 77% to return to their classrooms tomorrow morning, confident in the knowledge that they have reasserted their rights and raised quality public education to the top of the political agenda. (Here is a nice analysis posted by ‘Red Cedar’ on Oct. 21.)BCTF President Jinny Sims and her Executive Committee voted to recommend acceptance of the settlement package crafted by Vince Ready. Clearly teachers shared their leaders’ view that now is the time to get back to work and begin a new stage in their ongoing advocacy for public education.

Of the 30,427 votes cast, 23,632 were yes and 6,795 were no.

“Teachers have voted by a large majority to end our campaign of civil disobedience and to return to work tomorrow,” Sims said. “We will do so with our heads held high, and our hearts touched by the many gestures of kindness and solidarity we have experienced in the past two weeks.”

B.C.’s 38,000 teachers walked out in protest of Bill 12 on October 7, and maintained picket lines at all public schools throughout the province for the next ten school days. About 25,000 CUPE members who work in the school system demonstrated solid support, along with other co-workers from the IUOE and BCGEU.

In addition, thousands of parents, students, and community members joined their teachers on the picket lines and at public rallies, often bringing cookies and coffee along with their good wishes. To the surprise of many political commentators, public support for the teachers remained strong even after the strike was declared illegal.

“We are so grateful for the support from the parents and students, as well as the outstanding solidarity of school support workers and teachers across Canada and even abroad,” said Sims.

“Thank you to everyone who was with us in this struggle to improve classroom conditions and reclaim workers’ rights. Together we have all learned the important lesson that citizens who take a collective stand can make positive change in our democracy,” Sims said.

Sims assured parents that teachers will be working hard to help students make up for lost time, and she is confident they won’t have problems catching up.

However, she said, the work of rebuilding working relationships between teachers and the provincial government will be a more difficult job.

“This government has enacted six pieces of legislation targeting teachers’ rights and profession,” Sims noted. “These actions have undermined our trust in this government.”

Sims said teachers will be watching and holding this government accountable for their promises to amend the School Act to include firm class-size limits for students in Grades 4 through 12, and to address the serious issues of class composition and support for students with special needs.

Tomorrow, Sims and three other BCTF representatives will attend the first meeting of the Learning Roundtable in Victoria.
“We will be bringing a clear message from the thousands of people with whom we have walked and talked these past two weeks,” Sims said. “British Columbians support teachers’ speaking out for students, they care deeply about the learning conditions in their children’s classrooms, and they want the government to reinvest in a strong and stable public school system.”

BCTF Press Releases

Breaking News

Hillary’s On Strike Blog has a nice overview from a rank and file teacher’s perspective of the recent developments.

Surrey Teacher’s Association Recommends No Vote Nine Reasons to Vote No Download file here.

President of Sunshine Coast T.A. gives his personal reasons for voting yes (Click here to read.)

Greater Victoria Teachers’ Association Exec not making a recommendation. See here for details.

Flag at Halfmast. From as long as it takes

Premier’s Office Recommends Unconditional Acceptance of Report.

At an early-morning news conference, meanwhile, B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell also said his government is prepared to accept the facilitator’s report unconditionally, calling it a “constructive framework” for education in the province.

Read the full story in The Globe and Mail

BCTF executive calls for conditional acceptance of the Ready Report. Speaking on CBC Radio this morning, Jinny Simms announced the executive’s decision. If the government will guarantee legislating class size and composition issues by June of 2006 Simms will reluctantly recommend acceptance.

“If they give to us, in writing, a commitment that before the end of June, they will put in place firm numbers in the School Act for grades 4 to 12, and address class composition in the School Act, then we will recommend to our membership, reluctantly, but we will, for our members to vote on Saturday and Sunday so that our students can be back at school on Monday morning.” Jinny Simms on CBC Radio this morning.

Full Story, click here.

———————————–
Liberal’s true colours revealed: De Jong refuses to commit to amendments to School Act.

———————————–
One question comes to mind: Why wait until June 2006? It took the liberals less than a week to pass bill 12. I am sure that the passage of amendments to the School Act that enshrines appropriate class size limits and composition would pass easily and quickly.

Breaking News

Vince Ready’s ReportDownload file.

BCTF to hold province wide vote.
BC Liberal Government to consider report overnight.BCTF Report on the discussions with facilitator, Vince Ready
Source: BCTF

BACKGROUND

* On Monday night Vince Ready called the BCTF to say that he’d been appointed as a facilitator to promote discussions that could lead to a resolution of the dispute.
* The Full-Time Table Officers, supported by staff, met with Vince Ready four times over Tuesday and Wednesday.

PUBLIC GOVERNMENT RESPONSES

* Said they would not meet with teachers while we are on the protest lines.
* Would not admit that they were one of the parties working with Vince Ready.
* Premier and Minister of Labour spoke about changes to the School Act to make improvements.
* Acknowledged need to address class size and class composition.
* Reiterated that the round table on learning was the venue for learning conditions discussions.

GOVERNMENT POSITION IN THE DISCUSSIONS WITH READY

* No wage increase in a two-year agreement.
* No to a third year in this agreement.
* No to other forms of compensation, including benefit improvements and payment of Salary Indemnity Plan fee, although this is paid for most other public-sector workers.
* No contract language on learning conditions.
* Nothing that could be seen as rewarding teachers.

BCTF POSITION IN DISCUSSION WITH READY TO DATE

* Zero/zero mandate should not apply to teachers because teachers have paid a high price through the contract stripping in 2002.
* Were prepared to take 0% in the first year on salary, and work at other forms of compensation on the understanding that there would be a salary increase in the second and third years.
* Needed to see improvements for teachers on call.
* Must have class-size limits and class composition guarantees that are grievable.

BCTF PROPOSAL FOR RESOLUTION

BCTF representatives will be bringing the following elements for resolution into the discussion with Vince Ready today:

1. Amendments to the School Act to include:

– class-size limits for Grades 4-12 and limits for classes that have safety and exceptional learning issues, including the successful integration of students with special needs.

– staffing ratios for specialist teachers, such as teacher-librarians, counsellors, and learning assistance teachers.

2. Funding and a process for support for students with special needs that will:

– involve the school-based team (professionals working with the student’s parent).

– protect the confidentiality of the student.

3. a three-year agreement that provides stability to the system and allows time for relationships to improve.

4. salary and benefits improvements in years two and three of the agreement.

TEACHERS COMMITMENT AND DETERMINATION

These elements reflect teachers continued willingness to reach a resolution. We are determined to make improvements for students and for teachers, but we are also problem-solvers. We call on the government to work through the Ready process in the same spirit of co-operation. This is not the time for threats, inflexibility, or posturing.

Teachers are tremendously encouraged by public support. We thank the many, many parents and concerned community members who have expressed their support. We call on them once again to encourage government to acknowledge the best intention of teachers and needs that must be met in our public schools.

We are also heartened by the fact that over 40 school boards have called on the government to either repeal Bill 12, negotiate a settlement, and/or repeal Bill 12.

Teachers remain incredibly strong and determined to make improvements for students and to achieve a fair settlement for teachers. Our goal remains a settlement that meets the needs of students and teachers in this province.

For more information on the specific language being proposed by the Federation, contact your local office.