Anthropocene at the AGO

This gallery contains 7 photos.

Jarring, amazingly well-done. A snapshot of human’s influence on the planet. The work of Edward Burtynsky, Jennifer Baichwal and Nicholas de Pencier at the AGO.

More Galleries | Leave a comment

And Now Fall Arrived

This gallery contains 8 photos.

with multicoloured shades and mushrooms under trees

More Galleries | Leave a comment

When Summer Was Here

This gallery contains 7 photos.

the bumblebees flew and the berries grew

More Galleries | Leave a comment

The Academic Conference Genre Revisited

“Doing conferences differently” by Ilya Afanasyev, Nicholas Evans, and Nicholas Matheou is an interesting blog entry outlining an alternative approach to organizing and participating in academic conferences. By now, I have myself been to a good number of conferences to agree that the academic conference genre can be at times exhilarating and productive, but more often dissatisfying and alienating. The authors of this Verso blog’s entry narrate their efforts to organize an intellectual gathering that effectively challenged the often competitive, hierarchical, boring, and useless tone of academic conferences. The result: “Debt: 5000 Years and Counting,” a conference hosted in June of this year by the Birmingham Research Institute for History and Cultures at the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom.

In essence, Afanasyev, Evans, and Matheou took insights from “the Falmer Method” (put forth in 2014 by Andrea Cornwall, Frank Karioris, and Nancy Lindisfarne at the University of Sussex) to propose a different kind of conference. Three characteristics stood out to me from this alternative form of conferencing. First, the authors circulate their papers beforehand rather than presenting them at the meeting. This meant that attendees and panellists read other presenters’ papers ahead of time and, at the conference itself, attendees focused on discussing the ideas rather than hearing them for the first time. Second, panel moderators were tasked to facilitate discussions in strict speaking order. This meant that everyone got a chance to speak when it was their turn to do so. The intention was to equalize power differentials between those who often talk more and are heard and those who often do not get to talk much and when they do are not necessarily heard. In my view, this also meant that those who needed more time to articulate ideas had the chance to do so rather than being immediately outshined by those who are quicker in translating their thoughts into words. (I would have liked that for sure.) Lastly, the conference format had long breaks and communal food opportunities. It is true that many of the most enriching conversations take place when people feel warm in their stomachs, hearts, and minds.

The conference organizers are quick to point out that their conference had some limitations. For one, they chose the book of an already prominent author as an entry point into discussions of capitalism, finance, and debt. Yet I could not help but feel inspired by the prospect of undoing some of the most insidious aspects of the mainstream academic conference genre: the predominant presence of impenetrable cliques; the anticipation of meeting our intellectual heroes only to witness the gap between the impressive ideas outlined in their books and their less than remarkable ways of interacting with those who have not published books yet; the overwhelming number of simultaneous panels to which sometimes only the (not yet famous) panellists attend. Conferencing is still part of my future; I hope one day—not so distant in the future—I get to attend one of these Falmer-method-inspired conferences in which thoughtful and creative organizers and attendees find novel ways to engage, reflect, imagine, create, and dialogue in today’s complex world.

Posted in ogr | Tagged | Leave a comment

MOA

This gallery contains 8 photos.

More Galleries | Leave a comment

Gendered Trends in Publishing

This is an interesting article about the underrepresentation of women authors in political science journals.

“Gender Gap Without Gender Bias?” by Colleen Flaherty. Inside Higher Ed, June 12, 2018.

The authors of a recent study on this issue explored different explanations for this trend, including the following:

  • systemic gender bias in the review process favouring men authors,
  • women authors self-selecting out of top-notch journals,
  • underconfidence of women authors,
  • underrepresentation of women in co-authored articles, which were the articles most often sent out for review,
  • women scholars often engaging in qualitative research while flagship journals privilege publication of quantitative/statistical studies,
  • women political scientists submitting fewer articles for review.

In the end, it would appear that all of these factors are in some way at play. It would be interesting to find out whether these considerations unfold similarly in other social science fields. In any case, the key message that comes from this is that we still have work to do to reduce the gender gap in academic publishing.

Posted in ogr | Tagged , | Leave a comment

21 Questions with a Sex Worker Building Community

Tiny extract from an extremely neat interview with a sex worker in Edinburgh conducted by Raven Bowen:

Q: One thing that your work or existence is aimed to do for the sex industry?
A: I want to make sure that every sex worker has sex working friends that they can meet in person with. These connections are powerful.

The full interview is available here via the Sex Work Research Hub.

Posted in ogr | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ghost Bike

Beautiful ghost (or is it shadow?) bike sitting at the intersection of an urban place of grief.

intersection of grief

Posted in ogr | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Pros and Cons of Open Access

I have grown interested in the debates on open access, for what they tell us about access to information but also for what we can learn about internet communications today.  Nature has published an op-ed by Kate Worlock outlining some of the pros and cons of open access publishing.

The majority of learned societies continue to publish their journals simultaneously in print and online and will in all likelihood need to continue charging for print editions, perhaps on a print-on-demand basis, even if access to the electronic edition has been made free of charge. At present, many learned society members continue to prefer to receive their edition of the journal in print. Making a move directly to open access publishing and charging extra to receive a print copy could alienate a large percentage of the membership base.

Here is the link to the full article.

Posted in ogr | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Evaluation of the Sustainable Development Goals

Beautiful city: Guanajuato, Mexico. Enriching conference: Evaluation of the  Sustainable Development Goals.

Snapshots of International Evaluation of the SDGs Conference.

Thanks to the Canadian Evaluation Society Educational Fund (CESEF) for supporting my participation in this conference.

Posted in ogr | Tagged , | Leave a comment