What is Differentiated Instruction?

In my belief, every learner is different; therefore, I strive to incorporate various learning styles to ensure a quality learning experience. How can I do this? By differentiating my instruction!

To begin, I want to clearly state what it means to differentiate instruction. I have been discussing differentiation in my previous posts but have not clearly defined what it is. Differentiation is “’a philosophy that enables teachers to plan strategically in order to reach the needs of the diverse learners in classrooms today’” (Parsons, Dodman, & Burrowbridge, 2013, p. 39). In plain and simple English, it means to provide your students with the resources to meet their needs! Although the thought of this may seem impossible, as teachers have up to 30 students with unique personalities and learning styles, it is quite simple! How many teachers have provided students with a choice? How many teachers have allowed some students more time to complete their work? “Each teacher who has entered a classroom has differentiated instruction in one way or another. Teachers differentiate when they give a student more to finish an assignment, allow children choice . . . give different types of assessments” (Levy, 2008, p. 162). This is the simplest form of differentiating instruction for your students. However, to go above this is to provide your students an experience in which school becomes enjoyable.

To go above the basic form of differentiation, there are three words that teachers must understand: content, process, and product. Content is the material that is being taught to the students “Each child is taught the same curriculum but the content may be quantitatively or qualitatively different” (Levy, 2008, p. 162). The process is how the students learn the subject material. “The activities we provide for students learning must address different student abilities, learning styles, and interests” (Levy, 2008, p. 162). Finally, the product is how students are able to demonstrate their learning. This component of differentiated instruction may be formative or summative assessment but must reflect the students learning ability (Levy, 2008, p. 162). Refer to below to figure 1 for a more concise understanding of content, process, and product.

Figure 1:

Screen Shot 2016-02-14 at 1.06.56 PM

(Baecher, Artigliere, Patterson, & Spatzer, 2012, p. 17)

Having understood content, process, and product, teachers are able to begin differentiation. Similar to the example above, I will try to incorporate differentiation when working with students. I think it is crucial for teachers to begin implementing differentiated instruction slowly. Having to integrate differentiation in 7 elementary school subjects may be overwhelming. Therefore, I will begin practising differentiation in Math and English. Once I become comfortable in differentiating the content, process, and product, I will begin integrating more subjects in. Sooner or later, my entire practice will be differentiated.

 References:

Baecher, L., Artigliere, M., Patterson, D., & Spatzer, A. (2012). Differentiated instruction for English language learners as “variations on a theme”. Middle School Journal, 43 (3), 14-21.

Levy, H. M. (2008). Meeting the Needs of All Students through Differentiated Instruction: Helping Every Child Reach and Exceed Standards. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, 81 (4), 161-164.

Parsons, S., Dodman, S., & Burrowbridge, S. (2013). Broadening the view of differentiated instruction. The Phi Delta Kappan, 38-42.

Taylor, B. (2015). Content, Process, and Product: Modeling Differentiated Instruction. Learning to Teach, 13-17.

Inquiry and Practicum Reflection

During my practicum visit, I had a pretty interesting lesson on Second-Step. I knew in advance that the students had already done many of these program lessons and may not have enjoyed them. Therefore, I tried to implement other activities and videos as supplements to the videos that the Second-Step program provides. However, as soon as I began, I found the students were complaining about the videos, having viewed these in previous years, and having learned the same concepts.  I tried to continue on with the lesson but struggled in getting them to participate (during some portions of my lesson). At the very end of my lesson, when viewing the “Walk, Walk, Walk” music video, I had lost their attention and had to stop my lesson abruptly.

Reflecting back on this lesson, I can take away many positive aspects. Although the lesson did not go as planned, I learned much more than I ever could have in a lesson where my students remained on task the entire time. Do not get me wrong- I would love for the students to be engaged throughout my entire lesson. However, that will not be the case 100% of the time. Teachers with years of experience may have lessons that fail, and therefore, I am glad that I experienced this failure early on so I can learn from it before the beginning of my extended practicum. I am already articulating ways to engage the students for the following second-step lessons. Furthermore, I am discovering ways in which I may assist students that require differentiation.

This lesson went hand in hand with my inquiry on differentiated learning. “’Differentiated instruction implies a purposeful process for adapting the teaching and learning processes of the classroom to accommodate the needs of all learners’” (BCTF, 2015). According to the BC Teachers Federation, there are several aspects of differentiated learning, which I will discuss below. To begin, I must be a responsive teacher, especially when considering student needs (2015). Considering they did not enjoy the Second-Step lesson (and program in general), I must provide them unique ways in grasping the concepts. In addition, you must be flexible and adaptable when your students are not responding positively to a lesson (2015). I must be aware of student behavior, and provide students that are finding my lesson a challenge or boring with alternatives. This can only be done if I get to know my students better (2015). Some students may be preoccupied with other activities; therefore, I must get to know them better so I can differentiate my instruction to engage them with the rest of the class and the lesson. I am confident that as the weeks progress, I will be able to incorporate differentiation throughout my lessons to engage the students.

I am hopeful that next time I visit my practicum classroom, they will enjoy the lesson that I have created for them.

Reference

BCTF. (2015, June). Differentiated Instruction. Retrieved January 22, 2016, from BC Teacher’s Federation: https://bctf.ca/issues/resources.aspx?id=24271&printPage=true

Does Assessment Kill Student Creativity?

Does Assessment Kill Student Creativity

Pre-Reading:
When reading the title, “Does Assessment Kill Student Creativity”, I considered all of the positive aspects of assessment, as opposed to focusing on the challenges. I personally think some form of assessment if necessary for students. Maybe not at a primary level, but in intermediate and in high school, I can recognize its importance. I am not suggesting that teachers only assess students through standardized tests, but, I do think that assessment (formative or summative) is crucial for a student’s success.

During Reading:
-Because of pressures placed on teachers and how they use instructional time, creativity is given less focus
-“Teachers are required to devote increasingly large portions of their instructional time preparing students for assessments” p. 254
-What is creativity?
o“Interaction among aptitude, process, and environment by which an individual or group produces a perceptible product that is both novel and useful as defined within a social context”
-Creative process occurs through two stages: divergent and convergent
-Divergent: brainstorming to generate ideas
-Convergent: evaluating/choosing ideas, completing the project, and then discussing the results
-*Science fair example: choose an idea, complete the project, and explain the outcome to viewers!
-Not all students reach their potential in being creative because of classroom assessment
-Teachers ask students to display their best work: “teachers communicate to students that outperforming others, rather than self-improvement, is the reason for engaging in achievement-directed behavior” 257
-Assessments in classrooms allows to comparisons amongst peers
-Assessment itself doesn’t diminish creativity, but the message that teachers convey when asking students to do their best is what may kill creativity
-Counter argument: some students may excel in such structured classroom settings
-How to protect creativity: convey the message of assessment differently!!
-Minimize comparisons! *an example of this in my practicum classroom comes to mind. When doing DPA with the classroom next door, I suggested our class vs. theirs. The teacher opposed to this idea as we are creating comparisons such as: my class is better than yours (depending on the results). Therefore, we ended up mixing the two classes together to create teams
-Put less pressure on assessment!
-Don’t see low grades on assessments as a way to punish the students, but as a way to learn from them! This can be a useful for teachers as well as the students

Post Reading:
I thought this reading would be about the consequences of assessing students, and only put forth the negative aspects of it. However, this reading did much more than that. It explained creativity, and then instead of breaking down the negative aspects of assessment, it explained how the teacher’s role in conveying messages may be the part in what kills creativity. For most students, it is not the assessment in itself, but the way the teacher puts pressure on the students. I thought this article was interesting as it explained how to use assessment in a way that minimizes the pressure! We had a discussion last term, in which one of my peers said that a lot of this program is telling us “what not to do”, when will we learn “what to do”. This article did just that. It explained the consequences of how teachers present information, and provided the reader with alternatives in communicating.

Reference:
Beghetto, R. A. (2005). Does Assessment Kill Student Creativity? The Educational Forum , 254-263.

Differentiated Instruction: Focus on Math

The article I have chosen to discuss on my blog is very important for my inquiry research. It supports my concept on how differentiated instruction focuses on the various subjects throughout elementary school. Although it would be very difficult to explore all subjects in which teachers differentiate their instructions, I believe that focusing on Math, Science, and English will contribute immensely to my inquiry research. The article I have chosen focuses on math, and the use of a mathematical game to support students with varied needs. “Designing Differentiated Mathematics Games” by Christine Trinter, Catherine Brighton, and Tonya Moon provides a concise article on the various abilities primary students have when entering the public school system. To address their needs, the authors have suggested the importance of incorporating games to differentiate instruction. This method allows students to “make connections among multiple representations of mathematical topics” (Trinter, Brighton, & Moon, 2015, p. 93). Playing the game that this article recommends provides students with varied needs to “draw on [their] creativity”. I enjoyed reading this article, and would definitely use this to support my stance on differentiated learning.

Reference:
Trinter, C., Brighton, C., & Moon, T. (2015). Designing Differentiated Mathematics Games. Gifted Child Today, 88-94.