Categories
Lispector

The Hour of the Star – I Applaud His Courage

Now that I have finished this novel, I noticed that it starts with “all the world began with a yes” (3) and the last word is also “yes” (77). Overall, I thought this book was interesting in that the author also seems to be a character himself. He knows his goal for writing is to “write a story with a beginning, middle, “grand finale” followed by silence and falling rain” (5). Something I found unique is his way of writing, where he sets super low expectations saying “so don’t expect stars in what’s coming: nothing will twinkle” (8). I thought it was great how raw he is, instead of trying to set a false impression and lure readers in. Another part of the novel that supports this is “I read nothing for fear of polluting the simplicity of my language with luxuries” (14). He does not try to accessorize himself in “gold” and is not afraid to show who he truly is.  Following this, his whole intro feels like  “mit-bap-kkal-gi” which is a korean phrase for “laying the floor” or “setting the stage” in preparation for disappointment. My thoughts are confirmed on page 9, “because I’m scared” and “I still haven’t worked up the nerve to write it” (13). 

“This book is silence. This book is a question” (8). I began to ponder what he means by this and would love to know other people’s thoughts. Further, I was inspired by his confidence “to abandon the old already comfortable feelings” (11).

On another note, I felt like my inner thoughts were read so loud and clear when he said “but let’s get back to today. Because, as we know, today is today. You’re not understanding me and I darkly hear you laughing at me with the quick and rasping laugh of the old” (12). Also, at the start, I think he makes this “northeastern girl” super mysterious and I could not help but continuously be curious about who she is.

Something about the way he writes captivated me. Yes, I definitely got lost in all his words but some quotes were extremely powerful. For example, “for at the hour of death a person becomes a shining movie star, it’s everyone’s moment of glory and it’s when as in choral chanting you hear the whooshing shrieks” (20). I found that there’s a strange beauty to this book. My thoughts were a little all over the place for this book and I think that might be seen throughout this blog post. Hopefully, my ideas are still conveyed and can be understood.

Question: What do you think the title of this text entails? What does “star” mean?
(I sort of understood it as everyone is a star at their own thing or like a star on stage that takes effort to shine.)

Categories
Rodoreda

The Time of the Doves – A Turn of Events

To be honest, I am not quite sure what to think of The Time of the Doves. On one hand, I found it to be quite a long read and it was hard to pinpoint what was happening in some parts because I would lose focus. Yet, I still think it was an interesting read. There were several moments that stood out to me, which I will outline in this blog post.

To start, Quimet seems to assert his male dominance when he “said if I wanted to be his wife I had to start by liking everything he liked” (22). Personally, this was the biggest red flag to me because what do you mean “you’ve [simply] got to like it” (25)? The way he would violently shake Natalia’s head was alarming and I was surprised by the fact that she did not consider leaving the relationship. However, I felt like there was a big shift in how Natalia is treated when she is pregnant. Suddenly, she is treated extremely well to the point where she is expected to not work at all. 

Another thing I noticed was there was a big focus on boy versus girl, whether it was children or the adults in the text. For example, “Quimet said now we were even because I’d had the kids and he’d had a worm fifteen yards long” (78). Also, “he laughed at me, because you could see I looked funny with a belly that wasn’t mine” (58). I thought it was interesting to see how she separates herself from her own body part. In a way, saying that it belongs to her child, rather than to her.

I think I was in a sort of daze until Quimet died. I then got shocked that Natalia wanted to kill her children and then leave the world with them. In my reading note, I highlighted the quote “Quimet was dead. I wanted things to be like they’d always been: he was in the war and when it was over he’d come home” (138). I made a comment on how I did not think Quimet treated her that well but she still misses his presence.

Furthermore, on page 155, the shop owner provides Natalia a new “chance” by giving her a job, allowing her to feel a sliver of hope. This is supported by “it was hard for me to get back on my feet again, but slowly I returned to life after living in the pit of death” (158). I found depth in how the grocer knew, he had a gut feeling that she was going through a difficult time. In particular, “how he hadn’t married me to wash his clothes but to have a family” (167). This was the complete opposite of her relationship with Quimet. Here, I believe they started to learn what it means to be a family.

Question: Why are the children referred to as “the boy” and “the girl” instead of being called by their names?

Spam prevention powered by Akismet