Sony vs. Apple?

With Apple’s continued success with their iPhone, Sony Corp. has finally decided to bring their longtime smartphone plans to fruition. Unbeknownst to many consumers, Sony Corp. is actually separate from its joint phone venture, Sony Ericsson. The merger will cost US 1.5 billion, “as [Sony] seeks to exploit its music and video to help catch smartphone leaders such as Apple Inc.” Sony believes that linking its resources will reduce costs and allow the company to “more rapidly and more widely offer consumers smartphones, laptops, tablets and televisions.”

Since I didn’t know that Sony didn’t control their phone lines, I’m hesitant to see the new optimism resulting from this merger. Unless Sony places more focus on campaigning the introduction of this ‘rebirth’ (possibly with new products), I doubt that consumers’ demand would necessarily change. However, I know firsthand that they make quality goods, and this merger will improve the efficiency of their supply chain.

Despite Apple’s strong brand association with music, Sony has even deeper musical roots with their music label housing artists like Beyonce. Finally, Sony was synonymous with music during the time of Discmans and walkmans, so what’s stopping them from achieving that today.

Mmm… lasagna… from Tim’s?

As an avid foodie, Li Ming Huang’s blog entry really got me excited. As of Monday, Tim Horton’s officially “launched beef lasagna casserole… on its [lunch] menu”. As mentioned by Huang, Tim Horton’s is adding lasagna (with a side of garlic bread) in order to differentiate itself from fast food giants like McDonald’s.

In contrast to her opinion however, I think that this is a great step forward for Tim Horton’s. When one thinks of lasagna, it’s either home-made, from an Italian/Greek restaurant, or a tasty frozen dinner. This new addition is certainly innovative in the fast food market, especially since none of Tim Hortons’ close competitors (namely McDonald’s and Wendy’s) are offering either items. Furthermore, I agree with that lasagna is a “natural fit” within Tim Horton’s signature comfort food image.

Regarding the fact that the addition probably won’t stop consumers from eating lasagna at pizza chains, one should remember that these places aren’t in direct competition with Tim Horton’s (which belongs in the broader general fast food market). Most importantly, Tim Horton’s is “second to McDonald’s in [the] lunch market”, and this launch only furthers their expansion of customer base to include lasagna-lovers as well.

Food Recalls: Should the Public be educated in more innovative ways?

Picture: Courtesy of the CFIA

Even with all of our advancements in the field of health sciences, it looks like “the number of [the Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s] most serious recalls increased from.. 129 in 2010 to 147… this year.” Interestingly enough, this relates to our class discussion regarding the utilizing of data to work towards innovation.

With all of the data collected by the CFIA, they are working on better “educating itself on how to better monitor risks.”However, if they were more focused on educating the public, I think that there would be even more recalls instead of food poisoning victims. Although Canada uses a “voluntary-based recall system”, a better educated population would reduce the chance of consumers falling prey to foods tainted with salmonella for example. Furthermore, the Agency could better market its data to the public, so that more Canadians would be aware of the risks they face at the supermarket.

Whatever marketing strategy they choose, however, it’s certain that their choice must be new and exciting to convey public interest. After all, even though a recall might be important, a more entertaining headline (like the release of the newest iPod/iPhone) could easily garner more public attention.

A little thing called “Carrying Capacity”…

Photo: iStockphoto & Microsoft

Contrary to what seems like the whole world’s belief that the Earth will soon become unable to sustain all seven billion of us, the author of this article thinks that we’ve got “plenty of room for all.” He argues that the decrease in fertility rates coupled with increased harvest of “the three biggest crops: wheat, rice, and corn” (while maintaining essentially the same sized farmland as centuries ago), allows the Earth to sustain us with few problems in the near future.

I agree, but what interested me most was the notion that governments are greatest to blame for the Earth’s ‘doom’. Relating to Stakeholder Theory, a government is much like a business. In order to garner a nation’s support, it needs to be more inclusive of its stakeholders’ (i.e. taxpayers’) interests regarding decision making. Why spend taxpayer money on political campaigns and random statues, when we could be working towards greater economic efficiency instead?

While it’s important for consumers to reduce their carbon footprint, if the governments don’t play their parts efficiently, we might have to cross our fingers and hope to find a suitable substitute for our friend Earth.

Re: iPod

I recently read Annie Luk’s blog post on iPods, and I completely agree with her. If Apple decides to get rid of the iPod, their house of brands will significantly diminish in brand power. As she mentioned, iPhones are often seen as unnecessary (and too similar to the iTouch), while the iPad doesn’t seem convenient or practical to me. If there were no more iPods, I certainly wouldn’t be able to see myself purchasing a large touch-screen pad to fulfill my occasional need of portable music.

With Apple’s brand roots built so strongly with iPods, why should they get rid of the most portable products in their arsenal? Despite iPod sales contributing 42% less to Apple’s total revenue now, than before the launch of iTouch and iPhones , it’s still clear that many consumers wouldn’t think twice when deciding between an iPod and a Zune. At the end of the day, it often isn’t about the functionality of the product, but rather the image behind the brand itself.

Check out the article behind her post here: Should Apple kill the iPod?

Photo: Courtesy of Apple Inc  

More Competition for Wal-Mart?

Photo: Courtesy of CBC and Damian Dovarganes/Associated Press

As a frequent customer of supermarkets (such as Superstore, T&T, and Wal-Mart), I was intrigued to hear about Target’s grocery deal with Sobeys Inc.. In my mind, Target acts as an “American” version of Zellers; the logo and labeling within the two stores are both red. Furthermore, speaking from personal experience, even the store layout and products sold (e.g. in store clothing brands) look strikingly similar.

Thus, I exercise caution in thinking that Canadian Target stores (opening in early 2013) will be able to compete with industry giants like Wal-Mart. However, despite the risk, Target has built up an easily identifiable brand throughout its history.

Regarding its deal with Sobeys Inc., Target will surely benefit from working with such an established supplier. Since opening their first store in 1947, Sobeys Inc. is “one of only two national grocery retailers in Canada”.

After weighing the pros and cons, I feel that Target has a significantly larger chance at success, compared to Zellers’ venture into groceries (as discussed in an earlier Comm 101 class). They have all of the tools necessary to succeed, but only time will tell what the outcome will be.

Are business-people evil? You be the judge.

Although it might not be mentioned often, it’s long been apparent to me that there is a clear divide between two definitions of “business-person”. For many, business people are simply in it for the money; that business ethics are regarded with a certain stigma. A good example of this was the ethical issue stated within the article I read; many people disagreed with how “Finance Minister Paul Martin was balancing the nation’s books by taking a hatchet to social services.”

Perhaps the cuts “would hurt a lot of people” (according to the groups against them). However, economically, the cuts were quite sound.. at least according to the business community. As mentioned in the article, “business people were pleased that the finance minister was behaving responsibly…trim[ming] Canada’s ballooning deficit..”

Despite the social norm per se, I regard business people as workers who choose to place more importance on financial stability (and basic needs) than on wants and desires, in comparison to workers in other sectors. At the end of the day, it all boils down to a fundamental characteristic of market economies; that individuals’ every day actions spur from self-interest. In other words, everybody thinks about themselves.

Picture: Courtesy of Microsoft Office Clip Art

 

 

Hello world!

Welcome to UBC Blogs. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Spam prevention powered by Akismet