March 26 – April 4  “Final Project Critiques”

Outcomes

• Enact a critical outlook as visual readers, recognizing how meaning is cultivated and perpetuated through representation.
• Produce ethical, informed, multi-dimensional, work that is situated in contemporary concerns.
• Activate the process of making, as a way of knowing.

Lecture

March 26  Artist Talks:  Mandana & Angela
April 2  Artist Talks:  Christine, Matthew & Sam

Lab

You will have 10 critiques each day over the next two classes/weeks.  Students should have been informed of their critique date weeks ago.

Please record critique participation as the students are graded for their contributions.  Remind them that it is not the quantity of things they say, but the quality or thoughtfulness to their fellow peers’ projects.  Missing a critique day will result in a zero for that day, no exceptions.  (Academic advising is recommended for those with extenuating circumstances)

There are many ways to run critiques.  It is up to you how you wish to do them but there will be a 4 step approach practiced in the lecture (as training for peer review) and is posted in Canvas for them to review.

Some guidance:

• Have them open up their projects as soon as they get into class.
• Take the time to describe your critique methods at the beginning so they know what they are going to be doing.
• You can either have the class move around in groups, (can be crowded but also a community oriented feel) to the computers with the work on them, or you can display them on one monitor or projector and gather as a class, or you can do a combination of both.
• You can critique as an entire class (approx 10 minutes each) and talk about each project
  or
• You can set them up in smaller groups to critique other people’s work for about 5 minutes each. Then gather the class together as a group and have 7-minute critiques each, with the people assigned to the work at the beginning starting the critique for the works they looked at.  The method avoids the 3 minutes of silence that may happen when you just blindly go from work to work!
  or
• I had a past TA who would put pieces of paper next to every computer, and each student had to view each work and write something down about it. This surely helps you record participation marks, but does not really help to engage in a conversation or help guide them in strategies to look at art.  But you can think of this as a way to strategize any problematic classes, or as a supplement to a group critique before or afterwards.
• You can have the artist talk about the work at the start, (which can tend to make the group ‘gullible’ to their voiced intention) or you can have ‘silent artist’ critiques where the artist just listens (and perhaps takes notes of their critique) to the reception, leaving a minute or two at the end for artists to describe things that the class may have missed.
• Try and keep a critical but fair tone, also remember that they are vulnerable and sensitive as this might be the first work they’ve ever had work critiqued!  Remember how difficult those moments were?  Remember this is amoung their first experiences of critiquing, so do be aware of how vulnerable students are at this point, the thick skin is not yet developed!  This is a learning experience, sometimes what can be learned from one work could be an example for everyone, so pick your battles in which larger lessons you feel would be good to bring up for the entire class to learn from.
• Remind students that we grade their work regardless of what their peer’s say in the class critique, as they are learning how to see work, we are professionals and know how to see the nuances of what they wanted to do, where they did it, where they got distracted, etc. A positive peer critique, or negative one, does not reflect a potential grade what-so-ever!  However, a quiet critique is not a good sign for everyone’s critique grade, and overall sense of respect and community the course wants to promote.

Feel free to review the critique prompt and rubric here.

Reminders

• Grades are due 5 business days after the last class, therefore if student work can no longer be accepted after April 9/10.  At that point they will need to go to Advising to get a concession/deferral.
• Flash drives will be available for pick up in Somerset, I will inform them via Canvas Announcements when they can pick it up (unless we come up with a date now!).

March 12-17 “Appropriation Consults”

Outcomes

• Activate the process of making, as a way of knowing.
• Technically execute a work of digital art, and apply formal decisions that communicate ideas visually.
• Produce ethical, informed, multi-dimensional, work that is situated in contemporary concerns.
• Practice poesis in an artwork that demonstrates sensitivity of intuition transferred to intellect.
• Identify the characteristics of medium towards the interpretation of an image, in order to make informed material choices for their own work.

Lecture

Appropriation Continued (gaming and online/amateur)

Lab

Labs that did not go on a gallery trip last week will go this week, the following schedule has been set up for you:

Thursday March 12

• L18 – 9:45-10:15am – Audain Gallery, 149 West Hastings
• L19 – 11:45-12:15pm – Audain Gallery, 149 West Hastings
• CAP 4:45-5:15pm – TBD
• CAP 6:45-7:15pm – TBD

Tuesday March 17

• L12 – 9:45-10:15am – Contemporary Art Gallery, 555 Nelson St
• L13 – 11:45-12:15pm – Contemporary Art Gallery, 555 Nelson St
• L15 – 1:45-2:15pm – Contemporary Art Gallery, 555 Nelson St
• CAP – 4:45-5:15pm – Contemporary Art Gallery, 555 Nelson St
• L17 – 6:45-7:15pm – Contemporary Art Gallery, 555 Nelson St

As with the mid-term, you may hold personal meeting times this week to discuss project ideas, etc….  You can also extend this into group discussion work/feedback. Individual Meetings, you may want to have students sign up next week’s individual meetings so that they come only for their scheduled time, and avoids people waiting around restlessly. You can schedule this about 6-7 minutes apart depending on how large your class is.  Remind them hey can also use the computers during class time next week to complete their projects.  The following advice is courtesy of former Teaching Assistant, Stephen Wichuk.

Tactics for Appropriation Project
For the Appropriation project, you must do two things.  You must choose and collect interesting and fertile source material but you must also develop a formal and conceptual strategy for using this media. Initial project ideas may blossom either from existing media or from a conceptual strategy.  More likely, it will involve a back and forth process.

Starting with Interesting Footage:

• You may be drawn to specific clip or set of clips because they seem conceptually or formally very interesting even though you don’t immediately know what to do with them. In this case, it will be fruitful to bring the clips into FCPX and then play around with them.  Spend time with the clips – study them at different speeds, watch them without the sounds. Take note of as many formal elements as you can. What elements repeat, which differ? What is the smallest modification you can make to the footage that will change its meaning the most?
• If you get stuck, talk to your teacher(s) we can try to figure out what drew you to the initial media. There is probably a great idea hidden in there, but perhaps you need to find different, but related source material.

Starting with a Conceptual or Formal Framework:

Conversely, you may start with a precise formal or conceptual framework for collecting clips. This means you have a clear, conceptual search parameter but have not yet seen any or all of the footage that satisfies the criteria.

• Search and Re-search
  Research means creating conceptual filters that will help you observe, compare and judge media. However, it can also be a playful process wherein you allow yourself to drift from your original intent and embrace the accidental and unexpected. In either case, you have to search, refine your search, and search again!  Think about how your own research parameters are affected by the ready-made search engines (Google, YouTube). Remember – no archive is neutral.  Every archive tells us something about the history and desires of its archivists.The excess or rarity of certain footage can raise or lower the stakes of your project. Why are there so many clips? Why so few? What does this tell us about the subject? Have other people appropriated the footage already? If so, how has this been done, and how is your own attempt an original gesture?  If you are uninspired by the results of your conceptual framework (too few results, results are too formally different, too obvious) try shifting it slightly.
  For example, I’m generally interested in food storage practices (Tupperware, Ziploc etc.). A first conceptual framework might look for “clips of people demonstrating their homemade vacuum sealing devices“. This gives me a wealth of interesting DIY inventions I could not have imagined, but the styles of the videos are so formally different that no clear strategy for combining them is apparent.
  Therefore, I might decide to shift my conceptual framework to ‘clips of people vacuum sealing objects’ – which simples the collection formally. Now all clips are shorter and show the action of something being vacuum packed. On the other hand I have broadened the field in terms of original intentions. I may now find examples in advertisements, DIY instructional videos, but have also discovered the bizarre YouTube phenomena of people vacuum packing people with trash bags.

Tasks of the Collector: Trimming, Refining, Discarding
Not everything you find should make its way into your project. Collect many clips, but allow yourself to discard all but the most useful, the formally appropriate and highest quality.  With every clip you decide to use, think about what is the most essential moment and trim away the rest.

Modifications & Organizing Strategies
These are *some* general strategies – they are all potentially good or bad, depending on how appropriately and critically you apply them to your subject.

• Time Reversal:
  Possible Uses: Turn back history, trick the viewer or create a sense of the uncanny.
  Example: Imagine (Liselot van der Heijden)
  Dangers: Can be cheesy and dramatic.
• Slow Motion:
  Possible Uses: Expose the mechanics of the image and otherwise unnoticeable elements of movement, create a space for contemplation of the subject.
  Example: 24hr Psycho (1993) Douglas Gordon
  Dangers: Can be cheesy and dramatic.
• Fast Motion & Fast Cuts:
  Possible Uses: Expose changes/movements that occur over long durations, represent excess of imagery, create a sense of the uncanny.
  Example: Various works by Ryan Trecartin
  Example: I’m not the Girl who Misses Much (1986) Pippilotti Rist
  Dangers: Can be goofy and end up sounding like the Chipmonks.
• Extraction or Removal of Formal Element(s):
  Possible Uses: Disrupt the image entirely; subvert the narrative, focus attention on an element that normally would not be noticed.
  Example: Colors (2006) Cory Arcangel
  Dangers: Potentially a lot of work.
• Cropping, Trimming & Erasure of Parts of Image:
  Possible Uses: Disrupt the image entirely; subvert the narrative, shift attention on element that normally would not be noticed, such as the background.
  Example: Caryatid (2004) Paul Pfeiffer
  Dangers: Potentially a lot of work.
• Repetition of Single Clip
  Possible Uses:  Expose the mechanics of the image; create an affective, hypnotic or contemplative viewing experience that could loop. Image parameters may change with each repetition.
  Example: Ontics Antics Starring Laurel and Hardy: Bye, Molly (2005) Ken Jacobs
  Example (with successive modifications): Variations on a Cellophane Wrapper (1970) David Rimmer
  Dangers: Can be excruciating or boring, depending on what’s being repeated and for how long.
• Spatial Juxtaposition:
  Possible Uses: Cause a resonance or dissonance in real time between two or more clips. Clips that were not intended to interact with each other start to have a ‘conversation’
  Example: Through a Looking Glass (1999) Douglas Gordon
  Dangers: With a single channel work (i.e. one monitor or one projector), more clips mean smaller individual videos – make sure the clips are still legible enough to function.
• Temporal Juxtaposition (Montage):
  Possible Uses: Create a conversation between two or more sets of clips. Produce a third meaning in the cut between one clip and another. Compare or contrast two moving image conventions to show how they are related or how they differ. Create false sync or false movements between unrelated clips to produce new a narrative.
  Example: TV Dinner (2003) Liz Nofziger
  Dangers: Beware of the meaningless mash-up video!
• Presentation of Formal Inventory (repetition of similar elements):
  Possible Uses: Collect and organize clips based on repeating formal elements. Create audio or visual rhythms.
  Example: John 3:16 (Paul Pfeiffer)
  Example: This Transition will Never End (2012) Jeremy Shaw
  Dangers: Uninteresting or ill-defined formal frameworks will lead to uninteresting inventories!
• Presentation of Conceptual Inventory:
  Possible Uses: Collect and organize clips based on repeating conceptual elements that are not necessarily formally or compositionally similar (i.e. ‘people using the phone’ or ‘establishing shots from horror films’).
  Example: Telephones (1995) Christian Marclay
  Example: The Meantimes (2002) Constant Dullart
  Dangers: Uninteresting or ill-defined conceptual frameworks will lead to uninteresting inventories
• Audio/Visual Juxtaposition:
  Possible Uses: Remove or replace audio in order to evacuate the clips original intent or alter the meaning.
  Dangers: Don’t simply create a meaningless music video!
• Filters, Effects & Image Processing:
  Possible Uses:  Modify the texture, color etc. of a clip so.
  Example: Shiboogi (2012) Takeshi Murata
  Example: Monster Movie (2005) Takeshi Murata
  Dangers: Filters are easy and are usually superficial and meaningless! Keep in mind that Takeshi Murata writes the digital code for all of his psychedelic image compression tricks. His tools push the image loss that normally happens with online videos to a sublime and beautiful extreme! You should have a very good conceptual reason to use a filter, one that recognizes and plays off of their ready-made, gimmicky nature.

Homework Reminders

• Upload (or provide link to) rough draft of final project to ComPAIR for peer critique by March 19 and then critiques are due March 23, once again no extensions.
• Final Appropriation Projects are due in lab for critiques from March 26 – April 7 in lab.
• Remind students to bring in their draft for the next lab!

March 19-24 “Appropriation Workshop”

Outcomes

• Enact a critical outlook as visual readers, recognizing how meaning is cultivated and perpetuated through representation.
• Produce ethical, informed, multi-dimensional, work that is situated in contemporary concerns.
• Identify the characteristics of medium towards the interpretation of an image, in order to make informed material choices for their own work.

Lecture

Appropriation Critique – As with the midterm, I will use this class to conduct a training critique for the students preparing them for Appropriation critiques online and in class next week.

Lab

Artist Workshop (45 minutes)

Please come up with ways to discuss appropriated moving artworks with your class.  You can have them dissect work from lecture or links below, or other ways you can uncover this idea towards helping them think about appropriation in a more critical way.  What ideologies and meanings do certain footage/artifacts carry?  How have artists revealed these ideologies and made us question it?  Please feel free to add art work suggestions in the post reply box!

Example Video Works:

• Candice Breitz  Four Duets: Double Whitney 1999
• Candice Brietz Soliloquy Trilogy 2000
  So much more Candice Brietz on Vimeo
• Mishka Henner I’m not the only one 2015
• Oliver Laric  50/50  2007
• Aleesa Cohene Like, Like 2009
• Takeshi Murata Monster Movie 2005
• Scott Billings Good Bad Flat Round 2012
• Chris Bechman Oops 2011
• Angie Waller New Babylon 2004
• Abounaddara  Kill Them!  2015
• Marco Brambilla Civilization 2008 (& others)
• Mishka Henner & David Oats Photographers
• Christian Marclay Surround Krack 2014/15
• Christian Marclay Telephones 1995
• Christian Marclay  The Clock 2010
• Angie Waller The most boring places in the world 2008
• Douglas Gordon  24 Hour Psycho 1993
• Douglas Gordon and Philippe Parreno Zidane: A 21st Century Portrait 2006
  
• Tons more Cory Arcangel beyond what I showed
• Tracey Moffat Love and Other
• Chris Marker – Stopover in Dubai
• Max Grau – Craving For Narrative

— break —

Peer Review (45 minutes)

As in week 5, have the students look at one another’s works and give feedback.

Homework Reminders

• Draft projects need to be critiqued on ComPAIR by March 23.
• Final Projects are due next week!