Monthly Archives: March 2016

Libraries, Social Media, and Brand Love

For my Collection Development class here at UBC, I read an article by Susan Starr called “Creating Brand Love for Libraries: Can We Be a Kind of Paradise?” The article explores what “brand love” means and raises the question of whether it is possible for libraries to inspire brand love. I thought of Social Media class right away because it seems like there is a lot of potential for social media to play a major role in the development of brand love by libraries and similar institutions.

Starr writes that “brand love is characterized by a sense of natural comfort and fit, a feeling of emotional connectedness and bonding with the brand, a deep integration of the brand with a consumer’s core values, a heightened level of desire and interaction, and a commitment to the brand’s long term use” and points out that these are all valuable associations that library professionals would like users to make with our libraries.

Benefits of Brand Love

Benefits of Brand Love

But, Starr argues, libraries are doing branding wrong. They currently focus on the extrinsic rewards that libraries offer, such as access to information, a space to study, et cetera. But they are missing out on marketing the intrinsic rewards of libraries: the emotions or qualities that they spark, the basic pleasure that people get from using the “product” of libraries.

This leads to the question, what are the intrinsic rewards of library use? Starr points out that “loved brands create positive feelings such as happiness, admiration from others, control of one’s life, and so on.” As a health librarian, Starr thinks that feelings of control could be associated with her library, because of the idea that students who use library resources and study in the library have increased confidence and better performance in school. More than that, however, I think that an intrinsic reward of libraries is that libraries can contribute to an individual’s sense of self-identity and build a feeling of community. When you enter a library, sign up for a card, browse books, hole up at a study table, attend a program, or engage in the hundreds of other services that libraries offer, you are automatically a library user – and you are automatically a member of a broader community of library users. This intrinsic reward can be harnessed when libraries use media to market themselves and foster brand love.

So what happens after a library or other organization distinguishes a good intrinsic reward that they can use to encourage greater brand love? How does this play out on social media? The Purely Branded article From Like to Love: Brand and Social Media breaks some of these things down. One of the most important things is that organizations should use social media to create conversations with people who are already interested in and passionate about brands. Through these conversations, brands can create a social environment that stimulates a sense of belonging. In turn, this will lead to people having a significant sense of loyalty to a brand, repeatedly return to the brand, and recommend the brand to a friend.

I turned to Twitter to see if libraries were talking about brand love online. #Brandlove turns up a lot of tweets, but there are no results when searching #library and #brandlove together. However, #librarylove turns up a plethora of results – a lot of what people are doing when they are tweeting #librarylove is expressing their affinity for the library as a brand. One excellent example of this is an informal series of tweets by Calgary Public Library users in which they share photos of their library cards and discuss their attachments to the cards, noting nostalgic memories that they associate with the cards. This is uncannily similar to user-generated tweets that are tagged #brandlove, such as tweets where people share photos of Dairy Queen blizzards, comfortable airplane seating, and even deodorant.

#Librarylove

#Librarylove at work

The difference here is, however, that it is not a library that is starting this conversation about #librarylove – it is organic and coming from users themselves. After having identified their particular intrinsic value such as contributing to somebody’s sense of belonging, libraries have a potential to take a cue from other brands as well as library users and lead conversations about #librarylove.

 

6 Comments

Filed under Marketing, twitter

*insert Goodreads pun here*

My Goodreads shelf - note that I have a category for my favourite Agatha Christie books. I love that Goodreads gives me space to organize my nerdiness!

My Goodreads shelf

Lately I’ve had a lot of “Be my friend on Goodreads” emails come into my mailbox as my library school classmates are connecting with each other on the site. Because of this, I’ve become very interested in how people – and institutions! – use Goodreads to complement their online presence. I’m a semi-active Goodreads user; I use it to keep track of the books I read, but I only log on sporadically because most of my reading is (unfortunately) done over school breaks and I don’t write reviews. Even from my irregular use of the site, I can tell that it is a great place to get book recommendations from authorities you trust and strengthen social ties among friends, classmates, and even strangers.

Contrasting my relationship with Goodreads with those of my peers and other users, I began to wonder – have academics studied Goodreads in the context of how libraries can make use of this specific site? If so, what have they found? This is the perfect opportunity for me to put my own academic hat on and do some digging.

I wish that this was my academic hat. Image courtesy of http://bookshelvesofdoom.blogs.com.

I wish that this was my academic hat.

I turned to the trusty UBC library homepage – one of the best ways to satisfy scholarly questions and whims – and did a basic search for Goodreads I was very impressed with my findings – over 200 articles came up, which I was able to filter down to a manageable number of articles that answered my question. Here is my favorite article of the bunch – it has a fresh voice and is meticulously researched.

Finding Good Reads on Goodreads by Barry Trott and Yesha Naik, published in Reference & User Services Quarterly in 2012, talks about the ways that Goodreads can be used in libraries with a focus on how it can enhance reader’s advisory. The most important take-away is that Goodreads is a great way to bring the library out into the online environment where patrons are already congregating rather than waiting for patrons to come to the library’s website.

They point to two ways that public libraries can take advantage of Goodreads. First, public libraries could teach their patrons how to use Goodreads as a reader’s advisory tool for themselves. That way, “when patrons find the Goodreads page about a particular book they enjoyed, they are exposed to a RA goldmine: discussions about other books and authors, many of which are comparisons made between these books and authors and the original book”

A second way that libraries can use Goodreads is by creating an account for their library. They say that “the more the librarians post on their Goodreads account, the more they will be building a reputation for being a good source of information for reading suggestions.” Having a Goodreads presence can do more than allow libraries to recommend books: a Goodreads page is also an opportunity to boost a library’s brand, showcase library services, and demonstrate to community members that they are welcome in the library.

Salt Lake County Library's Goodreads page

Inviting patrons into the library through Goodreads

The authors point to the Salt Lake County Library Services page on Goodreads as an especially dynamic model of how libraries can take advantage of the affordances of the site. You can check out their page here to see the intersection of libraries and Goodreads in action!

I also found that Sacramento Public Library has an excellent Goodreads page, which they bill as “A virtual space for the Sacramento Public Library community to discover and talk about books.” I was especially impressed with their discussion threads, including one called “Let’s Talk About Racism.” They used this thread to advertise an upcoming event as well as to recommend a book and give patrons an opportunity to weigh in with their opinions about the book.

For those looking to read a broader view about Goodreads and libraries, I recommend a Library 559M UBC wiki page about Goodreads that has an excellent background on the history of Goodreads, the ways that libraries can use it, and some controversies.

And finally, an invitation: be my friend on Goodreads! Expanding my network there would a great first step to being more active on the site and engaging with the Goodreads library community.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

#Twitter and Librarian Community Building

Busy week = quick blog post, but I was so inspired by a recent class discussion about how social media platforms can be used by library professionals to provide support for each other that I wanted to jot something down. After this discussion, and a visit by a Hootsuite Social Media Coach who shared the importance of using smart hashtags to get increased benefits out of your use of Twitter, I looked up popular hashtags that librarians use to share their experiences and communicate with each other on Twitter. I’ve put a lot of thought into the ways that library professionals can use hashtags to connect with the public, so this was a really interesting new way of thinking.

Dive Into the World of Library Hashtags, a Techsoup blog post by Ginny Miles, identifies the most frequently used of these hashtags, including #librarylife, #satudaylibrarian, #librarianproblems, #lovemylibrary, and #inaljchat. I’ll share some of my favourites from the bunch soon and comment on their connections with theory, but I recommend that anyone who is interested should check them out. Very relatable – especially #inaljchat! (In related news, does anybody want to give me a summer job?)

 

3 Comments

Filed under twitter