Author Archives: MichaelHengeveld

A Capstone Project Hosted on Moodle

Overview/Rationale

I chose to create a module/unit in Moodle to work with our capstone projects for senior high school students enrolled in the STEM program—a project based learning cohort.  The “capstone” is the final 6 week group project for the course and is designed to be a summative assessment of the skills they have developed through the program, much like ETEC 590 is the capstone project is for the MET program.  This is especially useful for us as instructors because, although projects will change from year to year, the structure of the capstones will remain the same.  So, this assignment should be useful year over year with the chance for tweaks where necessary.  The function of the Moodle is to compliment F2F classes in a blended model. Continue reading

The Bicycle-Powered Submarine of Death: A Digital Story

Hello All,

In creating a digital story, I wanted to introduce Capstone Projects.  Every year, our program ends the year with a final project (this is just like ETEC590, which we will all have to do!).  Many students struggle with the scope of the project and their role in designing a solution.  I plan to use this digital story as a kick-off for a content module, and follow up the digital story with a discussion forum that is designed to  elicit prior knowledge from students around what is required for a long term project to be successful.

Ultimately, this is a lesson in risk assessment, which is really hard for 17 year olds!

The story embedded here was made with Camtasia (offered freely earlier in this course).  I chose to use a video format because of the strong reaction I have seen in students given access to short, high impact videos.  Bates (2014) suggests that students learn better from words and images used together, especially when the story is conversational in tone.  This video is a precursor for a discussion on Moodle, so I wanted to use a very direct story-based technique for bringing across the information.  Using Youtube as a hosting platform improves accessibility.  Using the video to stimulate discussion was based on the desire to encourage active learning (Chickering and Gamson, 1987) as well as student-to-student interaction (Anderson, 2004).

In terms of development, I used the recommended source 50ways pretty mercilessly.  It had great suggestions about how to organize a digital story, including great suggestions for creative commons in multiple media formats.  I also used StopMotion on the iPad to record a short doodle video.   All told, the process was about 7 hours, owing to my newbie status with Camtasia.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iRyM1ziVDg

Epilogue:  We made a lot of changes to our capstone projects after that first year.  We had a lot of ambitious and ridiculous ideas that failed utterly.  It was poorly scaffolded, and we erred too far on the side of motivation on the basis of student choice and relevance.  We discovered that students don’t instinctively do “literature reviews” (duh) and consider using Google to be tantamount to plagiarism.  One hour of research would have shown the project to be impossible as proposed.  On the plus side, they learned a ton, and Sean could describe to me exactly how they would have died and why.

References:

Anderson, T. (2004). Towards a theory of online learning. Theory and practice of online learning2, 109-119.

Bates, T. (2014). Choosing and using media in education: The SECTIONS model. In Teaching in digital age. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/part/9-pedagogical-differences-between-media/

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin3, 7.

 

Mike

Muddling with Moodle!

(Tl;dr —  Moodle seems to have two main weakness: age and too many choices.)

For this assignment, I explored Moodle as a potential LMS.  It was an adventure of endless clicking!  The intended participants were grade 11/12, enrolled together in a cohort of 23 to 25 students that combines four courses into a blended-learning model, STEM project based learning (PBL) program.  The urban school has a population of 800 students with a broad socio-economic range.  The program is elective, but sought out.  In general, the students have a sophisticated conception of learning as being active and based in understanding.  There is adequate technology available at the school, including laptops, high speed internet, and iPads.  Approximately 80% of students have personal mobile devices and about 90% have access to high speed internet in the home.  The two-semester course is divided into seven modules; a course introduction, and six projects that range in length from four to six weeks.  There are two team-teaching instructors; one for the academic math and physics, and one for the electronics and robotics technology component.   Continue reading

Mike’s Very Meta Discussion About LMSs

The act of developing a rubric for selection of an LMS, while enrolled in an online course hosted on an LMS is fertile ground for reflection!  Being my 7th course, I am now pretty comfortable navigating within the sandbox provided–both Blackboard and Canvas.  In a very meta way, I find that the MET program designs their courses in a way that follows best practice–our group work on this very project, for example, was a great exercise in meaning making in a social context.  Continue reading

Mike’s Flight Plan

I grew up at the introduction of the PC, starting with the Commodore 64.  Games gave way to coding and electronics during my math/physics undergraduate.  At some point in 1998, while networking the UBC physics computer cluster to solve climate modeling problems, I felt I was pretty tech savy, maybe to the point that it was part of my identity.  Then democracy came to technology. When I look at the huge change in the ensuing 20 years, it has become difficult to assess how effectively I am using technology, mostly owing to the rapid growth of similar software options and occasional game-changers (like video conferencing, Smart phones, touch screens).  I don’t have a cellphone and it can make me feel frozen in time—drowning even.  Am I still tech savy?  Am I leveraging technology in a way that aligns with best practice? Continue reading