Tag Archives: stolen generation

Module 3: Post 2 Aboriginal Opera

As I was reading the Guardian today, I unexpectedly came across an article on Aboriginal Opera singer, Deborah Cheetham. Cheetham is an accomplished opera singer who has performed across Australia and at major events such as the opening ceremonies of the Sydney Olympics and the rugby World Cup. She is believed to be the only professional opera singer of Australian Aboriginal descent.

The article notes that Cheetham was frustrated by the lack of Aboriginal voices in opera so she decided to write an opera for and about Aboriginal communities. Opening in 2010, Pecan Summer has been successful across Australia. The opera tells the story of the 1939 Cummeragunja mission ‘walk off’ where 200 Aboriginal peoples living in the Cummeragunja mission left the mission in protest of the poor living conditions and strict control. The seemingly simple step of walking away from the mission is an important step in the struggle for Aboriginal rights.

I was also interested to see in this article that Cheetham is part of Australia’s Stolen Generations. She was adopted at three weeks old and later told that her birth mother had abandoned her in a box in a field. It wasn’t until she was 22 that she discovered that she wasn’t abandoned and that she was able to find her birth mother.

I find this article very intriguing as it’s current, related to the topic that I am researching (Stolen Generations) and so interesting to see an Aboriginal woman bringing Aboriginal people and stories to opera.

Module 2: Post 3 – A Guide to Australia’s Stolen Generations

Leave a reply

Australia’s Stolen Generations refers to the unknown number of Aboriginal children that were forcibly removed from their homes and sent to live in Christian missions, foster homes or with foster families. This practise was in place from the 1890s – 1970s. The ultimate goal of this policy was assimilation of Aboriginal people into the dominant culture. This goal echoes that of the Canadian government’s residential school policy for Canada’s Indigenous children during roughly the same time period.

One seemingly different aspect of the Australian policy of removing children from the Canadian government’s policy of sending children to residential schools is the the Australian aboriginal children were permanently removed from their families. Unlike Canadian Indigenous children they did not return home during summer vacations. When Aboriginal children turned 18 they were released from care. Many could not remember their names or remember much about their families. Some were removed as babies and thus knew nothing of their families. Part of reconciliation in Australia involves trying to reunite individuals with their families.

In is interesting to consider that two similar policies occurred in two different countries, on two different continents during a similar period of time.

Module 1: Post 3 – Australian Aboriginal Children – The Stolen Generations

Leave a reply

Each year in the Middle School where I work, students read the novel Follow the Rabbit Proof Fence by Doris Pilkington and learn about the tragic practice by the Australian Government of removing aboriginal children from their home without evidence of abuse or neglect and forcing them to live in state run facilities. The novel recounts the story of three young girls who were taken from their home and moved to a facility 1, 600 km away. The girls escape and walk home simply by following the rabbit proof fence that ran north to south in Western Australia. The novel, and film, captivates students’. They are as astonished that a government could have such a policy as they are that children their age and younger could walk that far.

This practice by the Australian government is all too similar to Canada’s residential schools. It is not surprising that more than one country had a similar practice of removing children they deemed to be raised in an unsatisfactory setting and putting them in state run schools/facilities. Not surprising, and not right. It is tragic that these children are then subjected to abuse at the hands of those who are meant to be caring for them. As the article “For residential school kids, a legacy of sex abuse” suggests, the abuse suffered by children at the residential schools impacts future generations. Many of my Indigenous friends are affected by the suffering their parents and grandparents endured at residential schools.

The belief that a government can single out the children of one group of people and forcibly remove them from their home and subject them to live their childhood in a state run facility is barbaric. That this practice happened for so long in so many countries is sad. I am hopeful that we are now learning from the mistakes of the past and realizing the long lasting impacts decisions can have on individuals and their families. I am hopeful that in learning from these mistakes future groups of people are respected and their traditions are valued and honored, not systematically destroyed.