Monthly Archives: March 2015

Don’t Be Afraid to Unfollow

https://recodetech.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/fb-unfollow.jpg?quality=80&strip=info

In November, Facebook rolled out a new feature that allows users to “unfollow” pages or friends without having to “defriend” anyone. This is a discreet way to avoid annoying or irrelevant content while retaining the ability to view friends’ pages or have your liked pages continue to appear on your profile. Facebook now allows you to control the content on your feed at a more granular level, allowing you to see less of a poster without blocking them entirely. These features are more convenient and visible than ever before.
I first learned about Facebook’s new “unfollow” feature through promotional ads they have been running on my news feed. In these ads people describe the reasons they have for unfollowing friends, and encourage users to unfollow “early and often.” I was surprised to see these ads on Facebook itself – unfollowing has always seemed like something Facebook discouraged both through design and site culture. Unfollow buttons were small and difficult to find, and people are encouraged to gather more friends and interact with the site more often. Now Facebook seems more invested in enabling users to curate their feeds. I began to understand what Facebook was doing – when users can curate their feed, they will receive better content, and if they receive better content they are more likely to visit Facebook regularly. In this way, Facebook has created a model where controlled dis-engagement can lead to greater general engagement.
This reminded me of a lot of discussions we’ve had in class about some of the problems with social media – pervasiveness, social envy, and the illusion of connection. Perhaps curation is an answer to some of these problems. A smaller, more focused and relevant news feed consisting mostly of strong ties could alleviate some of the pervasive stress of social media.
Edited to Add: I finally found the Facebook page that has the promotional videos that where showing up on my wall. You can view it here.

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Selfie Sticks

 

Recently a debate has been sweeping through museums throughout the world: should we allow the use of the new and wildly popular camera technology, the selfie stick? For those unfamiliar, selfie sticks are telescopic monopod devices that allow users to take selfies at more flattering and comfortable angles. Many museums, including the Smithsonian group, New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art and Modern Museum of Art (MOMA), the Getty Center in Los Angeles and the Cleveland Museum of Art, have decided to ban selfie stick use in their galleries, citing concern for the safety of museum objects and guests. A chain of emails I received last week concluded that they will be banned at the LBJ Library as well.

While I wholeheartedly agree that the safety of museum collections is paramount, what I don’t like about these debates is the tone of contempt anti-selfie-stickers assume. Wendy Malloy, Director of Public Relations for the Seattle Museum of Art, cited the “obnoxiousness factor” in the decision to ban selfie sticks. Some have coined the term “Narcisstick” to emphasize the narcissism of selfie culture. In the email I received, someone said (paraphrasing) “something with such an obnoxious name should be destroyed, not just banned.” This contempt for a useful, if frivolous, simple invention reminds me of the general contempt I often encounter towards new technologies, new ways of communicating, and basically anything millenials seem to like. Museums are struggling to keep up with modern trends, and are often perceived to be stuffy, boring, and no fun. We all know that isn’t the case, but museums aren’t helping themselves by spouting condescension and vitriol over a popular sharing tool.

The Centre for Computing history has taken to encouraging patrons to bring and use selfie sticks in the museum, mentioning their value both as tools for visitor engagement and for attracting new visitors through social media sharing. While this model can’t work for every museum – like I said, the collections come first – toning down the contempt is a good first step for museums trying to stay current.