Explorations in Classroom Cooking

Group 24 – Queen Mary Elementary School – Explorations in Classroom Cooking

It’s time to get kids thinking about food in a new light, and what better way to encourage them to eat those greens than by having them cook it? Group 24 was involved with a grade 5/6 split class at Queen Mary Elementary to show these young students the basics of healthful home cooking with lessons centered around eating with Canada’s Food Guide. Since they were cooking in a classroom, simple salads, kale chips, and muffins were the go-to recipes.  And of course cooking with 30 children posed challenges for the team, particularly when they are overly excited and handling knives, but everything was handled well and the students even proved how capable they were with knife and food safety. Members of group 24 really enjoyed this project and were excited to see the keen interest of the class in cooking and learning about nutrients, while at the same time learning a great deal about classroom management. Group 24 hopes that their lessons will inspire the kids to start cooking at home and be more conscience of the foods they eat.

You can access team 24′s recipes at bettertogetherbc.ca

Kat.

Orchard Garden

Group 29 – The Orchard Garden – The Orchard Garden Workshop Series

Situated behind the Macmillan building is the Orchard Garden. As nearly every LFS student has come to know, the Orchard Garden grows a bounty of fresh veggies for the campus and is a perfect place for outdoor-based educational workshops. This year the organizers asked what could possibly make their workshops even more interactive and fun? An outdoor kitchen! Which brings me to introducing group 29.

Group 29 was given the task of planning an outdoor kitchen next to the Orchard Garden, which was quite the undertaking and presented many ups and downs for the group members. Grant proposals were made for supplies and they even came up with their own design possibility. Things were looking good with all this hard work and it really seemed that their plan would stick around in the long run. Unfortunately it was too good to be true. After a meeting with the Macmillan building ops manager they found out that there were developmental plans for the Orchard Garden space and all their hard efforts would not last. But, ever the resilient bunch of students, they bounced back from that disappointment and found comfort in the fact that their work would still make a difference to those using the kitchen in the mean time.

Along with kitchen planning, the members of group 29 enjoyed harvesting and maintaining the fall Orchard crop to complete their CBEL experience. All in all, this project is thought of fondly by its members.

Kat.

Planning for Pollinators

Group 17 – Environmental Youth Alliance – Planning for Pollinators

The purpose of this project is simple: to compile experience, opinions, and insights of urban farmers on the use of native pollinators (more specifically with bees). The long term goal is much more complex and involves the EYA using the previous information for planning bee-friendly urban gardens throughout Vancouver with connecting corridors to increase the native bee populations. This is all very appealing in concept and the group members are enthusiastic for what this could do for Vancouver’s flourishing agriculture. There is, however, some disappointment that collecting data is all that they are doing – no analyzing, no implementation, no involvement other than discussions with farmers. The excitement was ramped up a bit with the volunteering where group members got the chance to participate in planting apple trees, something that can be enjoyed by the community for many years to come. One group member mentions that it was a great opportunity to meet people with similar interests and views. Unfortunately the excitement plummeted down again during the weeding session. We all agree that weeding is important, but when it comes down to it weeding is weeding, especially when it’s in the rain.

Kat.

Project Upcycle

Group 6 –  Quest Food Exchange – Project Upcycle

Quest is a non-profit organization that collects food donations from over 300 donators and sells the products at a marked down price for people in need. There are a range of volunteering opportunities at Quest with many tasks including: preparation of meals, giving cooking lessons, food sales, re-stocking, organizing shelves, disposal of inappropriate foods, recycling, and office work. One of the group 6 members explains that working with Quest is enjoyable since the organization is relatively new, and its coordinators are open-minded towards new ideas. He also mentioned that his experience volunteering at Quest has improved skills in organization, management, and efficiency. However, some of the work may be a bit dry if done for too long (for example, opening jars of expired peanut butter, disposing of the peanut butter, and recycling the empty jars – for four hours).

Kat.

Richmond Food Security Society

Group 4 – Richmond Food Security Society – Mapping Low Income Areas with Community Meals and Kitchens

I’m lucky enough to have convenient access to fresh, nutritious, and affordable food (a minute walk to my closest grocer!) but sadly many people have very poor food security, particularly among the low-income. Richmond is such a place where there is a wide range of food securities and incomes, and it was group 4′s job to map out and measure the spacial gaps between food service outlets and low-income, food insecure households. Many phone calls were made by the team to collect service information from these specialized food establishments to draw out the map. The members did many site visits and helped out during the active hours. As a plus, many made new contacts with dietitians, a huge advantage for many LFS students! The general consensus by the members is that this project made a significant improvement on their time management skills and taught them the frustrations of getting contact from many, many sources.

As the due date for this project is nearing, group 4 is finalizing their results and a conclusion for how food secure the low income households of Richmond are is coming soon.

Kat.

Mosaics.

“Something resembling such a picture or decoration incomposition, especially in being made up of diverse elements.”
– Dictionary.com
Group 1 Picture
Group 1 and their community partner.

A mosaic can be made of putting many different parts together. Some pieces of art are mosaics. Canada being a pluralistic country is a cultural mosaic. The University of British Columbia with academics gathering from all around the world is a mosaic of knowledge. Life, in all its complexities, can be re-described as a beautiful mosaic of shared experiences. Group 1, contributes to the mosaics of many with their work assessing the land owned in richmond.

ALUI_Richmond_C3
A survey map received by group 1.

Group 1 assesses under utilized city owned land in Richmond, BC. They hope to evaluate the land’s potential for agricultural production or other food related purposes. The overall goals of this endeavour could lead to food being produced for the community. The food produced for the community will hopefully alleviate food insecurity within the richmond area in a way that would satisfy the culturally diverse community. The possible future food production and Group 1’s current efforts both contribute to raising the local community’s awareness regarding food security issues. The raised awareness combined with food production would lead to better utilization of the under utilized lands owned by the city of Richmond. The community impact of the results of the land assessments could be monumental in the food system of the mosaic community of richmond.

Converted Land
A display of some converted land.

Currently, Group 1 has about 15 sites that they are surveying. Due to this being a very preliminary stage in the grand scheme of the project, the group will be conducting windshield surveys (surveying the land from a moving vehicle) in the end stages of the project. Overall, as closing thoughts, Group 1 told me that that “learned a lot and gained a lot of insight through the project.” Furthermore adding “May this course (LFS 350) help more students like [us] to clarify their goals and interest”. It seems like this experience will  definitely be a colourful piece in the mosaic of life in the community and students of LFS 350 alike.

– `rtang

Group 20 – Pasture Management

Gambier Island Sea Ranch

This group’s goal was to determine a sustainable pasture management plan for the Gambier Island Sea Ranch. In order to evaluate the pasture management, they travelled to Gambier Island. Their journey was one filled with travel and beauty.
They got up early on a Saturday morning to catch a chartered ferry to meet their community partner. When they made it to the island they were struck by its beauty. Their community partner came out to greet them with a herd of dogs, they were all very friendly. They were warmly welcomed into their community partner’s home and treated to tea and muffins. The group got to see salmon running up stream, seals eating the salmon in the bay, and an eagle soaring above. It was nothing short of a whimsical day.
The group took soil samples, built chicken nesting boxes and flaps and had the opportunity to be exposed to a wide variety of kind, accomplished, individuals with diverse careers. By getting out there and interacting with their community partner they were able to get the necessary background information needed to do literary research. This information was focused on how to improve the soil quality in order to enhance the forage grown for the animals to feed on. Their feedback will enable their community partner to increase the efficiency and sustainability of their ranch.

Harmony.

Melodious. Tranquil. Balanced.
All terms used to describe harmony, a beautiful combination of different aspects. Group 30 aids in creating this harmony by joining with their community partner, the Squamish First Nations people, to combine hard work with teamwork to build a garden and  communication with experience to build memories.

Plants at the Harmony Garden
Some plants at the Harmony Garden

Group 30 was working with the Squamish First Nations people in their harmony garden. As I dialogued with them, they continued to share about how the experience was meaningful to them and that they were happy to be providing concrete benefits to the community and work alongside some members of the Squamish people. They spent several days tirelessly weeding the garden, planting garlic, and spreading manure “even in the pouring rain”. In rest, they enjoyed the sight of their labour and drank tea steeped from the herbs and fruits right from the very garden they toiled. More exciting still, some group members were given the opportunity to learn how to smoke salmon. Such events added such depth to the project as it formed allowed this team to draw personal memories from the project.

Bench at the Harmony Garden
A bench in the Harmony Gardens

Currently the team intends to finish their CBEL project by making a children’s book and providing research for a cookbook being created by a master’s student also working with the community. They hope their research and book will be “used and reused in the community, spreading knowledge through the generations and creating excitement for learning” in the Harmony Garden and the community leading to more community involvement and growth in the gardens in the years to come. But, for now, the team celebrates the time spent with the community commenting “It added so much meaning to our project as we got to know those who we would be helping and truly connect with the community.” The connection of this group’s members and their CBEL project is just one of many in LFS 350, combined they form perfect. Harmony.

The Harmony Garden
A beautiful day in the Harmony Garden.

– `rtang

Group 5: Right to Food Interviews

“Out of sight, out of mind.” We sometimes get carried away with our own lives, trying to make ends meet, that we don’t stop to think of other people in our city that may be living hand-to-mouth. Through group 5’s effort to collect as much information as possible from individuals living in poverty in the Downtown Eastside Neighbourhood House, we are able to gain a greater perspective on their thoughts and reflections about the prices of living and food in Vancouver. The group was able to interview 17 individuals based on a standardized survey that they had created (scroll down for survey questions). In order to collect all this information, consent forms had to be given and the surveys were taken verbally and recorded for later transcription due to the language barrier.

Most of these individuals were older adults that are living on welfare. Some limitations that the group reported was the fact that it was a bias group of individuals that wanted to participate and although it was a plus having a multicultural group, it also provided language barriers. The group reported feeling that many individuals seemed interested in participating but may have not been confident in their English skills.

This project was overall worthwhile for group 5, they truly appreciated this opportunity that they received to learn and pilot this discussion that they feel needs to be had more often in our communities. They hope that this data collection could potentially spring on a policy change.

Being university students ourselves, this is a voice that we don’t generally get a chance to hear because we are so privileged to be given the opportunity to attend UBC. We, as LFS students, talk about food security and sovereignty on a daily bases but not very many of us know what it’s like to be living in such harsh situations. For this reason some individuals of group 5 decided to take on the $26 Welfare Challenge. Stick around to hear more about this challenge with a one-on-one interview with Etienne Nemanishen.

 

RIGHT TO FOOD SURVEY

  1. How many hours (on average) do you spend waiting in line every week?
  2. What would you be doing with your time if you weren’t standing in line?
  3. How many food lines do you stand in per week?
  4. What is one word that you would use to describe your experience in free-food line-ups?
  5. How many free meals do receive per week?
  6. Where do you obtain your free food?
  7. Are you satisfied with the free food that you receive?
  8. How many meals are you able to pay for per week?
  9. Where do you purchase your food?
  10. What sort of kitchen facilities do you currently have access to?
  11. What would you be able to cook if had improved facilities?
  12. What types of food make up the majority of your diet?
  13. Do you consider the nutritional values/origin of your food when making decisions regarding what to eat?
  14. Has your income changed your relationship to food in any way? If so, how?
  15. If welfare rates are increased, how would this affect the type and amount of food that you eat now?
  16. If welfare rates are increased, what would you be able to do that you are not able to do now?
  17. Is there anything further that you would like to say and/or comment on?

Group 9: Village Vancouver Transition Society

As it is my job to bring the various projects in LFS together and create that network and sense of connectivity, it is also group 9’s job to connect the various projects in Village Vancouver. Village Vancouver is part of a global movement called Transition Town aimed to reducing foil fuels, so everything is as local as it could get. These projects are situated in Kitsilano. Anybody is welcome to join these initiatives because anyone can make a difference. As witnessed by group 9, everyone seems to have different expertise in different things but they are all pieces of a greater puzzle that pieces together. “A lot of the people seemed really talented, which is amazing” as one of the members expressed to me their admiration for the interactions amongst the individuals that are involved.

Some of these individual projects and initiatives include community gardens, farmers markets and community pot locks. The involvement within these projects is extremely diversified; people of all ages, all ethnicities and demographics are involved.

But group 9 did face some unforeseen limitations that they believe may have hindered the effectiveness of their project. Some members felt that they were not given enough time to connect to the community, to feel a part of the community. And others felt that the community partners needed to be committed to working with the groups. Many groups faced communication difficulties and hopefully that will be improved for all LFS 350 projects next year.

-H