Tag Archives: death

Death with Interruptions

I really enjoyed this week’s novel, and it is probably my favourite by far in this course. The novel allowed me to take on a different perspective in considering the meaning and purpose of death. Saramago takes a very intriguing approach in exploring the topic of death. He specifically does so through an interesting thought experiment which essentially proposes a world where death is absent. In this country, death goes “on strike”. Death is suspended for people who are terminally ill. These people are alive, but at the same time, they are also not. They show signs of vitality, however, there is no improvement in their already ailing conditions. As a result, people begin seeking for death, making it seem like death can be controlled. 

When first coming across the idea of immortality, the thought seems too good to be true. Since death has always been one of the greatest fears of people, it is natural for one to celebrate eternal life. However, before being too absorbed in the joy brought by immortality, Saramago begins pointing out the problems of immortality, that it is presumably more disastrous than death. The problems of overcrowding, the funeral industry losing business, and other such events become apparent. People begin realizing that immortality is no longer ideal and that it does not constitute a utopian way of life. Just as death has been on strike for several months, thousands of people in suspended death actually died. Instead of allowing immortality to continue, death notices were given in a week advance to allow the people to take advantage of this time to say their final goodbyes to their loved ones. Personally, I think this is much more desirable than immortality. Oftentimes when people die, they don’t have the chance to properly say their farewells because accidents do occur suddenly. These warnings allow people to make the most out of their remaining time of life. In the context of this novel, immortality isn’t as good as we think of it to be. People whose deaths are delayed are really no different than being actually dead because the only difference is they are able to breathe (and that is the most significant sign indicating life). 

One element that I find extremely interesting is that Saramago personifies death. Death, in this novel, is not a phenomenon, it is represented as a character. In fact, “death” does transform into a person in the latter half of the book. This personification is extremely thought-provoking as the relationship between death and life is far more complex than death being the end of life. 

My question this week is what are your thoughts on the way death is explored in this novel?

The Shrouded Woman

Bombal’s Shrouded Women is a novel narrated by a dead woman, Ana Maria, who is also the main character of this story. The story begins with Ana Maria depicting the place where she is lying in and the people who are here to see her. Slowly, she starts to recount the memories from when she was alive: her first love with Ricardo, her reaction to her children’s marriages, her friend Fernando whom she describes how his love “humiliates her”, and finally reflects upon her marriage with Antonio (a man that she never loved). The most intriguing aspect of this novel is the way the story unfolds. It is told from a person who is dead but is still able to think, see. This choice of presentation allows for a very personal feeling, which enables readers to connect and understand the character from a more intimate level.The depictions of various events of Ana Maria’s life being combined with her reflections derived hindsight allows the book to be insightful. 

There were two instances in this book that I found to be particularly interesting. The first one is Maria Griselda’s own perception of her beauty. Maria Griselda is characterized as the “loveliest” woman any one has ever seen, and many people adore her for this reason. One would expect Maria Griselda to take pride in this beauty, especially since men praise her and women envy her. However, her thoughts are entirely opposite from what one would expect. From Ana’s narrations, we learn that Maria Griselda suffered and how she barely received love from her parents. Furthermore she experienced a sense of loneliness particularly from her parents not being able to resemble her, especially as she feels she isn’t able to find any common feature where she is recognized as “a link in human chain”. 

The other instance is Fernando’s response to Ana Maria’s death. Fernando was Ana Maria’s confidant, but he secretly adored her. He would always listen to what she has to say. He would even despise her husband on the surface but secretly envy his role. It was obvious that Ana Maria truly trusted Fernando as a confidant and appreciated his company. However, I was utterly shocked by Fernando’s reaction to Ana Maria’s death. Ana Maria expected Fernando to kiss her, but he only looked at her “fixedly”. He indifferently expressed how he feels that her death brings him peace, and that he even felt glad as he desired her death. Knowing the affection he had for the main character, it leaves me to wonder whether or not he really meant what he said.

My question for this week is why do you think Bombal decided to tell this story from the perspective of a dead woman?