My Ground – STP at its Best

The following is a video that not only appeals to me because of my love for soccer, but is also an exceptional example of STP done right.

With an organization as large as Nike, I imagine one of the challenges with segmenting would be achieving a balance between catering to a segment that is large enough (substantial) and one that is distinct enough from the general population (identifiable). Through videos such as this, Nike demonstrates its ability to find this balance. The “My Ground” video stands out because of how well it finds this balance. Little geographic or demographic segmentation appears to have done for the Nike soccer shoes, based on this video, and this allows Nike to cater to a broader segment base. In terms of the segment attractiveness criteria, this results in a more substantial potential target market. However, we see clear evidence of psychographic segmentation whereby individuals whose lifestyles include sports and active living are the focus. By including professional footballer Andres Iniesta, Nike is also able to demonstrate that although recreational athletes playing in their hometowns can use these shoes, so too can professional athletes playing for the world’s biggest teams. What I found most interesting however, was the middle of the video where Iniesta discusses the importance of taking chances. Although the video is about soccer, these lessons appeal to a broader audience, and in this way, even sports fans that might not play soccer will be engaged, building Nike’s brand power. These viewers might then purchase Nike equipment for the sport they do play.  Returning to the segment attractiveness criteria – the result of this is a more substantial and, because of the emotional connection, more responsive target group. Not only does the video thereby inspire soccer players to purchase Nike cleats, but it builds Nike’s brand, and in the long-term this is the real accomplishment of “My Ground.

The Epitome of Marketing – Super Bowl Sunday

While it would not be right to blog about something other than the Super Bowl, it would be too predictable to discuss today’s commercials.  So instead – I’ll reflect on the marketing strategies of the company that originally did  Super Bowl advertising best – Apple.

“1984” began Apple’s market positioning as a company that represents change and innovation. Importantly, Apple solidified its position in the eyes of the consumer by following up “1984” with commercials such as the following

Apple was able to deliver a strong emotional message, building on the affective component of consumer attitudes, while maintaining a fairly wide target market. How many consumers don’t want to be recognized as geniuses, or remembered as Muhammad Ali and Mahatma Gandhi are? Not many. “Think Different” is an exemplary model of how powerful marketing can be when everything in our textbook is acknowledged in cohesion.  It recognizes the social trend away from authority acceptance towards self-expression and free speech (CDSTEP). It addresses need recognition, or rather displaces it in favour of creating needs FOR the consumers. It reduces risks for the consumer in their decision process, to the point where there seems to be greater social risk in foregoing purchase than in making the purchase.

Over the years, Apple has been successful by continuing this branding, and by producing products that match this image. From the iPhone to the iPad, its products are revolutionary, making “Think Different” believable.  What Apple does best, is it presents consumers with a binary decision- the outcome of which is a win-win for Apple. Initially, it asked people if they wanted to be different, and offered them the products to fulfill that desire.  Where Apple is different from others however, is that it got so many people to say yes that those who don’t want to be different now purchase Apple products as well, so as to fulfill their desire for belonging. How Apple manages to simultaneously fulfill the desires to be different and be the same as others is beyond me. What I do understand is that, for the time being, Apple’s reaches out to a universally-appealing self-concept, and as one YouTube viewer put it, creates “GOOSEBUMPS”.