CEP and the BCTF returning to the bargaining table -whoops, picketline lengthens

May 17 -update: mediation rejected by BCTF executive. It’s time to sit down to the table and find a just resolution.

CEP and the BCTF will return to the bargaining table May 14th. The move came after the CEP applied to the Labour Relations Board for mediation, although the BCTF has not yet offered an official response to the CEP’s proposal for mediation.

It’s the second time the CEP has turned to the LRB for help. The first attempt for mediation, in March, was unsuccessful in resolving the contract dispute. However, the situation has changed significantly in the past two months after the CEP went on strike and then was locked out by the BCTF on the eve of the CEP’s suspension of picket action.

Background and Resources:

Prince Rupert School District Considering School Closures

SD #52 Public Notice:
On May 8, 2007, the Board of Trustees of School District No. 52 (Prince Rupert) adopted a motion to consider the closure of the following schools, effective September 2007:

Kanata Elementary School

Seal Cove Elementary School

Public meetings will be held in each of these schools to discuss the proposed closures:

• Kanata Elementary School – Monday, June 4, 2007, 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm

• Seal Cove Elementary School – Tuesday, June 5, 2007, 7:00 – 9:00 pm

Written submissions regarding these proposed closures may be sent to:

Board of School Trustees
School District No. 52 (Prince Rupert)
634 6th Ave E
Prince Rupert BC V8J 1X3

Prince Rupert Daily News article, May 11, 2007

Foundation Skills Assessment Week

It’s FSA week. Starting last Monday schools have been instructed to take attendance and report absences to the Ministry of Education. What’s the issue? The government is worried that parents might actually decide to pull their children from the writing of FSA’s. Apparently lacking the confidence to convince parents to participate it would seem that the tack being taken is to invoke the force of the school act. That’s to bad. One would think that the deputy minister and his government would rather convince people of the value of these narrow -scope exams rather than opt to ramp up the rhetoric.

Previous Blog Postings and Web Resources
Commentary by a parent concerned about the FSA’s
Foundation Skills Assessment
Testing, Accountability, and Standards
Making Money off of Testing
Deputy Minister’s Newsletter warning to parents
CEP President Anita Chapman on FAS
BCTF Executive officers statement on FSA’s.
Here’s the BC-PSEA intervention into the FSA debate. Their letter lays out ‘reasons’ to discipline teachers, among other things. Download file

Pressure put on schools to report students who do not take controversial assessment
Janet Steffenhagen, Vancouver Sun
Published: Monday, May 07, 2007

B.C. – The battle between the Ministry of Education and B.C.’s teachers’ unions over the annual Foundation Skills Assessment is likely to heat up today, with the ministry putting pressure on schools to report students who don’t take the controversial test.

Teachers’ unions are urging parents to pull their children from the tests, which are administered provincewide in Grades 4 and 7 to assess basic skills. They say the tests, the 2007 version of which are administered beginning today, don’t promote learning and are abused by the Fraser Institute to rank schools.

But the Education Ministry is fighting back, saying teachers are misleading parents by telling them they have the right to remove their children from the reading, writing and numeracy tests known as the FSA.

Students may be excused by the school principal only when they have learning disabilities, are new ESL students, are ill or are in the midst of a family emergency, the ministry says.

This year, for the first time, principals will have to report all excluded students to the district superintendent, and it’s clear long lists won’t win praise.

Ken Denike, Vancouver school board chairman, said the two sides are headed for a showdown.

“My reading of it is that the union has rolled up and put a line in the sand and the government is rolling up on the other side and they’re going to roll right over them,” he said in an interview.

The ministry has an advantage in that the lead union — the B.C. Teachers’ Federation (BCTF) — has been all but paralyzed by a contract feud with its employees. That put the brakes on a plan that could have seen teachers refuse to administer the tests this year in every school.

Still, a Vancouver union local says it has had such success with an ad campaign directed at parents that it expects the tests won’t even be handed out in a dozen elementary schools.

“I know for a fact there will be fewer students writing the tests this year,” said Glen Hansman, president of the Vancouver Elementary School Teachers’ Association, which has been campaigning against the FSA since 2002.

The goal, Hansman said Friday, “is to stop the dividing of schools between winner schools and loser schools.”

He was referring to the Fraser Institute report card on B.C. elementary schools, to be released later this month, which ranks schools according to FSA results.

Penny Tees, president of the B.C. School Trustees’ Association, says she doesn’t like the rankings either, but the tests are helpful and must be administered.

“Used properly, the assessments can help to further the dialogue on how the achievement in our districts, and in the education system as a whole, can be advanced,” she says in a letter to trustees last week.

The B.C. Public School Employers’ Association, which represents school boards in labour issues, also got involved by sending an e-mail to boards advising them of their rights and responsibilities with respect to the FSA.

“Any inaccurate information provided to parents by a teacher or the BCTF . . . should be corrected,” the association said in an alert to members.Teachers were told they have no right to send information opposing the FSA home with students, but Hansman said his union disputes that.

“We’ll resolve that through the grievance process,” he added.

Hansman said some teachers are opposed to the tests because of the rankings but others have broader concerns about the “accountability agenda” of the Liberal government.

“We’re being held to higher and higher account but we still don’t get the resources to do that work.”

Hansman said he doesn’t want to see teachers, parents and principals butting heads over the issue.. “I don’t foresee that happening in Vancouver. My sense is that principals and school communities have been respectful of the choices that parents have made.”

The tests are to be written over a two week period, with results available next fall. [By Janet Steffenhagen]

VSB to Open Model Autism School

Unconfirmed reports say that a model school for 10 – 20 kids with autism — funded by the Canucks is scheduled to open in Vancouver at Kerrisdale Annex this September.

VSB Trustees questioned at a public meeting Monday evening appeared not to be aware of any such plans. However, senior management responsible for learning services are reported to have said that “nothing is guaranteed at this stage. It’s still a proposal.”

A parent at that meeting stated that this was not the impression they had from a Kerrisdale Elementary parent. Apparently they had been informed that while charity funding has not been finalized, but the family who runs the Canuck Place charity is keen to hand some money over.The model school will be run under the auspices and governance of the VSB. The program is designed for intermediate grade students, grades 5 – 7. It’s designed to complement the elementary autism program that’s run out of Nelson. There will be no fees assigned to parents.
The number of students hasn’t been decided on as of yet.

Update: May 9, 2007
According to a VSB District Manager there is indeed a plan for a district program for autism much like the ones currently operating at Churchill and Nelson. It is to be a three tiered program:

Autism Resource Centre

  • Partial inclusion
  • full time inclusion
  • The goal would be to support students towards full inclusion where appropriate.

The Autism Pilot Plan is to involve Vancouver Teachers Association members and CUPE members, and would be run by the district.

The Canucks Foundation is interested in contributing start up grant funding, but that so far there is no finalized commitment from them, and that VSB would be responsible for finding ongoing sustainable operating funding for the program, if it were to go ahead. Given the funding uncertainty, it is very unlikely that the project would be ready to go ahead by September.

With resepct to public consultation the District manager said the Education Special Advisory Committee has input, and that it reports to Committee III, which reports to the Board.

So at this point it is not a segregated school, or a provincial school but an unfunded district program proposal.

VSB Educational Facilities Review

Vancouver School Board is in the processes of reviewing school facilities and programs with the possible outcome of closing schools. Vancouver CBC Radio carried coverage of this story this morning on the 5:30, 6;30, and 7:30 local news casts. You can listen to the two versions they played.

CBC Local News

According to the Vancouver School Board they are:

faced with some difficult decisions. Declining enrolment is having an impact on the programs and services the district can provide. In addition, operating and maintaining a large inventory of facilities requires significant financial resources.

In order to deliver a range of learning opportunities to the 56,000 students in Kindergarten to Grade 12 and adult education programs, the school board must ensure that education dollars are spent wisely.

Students, parents, staff and the public are invited to open houses hosted by the Vancouver School Board and District Parent Advisory Council as part of an Educational Facilities Review. The school board is seeking assistance in making decisions that best reflect the educational needs and values of Vancouver students and families.

Translated materials will be available in Cantonese, Mandarin, Korean, Vietnamese, Spanish and Punjabi. Interpreters knowledgeable in each of these languages will be assisting at the open houses.

VSB Educational Facilities Review background materials

Open houses will be held on:
Tuesday, May 8, 6:30 to 8:30 p.m.
Vancouver Technical Secondary School cafeteria
2600 E. Broadway

Wednesday, May 9, 6:30 to 8:30 p.m.
Tupper Secondary School cafeteria
419 E. 24th Ave.

Thursday, May 10, 6:30 to 8:30 p.m.
Magee Secondary School atrium
6360 Maple St.

BCTF Staff Locked Out

bc-0426bctf.jpg
Bargaining between the BCTF as employer and one of its two union staffs, CEP 464, began approximately 6 1/2 months ago. The BCTF executive appears intent on seeking major concessions from the staff whose labour power facilitate the BCTF’s own struggles against contract stripping and anti-union attacks. No one in the labour movement or allied communities can take any pleasure from what is happening. We can only hope that a fair and equitable resolution can be found.

News Feed on the BCTF Staff Lockout.
BCTF News Releases on their labour conflict.
CEP 464 (BCTF Staff Union) website.

In Memory

black_ribbon.jpg Our condolences to the family, friends, and colleagues of the women and men killed Monday, April 16th. Our universities, schools, and communities must to be places free from violence of all forms.

New York Times coverage.
CBC News coverage.
CNN coverage.
CBS map of US school shootings.

The White Ribbon Campaign: men working to end men’s violence against women.
Coalition for gun control.
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

VSB Proposes Job Cuts to Meet Funding Deficit

Superintendent, Chris Kelly, led Trustees and stakeholder representatives through the preliminary budget proposals. (Download overview).

The proposal forecasts a $5.83 million shortfall (based on an expected enrollment decline of 990 students) with the following reductions (with thanks to Patti for the summary and revisions April 12):

  • 3 Vice principals-
  • 1 systems analyst
  • 29 Special ed support workers (the ones saved after parent outcry in December)
  • 7 supervision aides
  • 132.6 teachers. 40 due to budget cutbacks; 55 due to enrollment declines, and; 37.6 due to “one-time funding” for 06/07
  • $200,000 cut from Learning & Development initiative-
  • closure of 20 portables

Teacher and parent reps asked a series of questions to which the majority Trustees deferred answers to senior management staff to answer. As an observer and as a participant as the DPAC rep to standing committee III I was personally frustrated that the majority trustees simply sat there and had nothing to say. When they were asked to respond the chair, Clarance Hansen, said that it was inappropriate to be asked to respond; Trustee Lee exclaimed upon the devastation caused the NDP in the 1990s, and Trustee Gibson said that she was there to listen and that even though she had questions there was a framework and she would listen. One silent NPA trustee spoke with me afterwards expressing their disappointment with the way education is being funded.

As a parent representative and as a voting member of society I expect more from my trustees. Even if all they had to say was ‘this is a tough decision and we have little if any room to maneuver’ I would have felt that they demonstrated more respect for those of us who volunteer our time to participate in this process.

As to what they could do -how about a real cost budget? What level of resources are needed to fund the type of education system that everyone claims we have? During the meeting staffing cuts were justified in terms of ‘formulas’ three and ten years old. A graph was produced to ‘demonstrate’ that Vancouver’s staffing level relative to enrollment has climbed significantly during the last five years (see post: math lesson) and therefore reductions in staffing levels are not a problem. I would take issue with that claim. Perhaps the original formulas were inadequate best fits to a poor condition? Perhaps higher staffing is the result of a policy designed to support and improve appropriate learning? Perhaps the demographics of our student population requires additional staffing? But, more importantly, shouldn’t elected officials and educational administrators be making decisions based upon educational principles that they support and agree with and, shouldn’t we be able to hear them talk about why they are proposing this approach?

Education Week in BC Continues with an omnibus bill

The following is taken from the Hansard record of earlier today. This is the third bill introduced this week related to education. There are many detailed minor changes in this bill. One that the minister didn’t mention in her introductory speech is an admendment to the School Act that allows the chair of a school board to thrown any one other than a trustee out of a meeting if the chair (or the majority of the trustees) deem the individual to be disruptive. In addition, being disruptive will no become an offense under the legislation.

Introduction and First Reading of Bills

EDUCATION STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2007

Hon. S. Bond presented a message from Her Honour the Lieutenant-Governor: a bill intituled Education Statutes Amendment Act, 2007. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]

Hon. S. Bond: Mr. Speaker, I move that the bill be introduced and read a first time now. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]

Motion approved. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]

Hon. S. Bond: I’m pleased today to introduce Bill 22, the Education Statutes Amendment Act, 2007. This act supports our government’s commitment to school safety and to an education system that is transparent and accountable to parents, students and communities throughout British Columbia. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]

Under this legislation, school boards must establish codes of conduct for their districts to help prevent bullying and harassment at their schools. It also introduces new measures to make school district business companies more accountable and transparent and to allow the province to communicate directly with our teachers. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]

Miscellaneous amendments to the School Act will include the additional use of personal education numbers, will more accurately describe the role of the board of examiners, will prevent conflicts that may arise when the school funding announcement date specified in the School Act precedes the provincial budget announcement, will partially reimburse students for expenses incurred in earning an external credential or post-secondary credit, and will reflect titles currently being used by the francophone education authority, the Conseil scolaire francophone. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]

Other amendments include clarifying that only the Ministry of Education can issue Dogwood graduation certificates, and making full financial reporting possible for the College of Teachers’ annual meetings. These legislative changes deliver on our government’s commitment to ensure that B.C. students are safe, that the education system in our province is transparent and accountable, and that it runs as efficiently as possible. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]

Hon. Speaker, I move that the bill be placed on the orders of the day for second reading at the next sitting of the House after today. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]

Bill 22, Education Statutes Amendment Act, 2007, introduced, read a first time and ordered to be placed on orders of the day for second reading at the next sitting of the House after today. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY

Related Education Week Legislation and DM’s Newsletters

  • It doesn’t rain, but it pours. . . . This week is setting a record for number of DM’s Newsletters. Read todays on, you got it –Bill 21– on disciplining teachers in public, online. Download the March 27th issue. You can read what was said in the legislature today here.
  • Newly released to coincide with the introduction in the legislature of Bill 20 (changes yet again to the school act; read article in today’s Times Colonist) is the DM’s newsletter explaining all the reasons why. Download the special Monday, March 26th issue. Proceedings in the legislature can be read from Hansard

Bye Bye Grade 12 Portfolio . . .

The grade 12 portfolio is gone. This week’s newsletter from the Deputy Minister outlines, in brief, the end of the portfolio. It also describes the ‘new’ emphasis on physical fitness, job training, and graduation transition planning. Ultimately it reflects the Ministry of Education’s emphasis on training workers for industry rather facilitating learning as a process of a democratic citizenry.

Students will need to do 80s hours of physical fitness, 30 hours of community service/work, and prepare a graduation ‘transition’ plan. While the Dm says the portfolio still exists, it would seem that it exists in memory and name only.

See the Minister’s new release: download file

The ministry’s portfolio page can be found here.

The BCTF statement on the end of the grade 12 portfolio can be found here.