Racism, Xenophobia, and discriminatory legislation in Canada’s Immigration Act of 1910.

Prompt

In this lesson I say that it should be clear that the discourse on nationalism is also about ethnicity and ideologies of “race.” If you trace the historical overview of nationalism in Canada in the CanLit guide, you will find many examples of state legislation and policies that excluded and discriminated against certain peoples based on ideas about racial inferiority and capacities to assimilate. – and in turn, state legislation and policies that worked to try to rectify early policies of exclusion and racial discrimination. As the guide points out, the nation is an imagined community, whereas the state is a “governed group of people.” For this blog assignment, I would like you to research and summarize one of the state or governing activities, such as The Royal Proclamation 1763, the Indian Act 1876, Immigration Act 1910, or the Multiculturalism Act 1989 – you choose the legislation or policy or commission you find most interesting. Write a blog about your findings and in your conclusion comment on whether or not your findings support Coleman’s argument about the project of white civility.

______________________________________________________________

According to the Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21’s website, The Immigration Act of 1910, was implemented to give the Canadian government “enhanced discretionary powers… [to] regulate the flow of immigrants into Canada, reinforcing and expanding the exclusionary provisions outlined in the Immigration Act of 1906.” (Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21, Immigration Act of 1910).  It seems that even federal branches of historical record keeping view this piece of legislation to be racist and xenophobic.

In the early 1900s, Canada began to see an extreme exodus of migrants. Canada, still relatively young, felt it necessary to curtail the amount of work allotted for itself by excluding people who were deemed “undesirable” (Immigration Act of 1910, 208)  or bound to be a burden on the state. These people included an entire “prohibited class”. (Immigration Act of 1910, 208)

 


______________________________________________________________

The “Prohibited Class” included:

“a) idiots, imbeciles, feeble minded persons, epileptics, insane persons                                       or people who have been insane within the last five years.”

“b) Persons afflicted with any loathsome disease, or any disease that may be contagious or infectious, or which may become dangerous to public health.”

“c) Immigrants who are dumb, blind or physically defective, unless in the opinion of a board of inquiry officer…they have money, or a profession, occupation, trade, employment or any other legitimate mode of earning a living that they are not liable to become a public charge…”

“d) Persons who have been convicted of any crime involving moral turpitude”

e) Prostitutes, women and girls coming to Canada for any immoral purpose, Pimps or persons living off the avail of prostitution

“f) Persons who procure or attempt to bring into Canada, prostitutes or women or girls  for the purpose of prostitution, or other immoral purposes.

“g) Professional beggars or vagrants or any other person likely to become a public charge”

h) immigrants who have been given or loaned by any charitable organization enabling them to qualify for landing under this act…” (Immigration Act of 1910) It is noted in the explanation of this particular note that; “This condition was prompted by an influx of impoverished British immigrants in 1907, many of whom had received assistance from charitable institutions to facilitate their immigration” (Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21, Immigration Act of 1910)

i) persons to do not fulfill or comply with any regulations which for the time being are in force and applicable to such persons under sections 37 and 38 of this Act.”

______________________________________________________________

As we can see from this list, Canada was seeking only the “best” applicants for immigration and anyone who could possibly fall under the charge of the state was considered “undesirable.”  This extreme rejection of anyone who could not contribute well, or at all or had the likely potential of being any burden whatsoever on the Canadian government was rejected.  It seems that government immigration officials had full authority to arbitrarily decide whether a person was “desirable”

There were also fee requirements imposed on would be immigrants. According to the Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21, “Orders-in-council passed later in the year further enhanced the restrictive immigration policies. All immigrants of Asiatic origin were required to have $200 in their possession before being permitted entry, while all other immigrants, male and female, were required to have a minimum of $25 upon their arrival in Canada.”  (Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21, Immigration Act of 1910). This specific legislation is extremely racist and counterproductive. This piece of racist legislation was intended to generate federal income and act as a deterrent from “All immigrants of Asiatic origin.”  (Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21, Immigration Act of 1910). It is also counterproductive, disallowing potential contributing workers and community members citizenship based on ethnicity, with different ideas, comes new innovation.

The act gave government officials absolute power, without transparency, to accept or reject any applicant as they saw fit. One such rule is as stands: ” Every passenger or person as to whose right to land, the examining officer has any doubt, shall be detained for further examination by the officer in charge, or by the board of inquiry and such examination shall be forthwith conducted separate and apart from the public, and conclusion thereof such passenger or other person, shall be either immediately landed or rejected and kept in custody pending deportation.” The veil of non public screenings no doubt allowed for an extreme number of unjust deportations.

The Immigration act of 1910 also paved the way for a permanent residency which we still employ today. On a personal note, I have several immigrant friends who say the process for immigrating to Canada isn’t terrible (in comparison to other countries) although is quite slow, still expensive and does not include many government assisted employment help. Transferable professions remain an insurmountable obstacle to many.  I found a wonderful report on employment and resettlement in Canadian Immigration. You can find it here. 

The part that interests me the most is of course the systemic barriers to re-employment in Canada. It seems we are past our racist past. In the article mentioned above, It states:

” The obstacles to seeking work typically involve a
combination of credentialing, Canadian work experience, devalued foreign work experience, and language issues [25,36,39]. Hiebert’s [22] focus group
study revealed that non-recognition of credentials was
a common experience, along with visible minority migrants’ belief that education and training from the United States and European countries were deemed more
valuable than that of other source countries” (Melinda Suto, Compromised careers: The occupational transition of immigration and resettlement, 419)

The article goes on to say that a major reason for underemployment in immigrants is: “The reasons for foreign work experience being “heavily discounted by Canadian employers” … range from discrimination and racism based on country of origin, to ignorance
about the value migrants’ experience could offer an organization” (Suto, 419)

This is extremely disappointing to me. I was hoping we would learn and offer more acceptable transition for educated immigrants and less blatantly racist prejudices.  There are of course many other reasons why it may be difficult for immigrants to find suitable employment in Canada, but from the state of this article, it looks like our government has such an inefficient method of allowing for help with employment that it should be heavily looked into.

This assignment has reminded of me of article I had read in the Globe and Mail: Report on Business last year entitled “For Canada, Immigration is a key to prosperity”

In this article it states: “Why is this so important? Because without this immigration flow, Canada’s population aged between 20 and 44 years old would be declining. That cohort, which constitutes most of the labour force, is the one that creates new households, buys new houses, has children and pays the greater part of taxation revenue. Without immigration, Canada’s natural population growth would not be enough to sustain economic growth and welfare. Quebec, given its demographic structure, especially needs immigration to increase its labour force in the short term so as to sustain the costs of its social programs.” (Globe and Mail, For Canada, Immigration is a key to prosperity) This article has very little actual information. It seems to be a propaganda piece to make the Canadian Government “look good” while refusing to educate the common layman on its processes at all.

The Immigration act of 1910, unfortunately does not show Canadian’s fairness or aptitude for multiculturalism. It shows a racist, xenophobic and discriminatory attitude toward immigrants in the early 1900s.  It falls absolutely in line with Coleman’s notion of “White Civility”. The blatant disregard for public transparency and the self harming repercussions of such a piece of legislation is embarrassing and appalling to read and it appears Canada hasn’t improved much.

Works Cited

“Immigration Act, 1910 | Pier 21”. Pier21.Ca, 2019, https://pier21.ca/research/immigration-history/immigration-act-1910.

 Suto, Melinda. “Compromised Careers: The Occupational Transition Of Immigration And Resettlement”. Video.Med.Ubc.Ca, 2019, http://video.med.ubc.ca/videos/osot/faculty/ms/Compromised_Careers.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.

Gignac, Clement. “For Canada, Immigration Is A Key To Prosperity”. The Globe And Mail, 2018, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/for-canada-immigration-is-a-key-to-prosperity/article14711281/.

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Racism, Xenophobia, and discriminatory legislation in Canada’s Immigration Act of 1910.

  1. Ross says:

    Hi Sean!
    Thank you for your article, I wrote on the exact same topic, although I think you did a much better job exploring how things are done today and relating it back.
    It is especially interesting the economic impacts that immigration is currently having on Canada in terms of holding up our social support systems. Would you agree that the policies currently in place restricting transferability of professions for immigrants are a) inherently racist, and b) in place to also push the notion of “white civility”? To me it feels like immigrants are forced to take jobs below their education level or training so that the important jobs are left for “real Canadians”…. or those that aren’t foreign?

    Look forward to hearing your thoughts!
    Ross

  2. MaxwellMcEachern says:

    Hey Sean.

    This is another great post that has me thinking.
    Because of this act, it justified the actions of millions of Canadians during this time period. The top down legislation led immigration officers to have their own discretion and decide the fate of many hopeful immigrants that landed on Pier 21. This racism would have been brought into the homes and spread throughout the communities. Like you mentioned, Asiatic peoples were deemed less desirable by the government and the rest of Canada. As we have been talking about throughout the course, generational trauma and political influences have led to many Canadians expressing racist sentiments. It would be over one hundred years before seeing any progression in this area.

    Thanks,
    Max

  3. Kynan Pereira says:

    Hi Sean,

    Great overall summary of the policy. I too wrote about the Immigration Act and I agree with how you phrased things. The act was truly “a racist, xenophobic and discriminatory attitude toward immigrants”. Through my research, I realized that the British Empire still had a large influence over Canada at the time, even though Canada was a sovereign nation. I related the policy to something of British influence like many of the policies around that time. Do you think the colonial presence of Britain had a say in the creation of the Immigration Act, even if indirectly?

    Cheers,

    Kynan

  4. TonyBae says:

    Hey Sean, man, this post really got me thinking about my own perception. I’m an immigrant from Korea, and I’ve seen my parents struggle with employment. We didn’t fare too terribly, as my father worked for an American petrochemical company back in Korea, we were unemployed for less than a year. But I’ve seen many other Koreans come to Canada carrying with them successful white-collar backgrounds only to be forced into working in labour areas they have no experience with, or forced to head back to Korea after not being able to find a job.

    My mother, on the other hand, wasn’t as lucky as my father. She was a high school teacher in Korea, but nothing was transferrable to Canada. I understand that she needs to be taught the Canadian school curriculum and such, but to disregard her whole degree seemed harsh. This made it especially hard when they divorced and she had to go back to school in Canada to be employable again (which thankfully worked out really well).

    The worst part of all this is my own perception. It didn’t occur to me until you mentioned that training/education from European countries is considered more valuable in Canada. My first thought was, shamefully, to agree with it. Somehow in my own head, due to what I saw as I grew older, I also devalued training and education in Asia. We always told ourselves that it was because our school courses are different so our people had to go back to school, or something along those lines. It made sense to us that the US is considered equal because Canada and the US are similar in many ways. But why do we think that way about European nations? Why is Germany or Italy’s schools more valuable than Korea? There is no real other reason than those nations being predominantly Caucasian. It’s unfortunate this continues to happen and will continue to happen as people, like my family, will be brainwashed into thinking these type of treatment is just.

    Thanks for opening my eyes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.