Categories
ETEC 590

TQS – Competencies of a MET graduate

Competencies AnalysisThe TQS document envisions the following competencies listed below in relation to the MET:

1 – The ability to demonstrate an understanding of the theory and research in educational technology. This is the foundation of being a “Master” in our subject area. Bloom’s Taxonomy: Knowledge and Comprehension

2 – The ability to make connections between and critically examine past and present work in the field of educational technology. This competency is important because it demonstrates that knowledge in the field is not simply a regurgitation of memorization, rather, is knowledge understood to the level where critical analysis can take place. Bloom’s Taxonomy: Analysis

3 – The ability to conduct research in the field of educational technology and make connections between that research and existing theories and research. It is valued that not only will we be able to study and make connections between existing research but also that we will come to our own conclusions through carrying out research first hand. Bloom’s Taxonomy: Application, Analysis, Synthesis

4 – The ability to show what we know. Presentation is important – how clearly can we articulate what we know? Research papers to ePortfolios and everything in between. Bloom’s Taxonomy: Evaluation

Competencies missing?

1 – I do think it is important for graduate students to show how their personal beliefs are motivated by /motivate their field of study. In the case of educational technology, it would be important to see the evolution of one’s teaching/learning philosophy as a result of their program experience.

2 – A MET graduate should be able to take research and theory and show that they can apply it to the selection of educational technology. This is larger what is covered in ETEC 565 but ultimately, as a graduate of MET, I believe that I should be able to take a situation on a case study basis and apply my MET understanding in order to select appropriate technology.

3 – I’m not quite sure how to articulate this, but I believe that as a MET graduate I should be able to communicate an understanding of the direction of my field of study. Meaning that I should be able to articulate how cultural, political, historical etc. motivations will continue to guide educational technology in the teaching/learning setting.

The neat thing about this exercise is that I can already plainly see where many of the courses I have taken fit into the competency puzzle, particularly the role of the core courses!

Categories
ETEC 511

Spirituality and Educational Technology

I hadn’t given too much thought to the interaction between spirituality and educational technology before encountering it in this course. One of the thought questions provided is “is there a difference between spirituality in today’s technology-driven world and the spirituality of 500 years ago?”. I think that because technology has made the world a smaller place in the sense of communication, travel and being able to “know” about other people and places, much of an individual’s spirituality is based on the idea of knowing about something. What I mean by that is that because there are less unknowns, many people base their spirituality in facts and tangibles rather than “what ifs” and intangibles. For many, spirituality comes from a deep connection between the individual and a belief system and 500 years ago, there were less options for belief systems and in many ways, spirituality was prescribed. Nowadays, people are able to chose to be spiritual around many non-traditional ideas…. there are those than say rock n’ roll is their religion and as mentioned in DLG 11’s presentation, there are those who feel a spiritual connection to all things Mac. The technology driven world has definitely redefined spirituality and has forced individuals to clarify their own spiritual beliefs in relation to this world.

Categories
ETEC 511

Economics of Educational Technology

economics of ed

This screen clip demonstrates the versatile ways in which we infuse technology into our everyday lives. During this economic crisis, it is clear that a distinct area of opportunity lies in teaching and learning technologies amongst other programs that replace the tangible institutions defined by space and time with technological versions of same.

Categories
ETEC 540

Multiliteracies

I was first introduced to the New London Group in ETEC 510 when I was designing a learning environment. My group used the New London Group framework and the four processes you listed in order to frame our project. I think that one think curriculum designers must understand is that all of these processes ARE achievable in an online learning context and once educators see that this is possible, then they will begin to see how important an understanding of multiliteracies is. Before I started this program I was unsure that an online learning environment could emulate a classroom learning environment. Now that I am almost finished the program I can see that it do so and also has made me more technologically aware – I suppose more technologically literate. As we move to relying more and more on the available information and communication technology, I am hopeful that teaching multiliteracies will play a more prominent role in literacy education.

Categories
ETEC 511

Is access to sites and information on the internet changing, in your experience? What limits have you encountered?

In discussing the economics surrounding content on the Internet, Ciffolilli brings up a couple of good points about the changing access to information.

Personally, this is area that really interests me and one that I am actually exploring in my major paper for this class. In my experience access to site and information in changing, mostly in the name of economics. I find that many sites, whether journals, presentation tools or teacher resource sites, require subscriptions or memberships. In the case of journals, while I can access most through UBC VPN, what happens when I am no longer a UBC student? John Willinsky (instructor of LLED 565) has some great papers surrounding this subject and has started the Public Knowledge Project (http://pkp.sfu.ca/publications) to address this issue.

Some of the limits I have encountered both as a student and a teacher, are beyond the “closed door” of requiring a paid membership for access, rather, they have to do with the limitations in established authority of information. Is there a way of knowing whether the information we are reading is accurate or spoken from a position of authority or personal opinion? This has been a limiting factor for my students who often come across inaccurate information but take it at face value. Like Creative Commons stamps a seal of use on images, I wish there were a way for an authoritative body to stamp a seal of accuracy on information, in the free domain of course!

Categories
ETEC 540

Revolutionizing information organization and academic authority

Commentary #2 – In response to Michael Wesch’s video, “Information R/evolution” (Module 4)

Appropriately “hyper” for the purposes of framing hypertext and the changing technologies of writing and archiving information, Micheal Wesch’s Information R/evolution is a dynamic interplay of text technologies that incorporates both the hypertext discussion of Jay David Bolter and the organization discussion of Walter Ong. Wesch speaks to the evolution of the pre-typographic notion that information is “a thing… housed in a logical place… where it can be found” and how we have now moved towards a place where technology affords the ability for anyone to create, critique, organize and understand. Information R/evolution touches upon two interesting developments supported by the hypertext environment of our technological world: the nature by which information is stored and the nature of authority.

Information R/evolution starts out with images of the typewriter, standard filing cabinet and card catalogue. This is intentional as each of these three objects were, for many years, definitive symbols of the way by which information was recorded, stored and retrieved. In unpacking the information evolution, these images quickly transform into those of word processing programs, blogs and search engines. Wesch suggests that it does not take an expert to attend to organizational tasks; rather, we are all responsible for the tagging, bookmarking, categorizing and otherwise organizing of information. The organizational affordances of technology are illustrated in the video and echo Walter Ong’s discussion about categories and lists and how they create meaning out of space, impressing through “tidiness and inevitability” (Ong, 2002, p.120). Wesch illustrates this revolution as a true transcendence of place with regards to the means by which information can be rethought “beyond material constraints”. The ability to store information simultaneously in multiple places is not only crucial to the way information is stored but also crucial to the speed at which information is retrieved. Bolter (2001) further discusses this issue in his study of hypertext and cites hyperlinking as the process by which the reader can “continue indefinitely…through the textual space…throughout the Internet” (p.27). An interesting facet of Wesch’s video is that he does not rely on lengthy text to illustrate his point, rather, he demonstrates visually the remediation of print by modeling the organizational affordances of hypertext on a single computer screen, devoid of the paper trail that previously defined information technology.

The nature of authority is touched upon in Information R/evolution and it is suggested that the nature of modern typographic culture has broadened the constraints of previously established information authority (academics, librarians etc.). Information R/evolution raises the issue of how people, either for personal or academic purposes, come to find the information they are seeking and what format they are ultimately presented with. Simply put, “together, we create more information than experts”, is a powerful truth that highlights not only the responsibility of those posting on the web to categorize their information, but also the fact that authorship is seemingly more open. The boundaries of expert and non-expert were more defined in a chirographic and early typographic culture whereby there was an entire process surrounding how one became an author and therefore, an authority. Wesch encourages the viewer to think about authority in the context of this information revolution. While there exists scholarly access points through university libraries, Google Scholar etc., the mainstream user relies on search engines such as Yahoo and Google in order to find definitive sources of information. The breadth of information allows the viewer to view not only authoritative sites (National Geographic, BBC, etc.) but also collaboratively edited sites (Wikipedia) and personal sites (parenting blogs, personal interest sites, etc.) thereby creating a multidimensional approach to any given topic.

However, Wesch indirectly highlights the flip side, which is the uncertainty of the information found. The access itself may be much easier by being able to use one’s personal computer to access library catalogues and search engines rather than searching, in person, through an onerous card catalogue, however, the expanse of the web does lessen the power of established authority. Wesch cites Wikipedia as an example by stating “Wikipedia has 15 times as many words as the next largest encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Britannica”. While this is a seemingly simple statement, it has much larger ramifications for the growing debate about authority on the web, as Wikipedia is a collaboratively created encyclopedia that can be openly edited. More powerful than this statement is the fact that Wesch uses a live screen clip showing himself editing Wikipedia in “real time” and then adding one more person to the tally of the 282,874 contributors that appeared at the time, illustrating the very fluid and “living” nature of information on the Internet.  While effective in drawing forth questions about authority and research, I would be interested to see Wesch explore, more closely, the nature of how one conducts research through a similarly styled video.

Bolter speaks of the “breakout of the visual” and in that spirit, Wesch shows that the dominating visual message of Information R/evolution can be just as powerful as written prose exploring the same topic. Wesch’s visual inspires reflective thought about the evolution of information but also the current revolution taking place in terms of information organization, conducting research and the nature of authority.

References:

Bolter, Jay David. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print [2nd edition]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ong, Walter. (2002) Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.

Wesch, Michael. (2007). Information R/evolution . Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4CV05HyAbM

Categories
ETEC 540

The Newspaper in America: Boston 1690-1719

View my research project here!

Categories
ETEC 540

Writing directly on the web

I usually type my posts in MS Word and then paste them into Vista. Like you, I like the familiarity of the program but in addition, I like the “safety” of writing in Word. I know that my work will be saved within my own computer and only when I am really ready to unleash my thoughts on the public, will I paste into Vista. When I was in highschool, I used to always write my drafts on paper and then, when I was finally ready for the final product, would I type into MS Word. I see these two approaches as similar. I think the concept of a blog is changing this for people…. the idea that writing can exist as a direct stream of consciousness onto the web that is not necessarily polished is making it easier for some to go right to the endpoint in order to write. Social Media/Web 2.0 is taking a lot of the formalities out of writing in both a good and a bad way. Bad in the sense that many students seem to be losing grammar/spelling skills because of all of the online lingo but good in the sense that the process of writing itself is actually becoming easier for some students because they are so accustomed to pontificating on the web. The web is not the official place of formal writing but rather the place for anything and everything!

Categories
ETEC 540

Word processing for students with learning disabilities

From my perspective, as someone who works with students that have learning disabilities, word processing has been a huge equalizer for those students with fine motor difficulties, dysgraphia or other disorders of written expression. The ability that students have to manipulate their words and be in a constant state of editing rather than churning out draft after draft, has made the writing process much easier for them. Being able to bold/italicize text, add bullet points, create charts in a matter of seconds has also made note taking a much less stressful process for these students as well. I know that there are critics who say that the reliance on computers is a bad thing in respect to the spelling and grammar abilities, but really, I think that word processing has made the learning process itself less onerous for these students and therefore “trumps” the issue of spelling and grammar. Bolter points to the issue of revising as being a huge affordance of a word processor and I agree – it is seemingly simple, but when we really think about the progression of the writing process, word processors have taken us a long way!

Categories
ETEC 511

Haraway’s blurred boundaries

Haraway image

Haraway describes the blurred boundaries between “human and animal”, “animal and machine” and “physical and non-physical/virtual”. I think that the mythology structure in ancient Egypt (as referenced in the image above) represents these blurred boundaries well. While the virtual wasn’t a concept all those hundreds of years ago, the blurring between human and animal has origins within this civilization. By starting in ancient Egypt, one can see how the natural progression was to shift to the blurring between “animal and machine” and now finally, “physical and non-physical/virtual”.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet