Categories
Submitted Assignments

Digital Story

For optimal viewing, view my digital story in Google Maps

View Adventures in Europe in a larger map

Originally, I was going to select Bubbleshare to tell my digital story. After all, I have used it for that purpose many times before. However, after viewing Alan Levine’s (2007) “50 Web 2.0 Ways to Tell a Story”, I was inspired to try something new and ultimately use a tool that will be very applicable to teaching social studies. I have used Google Maps hundreds of times for the purpose of finding directions but I never thought of it as anything other than a locator tool. After seeing the options it provided for virtual storytelling, I was convinced that it was the right tool to tell my story and the right tool to introduce to my social studies students.

The story I chose to tell was about my own experience traveling. Google Maps was the right tool for several reasons. In the context of social studies and of traveling, I don’t believe that a story necessarily has to be sequential in order to understand it. Google Maps affords both a sequential or non-sequential viewing experience that can be determined by the viewer and facilitated by the ordered plots along the left side of the map (a sequential experience) or the scattered location plots on the map itself (a non-sequential experience). In reference to my story, my trip obviously took place in a certain order but to understand my thoughts on a city or to view my images one does not need to view each part in order.

I wanted to express that my travels were not linear events but rather interconnected events that were many individual experiences that also formed a collective whole. Google Maps was the tool that could best represent this due to several features.

1) The ability to colour code locations. Note that blue markers were my first trip and green markers were my second trip with London as the sole yellow marker because it was a part of both trips.
2) The ability to “symbol code” locations. The thumbtacks represented overnight stays whereas the raindrop markers represented daytrips.
3) The ability to draw routes. Google Maps allowed for me to draw my route of travel and also colour code them.
4) The ability to allow for sequential and non-sequential viewership.
5) The ability for me to situate locations on or near a map so that viewers can physically see the locations and the distances between them.

Depending on the topic, students can use Google Maps to tell a story about where they have been or use Google Maps to support a historical or cultural understanding from class. Since Google Maps is a “zoom in, zoom out” interface, students can tell their own story utilizing photos, text and map points for a trip as broad as around the world to a trip as small as Vancouver to Kelowna. This tool would be useful in my ancient civilizations unit for the same purpose, student could plot the route of a historical figure or entire culture or tell a story about a country that demonstrated knowledge of same. The simple, unrestricted set up of Google Maps allows for different styles of writing to set the tone for the story whether it is first hand experience, taking the first person perspective of a historical figure or third person factual view. Additionally, Google Maps affords the creator the opportunity to colour code map points, create routes and embed the map within another site.

A story telling approach in the social studies classroom using social media allows for students to create outside of the static Web 1.0 in the dynamic Web 2.0. In reflection, I can already see how a story telling approach in Google Maps would enhance a project that I have already done with students. Previously, I had students complete a “Lonely Planet” assignment where they used Powerpoint to create a slideshow meeting specific criteria about a country that they wanted to visit using their newly acquired information literacy skills. However, even after spending many weeks on this, most students could not situate their country on a map! Had I used Google Maps to have students write a fictional story about traveling in a country of their choosing that demonstrated knowledge about the country, students would be physically creating on top of the map.

Furthermore, Google Maps could be utilized as a much more dynamic way of having students report on summer vacation, field trips or camps. Lamb (2007) too mentions that “integrating maps with other tools” can enhance a school’s field trip.

As Google Maps provides the options for making a map public, students can view each others maps and, in the case of reporting on a field trip, compare how the experience was the same or different as their own. Lamb (2007) states that “when remixing happens in a social context on the open web, people learn from each other’s process” and that is exactly what Google Maps affords.

Outside of Google Maps, story telling is an effective tool to use in the context of the social studies classroom. In referencing Bloom’s Taxonomy, teaching social studies has formerly favored the internalizing of knowledge and then regurgitating that knowledge in the form of essays and homework question responses. However, the emergence of social media allows for a story telling approach to be taken in actually applying knowledge in a meaningful way. I certainly could have written an essay about my travels but it was more engaging, meaningful and interesting to tell my story instead through Google Maps. Alan Levine’s (2007) “50 Web 2.0 Ways to Tell a Story”, confirms that there is not just one storytelling tool, rather, there are different tools to meet the needs of each subject and story. While the map feature of Google Maps made it particularly applicable to the social studies context, there are also other tools that will, above all, engage students in creating meaningful reflections of their learning.

Reference List:

Lamb, B. (2007). Dr. Mashup; or, Why Educators Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Remix. EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 42, no. 4 (July/August 2007): 12–25. Accessed online March 9 2009 http://www.educause.edu/ER/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume42/DrMashuporWhyEducatorsShouldLe/161747

Categories
Submitted Assignments

Communication tools

My tools subscribe to the first model mentioned by Anderson (2008), the community of learning model, as my LMS is set up such that the activities and assignments read like a traditional classroom with the purpose of the LMS being to have the students work within the technological environment as a means to expand their learning horizons rather than the LMS acting as a platform for distance learning.  It is my hope than an LMS can be a balance for my middle school students that bridge their knowledge inside and outside of the classroom.

Discussion Forum

A single, simple discussion forum is easy to use with few steps involved and brings a collaborative venue to the course that allows (or sometimes forces) students to interact with each other about the subject matter. It allows students to post their work and receive feedback from someone other than the teacher and allows them to see both the quality and content of work from other students. Students are also exposed to opinions and perspectives that may challenge or inspire their own learning. Discussion forums are limited by the fact that since they aren’t in “real time” responses can be scripted and carefully worded (which may not necessarily be a negative thing when working with middle school students). As my target students are not as inclined to participate in face-to-face discussions, it is my belief that a discussion forum can be a low risk tool for them, especially for those students who have a difficult time articulating their thoughts with time constraints. Tone is also lost as is the nature of an asynchronous communication tool. Note that within my LMS there are several discussion forums, providing both entire class forums and small group forums. It is my hope that in facilitating discourse through these forums, my students will become a part of a community of inquiry, articulate their ideas to others and uncover misconceptions in their own thinking (Anderson, 2008, p.10). Anderson (2008) speaks of teachers modeling appropriate responses to discussion questions, particularly at the beginning of a course, and I have done this by setting the tone for responses in my “Icebreaker” discussion forum.

Chat

I chose chat as synchronous communication tool because it too is relatively easy to use with few steps and students are familiar with using such devices. In my own practice, I am particularly interested in taking tools that students would use for play and having them use them for academic purposes. Chat allows for real time discussion and also forces students to adhere to a scheduled time. It is, however, limited by the fact that in Moodle students have to type their words rather than speak them, which can be onerous. Anderson (2008) notes that the issue of time zones can hinder synchronous communication, however, as I am operating in the K-12 context, my communication tools are targeting students who operate on very similar schedules within one time zone. Chat works effectively and presents students with a good introduction to using a synchronous communication tool in an academic environment. The required chat involves no teacher involvement which puts the responsibility on the students to organize their chat time and be accountable for showing up and participating – invaluable skills for middle school students. Note that within my LMS I have set up several different forms of chat rooms: a “help” chat that lists hours I will be present to speak with students, a study chat which is an optional forum for students to communicate in and a collaborative chat (Republic vs. Empire Chat) that is required in order for students to be able to complete a project. Like the discussion forums, my hope is that students will be able to see chat as a tool that can serve many purposes as opposed to just a one-dimensional component.

Chickering and Gamson’s (1987) Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education lists “encourages contacts between students and faculty” as part of good practice. I think that the communication tools I have chosen are appropriate for my target students as they rely on student participation without the expectation that myself, as teacher, will be running the show. They are tools that manifest themselves in ways similar to familiar tools for students such as MSN Messenger, Skype, Facebook etc. and are beneficial from an assessment perspective as they allow the teacher to have a record of participation.

References:

Anderson, T. (2008). Teaching in an Online Learning Context.  In: Anderson, T. & Elloumi, F. Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University. Accessed online 15 June 2009 http://www.aupress.ca/books/120146/ebook/14_Anderson_2008_Anderson-DeliveryQualitySupport.pdf

Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.F. (1987).  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.  American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39 (7), p. 3-7.

Categories
Submitted Assignments

Flight path

As a new teacher in a tough job market, I have worn many “hats” in an effort to get my foot in the door. My experience is limited in terms of duration, but plentiful in terms of learning. In three years, I have worked in an elementary gifted program, in an elementary social development program, as an elementary learning assistance teacher, as a special needs case manager, as a grade 4/5 classroom teacher and as a K-12 substitute. I am taking the MET because I am a “techie” and I want to be on the front lines of integrating technology into education. My goals for ETEC 565 are quite simple. I want to learn about how to select appropriate learning technologies and how to use technology as part of communication and assessment within the classroom.

LMS
I want to learn about how to use an LMS like Moodle effectively with intermediate elementary students. I hope to learn how a LMS can be a tool for creating independence among learners and as a tool for organizing students.

Synchronous communication

As far a communication goes in the evolving field of educational technology, asynchronous communication has taken precedence. Now that mainstream technology has made synchronous communication more available (ie. Cameras, speakers and microphones are built in to most newer computers/laptops), I am curious to see how it is integrated into online learning. I have used Elluminate (for an ETEC 510 project) and Vista chat already. I am confident that I can master the use of synchronous communication tools by simply being told about the options available! Synchronous communication would be very much supported by both Chickering and Gamson and Bates and Poole as it allows for prompt feedback, encourages interaction between faculty and student as well as reciprocity between students and allows for a level of (I)nteractivity that is second only to face to face communication.

Assessment
I would like to learn about the most effective options for assessment that would provide prompt feedback to students.  Chickering and Gamson’s “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education” (1987) lists prompt feedback as one of its practices and I think this can be better achieved by using an LMS to submit assignments, direct email between students and instructors and delivering practice quizzes with automatic assessment.

Social software
Keeping the Bates and Poole (2003) SECTIONS framework in mind, I wonder if social software can be a way to meet the interests of the age group of students that I am teaching. I hope that ETEC 565 can guide me in using social software in such a way that it appeals to my students and has them associating social software with meeting their academic needs rather than just solely for pleasure purposes.

Multimedia
For me, multimedia tools resonate with Chickering and Gamson’s (1987) principle of “respect[ing] diverse talents and ways of learning”. There are many ways to incorporate multimedia into teaching and learning and I hope to learn how to embed these activities within a site.

References
Bates, A.W. & Poole, G. (2003). Chapter 4: a Framework for Selecting and Using Technology. In Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education: Foundations for Success. (pp. 77-105). San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.

Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.F. (1987).  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.  American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39 (7), p. 3-7.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet