I like both of these frameworks and can really visualize their application. ETEC 510 had me apply the SECTIONS framework, which I find a little more complex to apply, so here I will focus on two of the “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education” which resonated the most with my own teaching practice.
Uses active learning techniques
In reading this section, I was reminded of the style of learning that was prevalent throughout my own elementary and secondary education. There was a heavy focus on reading (novels, texts, articles) and then spending hours answering comprehension questions and the odd critical thinking question. I became (like many) a pro at memorizing and regurgitating but not as adept at putting my knowledge into practice. I attribute this largely to the lack of active learning techniques. In my own teaching practice, I tend to look at what I am teaching and try to limit the as much as possible the amount of that kind of “seatwork”. In working with intermediate students, I have to keep their attention and interest (especially because I am the only teacher they are with all day). In doing group work, I ensure that all students are accountable and can’t just zone out by using self and group evaluations as well as specific individual tasks within the group setting. I will set up stations during certain subjects/themes and get students involved in their own learning rather than just learning from the sound of my voice. In utilizing the principles of project based learning, students will create artifacts/exhibits for science/social studies/language arts projects that demonstrate and understanding of what they know through tangible displays rather than just through their writing. If a video is shown, critical thinking questions are asked; on field trips, students are required to collect information/artifacts in order to review the trip.
Respects diverse talents and ways of learning
In differentiating instruction for my students, I respect the fact that they are unique individuals with varying learning styles as well as individuals who possess different strengths and weaknesses. I had a very diverse grade 4/5 class that had me making many adaptations to materials for accommodate learning styles. When I was teaching I would, as much as possible, provide visuals to accompany written and verbal information. Working with students with autism spectrum disorder has certainly helped me understand the importance of visual learning for many students, with or without autism. I try to adhere to Bruner’s stages of representation when teaching by having enactive representation (action/”doing”-based), iconic representation (image-based), and symbolic representation (language-based). With summative projects and assignments, I give students the choice in delivery (ie. Podcast, portfolio, PowerPoint presentation, poster etc) because I know that students have preferences based on what they feel they are the most successful with. That isn’t to say there aren’t things I have everyone do, but most of the time, I do allow for that choice. I also “subscribe” to self-regulated learning (“SRL”) whereby the parameters of the classroom are defined as the ability of the teacher to incorporate complex tasks, self-assessment and give students choice with respect to their learning. Teachers that subscribe to an SRL environment also recognize that students will all learn at a different pace and therefore there is no pressure to assume that all learners will complete all of the same tasks at the same rate. I think that SRL is respectful of diverse ways of learning in a fashion similar to that of the Montessori philosophy.