Category Archives: Physical/Theoretical

The end is in sight…or maybe not.

Go into the UBC chemical storeroom, and you will find a range of chemicals. But what you won’t find at UBC, or anywhere else, is the element unquadseptium. And that’s because unquadseptium, with an atomic number of 147, has yet to be proven to exist and, according to some chemists, will never exist.

Since Dimitri Mendeleev developed the periodic table in 1875, chemists have added 55 elements to its rows and periods. While most of the 118 elements we are familiar with today exist naturally, some exist briefly and only after the collision of high-speed particles. These “synthetic” elements include einsteinium (atomic number 99) through organessan (atomic number 118).

Dimitri Mendeleev’s prototype for the periodic table. Source

Creating new elements is an ongoing area of research. The question that divides chemists is whether a limit exists for nuclear mass and, therefore, the number of elements that may exist. Multiple chemists have used Einstein’s theory of relativity to try and determine the limit to the mass of an atom’s nucleus.

The nucleus of an atom exerts a gravitational and magnetic pull on the orbiting electrons. As the mass of the nucleus grows, so does its pull on the electrons, and as modeled by the Bohr equation, orbiting electrons must travel faster to prevent falling inwards. According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, mass increases exponentially with speed. A result of this relationship is that the speed of light presents a universal speed limit for matter.

This universal limit led Richard Feynman and other chemists to propose element 137 as the limit to the periodic table. Feynman argued that beyond element 137, electrons would have to travel faster than the speed of light to remain in orbit and could not exist according to the laws of physics.

Pekka Pyykkö’s proposed 172-element periodic table. Source

However, many chemists argue that the limit for nuclear mass should be much higher. Notably, Pekka Pyykkö from the University of Helsinki published a paper in 2011 that theorized the existence of elements up to atomic number 172. His paper built upon the work of physicists Berndt Muller and Johann Rafelski. The two physicists used the Dirac equation, which considers effects ignored by the Bohr equation, to find the maximum limit for nuclear mass. According to the Dirac equation, orbiting electrons reach the speed of light when the atomic number equals 173 and not 137.

Pushing the limits of the periodic table further still, some chemists and physicists believe that nuclear mass is unlimited. They propose that new quantum behavior of electrons, unknown to present science, allows the orbit of “superheavy” nuclei. Physicist Walter Greiner believes that after element 172, electrons enter a never-ending continuum of negative energy. Greigner believes that the periodic table “will never end!”

In the coming years, chemists and physicists will discover new elements as we develop stronger particle accelerators and detectors with greater sensitivity. However, it remains unknown what the limit to these discoveries will be; only time will tell whether future chemists will see the likes of unquadseptium in their labs.

Should cigarettes be abolished in Canada?

Smoking tobacco has been prevalent in Canadian communities for a very long time. Indigenous groups in Canada have been known to use tobacco to smoke for thousands of years. Canadians have been smoking cigarettes since the early 19th century. As time has advanced so have our smoking habits. In 2020 the University of Waterloo conducted a smoking prevalence survey where they concluded that 3.2 million Canadians (approximately 10.2% of the entire Canadian population) actively smoke cigarettes. The current trend in cigarette usage has seen a decrease in cigarette usage over the past 20 years. However, despite the decrease, some people feel that cigarettes should be banned altogether.

Common Cigarette

Tobacco use continues to be the leading cause of preventable illness and death in Canada. Over 48,000 Canadians die from tobacco use every year. Smoking legislation has already come a long way since the 19th century. Smokers would argue abolitions is an extremely drastic change however it is important to remember that it was only just over ten years ago that smoking with children in the car was legal. If a smoker was told that they weren’t allowed to smoke in a bar in the early 21st century they most likely would have gone ballistic believing that it is a complete infringement on their rights. Cigarettes are also a major cause of fires in Canada. From 2012-2015 11% of all outdoor fires were deemed to be caused by cigarettes that were improperly disposed of.

Wildfire prevention icon “Smokey the Bear”

In Canada, the cigarette and tobacco economy is one that puts roofs over people’s houses and food in their children’s mouths. There are over 2,300 Canadians working in the cigarette and tobacco manufacturing sector as of 2023. Economics is not the only reason abolition would be the wrong approach. Considering the health of current smokers is extremely important. Out of the 3.2 million Canadians that actively smoke cigarettes 2.6 million of them are daily smokers. If these people can no longer smoke their cigarettes they can experience serious withdrawal symptoms. Feelings of high anxiety, depression, and lack of sleep can severely impact a person’s mental health. Many people believe that being able to buy and consume cigarettes is their human-born right. A right that should not be infringed upon by the government. It does not take a smoker to not want to have freedoms of choice to be limited by the government.

A Breakthrough in Nuclear Fusion

On December 5th 2022, scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in the United States successfully created the reaction that powers the sun – nuclear fusion ignition – for the first time in human history.

The announcement was made by the US Department of Energy on December 13th. Described as a “historic, first-of-its-kind” achievement, the event has excited the scientific community because of its potential as a clean energy source.

Inside the LLNL’s National Ignition Facility, where the experiment took place. Credit: LLNL

To achieve ignition, the scientists had constructed “the world’s most energetic laser”, consisting of 192 powerful laser beams. This laser was used on a small canister containing the compounds deuterium and tritium, causing the compounds to fuse together. The reaction generated 3.15 megajoules of energy from an input of 2.05 megajoules, a markup of 54%.

After over 60 years since researchers first began to study nuclear fusion, this result finally proved that controlled fusion that produces more energy than it consumes is possible.

Depiction of fusion: deuterium(D) and tritium(T) fuse to form the larger Helium(He) and release energy. Credit: US Department of Energy

Nuclear fusion is the process that allows the Sun to emit vast amounts of energy in the form of light and heat. It involves the joining of two atoms of a lighter element to form a heavier one, releasing energy in the process.

Compared to nuclear fission, which is how nuclear power plants generate energy, fusion is much more powerful. It is also much cleaner as it does not produce radioactive materials as a byproduct.

Because of this, many believe that nuclear fusion is a promising avenue for sustainable and eco-friendly energy in the future. However, there is still a long way to go until fusion can be viable for commercial use.

When asked to comment on the time needed, Kim Budil, the director of the LLNL, stated that “It’s probably two or three decades. Scaling from where we are today to what you would require for a power-generating plant is a pretty significant challenge.”

Director Kim Budil at the announcement of the achievement of ignition on December 13th, 2022. Credit: Mary Calvert/REUTERS

For the 8000 engineers, physicists, and chemists at the LLNL, this event is just the first step. Researchers will have to find ways to conduct nuclear fusion that are faster and cheaper, while also generating much more power. According to Budil, “What we need now is a scientific and investment strategy that allows us to make progress on all of these fronts simultaneously… [because] we need gain of a few hundred [megajoules] to make an energy system.”

Despite the many challenges ahead, Tim Luce, one of the leaders of the international fusion research project ITER, remains hopeful. “A result like this will bring increased interest in the progress of all types of fusion, so it should have a positive impact on fusion research in general,” he states.

A Breakthrough in Nuclear Fusion

Announced by the US Department of Energy on December 13th, this “historic, first-of-its-kind” achievement has excited the scientific community because of its potential as a clean energy source.

Inside the LLNL’s National Ignition Facility, where the experiment took place. Credit: LLNL

To achieve fusion ignition, the scientists had constructed “the world’s most energetic laser”, consisting of 192 laser beams, and aimed it at a small canister containing the compounds deuterium and tritium. They were able to generate 3.15 megajoules of energy from an input of 2.05 megajoules, a markup of 54%.

This result – more than 60 years after researchers first began to study fusion – proved that controlled nuclear fusion that produces more energy than it consumes is possible.

Depiction of fusion: deuterium(D) and tritium(T) fuse to form the larger Helium(He) and release energy. Credit: US Department of Energy

Nuclear fusion – the process that allows the Sun to emit vast amounts of energy in the form of light and heat – involves the joining of two atoms of a lighter element to form a heavier one, and in the process releases a lot of energy. Compared to nuclear fission, which is how nuclear power plants generate energy, fusion is much more powerful and also much cleaner as it does not produce radioactive materials as a byproduct.

For these reasons many believe that nuclear fusion is a promising avenue for sustainable and eco-friendly energy in the future.

However, there is still a long way to go until fusion could be viable for commercial use. When asked to comment on the time needed, Kim Budil, the director of the LLNL, stated that “It’s probably two or three decades. Scaling from where we are today to what you would require for a power-generating plant is a pretty significant challenge.”

Director Kim Budil announcing the achievement of fusion ignition in December 2022. Credit: Mary Calvert/REUTERS

Moving forward, the over 8,000 engineers, physicists, and chemists at the LLNL and researchers worldwide will have to find ways to conduct fusion ignition more quickly and cheaply, while also generating much more power. According to Budil, “What we need now is a scientific and investment strategy that allows us to make progress on all of these fronts simultaneously… [because] we need gain of a few hundred to make an energy system.”

~ Rebecca Yang