Tag Archives: Evolution

Why are we the only alive human species?

One of the main questions of humankind has been that one related to the evolution of its own species. Humans  have always wondered what special characteristics make us different from our ancestors and how is that we are the last hominid alive on the planet.

Was it the size of our brain? Was it a dramatic change in our cognitive activity? Was it the environment or the diet?

Among the hypotheses are natural competition and adaptation, a burst of cognitive development and the ability to solve problems as a key to survival, however, there is more on the story.

                                                  Human Evolution                                                         Credit: GIPHY

‘Generalist-Specialist’ new ecological niche

Until now it was thought that the stiff competition and dramatic cognitive changes have mainly contributed to the success of our species, however, new findings revealed that rather, the unique ecological position of humans as global ‘generalist-specialist’ is what mainly determined the prevalence of  Homo Sapiens (H.Sapiens).

In ecological principles, generalists and specialists are defined as completely different ecological niches, where generalists are species that tend to thrive in a variety of environmental conditions and specialists, species with very specific adaptations to a given environment. However, in the case of H.sapiens, a mix of these two niches appears to have contributed to the success of the species.
According a study conducted by scientist from the Max Planck Institute for Science of Human History (MPI-SHH) and the University of Michigan, the ‘generalist-specialist’ niche helped H.sapiens survive and was at the same time the key factor that allowed humans to be the last hominid alive on Earth.

In contrast with their relatives, our ancestors were able colonized very challenging environments ranging from desserts to rainforest and high altitude places making them specialists to adapt to extreme conditions, and generalist in the sense that they can adapt to almost any type of environment. This behaviour is associated with our unique characteristic of ecological plasticity, meaning that H.sapiens in contrast with all other species had the advantage to be able to shape their ecological behavior and adapt to extreme conditions.

Distribution of the Hominidae Family at the time of the evolution and dispersal of                                                        Homo sapiens                                                              Credits: Science Daily

Hominids Cooperation  and  Interbreeding

Cooperation among individuals non-kin individuals as well as passing and accumulating knowledge from previous populations may also help to develop the unique “generalist specialist” niche. Some of the other investigations also suggest that this ‘generalist-specialist’ behavior on early species allowed for hominid interbreeding which result in complex anatomical and behavioral characteristics that give rise to our unique species.

Short overview of the Hominidae Family evolution. Source: Youtube

In this study scientists also debated that although genomic and anatomical research of specimens is important,  the analysis of the ecological and environmental characteristics of the geographical regions is essential to  understand evolutionary pathways. According to this group of scientists, the future investigations have to shift from attempts to understand human earlier traces and start to better understand the ecological impact of the H.sapiens as species.

 

Directed Enzyme Evolution: A novel technique to speed up evolution and create specialized proteins

What would you think if I told you that it is possible to speed up millions of years of evolution in a test tube on the lab?

Well, this is exactly what three scientists independently achieved. The 2018 chemistry Nobel Prizes developed a crazy and revolutionary process called direct evolution. This process uses evolutionary concepts to produce novel proteins with the desired characteristics to be used in distinct fields such as the pharmaceutical industry, the production of renewable energy among others. The revolutionary idea of directed evolution was developed by Prof. Frances H. Arnold, Prof. George P. Smith, and the emeritus research leader Gregory P. Winter. 

Nobel Prize in Chemistry,2018 Nobel Prizes,Chemistry Nobel prize

                                                    Source: Hindustan Times.                                                            Frances H. Arnold, a professor of chemical engineering, was awarded half the Nobel prize for being the first person to use evolutionary techniques since 1996 to accelerate the production and modification of enzymes. Meanwhile, Prof. George P. Smith and Gregory P. Winter worked on using direct enzyme evolution to improve the synthesis of more efficient enzymes used in the pharmaceutical field.

But what is exactly is Directed Evolution?

                             “Life Evolution”                                Credit: GIPHY

Nature over the years has used evolution to create the diverse environment around us. Over the generations, nature has made sure that only the desired and competent genes pass the filter of natural selection. The individuals with the “strongest” characteristics thrive in the environment, leaving better fit  populations. Similarly, these principles were used by the pioneer scientists to accelerate evolutionary processes and replicate pathways in which enzymes are naturally selected.

“Humans have exploited the concept of Darwinian evolution for thousands of years with selective breeding,” said Stefan Lutz, the chairman of the chemistry department at Emory University. “Directed evolution takes this same principle and applies it to the lab.”

Directed evolution works by inducing repeated mutations on bacteria or viruses, creating mutated populations that give rise to the desired enzymes. In each turn of bred the chosen enzyme is artificially selected allowing it to be more specialized over time. Different methods are used to induce random mutations; methods such as  chemical mutagenesis, UV radiation, and DNA recombination. The novel part is the use of the called error-prone PCR, which induces random mutagenesis in the bacterial strains. This technique is well suited for this job because it allows the scientists to keep track of the number of genetic doubling events occurring. This unique process optimizes the use of mutations for evolving enzymes to an improved version of themselves with a more stable folding, solubility, and binding affinity. With this technique, the scientists have rendered enzymes 256 times more effective than before.

Graphic illustrating the work flow for the directed evolution of enzymes

                                     “Directed Enzyme Evolution Technique”                                       Source: Quanta Magazine

The magic of this technique is that directed evolution can be used  as an alternative pathway to solve questions related to life evolution, as well as to study different research areas related to industrial and pharmaceutical processes. The improvement of proteins is used in industrial processes to manufacture biocatalysts that are resistant to extreme temperatures and very harsh environments. Evolved enzymes can be also used as a sustainable way to accelerate chemical reactions for the production of drugs in a very cost-efficient way, and to maximize the production of  certain drugs. Surprisingly, scientists also hope this new technique will help generate new sources of renewable energy, by using the catalytic power of enzymes.

                              ” 3D Enzyme Structure”                                   Source: GIPHY

The discoveries from three inspiring scientists models paved the way for future scientists to use this technique to solve urgent global problems  such as the development of renewable energy sources.

Daniela Yanez

 

Link

Integrating Peptides into RNA-World

Integrating Peptides into RNA-World

The RNA-World

Over 4 billion years ago, the molecular precursors to life showed up in the inhospitable soup of chemicals that we can barely recognize as Earth. The identity of these first molecular precursors is a schismatic “the chicken or the egg” debate, splitting people between groups that support molecules that carry information and ones with enzymatic activity.

If only a family of molecules could both have enzymatic activity and contain genetic information. Thus we enter the “RNA-world”, RNAs are molecules with its unique properties of having enzymatic activities and contain genetic information, it is the perfect molecule to self-replicate and mutate to pave the way for peptide and DNA to take over each role more effectively. This was the widely accepted theory since the 1960’s and remain relatively unchallenged until recently.

File:Geological time spiral.png

The timeline of the biodiversity of Earth, it all started with a few molecules. Image Credit: United States Geological Survey

The Problems of RNA-World

An article in Biosystems and another in Molecular Biology and Evolution, showed why a peptide-RNA complex world view is better than RNA-world hypothesis at explaining what the primordial molecular precursors would look like.

The researchers, Charles Carter from the University of North Carolina and Peter Wills from University of Auckland, from the articles approached the subject from two angles. First, from the perspective of enzymatic activity, although RNA show enzymatic activity but RNA does not react well to change like proteins. As a result, in the environment 4 billion years ago when the sea was cooling rapidly, the only way enzymatic activity could have survived was through proteins.

The other problem was genetic information, because at the beginning there were no genes or genetic codes. The changes and mutations in RNA would only be reflected in its abilities as an enzyme. An RNA only world cannot explain how and why the changes in RNA would lead to the creation of a genetic code with the purpose to create proteins. Thus, leaving a gap between the RNA world to the protein and DNA world.

The Peptide-RNA World

They proposed that a peptide-RNA complex, with the peptides that contain enzyme activity and RNA for genetic information, would fill the gap that the RNA-world cannot explain. This relationship would directly explain how mutations in RNA would affect enzymatic activity in protein, and why it needs to create better proteins to protect itself from a wider variety of situations. Furthermore, the addition of proteins explain how the first molecular precursors could survive in the ever-changing climate of the relatively new Earth.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Protein_mosaic.jpg

A protein mosaic, providing an insight on the complexity of proteins. Image Credit: Astrojan

When the proteins and RNA were joined together at the start of life, the mechanisms for construction through transcription, translation, and replication must have co-evolved. With this concept in mind, the researchers found commonalities between compounds similar to evolution from a common ancestor. Thus, with these concepts in mind, when looking at molecules we can find an evolutionary chain to see how molecules developed to be what it is today and also why they developed this way.

Finally, to answer the “chicken and the egg” debate, it is likely to be both like an Oyako-Don (mother-child bowl), a Japanese dish that harmonize chicken and eggs. Life as we know it was likely developed through a combined effort of RNA and proteins.