Author Archives: mollyfu

Cancel Fast-Fashion, or cancel the Environment?

Let’s face it, who doesn’t like a good bargain deal for clothing? No one enjoys going out of their way to pay a whopping sum of money just to keep in trend, and for those with that mentality, fast fashion is the way to go. However, behind all the glorious deals, that allow consumers to snag trending clothes at a reasonable price, comes a major cost to the environment.

Fast-Fashion Giant: Zara

 

The fast-fashion businesses has been booming especially in developed parts of the world, which raises eyebrows in concern for how sustainable practices are. Given the rate and magnitude at which these clothes are produced, it is at the same rate the unsold products are discarded and wasted. For example, these businesses claim their wasted, unsold merchandise is reportedly burned, thus further instigating the negative climate impact. And this does not even dive into the tragic details of production.

Certain synthetic materials such as polyester and nylon, not only have a lasting impact due to the stubborn nature of these materials being unable to biodegrade. These materials end up in marine ecosystems which affect the food chain from the bottom up which in turn have a ripple effect on larger mammals such as humans. There, we see the full circle coming together.

Microplastics in Marine Environment

 

This raises concern whether fast-fashion culture needs to be stopped, and have more sustainable practices replacing it. The answer: it is complicated. Although it is a necessity to have more sustainable sources of clothing, the reality is that big giants such as: Zara, H&M, Uniqlo, these brands are not going to change if the consumer mind-set remains the same.  As a matter of fact, the LA times reports that over 50% of adults under the age of 34 agreed they would make a switch to a more eco-friendly brand. Meanwhile, less the 40% of adults over the age of 50 had the same mindset. This is a tell tale sign that young people are the catalyst for the future. So, how would one go about making sustainable changes to their wardrobe? Check out Sedona’s take on how she made the switch!

Given this insight, thrift shopping is a possibility of creating a new business model that creates sustainable practices within our economy. Although this model is imperfect, and there is still some waste created, it is no where near the waste of fast-fashion businesses. Remember that improvement is better than staying stagnant, and remember that you have a lot more influence than you know.

Written by Molly Fu

Social Media! How Harmful can It possibly be?

It’s being preached about everywhere, having an online presence is directly associated with plummeting mental health… Right? As seen on platforms such as Instagram they have completely removed the ability to view the number of likes on another user’s post in efforts to stifle the issue. A similar matter is explored in the article written by Scientific American, concerning a study conducted by Jensen et al. ,on a group of young teenagers to determine if being in front of a screen has harmful effects on their mental health. To summarize, the study found no correlation with the duration of screen time and negative mental health. Furthermore, there was no negative effect if there was less time spent on screen either. However, the study did find that teenagers who exchanged more messages online were more likely to feel more connected to their friends, and generally happier. This study lacks expansion on what the teens are doing online as there are varieties of different outlets on screen. Ranging from video games, the browsing videos, to different social media platforms.

This then prods the question, if screen time is not the factor that is making teens more anxious and depressed, then what is? I feel that perhaps this study was not in depth enough because it did not measure what the teens were doing specifically. Perhaps if the study was conducted with different control group and there was a comparison between different control groups on varied media platforms, there would be a correlation found. 

A different look at this issue is presented by Bailey Parnell, who stresses that social media does having long lasting implications on society. She expands that over 70% of Canadians use social media. Canadian voter turnout is not even near 70%. Further more, users are on their phones for an average of 2hours per day. We typically are not even eating for that long in a day. She justifies that anything that we do this frequently most definitely has an impact on our lives. In addition, she states that social media allows for constant comparison towards someone else’s highlights. Which can have detrimental effects on one’s own well being.

From these two sources, comes two opposite results. With my own experience with social media, my support stands behind Bailey’s. Social media usage is becoming more of an epidemic. With the users becoming younger every year, this subject should not be glazed lightly over. The initial study done was too simplistic, and further research should be conducted to truly evaluate the exact impacts of social media influence on our lives.

 

Written by Molly Fu