Category Archives: Science in the News

Link

A robotic hug For Jellies

A robotic hug For Jellies

How does one capture a very delicate animal such as the jelly? The research conducted at Harvard University in Cambridge lead by Nina Sinatra has the answer.

They engineered a robot that mimics a human hand to capture delicate Jellies whose body is 95% water, slippery, and very soft. This robot, which they presented on August 28th, 2019, can capture a Jelly using its soft foamy fingers in a hug like motion. Before researchers were forced to use their own hands, which the jelly could slip from or use nets that could harm the incredibly delicate, and fragile tissue, or worse, robots made to capture other brittle sea animals such as sea cucumber would tear jellies apart.

The problem with capturing jellies without hurting them was an obstacle to fascinating scientific research. So far, Jellies have helped us learn vital information such as techniques to study microscopic organisms and macro-molecules with Green Fluorescence Tag microscopy. In this method, green fluorescence protein is extracted from jellies and used to dye parts of the cell and study vital information such as gene expression.

Jellies Have the potential to teach us far more, as they have many abilities that could be of assistance to us. For example, Jellies can reverse their aging process, and that is one of the things that humanity has been trying to reach since its beginning, leading to legends or stories such as “fountain of youth.”

Now this robot’s impressive structure can help open the door to opportunities that jellies hold for us. The machine incorporates a 3D printed palm that has the shape of a rectangular box with six fingers made of soft rubbery silicone attached. The fingers have a more rigid side made of nanofibers and channels of water that go through the fingers. When the jelly is in contact, the robot pumps water into the fingers, which causes them to bend on the more on, the stiffer side and close in the jelly.

This foamy robot is a step to further discoveries for a brighter future. The abilities of this robot can give scientists the opportunity to study more fragile and hard to capture marine animals. In addition,  using robots similar to this to collect specimen can reduce potential harm to animals and make research more friendly.

Zahra Ghodsi

Link

Can Eels get High on Cocaine?

 

European Eel (Anguilla anguilla) (Source: Flickr)

The European eel (Anguilla Anguilla) is considered a highly endangered species in the wild and new research suggests that this could be largely due to illicit drug residues such as cocaine that is found in surface waters around the world.

Anna Capaldo, a research biologist at the University of Naples Federico II studies the effects of trace concentrations of cocaine on the European eel. She reports that the eels are extremely vulnerable to low concentrations of cocaine, especially during adolescence as the cocaine can cause fluctuations in hormone levels, which can further result in major physiological impacts such as muscle swelling.

How Does Cocaine Enter the Water?

Cocaine (Source: Flickr)

Treated wastewater is the primary source of these cocaine residues in the water. Cocaine does not absorb well in the human body as it continuously cycles through the bloodstream to various organs such as the heart and brain, until it can finally be broken down and excreted by the body. Moreover, cocaine breaks down rather quickly in the body, as it has a half-life of roughly one hour. This means that after one hour, half of the cocaine in the body will be eliminated from the body, primarily through urine and feces. These cocaine-laced excretions end up in wastewater and ultimately makes it way into rivers, oceans and other bodies of water. Millions of individuals illegally abuse cocaine, which is a primary reason why these residues are found in surface waters around the world.

Can Cocaine Get Eels High?

In short, yes.

Small concentrations of cocaine is found to increase dopamine levels, a hormone responsible for providing feelings such as pleasure.

More concerning, however is that the cocaine increases a stress hormone called cortisol. Cortisol is responsible for inducing fat consumption, which can be detrimental for the European eel as it can significantly delay their timing for migration, as the eels must build up enough fat in order to successfully complete their journey to sea.

Solutions and Future Research

Research shows that cocaine residues in the water is a clear threat to susceptible species in the aquatic environment such as the European eel.

So what can been done to stop this?

Simple.

Stop people from using illegal drugs such as cocaine in the first place!

Easier said than done. The sad reality is that governments around the world have been trying to accomplish this for decades, so maybe there is a better solution.

As of now, little is known about the distribution pattern, occurrence and ecological impacts of cocaine residues in surface waters and even drinking water and wastewater. However, it is clear that these drug residues are a major threat to susceptible species such as the European eel. Thus, more research must be done on the worldwide prevalence of these cocaine residues and their potential effects on the environment, in order to determine whether it is appropriate to spend resources and implement regulations regarding the occurrence of these drugs in wastewater.

(Source: Flickr)

Or, instead of doing all that tedious research, people can start following the law by not consuming illegal drugs and stop excreting their cocaine-laced defecate and urine into the water!

Written by Justin Kim

Football hits to the head not resulting in concussions also cause brain injury

Football is an inherently dangerous sport. Football players routinely sustain injuries on various areas of their bodies and have the shortest playing career of the 4 major North American sports at 3.5 years. A major source of these injuries, some of which are career ending, are head injuries that cause concussions; a concussion occurs when the brain slams against the skull. Concussions are slowly being recognized for the danger they carry in football, but it turns out that major brain injury can still occur even without a concussion occurring.

In a study published in August of 2019, researchers found major brain injury in players who had concussions and even those who didn’t. 38 players from the University of Rochester men’s football team in 2011, 2012 and 2013 wore accelerometers in their helmets to measure the severity and direction of hits sustained. They also had their brain’s white matter structural integrity measured using fractional anisotropy (FA). FA measures where water molecules diffuse. Changes to the direction of movement of water molecules allows researchers to determine what changes or damage occurred in the players’ white matter.

White matter is a part of the central nervous system that is made up of myelinated, or coated, axons that send information to other brain cells, called neurons. White matter functions as relay system that communicates with different parts of the brain and connects everything together. Damage to white matter negatively impacts the brain’s communicative abilities.

Stock photo of football players from Pexels

The results from the study showed an overall decrease in the integrity and density of midbrain white matter across a football season. Even after accounting for 2 players that sustained concussions, the results stayed the same. It was also found, using the accelerometer data, that the severity of the drop in FA scores increased with hits the rotated a player’s heads, rather than head on ones. These results show that impact to the head, especially hits that rotate the head, can cause brain damage by affecting white matter, even though a concussion does not occur.

These results represent an existential problem that has been building for football: how can you fix an inherently dangerous sport? If routine hits cause brain injury, how can you eliminate these hits in a sport that is built on tackling? One solution, that may appear contradictory on the surface, is to eliminate helmets in the sport. Helmets only protect against skull fractures and do a terrible job of protecting against other head injuries. The American 7s Football League, or the AF7L, already implements this variation on the sport. Elimination of helmets leads to better tackling form as defenders can’t rely on hitting the offensive player in the head, as the surface area for contact is greatly reduced.

Free photo of a football helmet from Pixabay

Currently, however, football carries many risks associated with it that players, parents and coaches must weigh against potential rewards the sport may provide. Ball may be life, but maybe trading in your football for a basketball will be better for your brain.

Written by Kuljit Grewal

Stem Cell Therapies Banned by Health Canada

Indiscriminate bans could lead to patients being left with no options for their pain.

Source: Amaregenmed, Injection knee ama regenerative medicine, 2018. 1,920 × 1,080 (1.07 MB). https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Injection-knee-ama-regenerative-medicine.jpg#file (accessed September 23, 2019).

In May 2019, over three dozen clinics across British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec were ordered by Health Canada to cease and desist offering unapproved stem cell therapies. While this may seem like a reasonable regulation to prevent untested medical treatments being used on unsuspecting patients, many clinics, like Toronto PRP and Stem Cell, say that this ban is too broad and denies patients access to well-documented successful treatments.

YouTube Preview Image

The above video by the DISC Spine Institute – Dallas explains what adult stem cells are and how they can be harnessed for stem cell therapies.

Adult stem cell therapies have been shown in multiple studies to be effective for joint, ligament, and tendon injuries, such as osteoarthritis. Additionally, many patients who have undergone these “unapproved” stem cell therapies have noticed greater range of motion, less pain, and more functional abilities. With the new regulations, all similar treatments, except for certain blood cancers, such as leukemia and lymphoma, would only be available to a select few patients through clinical trials.

This ban does not come without good cause, however. Many private clinics have been advertising stem cell therapies as the ultimate panacea, offering it as a treatment for autism, multiple sclerosis (MS), ALS, and even hair-loss, when there have been no studies to prove their effectiveness in these conditions. Additionally, the nature of these therapies, while leading to long-term improvements, could also lead to long-term threats for those seeking these treatments. Health Canada states that many risks, such as infection by bacteria and viruses, patient cross-contamination, and even tumour formation, have been observed in unapproved stem cell therapies.

There is also a more sinister aspect to these unproven medications. Due to the thousands of dollars each stem cell therapy costs, there is a high risk of financial exploitation. Many private clinics who are capitalizing on the clout of a cure-all miracle drug are using stem cells for absolutely untested treatments, and gaining up to $15 000 per treatment. These sorts of advertisements depend upon the desperation of the sick and disabled and their families to make their living, and most doctors agree it has to stop.

At the end of the day, many believe that Health Canada had to do something about the unregulated use of stem cell therapies across Canada. However, there is also worry that those desperate enough to pay the high fees for these treatments would be willing to go to less safe clinics outside of Canada to undergo these treatments anyways. By slowly implementing restrictions, instead of this broad ban, Health Canada could have avoided this issue, as well as prevented the denial of viable treatments to patients in need.

Written by Kaitlyn Le

Bringing Back the Dinosaurs

In November of 2018, Chinese CRISPR researcher He Jiankui sparked international outrage after announcing his experiment to create genetically modified twins using CRISPR. Despite what this event may seem to say about Chinese research ethics, China actually has strict regulations put in place to prevent incidents like these from occurring. They are also at the forefront of CRISPR research, using the genome editing tool in the agricultural industry to efficiently feed their massive population with restricted resources and space. The technology used in the twin experiment is also nothing new and mysterious. CRISPR is a well researched natural defense tool discovered back in 1993.

CRISPR, which stands for “clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats”, uses a guide RNA to guide a separate piece of DNA to a specific target in the genome of a cell, where the Cas9 enzyme cuts the current DNA in place. The cell’s natural DNA repair machinery then heals the cut area with the DNA bound to the guide RNA, implementing the DNA into the genome. While there are other methods to edit the genome, CRISPR is relatively cheap, safe, and specific to it’s target.

The cause for concern should not be how little we know about this tool, but instead for how well we know it’s potential. The same tool that helps China grow better crops can also bring back the woolly mammoth or dinosaurs back from extinction. By extracting DNA from bones and other remains of extinct animals, Many species have had their genomes partially sequenced. These genomes can be cut and pasted into living animal cells, to bring about a new hybrid species with traits like the extinct species. Theoretically with a completely mapped genome, the extinct species can be brought completely back to life.

While it seems like a good idea to bring back certain extinct species, we should consider the effect it will have on our current ecological systems. These species were adapted to live in an environment from their time, but we now have different ecological ranges. We should also consider the factors that led to the extinction of that species. What measures will be put in place to prevent their extinction this time around, and what effect will the revival have on current species biodiversity?

Social Media! How Harmful can It possibly be?

It’s being preached about everywhere, having an online presence is directly associated with plummeting mental health… Right? As seen on platforms such as Instagram they have completely removed the ability to view the number of likes on another user’s post in efforts to stifle the issue. A similar matter is explored in the article written by Scientific American, concerning a study conducted by Jensen et al. ,on a group of young teenagers to determine if being in front of a screen has harmful effects on their mental health. To summarize, the study found no correlation with the duration of screen time and negative mental health. Furthermore, there was no negative effect if there was less time spent on screen either. However, the study did find that teenagers who exchanged more messages online were more likely to feel more connected to their friends, and generally happier. This study lacks expansion on what the teens are doing online as there are varieties of different outlets on screen. Ranging from video games, the browsing videos, to different social media platforms.

This then prods the question, if screen time is not the factor that is making teens more anxious and depressed, then what is? I feel that perhaps this study was not in depth enough because it did not measure what the teens were doing specifically. Perhaps if the study was conducted with different control group and there was a comparison between different control groups on varied media platforms, there would be a correlation found. 

A different look at this issue is presented by Bailey Parnell, who stresses that social media does having long lasting implications on society. She expands that over 70% of Canadians use social media. Canadian voter turnout is not even near 70%. Further more, users are on their phones for an average of 2hours per day. We typically are not even eating for that long in a day. She justifies that anything that we do this frequently most definitely has an impact on our lives. In addition, she states that social media allows for constant comparison towards someone else’s highlights. Which can have detrimental effects on one’s own well being.

From these two sources, comes two opposite results. With my own experience with social media, my support stands behind Bailey’s. Social media usage is becoming more of an epidemic. With the users becoming younger every year, this subject should not be glazed lightly over. The initial study done was too simplistic, and further research should be conducted to truly evaluate the exact impacts of social media influence on our lives.

 

Written by Molly Fu