Categories
Uncategorized

Nadja: Not really a love story?

So, Nadja was my first ever introduction to surrealist fiction, and all I can say is…at least it was less confusing than Proust.

For starters, the first few parts of the book left me wondering whether I was reading the right book or not, because like… where exactly was Nadja? It felt I was like reading Breton’s notebook, except he’s already circled and underlined parts I was supposed to find profound. I didn’t always. Sometimes I just felt like I was being talked at lol. I do get that that’s sort of the surrealist thing, though.

But when Nadja finally enters the book, it gets so, so, so much more interesting. Not because the writing changes (although it does feel more focused), but because she’s just… weird?? Compellingly, though, don’t get me wrong. I could see why Breton was obsessed with her. But at the same time, it also felt like he only loved her as long as she stayed unreadable to him. The second she became more real—vulnerable, messy, like a normal personhe started distancing himself from her.

There’s this quote that stands out to me: “Andre? Andre? . . . You will write a novel about me. I’m sure you will. Don’t say you won’t.” (pg. 100)

And yeah, well, she was right. But not in the way she probably meant. It doesn’t feel like a love story. It feels like he’s trying to turn her into a symbol of something bigger—Surrealism, madness, mystery—and once she stops being useful for that, she disappears. I also can’t stop thinking about how the book ends. Like, after all that, he doesn’t visit her when she’s institutionalized against her own will (after calling her “mad,” which like… okay??). Like woah. I guess she really was just a phase to you Breton. (Oh, and can we also talk about the fact that he was married the whole time?)

So yeah. This didn’t feel like a love story to me. It felt more like a story about obsession, and not just with Nadja, but with what she represented to him. I don’t think Breton loved her. I think he was fascinated by her, consumed by her strangeness, drawn to her like she was an idea instead of a person.

That being said… I still liked the book. The writing is gorgeous in places, and the structure (or lack thereof) actually made it really interesting to read. I also liked the images scattered between pages. My discussion question would be: Where can we draw the line between love and obsession?

Categories
Uncategorized

Hello world!

Hi everyone. My name is Fiona, and I’m a first-year science student hoping to go into Biochem next year. I was born in Jakarta, Indonesia, and have lived there all my life before moving here for university, so the sudden weather change is definitely taking a toll on me (I’ve gotten sick like 3 times already lol). To be completely honest, I registered for this course on a whim (yesterday, to be exact), so I came into today’s lecture having no idea what I was getting myself into. I grew up bilingual, speaking both Indonesian and English with my family and friends (and a bit of Mandarin as well, although I’m not the best at it…), but despite that, I can’t say that my English skills are particularly the best. A few fun facts about me are that I love to travel and that I love animals (and I have two dogs at home that I miss alooot).

What intrigues me the most about this course is that it essentially ‘forces’ us to read __ amount of books per week—something I, as a major procrastinator, might find quite difficult. I’m admittedly not the most avid reader, although I have read ny fair share of fantasy novels, but I hope taking this course can help me change that.

As for my personal answer to the question “Where is the Romance World?”: it would be everywhere and nowhere all at once.

Romance, to me, isn’t really a place, but more of a feeling. It exists wherever love exists, and love itself is something abstract—something that cannot be easily defined because it means different things to different people. Love can be romantic, but it can also be platonic, like between close friends, or intense, like between lovers. Because of this, I believe romance isn’t something that can be fixed to a single definition or confined to one form.

Growing up, I loved watching Korean romance dramas, and because of that, the word “romance” naturally brings certain images and places to mind. When I think of romance, I imagine the settings I saw on screen—streets, cafés, etc.,—which made South Korea feel like a kind of “Romance World” to me. However, I realize that this association doesn’t exist because romance is inherently tied to that place, but because my own experiences and memories shaped the way I perceive it. In reality, romance means something different to everyone. The way we define love and where we imagine romance to exist is influenced by our upbringing, culture, and personal experiences. Someone who grew up in a different country, watching different stories, or experiencing love differently might associate romance with an entirely different place—or with no specific place at all. In that sense, the “Romance World” cannot be confined to one country or location—it exists wherever and whenever people choose to see it.

That’s it, and thanks for reading my blog : )

Spam prevention powered by Akismet