A wild and wacky adventure through the marketing!
 

Marketing Review!!!

 

 

This term I had a great team as we all collaborated on the assignments and worked together incredibly well.  Through respecting each other’s ideas and building upon them we were able to produce an end product we could all be proud of.  The assignments also helped me realize how marketing affects our daily lives.  From companies targeting and segmenting groups on specific factors (i.e. Geographic, demographic), to brand affiliations, recognition and associations, marketing constantly surrounds us.


 

The main skills I developed were relating the course concepts to real world examples, and thinking critically about a company’s 4 P’s and their STP strategies.  Concepts constantly overlap and affect each other, such as a brand’s image affecting how they promote the value of certain products.  In the world things are rarely black and white, they are typically some shade of grey.

 

 Tourism Whistler

 

Working with such awesome group members helped develop my ability to effectively communicate my views and opinions as well as respond to any constructive criticisms.  I would not change anything about my group members, and with regards to the assignments, I felt we worked well to accomplish our goals and follow our group contract.  When one member put forth more effort in one area, the other members would put in extra effort in others.  As a result, we had fantastic team cohesion and everyone did their parts excellently and pulled their weight.  Not only did we finish the assignments on time and to our high standards, we had a great time doing them!

 YouTube Preview Image

Video Resume – Just for fun!

 

 

 

 

This course was incredibly useful, and contributed to my critical thinking abilities.  My favourite aspect was constantly relating the theory to personal and world examples.  Through this, I was able to understand the material with greater ease, and will continue to relate everything I learn to previous experiences in order to understand and remember them more.

 


Caffeine Loyalty!

Coffee, coffee, everywhere!  A commodity product due to its vast availability, and it appears that North America loves their coffee since you can find it wherever you are.  I am even a slight addict myself.  Now certain companies have discovered this segment that were not traditionally in the coffee market.  The McCafe product line was an extension by McDonalds, which offers more than coffee too, it offers specialty drinks such as mochas and lattes.  With this increase in competition, companies whose revenues are almost solely based on coffee should have lost market share; however, Starbucks has been successful in turning the coffee “commodity” into an experience.

During economic downturn people typically tend to turn away from luxury goods and extravagances.  Do people really need a triple shot Venti Americano?  Not really, but “Starbucks customer loyalty has assisted the company more than any ad campaign could have”.  Sheila Shayon outlines this success by noting the “comfortable atmosphere” that has been established, as well as Starbucks successfully positioning itself as a place to go and chat with friends or study for classes.

 Starbucks Reward Program

This clearly indicates customer and brand loyalty is the best way to retain customers and handle increases in competition.  As other companies have began to offer Starbucks main products for less, the company has focused more on the experience and customer loyalty programs in order to retain the majority of its consumers.  It has transformed coffee in to a lifestyle.  You cannot purchase true customer loyalty, it is developed through how you treat customers and develop your brand over time.  Starbucks has invested heavily, through time and money, in creating a comfortable environment where people want to invest their time and money and take part in loyalty programs.  Consequently, when people think of “coffee shops” Starbucks it one of the first companies that come to mind.

YouTube Preview Image

Recent Starbucks Loyalty Initiatives

 

Sources:

McCafe – http://www.mcdonalds.ca/ca/en/menu/full_menu/mccafe.html

Sheila Shayon Blog – http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/Starbucks-Customer-Loyalty-030813.aspx


Starbucks PR Issues? No PRoblem

Starbucks quickly righted a perceived wrong in one of its UK market by agreeing to pay “20 million pounds in tax over the following two years”.  “Since its entry in the UK 14 years ago, the company has only paid 8.5 million pounds in taxes.”  Although it has been operating within the bounds of the law, the people have felt this is far too small a sum for such a large company especially with the current economic climate.  Starbucks’ twitter account was even infiltrated and image-harming messages were posted.  Joe Ip argues in his post “Starbucks Repercussions for tax ‘evasion’: hacked social media” that repaying money will restore its public image for the company, and he is absolutely accurate.

 

 

People tend to have a “what have you done for me lately” mode of thinking. Starbucks has not contributed significantly to the UK in its taxes; however, that was not apparent until the recession.  In order to restore its image to its former glory as a humanitarian, sustainable, caring company, Starbucks offered to pay millions more in taxes.  Because people were temporarily upset with the company and simply voiced their displeasure, the company responded.  This has happened throughout history; public relation issues, and when solved quickly and address the problem, results in a restoration of the brand.

 

A “forgive and forget,” or at least “forgive”, attitude is adopted.  For example, when a Tim Horton’s employee was let-go after giving toddler a Timbit, people did not hold the entire organization at fault or boycott it.  Tim Horton’s management acknowledged the mistake and attempted to fix it to the best of its ability.  Conversely, most people still have negative notions towards British Petroleum due to the Gulf of Mexico spill.  Luckily for that company, a “forget” attitude was more-or-less adopted because it is not commonly discussed, yet the effects were (and are) devastating.

 

Consequently, this small blunder for Starbucks (even though still operating within the bounds of the law) will just be a small blip, having no long-term effects.  The company addressed the problem and has gone out of its way to make amends.  Public relation issues can solidify a company’s image, either positively or negatively.  By promising to pay funds when it was not forced to, Starbucks is ensuring people think of it in a positive light.

 

 

Articles:

http://www.marketingweek.co.uk/news/starbucks-twitter-campaign-hijacked/4005161.article

http://www.marketingweek.co.uk/news/starbucks-tax-move-a-wake-up-call-for-other-brands/4005112.article

https://blogs.ubc.ca/joeip/


Caps’ Crazy Crowd

Last season I went to several Whitecaps games and all of them combined were less than the cheapest Vancouver Canucks’ ticket.  The crowd was rowdy and had specific chants that continued throughout the entire game.  The atmosphere was ecstatic, the singing, the hollering, the yelling.  And to think, all of that did not cost an arm or a leg, or both for that matter.

 

When I was a child I had the luxury of going to a few Canuck’s games with my parents and my brother.  Yes, I’m sure it was not the cheapest, yet as a rare luxury it was affordable.  Now, however, it would be incredibly costly to get four seats anywhere in the arena.  Thankfully, for a fraction of the price you can go see an MLS game.  The Whitecaps have strategically positioned themselves as the most affordable (and in my opinion best atmosphere) professional team in Vancouver.  Families, as well as students and young adults, can afford to go watch these games.  Their new promotion targeting students will entice many to purchase season tickets since it costs only $189 (less than $11 per game) and the seats are located in the heart of the Southsiders’ section.

 

 It is absolutely wonderful to be able to afford to go out and see a game.  The Whitecap’s are aware of its relative popularity to the other two professional sports, so the lower ticket prices will increase demand and increase general awareness for the team and the sport.  The world of professional sports is no longer that solely of the business and networking professional.  The Whitecaps FC have returned it to families who want to be able to afford a luxury, and students who desire a break from studies, allowing everyone to get lost in a whirlwind atmosphere.

 

YouTube Preview Image

Southsider’s Experience Overview


High Prices = High “Joe” Deterrent

Affordability, one word that almost singlehandedly determines how people spend their discretionary income.  If they cannot afford the “luxury” they will simply not get it.  Unfortunately, as is often the case, someone else can afford it and is willing to pay the price.  In a town where there are three major sports teams tickets to watch the games live can be incredibly hard to acquire, especially with the Vancouver Canucks.

The Vancouver Canucks have incredibly high ticket prices, which allow them to target a higher income segment of the market.  Although there are not as many games compared to professional MLB or NBA teams, the high price is due to the constant high demand for tickets.  There are few promotions directed towards the “average consumer”.  Also, in order to reach this high income segment they promote towards businesses, reminding them they can rent a suite to “strengthen their networking skills” or “reward their staff.”  Unless a big hit, dazzling goal, or sequence of breath-taking plays occurs, the crowd seems almost inexistent.  It is an atmosphere tailored for networking, centred on business professionals that share the great Canadian past time, hockey.

 

On a regular night, with no intense rivalry game occurring, the cheering primarily comes from the upper bowl, the “nose-bleeds.”  Yes I’ve been to hockey games, and yes, they are a lot of fun.  However, they are fun because of the cheering in the upper bowl, the camaraderie of people standing and shouting and supporting a team they love.  Unfortunately, this has declined over time due to the unaffordability of tickets.  Thankfully, there are two other professional teams that understand at least 100 dollars per ticket is not affordable for the typical person.


The Good, The Bad, and The Corrupt

A hero, revered by many, has officially admitted to obtaining his godly feat through cheating and coercion.  After years of prosecuting those that have announced his guilt, he has finally admitted to it.  Lance Armstrong has finally confessed to using performance-enhancing drugs to win the Tour de France seven times in a row after defeating testicular cancer.  What seemed impossible to accomplish was truly impossible without the aid of these drugs.  Although this is terrible for the sport of cycling, it has completely tarnished the reputation of a man who was awarded millions of dollars of sponsorship revenue, and also raised hundreds of millions of dollars for cancer research.

 

Lance Armstrong repeatedly attempted to maintain his innocent image, but his unethical decisions, which resulted in his victories, eventually caught up with him.  His personal brand and legacy have been tarnished beyond repair.  Moreover, from his successes he earned sponsorship deals with various companies, such as Nike.  He then falsely represented these corporations, and the foundation Livestrong, since his success was largely due to his victories in the Tour de France.

 

Traditionally, ethics in marketing has referred to companies promoting products; however, in this case, it is a dishonest athlete falsely promoting himself and his personal brand.  Lance Armstrong sponsored various companies, fully knowing his accomplishments were a result of his cheating.  His personal image and brand will never be the same, and this man, who was once a hero who defied the odds, has fallen.  Although the foundation he initiated has raised almost half a billion dollars for cancer research, it will be difficult for him to overcome his newly tarnished image.

 

By knowingly misleading companies to earn millions of dollars, his acts were heinous.  Unlike another well known advocate for cancer research, Lance Armstrong’s actions were centred around personal greed, as well as unethically presenting himself as a cancer survivor who was thought to have accomplished the impossible.

Article Sources:

Los Angeles Times, Lance Armstong on Sponsors leaving: A $75-million day in losses, 2013

CBC, Lance Armstrong Admits to Doping in Oprah Interview, 2013

The Vancouver Sun, Lance Armstrong naked, exposed as the author of his own scam, 2012

The Difference between Lance Armstrong and Terry Fox

 

Picture Sources:

 CBC News

 USA Today

The Difference between Lance Armstrong and Terry Fox


Spam prevention powered by Akismet