Categories
Political Parties

Alan Garcia & Lourdes Flores Close their Campaigns in Lima

Maxwell A. Cameron & Fabiola Bazo
Photos: M. Cameron & F. Bazo
April 6, 2006

Both Lourdes Flores and Alan Garcia closed their campaigns tonight, within a few city blocks of one another. Flores held her meeting in the Campo de Marte in the district of Jesus Maria, while Garcia closed his campaign in the same spot used by Ollanta Humala last night: in front of the Place of Justice in the city center.
Both meetings drew large crowds. It is easier to compare the size of the crowd that came for Garcia with the size of the crowd that assembled for Humala since they were held in exactly the same place. Our sense is they were comparable in size. Both were massive meetings. The APRA crowd was friendlier to outsiders than the Humala supporters. APRA draws support from a cross-section of the society, and it shows in the faces of those who gathered to hear Alan Garcia. There were many lumpen elements in the gathering of Humala’s supporters (a foreign journalist had his cell phone stolen and we almost lost a watch). The APRA crowd was remarkably disciplined and well behaved. They listened patiently and cheered enthusiastically while their leader spoke for a least two hours.
The contrast with Flores’ rally was striking. Flores’ meeting was colorful, up-beat, telegenic and full of razzmatazz. Every detail was carefully scripted. The security detail was organized and courteous, and the lights and colors were brilliant. The stage was positioned so that it looked out at a long street full of people; the media was placed behind the stage offering a view of Flores in a sea of supporters. The crowd seemed larger because it stretched way down the street, but it was not broad. One has the sense that Flores support is broader than it is deep, and the layout of the meeting seemed designed to convey depth of support at the expense of breadth.
IMG_1862.jpg
IMG_1856.jpg
Flores’ stage was like a cat-walk, allowing her to be close and surrounded by enthusiastic supporters. She spoke briefly and forcefully, and yet it is hard to remember exactly what she said. There were allusions to “Peru profundo” the “deep Peru” and promises to address the need for major changes. She spoke as a woman and of her commitment to the women of Peru. After the speech there was music, fireworks, confetti. Flores was joined on the stage by her congressional candidates. Flores’ supporters appeared to be considerably whiter and more well-to-do than the APRA crowd, and certainly more affluent than the Humala supporters.
IMG_1845.jpg
IMG_1850.jpg
The APRA rally appeared to be substantially larger, perhaps bigger than the Humala rally (which we estimated at 20,000).
IMG_1910.jpg
Whereas Flores was brief and finished early, Garcia was speaking when we arrived and went on for close to two hours. And, whereas Flores spoke in general terms, clearly aimed at winning the widest possible support, Garcia’s speech was doctrinaire and policy-specific. One got the sense that he was aiming to mobilize core supporters and to make as many promises as possible to pull out specific groups of voters. He spoke of the plight of fishermen, students, teachers, members of the police force, pensioners, workers, miners, small businesses, and he had a promise for each group.
IMG_1913.jpg
Whereas Humala’s closing rally yesterday emphasized his diagnosis of the problems facing Peru and some broad ideas for change, Garcia was full of specifics. He reserved harsh words for the government of Toledo, especially the management of the Camisea natural gas project. He was often funny and mordant.
IMG_1903.jpg
Garcia struck characteristic poses on the podium, including resting with one elbow on the podium and the other on his hip, or reaching over the podium and looking down on the crowd like Haya de la Torre. The most intense moments of interaction with the crowd occurred when Garcia attacked the Palace of Justice, calling for a profound reform, or when he called for the death sentence for child molesters.
How much do these closing campaigns matter? It is hard to know. In a symposium in the Universidad del Pacifico, Alfredo Torres noted that in the last published APOYO poll Humala’s support had declined by two points, and this trend might well continue. There is probably great volatility in the electorate right now. The attacks on Humala in the press are relentless. They could have the effect of either undoing some of his support, or encouraging Humala supporters keep quiet—Torres spoke of a spiral of silence. The race may turnout to be closer than anyone imagined. In this context, the closing acts may have significance.


Una noche de colorido, música y abundancia de promesas electorales
El Comercio, 7 de abril del 2006.

En cada uno de los mítines se combinó la música y el baile todo con el fin de entretener a los asistentes a las concentraciones
A solo tres días de las elecciones en las que elegiremos al nuevo presidente de la República y los congresistas –además de los representantes para el Parlamento Andino–, las calles del centro de la ciudad acogieron a miles de partidarios de Unidad Nacional, el Partido Aprista Peruano y el Frente de Centro.
Las decenas de miles de simpatizantes de las mencionadas agrupaciones políticas llegaron hasta el Campo de Marte, el Paseo de los Héroes Navales y el Paseo Colón, respectivamente, para asistir a las concentraciones de cierres de campaña de sus candidatos a la presidencia.
En las tres concentraciones el ritual fue bastante similar. Durante varias horas incluso antes del inicio de los mítines, potentes parlantes se encargaban de lanzar notas musicales o voces que arengaban en favor de uno u otro candidato.
En cada uno de los mítines se combinó la música –en algunos casos criolla, como Unidad Nacional que llevó a Lucía de la Cruz, y en otros la salsa– y el baile , todo con el fin de entretener a los asistentes llegados con bastante anticipación y que aguardaban a sus respectivos líderes.
El remate final de los mítines, como no podía ser de otra manera, fueron los discursos de orden que estuvieron a cargo de los candidatos presidenciales, quienes apelaron a todos sus recursos para lograr la atención de los asistentes.
En sus alocuciones Lourdes Flores Nano, Alan García Pérez y Valentín Paniagua desplegaron todo su arsenal verbal y también sus recursos gestuales para ofrecer las soluciones que aplicarían en favor del país en caso de vencer en la carrera electoral.
Combate contra la corrupción, reducción de la pobreza, reforma del Estado, apoyo al agricultor, solidaridad, lucha contra el hambre, fueron algunas de las muchas propuestas escuchadas ayer en cada una de las concentraciones.
Como telón de fondo estaban las multitudes enfervorizadas que en algunos casos llegaron por sus propios medios, pero se trasladaron en los numerosos ómnibus estacionados en las cercanías de los mítines. Todos llenaron de pica pica, pancartas, banderolas, globos y gritos los escenarios de cada una de las concentraciones.
Pese a la cercanía de los tres mítines, afortunadamente todo transcurrió con total normalidad.
Aproximadamente a las diez de la noche todos los mítines habían concluido. Ahora todo queda en manos de los electores.
Ecos electorales
El Comercio, 7 de abril del 2006

Chaparrón bailarín
Algunas horas antes de la llegada de Valentín Paniagua y como para calentar el ambiente, los simpatizantes del candidato del Frente de Centro bailaron al compás de las notas de una orquesta salsera que hizo levantar de sus asientos a varios de los candidatos al Congreso que se encontraban en el Paseo Colón. El conocido muñeco Chaparrón demostró sus cualidades de bailarín.
“Si pierde me voy”
Como ha sucedido en las últimas concentraciones de Unidad Nacional, la cantante de música criolla Lucía de la Cruz ofreció anoche un recital con lo mejor de su repertorio en la concentración realizada en la Avenida de la Peruanidad del Campo de Marte. Se mostró tan entusiasmada y comprometida con la causa de Lourdes Flores que anticipó que si no gana la lideresa de Unidad Nacional, se retiraría del canto. A más de uno le hizo recordar una advertencia similar hecha por Augusto Ferrando en 1990 en relación con Mario Vargas Llosa.
Garra crema
Más de un ex deportista estuvo ayer acompañando a Lourdes Flores Nano en su mitin de cierre de campaña. A la otrora voleibolista Gaby Pérez del Solar, quien postula al Parlamento, se sumaron dos conocidísimos ex jugadores de Universitario de Deportes, José el ‘Puma’ Carranza y Roberto Martínez, quienes llegaron a mostrar su respaldo a la candidatura de Flores Nano y de paso aprovecharon para echarse un bailecito mientras esperaban el inicio del discurso de la candidata.
¿What do you say?
Y a propósito de la lideresa de Unidad Nacional, ayer durante la última conferencia de prensa que ofreció Lourdes Flores estuvieron presentes periodistas chilenos, argentinos, venezolanos, españoles y estadounidenses. Precisamente uno de estos últimos le lanzó varias preguntas en inglés, por lo que ella muy amable le respondió en el mismo idioma (con su posterior traducción). Las consultas fueron varias y en consecuencia las respuestas. Sin embargo, a un incómodo asesor se le escuchó pedirle a su candidata que no hablara más en inglés. ¿Acaso quieren evitar al máximo que alguien pudiera restregarle el apelativo de candidata de los ricos? Ojo que hoy en día hablar inglés ya no es un privilegio.
Mensaje de cierre
Javier Diez Canseco, candidato del Partido Socialista, optó por un perfil discreto para el cierre de su campaña y envió un mensaje a sus simpatizantes a través del cual invitó a emitir este domingo 9 de abril lo que él denomina el voto socialista.
Medio Oriente
En Arequipa no pasó desapercibida la presencia de un corresponsal de Al Yazira, considerado uno de los canales más importantes del mundo árabe. El hombre de prensa llegó hasta la ciudad del Misti desde Venezuela para entrevistar al candidato de Unión por el Perú, Ollanta Humala, quien eligió esta ciudad para efectuar su cierre de campaña.
Otra vez Ricardo
Ricardo Wong ya lo había hecho una vez, cuando en un programa periodístico de televisión, en vivo y en directo, hace algunas semanas anunciaba su renuncia a la candidatura a la Presidencia de la República. Claro que después se retractó aduciendo que sus bases le exigían no dar un paso al costado. Anoche, Alan García, en su mitin realizado en el Paseo de los Héroes Navales anunció que el candidato presidencial de la agrupación Y se Llama Perú había declinado su candidatura a favor del líder aprista. ¿Y qué dirán las bases esta vez don Ricardo?
Solidaridad fraterna
A más de uno sorprendió la presencia del alcalde de Miraflores, Fernando Andrade en el Paseo Colón. ¿Qué hacía por allá el burgomaestre miraflorino? Llegó hasta el estrado principal del Frente de Centro para apoyar a su hermano Alberto, quien postula en la plancha presidencial de Valentín Paniagua como primer vicepresidente, pero también postula al Congreso.

portadaperu210704.jpg
Source: Perú 21, 7 de abril del 2006
portadacorreo0704.gif
Source: Correo, 7 de abril del 2006

5 replies on “Alan Garcia & Lourdes Flores Close their Campaigns in Lima”

great eye-witness report -as usual-, Max! Kudos.
My wife is a Garcia supporter and she laughed out loud when the obligatory white APRA dove decided to step on Garcia’s head during the closing moments…

it seems the Cuban press seems to disagree with your vision/math, which is not really surprising:
“Although the surveys always gave a disadvantage to Humala in the capital, which concentrates 34% of more than 16 million voters, he was able to gather more followers on Wednesday than his two rivals together last night.
While the lieutenant colonel in retirement managed to concentrate more than 90,000 people, his contender Lourdes Flores obtained the presence of one third (30,000) and Alan Garcia two thirds (60,000).”

I find it incredible that Peruvians could be seriously considering Humala as a presidential candidate. The man is no more than a comunist and a radical, dressed up and signing Hitler songs, with the difference being Hitler despissed the Jewish community, while Humala hates anything that is not Indian. Further if this man gets elected president, the first thing he will do is take the country into a war against our neighbor Chile. Chile a country whose superiority is not only in arms, but also, with the education of its armed forces, will squash Peru with little problem. This man will sink the country back into the middle or dark ages. If Humala is elected, Peru will loose financial and economic support and confidence from its allies overseas.
Humala’s ideology is incomprehensive, nonsensical, and a mixture of comunism coupled some form of Nazism with a deep hate towards the White and Mestizo Peruvian society, and also all other Democratic and Capitalist socities in the World.
One would think that with the last 3 bad choices Peruvians have had in electing UNKNOWN individuals as Presidents, they would have learned a lesson. Too bad they have learned nothing from their history!

I wish I had the crystal ball the last person had with regard to the outcome of events that would follow if any of the three leading candidates entered office. I do not, however, and it would be speculative for me to assess the future from the vagaries of campaign speeches of either of the three contending partys.
First of all as the the simply reductionist argument regarding Mr. Humala they appear to bely an inherent fear and perhaps possible racism on the class and perhaps even racial category of people who make them. Aside from Amazon Indians and some groups such as the quero, or uros peoples of the southern provinces the majority of perus “racial” stock might be defined as mestizo. However this is not to say that their is not a great variety of distinct ethnicities within many of the southern and central states of peru. Identity is furthermore more fluid in Peru than it might be in Ecuador or Bolivia, which I might ad are country’s with strong indigenous organizations which if they have not generated new indians have revindicated ethnic pride among the variety of ethnic groups in those respective country’s This sense of ethnic pride, which I would qualify as a newfound self respect, although perceived as racist by people who perhaps have not relation to such person is a phenomena whos time has come. From my personal experience with peruvians in the interior of huancavelica who are of quechua speaking stock, I have never gathered that their is a unqualified rejecteion of lighter skinned persons. THis has never been the case when I broguth my friends along to meet my comunero kin. Rahter most are generallly eager to learn of events outside of their region and eager pick up some english.
Second has the person who recently commented listed to RPP CPN or even outside coverage of interviews with the UPP candidate. Never has he acknowledged his party as communist. Rather he has acknowledged the influence of perruvian intelectuals such as Haya de la Torre and Mariategui: one of which was openly not communist but rather anti-imperialist and for latin american intergration; the other who was communist. However, in his discourse, Mr. Humala has never rejected capitalism but has been more willing to undertake a project of regional intergration with governments whos racial stock varies from white to mixed afro indigenous stock. His reticence to approve a free trade deal, at least w/o reviewing it and assessing if it is in the nations interest, is consistent with popular sections which have called for a referendum which has recently been recognized by the JNE to be put before congress. Also I might add look at his wife Nadine she is not a chapqa, lucanas, huampo etc., not are all the member of his camps “indians.” In fact from what I’ve seen the range of supporters does encompass different ethnic groups in peru but also encompasses poorer and working class mesitzos and even middle class whites and mestizons, although in lesser numbers.
Two in an interview in Cuarto Poder, he has never discussed entering into open conflict with Chile but has been cautious of the recent purchases of weaponry by that nation, which I do not believe was correct for him to discuss since he is not currently an election official. However when asked about the speculative possibility of tension with Chile, Humala responded that to pursue an arms race is not in Peru’s interest. Addtionally, Humala, has talked of the current chilean president Bachelet as a memebr of a new generation of latin american leaders, suggesting some affinity for her and her party’s left of center political position.
In regards to rejecting the consensus of its neighbors and allies, look again at the facts 70% of peruvians would rather not see the TLC go through under th current administration and there are more than enough signatures to have compelled the JNE to request that current congress pass a referendum on the issue. Instead of turning to convenient “allies and neighbors” abroud the country should heed the democratic processes realized at home with regard the TLC through popular means of protest and a call for a referendum. However, the much ballyhood UN party of Flores Nano has taken a stance that the TLC should be passed under the current congress despite popular opposition to this happening. See todays journals La Republica.
Again, the contrast is that Humala and the UPP PNP party’s would welcome the referendum as a manifestation of the popular will of the people, and Humala himself is reticent in approving such an agreement w/o revision. See again todays journal La Republica. Meanwhile Flores Nano and UN would rather dodge this issue. Many leaders on the left have also been critical of the insistence of the current president to ram throught that agreement b/c of the probability that it would overide/compromise the country’s constitution in terms of getting out of unfavorable trade agreements. Again the measure of democracy is not only the ability of a nation to arrange electroal elections, it also encompasses it efforts on teh social economic needs of its populations and an ability to address the demands of popular movements in regards to issues that would effect the country’s economic and political character.
Racist, Homophobic, Sexist etc etc. If you haven’t kept up on the other side of coverage either through neutral media coverage such as is provided in sightes such as this or independent web sights you would not have been aware that a small protest organized by members of the socialist party and other left leaning groups was in opposition to measures taken by the mayor of lima, a promoter of Lourde Flores and UN member, which the protesters considered to be against the LBGT community.
http://peru.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/26504.php
Mario Vargas Llosa, the world renowned peruvian, intellectual has in his later literary work and public statements made statements that suggest a hostility to peru’s indigenous cultures.
>
Poole, Deborah and Renique Gerardo, “Peru: Time of Fear,” (Latin American Burea 1992) page 140.
> (p. 294 La Utopia Arcaica MVL.)
Montoya, Rodrigo Rojas “Todas las sangres: ideal para el futuro del Perú,” Assessing MVL’s book “La Utopia Arcaica.”at http://www.andes.missouri.edu/andes/Arguedas/rmcritica/rm_critica3.html
There is also an interesting assessment of MVL and the inherent racism of his rhetoric, and in my opinion that of elite peru which I now deem the VIP republic in teh following link.
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=20&ItemID=9955
Mr. Vargas LLossa is also the intelectual author of the rebirth of the Social Christina Party expressed in teh FREDEMO front and Currently in UN by way of his casting the political discouse in Peru in terms of Democracy and Authoritarianism. This strategy was used against AGP and APRA during the initial round of the 1990 peruvian presidential race. Poole and Renique at page 140.
It seems that from my outside observation of the peruvian election you etheir have to have a well disicplined party structure as is the case with APRA, a well financed and coordinated campaing to airbrush out the non-social democratic aspect of a party’s political platform as in UN and Lourdes Flores or you have to bark hard and often as in PNP/UPP and Humala.
Although I am cognizant of the attacks launched against the UPP/PNP candidateI will not apoligize for defending Humala where many of the attacks are simply reductionist and not inconsistent with a general media strategy that appears to dig up stories, accounts and accusations when Humala is leading the polls. This is not to say that if he is found guilty with all due process afforded him that I will continue to support him.
For me it appears that his strong style has given him a chance to stand out and present issues that are part of the deep and, hopefull not, ireversible fractures that cut across peruvian society.
Sadly candidates with impressive credentials such as Javier Deiz Canseco, Susana Villaran, or even the Chapparon or not present b/c in the circus that is peruvian politics they are a tad to dignified to stand out.
I welcome feedback and will of course take VIP citizen comments with a grain of salt.
Victor E. Ramos

The blatant and outrageous defense of Mr. Humala’s beliefs is laughable at best. One only has to look at Mr. Humala’s friends, family history and his affiliation with Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro to see through the clouds and conclude what Mr. Humala’s true political beliefs are. Has anyone forgot Mr. Humala’s wife was a member of a terrorist group?
Where did Mr. Humala go to be operated? Did he travel to the United States, Great Brittan, Canada or Europe? No, he went to Cuba! Who were his principal sponsors and the individuals that attempted to induce the Peruvian population to vote for Mr. Humala?
In fact, Mr. Humala, as we see now with what has transpired after elections and the declarations of former leaders of his purported party, lacked an organized political party, had no political plan, no set ideology and lacked the education or the preparation to even run a back street repair garage.
There is an old saying in Peru “A Palabras Necias, Oidos sordos!!!

Comments are closed.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet