Weekly Book Blog

The Old Gringo Review

For this weeks book, I read The Old Gringo, by Carlos Fuentes. To be honest with you, I found this book to be a little bit confusing, but for a few different reasons. 

At the beginning of my reading, I found the old gringo’s motivation to be a bit strange; he has come to Mexico to die? Once I got more into the reading, I found myself affirming that Bierce (the old gringo) has very little to live for. It’s even exemplified on page 45 of my copy, in which the main character says, “To the earth and sky alike, to the vegetation of the desert, to whatever took form in sense or consciousness, this incarnate suffering addressed that silent plea: ‘I have come to die. Give me the coup de grace’ “ (Fuentes, 45). I did not know what a ‘coup de grace’ was until looking it up, but it actually refers to the final blow given to a wounded person or animal in order to kill them. Even the main character acknowledges that this is the final thing he wants to finish his life off. That really speaks to the characters life, Bierce seems relatively well thought out in his actions and decisions, and it’s interesting that Arroyo finds that within Bierce too. The Old Gringo’s reasoning as to why he’s come to die is gone into depth later in the novel, but I found it really telling, and a bit of a sad reveal into Bierce’s life.
Now, to discuss Harriet Winslow, who is another interesting character in this novel. Originally when I was introduced to her, I found her to be sort of naive; she spent her time thinking that the Miranda’s would come back to their burning hacienda (the Miranda’s being her employers). There was also a line in the novel in which Winslow said that coming to Mexico was her ‘duty’, and that sort of made me think about what her motivation was; why did she choose Mexico, to teach the children who were going to be a ‘challenge’ for her? I know we receive quite a decent amount of her backstory (with her beau Mr. Delaney, the death of her father), but I want to know exactly why this American girl made this decision. It sort of reminds me of Bierce’s motivation; Bierce comes to die, to fight in the Mexican revolution. Harriet comes to Mexico as a new thrill (or ‘cheap thrill’ as a line in the book puts it); could that also be a motivator for Bierce? 

Another aspect I found to be a little confusing was the relationships between Harriet and Bierce, and Harriet and Arroyo. I did not know if Harriet and Bierce’s relationship was one of a father and daughter, or a romantic one. Furthermore, I found that Harriet and Arroyo’s relationship was very confusing, because I did not know if she felt affection, anger, hatred (or a mixture of all) towards him. After some thinking, I wonder if the bit of confusion I was feeling about these relationships was intentional, and Fuentes knew how he was setting these connections up. 

Something that I found when I was doing a bit of research on the book was that Fuentes wrote this book over about 20 years; I don’t know if it is just the effects of a good book and author, but there were some lines that I found were very wise and seemed to be the reflection of someone with life experience. One that particularly stood out to me was spoken by the old gringo, in which he says: “the only way you escape corruption is to die young.” I know that’s spoken by an older character in the novel, but it feels so enriched with Fuentes’ life experience. A question I would like to leave you is this: Do you think that The Old Gringo would be able to exist as a novel if Bierce’s motivations were different? To further elaborate upon this question, do you think that it would be possible for this novel to exist if Bierce did not want to die? 

Standard
Weekly Book Blog

My Take on The Shrouded Woman

I found that I really enjoyed reading The Shrouded Woman. The first few pages really set up the general gist of the narrative, which was a very interesting concept in my opinion. I thought that Bombal did a great job of engaging readers (or me at least; and sometimes I find it difficult to enjoy certain novels of this genre). I have only read one novel prior to this one that was focused on the perspective of a dead person looking in on their life, which I thoroughly enjoyed in The Shrouded Woman. Occasionally, I found myself a bit confused when following the progression of the novel, specifically with regards to flashbacks and her current point of view; although, I usually found my way back to the main progression. The use of flashbacks integrated with the unique perspective of the dead Ana Maria allowed for the ability to delve into certain topics with different perspectives. I constantly was thinking of the topic of femininity within the novel, especially with Ana Maria in mind (mainly because she’s the main character in the novel). The first example I can think of is when she’s describing the flashback of Ricardo, her love for him, and how she was feeling when he sort of abandoned him; it’s almost as she completely gave up on things, and became extremely depressed. This made me question how reliant she was on a man who I don’t think truly loved and cared for her at that point (maybe before, but not anymore). Is that what Ana Maria thought her life should be equated to? Recall the quote from the book, “I felt weak, with no desires, my body and my spirit indifferent as though they were filled with passion and sorrow.” I felt as if she was very obsessed with this man, and it almost changed her perspective on life. Furthermore, I believe that her relationship with men greatly affected her femininity when she was married to Antonio (at least in the flashbacks). Her gradual resentment made it seem as if she was so unhappy with her life, that even it is stated in the novel, “the destiny of women is to remove the pain of love in an orderly house, before an unfinished tapestry.” I got the impression that she could not be independent among herself, specifically in relation to men and romantic partners in her life. However, I don’t want to only talk upon the femininity aspect of the novel, but I’d like to delve into what this novel provoked me to think about death, and the perspective of what happens beyond this earth. Ana Maria’s perspective post-mortem illustrated that she had many revelations, which I thought was an interesting part of the book. The aspect of reflection of her life seemed very good and almost in a sense philosophical, because she considered her feelings and thoughts in a new light. For example, when she sees Antonio crying, instead of being filled with hate, she almost feels great pity for him; “she feels her hate withdraw and disappear”. That was a very interesting moment of character development. Now, a final question I have for readers of this blog post is this; how do you think the novel would have differed if female independence had been a more prominent theme within the novel? What I mean by this is how do you think the novel would be different if Ana Maria found peace with not being with a lover? Would that even be possible, given the fact that this novel was written in the 30’s? I know I said I didn’t want to completely talk about the feminine aspect of this novel, but I don’t often get the chance to analyze and criticize novels with such interesting female protagonists (if you can even call Ana Maria a protagonist or narrator?). I would want to read this book again and find more evidence to support claims once I discuss this with other classmates!

Standard