The Maker Movement

http://www.hackeducation.com/2013/02/06/the-case-for-a-campus-makerspace/

The makerspace is something that has grown out of what’s called the Maker Movement, a loose affiliation of software and hardware hackers and hobbyists of all sorts.

The Maker Movement is a contemporary version, if you will, of the old punk ethos and its DIY culture — just with newer technology. Perhaps you remember the old illustration that said “here’s three chords, now form a band” — today, it’s “here’s a motherboard and some cables, now go build a computer.”

The makerspace is something that has grown out of what’s called the Maker Movement, a loose affiliation of software and hardware hackers and hobbyists of all sorts.

The Maker Movement is a contemporary version, if you will, of the old punk ethos and its DIY culture — just with newer technology. Perhaps you remember the old illustration that said “here’s three chords, now form a band” — today, it’s “here’s a motherboard and some cables, now go build a computer.”

Makerspaces are a newer version of the old Silicon Valley “home-brew computer club,” whose members included Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak.

But the makerspace takes a more public-facing, more community-oriented form than we’ve seen with individual DIY hobbyists or small hobby groups —  those who work in basements and garages and sewing rooms and living rooms and workshops.

The Maker Movement brings them out into the open, into the public to share and to learn together.

The Maker Movement is closely associated with Make Magazine — sometimes described as a 21st century Popular Mechanics — and the Maker Faires that the publication helps organize around the world. But there are many resources and traditions makers draw from and many places where makers gather.

Where good ideas come from

In his 2010 book, “Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural Story of Innovation”, author Steven Johnson debunks the myth of the “eureka moment”, too often given credit for revolutionary thinking, he says. According to Johnson’s research, good ideas more typically develop over time in what he calls a “slow hunch”, where a thought percolates away for years and years to emerge when ready, often after some new interaction or stimulation. Johnson thus postulates that the most consistant source of good ideas is in fact collaboration. Environments that encourage people to share ideas and have their different thoughts collide and interact are the places where the most substantial intellectual progress is typically made. In the video below Johnson discusses this concept and how the growth of coffee houses during the enlightenment increased the number of interactions, triggering a myriad of new ideas impacting culture, politics, science, and art. http://peterjory.blogspot.ca/2012/10/where-good-ideas-come-from.html

Educator Innovators

A Six-Point Checklist for Education Innovator

http://fluency21.com/blog/2013/01/10/a-six-point-checklist-for-education-innovators/

 

Whether innovators are drumming up new business ideas or hard at work solving community problems, they share certain characteristics. They tend to be action-oriented. They know how to network. They’re willing to take calculated risks. They look ahead, anticipating benefits that others might not have imagined yet. They work to overcome obstacles. Especially in the social sector, they’re generous about sharing what they know and eager to help good ideas grow. When educators exhibit these qualities, they show students how innovators think and act. They become innovation role models.

If you’re a teacher looking for opportunities to bring innovation into the classroom, start by considering your own strengths and weaknesses as an innovator. If you’re a school leader, think about how you encourage — or discourage — innovation among your staff. Here are six questions to consider.

Are You Action Oriented?
Taking action is a hallmark of innovators. It’s equally true whether you’re talking about educators developing new projects or social entrepreneurs implementing life-saving approaches to health care. Stanford University’s d.school, a global hotbed of design thinking and innovation, calls this trait a bias toward action. It’s about “doing and making over thinking and meeting.”

In the classroom, a take-action teacher recognizes opportunities. This is the kind of educator who spots a new idea and thinks, “I can do something with this.”

Do You Know How to Network?
Educators who are determined to unleash their students’ innovative capacities show another common characteristic. They are eager to share. They know how to network. Using Web 2.0 tools, many of today’s innovative teachers and school leaders are thinking aloud about what’s working and what’s hard in their classrooms and communities. Their blogs, tweets and wikis open a window on ideas at the formative stage. Their thoughtful reflections also allow others to learn from their examples and build on their insights, demonstrating the power of social networks to grow good ideas.

Educators who know how to network take part in online and in-person communities to advance their professional learning.

Are You Willing to Take Risks?
It may feel risky to learn in public, but educators who take this approach are modeling what it means to be a risk-taker — another known quality of innovators. Educators who are risk-takers are likely to be applying for grants or accessing resources in other creative ways, piloting new instructional approaches, or challenging policies that limit students’ ability to learn.

Can You Look Ahead?
Here’s the tricky part about innovation: it’s hard to see it coming. Once an innovative idea or product has taken hold, it’s difficult to imagine doing without it. (Can you recall a time before seatbelts or smartphones?) Because innovation creates a new normal, it’s often only in hindsight that we can see the wisdom of breakthrough ideas.

Educators who know how to look ahead are able to anticipate the benefits of introducing promising approaches or technologies.

The challenge comes at the early stage, when it’s tempting to dismiss novel ideas as impractical or impossible. Glen Bull, an education professor at University of Virginia, emphasizes the importance of looking ahead so you can position yourself to catch the early wave of a promising classroom strategy or emerging technology. This is part of the innovator’s mindset, too. Although many of today’s teachers and students would be hard-pressed to remember a time before schools had access to the Internet, this online world was once an untested, even controversial idea for education. “When we first proposed connecting all public schools to the Internet, people thought that was craziest thing they’d ever heard of,” Bull admits. “What people missed seeing was the trajectory — imagining where this could go. You have to consciously link [innovations] to learning outcomes.”

Now, Bull and his team are hard at work on a new project that introduces children to engineering with the use of inexpensive desktop fabricators — a kind of 3-D printer. “We’re right at the cusp,” he says, “in the same way that we caught the leading edge of the Internet revolution. We expect this to be just as profound.”

Educators who know how to look ahead are able to anticipate the benefits of introducing promising approaches or technologies.

Can You Overcome Obstacles?
Innovation can be a messy process, fraught with failure and frustration. Even in the business world, where there’s tolerance for risk if it might lead to financial rewards, the quest for new ideas can get messy. If educators can accept the creative mess that comes along with the process, innovation stands a chance.

Educators who have the innovator’s mindset don’t get frustrated by “yeah, but…” thinking. They find workarounds to obstacles, whether that means being creative about securing resources, finding flexibility within the curriculum, or overcoming technology barriers so that students have access to the powerful tools they need.

Do You Help Good Ideas Grow?
Innovative educators find a way to move ideas ahead. They not only recognize opportunities, but also know how to create them. And once they hit on a good idea, they make sure to spread the word. Being able to take a worthy idea to scale is one more quality that innovators share.

Educators with this mindset know how to build buzz for good ideas. They find allies and brainstorming partners. They build collaborative platforms, such as project wikis that others can join and expand. They open windows to the innovation happening in their classroom by inviting the community to project showcase events or posting video documentaries of student accomplishments.

When these qualities come together in the classroom, students stand to gain. Antero Garcia offers a good example. As a high school English teacher in a high-poverty neighborhood of Los Angeles, he regularly designed learning experiences such as alternate reality games that engaged students in new ways. These experiences have unfolded because he stays on the lookout for connections and expertise beyond the classroom. He looks for opportunities in which students can influence their community. He reflects publicly about these projects on his blog, The American Crawl, as well as on collaborative publishing sites like the National Writing Project’s Digital IS.

“Innovation is not a word you hear much in teaching circles or as a way to describe what teachers do. In my experience as a teacher,” Garcia says, “no one’s ever called us innovators.” The very word “sounds disruptive,” he adds, but in a good way. “If used authentically by the teaching profession, innovation could be a way to turn things around.”

Imagine the energy we might unleash if we can encourage more of these qualities, among educators and students alike.

Liberating Large Lectures

How a Stanford Professor Liberates Large Lectures

Economics Professor Timothy Bresnahan gave his first teaching tip at the start of his talk, “Large Classes: Keeping the Energy in 220 Relationships at Once,” by saying he would be sitting down during his presentation.

“This is my first trick for you,” he told a noontime audience assembled around a conference table in the Mitchell Earth Sciences Building. “You want your students to be active; you’ve got to be a little passive.”

Speaking last week at a the brown bag lunch series, Award-Winning Teachers on Teaching, Bresnahan said one way he practices passivity in his statistics class is to simply “shut up” after giving students a fun problem – such as testing the theory that storks bring babies, using data about the number of human births and the number of stork nests in English towns.

After discussing the data, which suggested that storks bring babies, Bresnahan said he stops talking, a technique he called “the most important tool of wiliness.”

“After three minutes, I’ll say, the reason I got this job is I’m paid by the hour, I’m perfectly happy to sit here until somebody has something intelligent to say,” he said.

“At minute six, I’ll say, you guys do know the correct theory, right? We deliberately picked an incorrect theory. At eight minutes, I’ll say, OK, maybe there are some people that don’t know the true theory here. You engineering students, you can ask after class and I’ll tell you the true theory. And eventually, even among 21st century students, somebody will say, could it be that this is a correlation that’s not causal?”

Bresnahan said he doesn’t let them stop talking until they arrive at an explanation.

“It’s easy to say this statistical model is false,” he said. “It must be correlation, not causation, when you know the right answer. But in a live example, you don’t know the right answer. So I will push the students, once they start talking, to tell me why this one came out that way. I’ll ask them, ‘Why do we get this correlation?’ And eventually someone really, really smart will say there are probably more storks and moms in the bigger towns and that’s why you get this correlation. Which is a very, very good answer for a sophomore.”

Know them. Challenge them. Liberate them.

Bresnahan said large lecture classes present three challenges: keeping students energized; drawing them into the intellectual community associated with their majors and into the Stanford intellectual community; and teaching them the tools they will use in advanced economics classes.

He presented a three-part strategy: Know them. Challenge them. Liberate them.

Bresnahan said he memorizes the names of all 220 students enrolled in his large lecture classes, after reviewing photographs – taken by teaching assistants – of each student holding a sheet of paper with his or her name written in large letters.

“This is me being an overachiever,” he said of his memorization routine. “I don’t think I’m a particularly charismatic lecturer; I don’t think I can carry the room. I do think that I can reach out to people and induce them to think by calling their name.”

At a minimum, he said, learn the names of 15 to 20 students by taking them to lunch.

“This is a terrific investment,” Bresnahan said. “First off, you’ll know if what you’re doing is playing. And second, you’ll have people to call on when you want somebody to say something other than you, which is really, really important.”

Bresnahan said he tries to create “challenges to active thinking everywhere,” such as posing an interesting question about a problem students have just solved.

After a class of sophomores had solved a problem set about two groups of people and wages, testing the difference between two means, he asked: Which group do you think came from East Palo Alto and which group came from Atherton?

“This is a significantly easier question than all the technical stuff they’ve just done, but a very substantial fraction of Stanford sophomores, almost all men, will say, ‘Wait a minute, you didn’t teach us that,'” he said.

Asking questions about material not covered is a “really good trick, very reliable,” Bresnahan said.

“Someone will pop up in class during question time and say, ‘How are we supposed to know that?'” he said. “You say, ‘You’re supposed to be a capable, working person.'”

Bresnahan suggested picking advanced undergraduates as teaching assistants – students who took the course last year and had a lot of fun – as a way to reduce the “social distance” between the people who teach and the people who learn.

“To go back to my original theme, it’s easy to get a large body of knowledge – or tools – across to these highly motivated, hard-working students,” he said. “To get them to feel you really want them to take up these tools and use them, you’ve got to go a little out of the box.”

As for liberating students, Bresnahan said it’s important to “turn them loose” to make discoveries on their own. “I let them show off,” he said.

Bresnahan said he gives students the chance to shine with a weekly “submit-a-slide contest,” in which a student gets seven minutes to present a slide illustrating the best or worst statistical analysis found in that week’s Wall Street Journal or San Francisco Chronicle. He said the exercise is “incredibly empowering” for students, and since it’s not counted toward their grades, it’s not threatening.

The prize for winning Bresnahan’s “build-a-data-set contest,” which requires students to form teams of at least three people, is permission to be a day late on the following week’s data set.

“I want to give them a toolkit and encourage them to put it to use on stuff they think is exciting and where they think they have knowledge, because that’s a really, really difficult problem for beginning students, to have enough knowledge on top of all your tools to do a serious empirical study,” he said. “It’s just amazing what they do.”

Stanford’s Center for Teaching and Learning sponsors the Award-Winning Teachers on Teaching series.  A video of Bresnahan’s 45-minute presentation, and the question-and-answer session that followed, will be available in January on the center’s website.

Creative Cycle

http://edexcelcreativenewmedia.ning.com/profiles/blogs/making-the-creative-cycle-work

Creative cycle skills:

Each of the sections of the creative cycle demands a set of particular skills:

Observation:

  • Sketching
  • Selecting relevant primary and secondary sources
  • Writing
  • Mind-mapping
  • Making links
  • Separating information
  • Discussion

Analysis:

  • Research and inquiry
  • Writing
  • Making connections to artists and designers
  • Making links to non-art and wider cultural information and media
  • Contextualisation
  • Comparing and contrasting
  • Breaking down art and design into components
  • Assessing the relevance and potential of media

Development:

  • Time management
  • Assessing the relevance and potential of media
  • Production, operation and manipulation skills
  • Creative problem solving
  • Risk taking

Personal response:

  • Synthesis
  • Differentiation
  • Presentation / delivery
  • Refinement
  • Innovation

Evaluation:

  • Questioning
  • Reflection
  • Setting evaluative criteria
  • Having an overview
  • Listening / taking on feedback
  • Writing and communication

The awesome project

“Every month, Ocampo-Gooding and nine others in Ottawa pledge $100 of their own money. Then, they get together and cut a $1,000 cheque for a project they like.” What I like about this is that the definition of “awesome” is wide opemn, and that the money is given with no strings attached. “If you build a giant tricycle that shoots fire, that sounds awesome … and was actually a proposal in Portland,” he says, rhyming off some of his recent favourites. “If you write us saying you want to build animatronic giant teddy bears to put in daycares, that sounds awesome. If you want to host ginormous murder mystery party with hundreds of participants with pieces written for each one, we want to (help you) do that.”

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/12/21/pol-awesome-foundation-ottawa-giving.html?cmp=rss

Desirable difficulties / Dual process theory

A recent study suggests that our modern lifestyles are making us “less intelligent” than our
ancestors, at least at a genetic level. This research echoes concerns Einstein had when he
supposedly said, “I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The
world will have a generation of idiots.”
The immediate availability of information has created a particular conundrum in our modern
society. When it takes a mere few seconds to find information about almost any topic, the
value of knowledge and expertise is being devalued as information becomes cheaper and
more accessible. This is despite the fact that information, knowledge and expertise are
fundamentally different entities.

Education in the information age: is technology making us stupid

http://theconversation.edu.au/education-in-the-information-age-is-technology-making-us-stupid-10844?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+conversationedu+%28The+Conversation%29&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher