Architecture

Our Children will Build the Future

The UIA Built Environment network aims to help Architects and Teachers everywhere show young people what makes good Architecture and a Sustainable environment. So that, as adult citizens, users, clients and decision-makers they may take an active part in shaping the world they live in, embracing both heritage and innovation in the creation of communities which provide a healthy and harmonious quality of life for all.

http://uia-architecture-children.bak.de/index-en.html

Wolcott High School

From Gianpaolo Versace @ Steelcase

Attached are some images of a recent project we did at a high school in the US. This high school dedicated to students with dyslexia and other language-based learning disorders. You can find more information by clicking HERE.

Another really interested school project we were involved with was The Academy at Opry Mills in Tennessee. They offer a degree completion program for students that are a few credits shy of a high school diploma. This school is inside a shopping mall. Click HERE for the video.

Liberating Large Lectures

How a Stanford Professor Liberates Large Lectures

Economics Professor Timothy Bresnahan gave his first teaching tip at the start of his talk, “Large Classes: Keeping the Energy in 220 Relationships at Once,” by saying he would be sitting down during his presentation.

“This is my first trick for you,” he told a noontime audience assembled around a conference table in the Mitchell Earth Sciences Building. “You want your students to be active; you’ve got to be a little passive.”

Speaking last week at a the brown bag lunch series, Award-Winning Teachers on Teaching, Bresnahan said one way he practices passivity in his statistics class is to simply “shut up” after giving students a fun problem – such as testing the theory that storks bring babies, using data about the number of human births and the number of stork nests in English towns.

After discussing the data, which suggested that storks bring babies, Bresnahan said he stops talking, a technique he called “the most important tool of wiliness.”

“After three minutes, I’ll say, the reason I got this job is I’m paid by the hour, I’m perfectly happy to sit here until somebody has something intelligent to say,” he said.

“At minute six, I’ll say, you guys do know the correct theory, right? We deliberately picked an incorrect theory. At eight minutes, I’ll say, OK, maybe there are some people that don’t know the true theory here. You engineering students, you can ask after class and I’ll tell you the true theory. And eventually, even among 21st century students, somebody will say, could it be that this is a correlation that’s not causal?”

Bresnahan said he doesn’t let them stop talking until they arrive at an explanation.

“It’s easy to say this statistical model is false,” he said. “It must be correlation, not causation, when you know the right answer. But in a live example, you don’t know the right answer. So I will push the students, once they start talking, to tell me why this one came out that way. I’ll ask them, ‘Why do we get this correlation?’ And eventually someone really, really smart will say there are probably more storks and moms in the bigger towns and that’s why you get this correlation. Which is a very, very good answer for a sophomore.”

Know them. Challenge them. Liberate them.

Bresnahan said large lecture classes present three challenges: keeping students energized; drawing them into the intellectual community associated with their majors and into the Stanford intellectual community; and teaching them the tools they will use in advanced economics classes.

He presented a three-part strategy: Know them. Challenge them. Liberate them.

Bresnahan said he memorizes the names of all 220 students enrolled in his large lecture classes, after reviewing photographs – taken by teaching assistants – of each student holding a sheet of paper with his or her name written in large letters.

“This is me being an overachiever,” he said of his memorization routine. “I don’t think I’m a particularly charismatic lecturer; I don’t think I can carry the room. I do think that I can reach out to people and induce them to think by calling their name.”

At a minimum, he said, learn the names of 15 to 20 students by taking them to lunch.

“This is a terrific investment,” Bresnahan said. “First off, you’ll know if what you’re doing is playing. And second, you’ll have people to call on when you want somebody to say something other than you, which is really, really important.”

Bresnahan said he tries to create “challenges to active thinking everywhere,” such as posing an interesting question about a problem students have just solved.

After a class of sophomores had solved a problem set about two groups of people and wages, testing the difference between two means, he asked: Which group do you think came from East Palo Alto and which group came from Atherton?

“This is a significantly easier question than all the technical stuff they’ve just done, but a very substantial fraction of Stanford sophomores, almost all men, will say, ‘Wait a minute, you didn’t teach us that,'” he said.

Asking questions about material not covered is a “really good trick, very reliable,” Bresnahan said.

“Someone will pop up in class during question time and say, ‘How are we supposed to know that?'” he said. “You say, ‘You’re supposed to be a capable, working person.'”

Bresnahan suggested picking advanced undergraduates as teaching assistants – students who took the course last year and had a lot of fun – as a way to reduce the “social distance” between the people who teach and the people who learn.

“To go back to my original theme, it’s easy to get a large body of knowledge – or tools – across to these highly motivated, hard-working students,” he said. “To get them to feel you really want them to take up these tools and use them, you’ve got to go a little out of the box.”

As for liberating students, Bresnahan said it’s important to “turn them loose” to make discoveries on their own. “I let them show off,” he said.

Bresnahan said he gives students the chance to shine with a weekly “submit-a-slide contest,” in which a student gets seven minutes to present a slide illustrating the best or worst statistical analysis found in that week’s Wall Street Journal or San Francisco Chronicle. He said the exercise is “incredibly empowering” for students, and since it’s not counted toward their grades, it’s not threatening.

The prize for winning Bresnahan’s “build-a-data-set contest,” which requires students to form teams of at least three people, is permission to be a day late on the following week’s data set.

“I want to give them a toolkit and encourage them to put it to use on stuff they think is exciting and where they think they have knowledge, because that’s a really, really difficult problem for beginning students, to have enough knowledge on top of all your tools to do a serious empirical study,” he said. “It’s just amazing what they do.”

Stanford’s Center for Teaching and Learning sponsors the Award-Winning Teachers on Teaching series.  A video of Bresnahan’s 45-minute presentation, and the question-and-answer session that followed, will be available in January on the center’s website.

Phased Development Plan for the IL

VISION

To create a classroom space where one can explore, create and experience innovations in pedagogical excellence.  Image that space as signaling possibilities by simply observing and participating in the actions / interactions of those teaching and learning within the environment – both physical and virtual.

PURPOSE

To answer the following questions, in a time of substantial change, globalization, and ubiquitous access to information

  • What does it mean to teach well?
  • What might teaching and learning look like?
  • What environments support / foster changes in teaching & learning?

GOAL

  • To work with faculty, staff, students, and affiliates to provide appropriate tools and spaces to imagine and explore meaningful innovations and pedagogical practices
  • To work with developers and innovators to incubate significant educational tools and learning environments

Objectives

  • To support faculty and students to obtain grants and other funding options to support and sustain their innovations
  • To provide consultation and leadership in the Okanagan Valley and beyond to pedagogical excellence in a time of change and possibility (e.g. school districts, ministries, NGOs, etc.)

OUR ADVANTAGE

  • Driven and nimble
  • Supported by academics with a proven record of innovation and pedagogical excellence
  • Networked to existing partnerships with ICT innovators / developers in the Okanagan Valley
  • Networked with existing academic partnerships / affiliations with national and international universities

COMPONENTS

The ILC is made up of three distinct components (classroom, pedagogical incubator, and design lab) that will be developed gradually and modified regularly as budget and space allocations allow.  We recognize the word innovative is problematic, as what is state of the art, edgy and exciting can quickly become traditional and ordinary.  We also recognize that without innovations in pedagogical practices, exciting technologies can be used for mundane purposes.  Therefore, we are thoughtfully creating an iterative model of development that stages investments of hardware and software in a phased way in order to leverage budget and donations in a thoughtful and creative manner and match and enhance pedagogical endeavors.

PHASE #1

  • Acquire furnishings (tables, chairs, etc.)
  • Install writeable walls
  • Install wireless, short throw projectors x 2
  • Acquire Apple TV units to manage projector outputs
  • Install adequate power outlets

PHASE #2

  • Acquire iPads and Bretford charging cart (display adapters, apps)
  • Acquire MAC mini and large LCD screen to use as a maker station and display unit on south wall and to serve as iTunes hub for iPads

PHASE #3

  • Acquire remote viewing software and install cameras
  • Acquire 2 more MAC minis and large LCD screens to add to existing maker station on south wall

PHASE #4

  • Begin to purchase peripheral items based on need / interest as budget allows
The first floor plan


The ILC

The goal of the ILC is to provide appropriate tools and spaces for educators, entrepreneurs, dreamers and tinkers to imagine and explore innovations in teaching and learning. It will engage the UBC community – both town and gown, in all aspects of innovative pedagogy, supporting economic growth in the region, and continuing to advance the proven accomplishments of K-20 educators who work and live outside the lower mainland.

The ILC recognizes its unique position within a nimble campus and embraces both the potential and promise for contributing to the place of mind on the Okanagan campus of the University of British Columbia. The ILC consists of three integrated components – a design studio, an incubator for pedagogical innovations, and an innovative classroom, each synergistically linked to a research hub, (i.e., the proposed Centre for Research and Mindful Engagement, CRME). Activity within each component of the ILC is detailed in the management plan.

Educators and industry will benefit from the Innovative Learning Centre through collaborative projects and synergies afforded by access to research, design, incubation, and testing. The ILC will become a home for educators, undergraduate and graduate students, visiting academics, entrepreneurs, and industry partners as we work together to imagine and design new ways of thinking and learning in a time of substantial change, globalization, and ubiquitous access to information. We recognize that Canada’s place in the knowledge economy rests substantially on the ability of education and research institutions to inquire into and grapple with new ways of engaging learners in discovery and innovation.

Behind the ILC Design

In 2008 I attended Design and the Elastic Mind at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. Images and ideas have stayed with me, prompting the question – What does educational experimental design look like at the intersection of innovation, functionality, aesthetics, and deep knowledge of brain research?

Design is the bridge between the abstraction of research and the tangible requirements of practice (Itrusha & Roberts, 2008). It is “the translation of scientific and technological revolutions into approachable objects [and examples] that change people’s lives” (p. 4). Design helps develop the elastic mind that forms and informs innovation.  Bergdoll (2008, p. 10) suggests mental elasticity creates the “flexibility and strength to embrace progress and harness it” and is “best suited to confront a changing world of seemingly limitless challenges and possibilities.”

Now, in an increasing time of substantial change, globalization and almost ubiquitous access to the Internet, literature (Wagner, 2012, and others) suggests we need problem solvers, innovators, and inventors who are self-reliant and can think creatively and logically.  People with minds elastic enough to survive and thrive with change and uncertainty.  Ironically, at the same time, educators, economists, parents and students criticize existing formal education institutions, suggesting traditional venues are not fostering innovative capacity, encouraging student engagement, and/or integrating technology meaningfully into learning. As we come closer to the end of the second decade of the 21st century, the intent of the ILC is to (1) acknowledge the inadequate models of innovative teaching practice and the limited number of creative learning environments where educators, learners, and industry can design, build, incubate and research imaginative technology enhanced teaching and learning, and (2) to provide some examples of what might be.

The purpose of the ILC is to investigate the look, feel and design of an innovative learning environment within a formal educational setting.  It will investigate both physical and virtual elements used to disrupt traditional teaching and support interactive, playful, deep learning in a more studio based way, building on Johnson’s notion of the genius of the tinkerer (2010).  Specifically, the ILC, through collaboration, research and practice, will seek existing examples of exemplary institutional design; imagine with educational leaders what might be required; partner with industry and academics with an understanding of design to assemble, use and research spaces that by their very design (furnishing, technology, pedagogy, look and feel) invite changed and enhanced practice.

Findings will inform Canadian companies working at the forefront of (1) educational software design and (2) educational furnishing design to imagine and understand the impact physical space and design of learning environments has on learner engagement and the development of creative potential and meaningful learning for learners – both educators and students.  Findings will also inform academics, and educators as to the potential of disruptive learning environments to support innovative practices and suggest ways to design learning experiences suggested by Einstein when he said, “I never teach my pupils; I only attempt to provide the conditions in which they can learn.” This research will continue to an understanding of the conditions required to foster and sustain innovations in teaching and learning.

References

Bond, T. (2012).  Flipping the classroom with Glogsteredu.  iTunes iBooks: California Baptist University & GlogsterEDU.

Johnson, S. (Sept. 25, 2010).  The Genius of the Tinkerer.  The Wall street Journal – Saturday Essay.  Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703989304575503730101860838.html

Wagner, T. (2012).  Creating Innovators: The Making of Young People Who Will Change The World.  New York: Scribner.

Young, J. & McCormick, T. (2012) (Eds).  Rebooting the academy: 12 tech innovators who are transforming campus.  Washington, DC: The Chronicle of Higher Education.