Daily Archives: March 17, 2006

Quote of the year

By way of the Wall of Separation:

On Wednesday, March 1st, 2006, in Annapolis at a hearing on the proposed amendment to the Maryland state constitution that would prohibit gay marriage, Jamie Raskin, professor of law at AU, was requested to testify.

At the end of his testimony, Republican Senator Nancy Jacobs said: “As I read Biblical principles, marriage was intended, ordained and started by God – that is my belief,” she said. “For me, this is an issue solely based on religious principals.”

Raskin shot back that the Bible was also used to uphold now-outlawed statutes banning interracial marriage, and that the constitution should instead be lawmakers’ guiding principle. “People place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution; they don’t put their hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible,” he said.

The room erupted into applause.

Raskin is the author of a great book for high school students titled We the Students: Supreme Court Decisions for and About Students, as well as Overruling Democracy: The Supreme Court Versus the American People in which he describes the transgressions of the Supreme Court against the Constitution and the people—and the faulty reasoning behind them—and lays out the plan for the best way to back a more democratic system.

He’s also running in the Democratic primary got Maryland State Senate in September against 20 year incumbent Ida Ruben.

Florida to hire $10-per-hour temp workers to grade high-stakes exams

As outrageous as it sounds, this is not an uncommon practice. In fact, it makes lots of sense with schools focusing like a laser beam on raising test scores (instead of, say, helping kids learn to think critically and make sense of the world for themselves), minimum-wage test scoring will be one of the hot new information-society careers school grads will have to look forward to.

The Sun-Sentinel (Ft. Lauderdale, FL): State to hire $10-an-hour temporary workers to grade FCAT exams

TALLAHASSEE — Critics of Florida’s high-stakes FCAT exam are lashing out at the state for hiring thousands of $10-an-hour temporary workers to score tests that are so critical in determining school grades and student promotions.

“Florida students and their parents need assurance that their tests are being scored fairly and competently by people actually qualified to grade them and by people who have actual educational experience,” said Senate Democratic Leader Les Miller of Tampa, who Wednesday called on the state to investigate the hiring practice.

The uproar comes in the wake of a Kelly Services ad announcing 300 part-time openings in Central Florida for “scoring evaluators.” Duties include “electronically scoring essay-style questions for grades K through 12 on standardized student achievement tests.”

Those who apply get one week of training under the guidance of the state education department and CTB/McGraw Hill, which is under contract to grade the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Tests being given this month and next.

“It’s scandalous and demoralizing for teachers,” said Rep. Shelley Vana, D-Lantana, former president of the Palm Beach County Classroom Teacher Association and currently a science curriculum coordinator for the School District. “The question of who is scoring the test is important because of its high-stakes nature and the fact that parents don’t get to see the test.”

FCAT scores determine whether a student will receive a high school diploma. They also are used to determine whether a school is failing and affect school funding.

“If you’re holding highly educated teachers accountable, the same should be done for grading the exam,” said Pat Santeramo, president of the Broward Teachers Union. “It was always believed that professional educational companies with experience in this would be doing the grading. This is definitely one step below.”

State officials defend the practice — even though the FCAT Handbook states “professional scorers” will grade the test — and claim half the workers are retired teachers. Test scorers work eight hours a day for five weeks.

“They must have at least a bachelor’s degree to get a foot in the door,” said Cathy Schroeder, spokeswoman for the Department of Education. “And we make sure they understand how each question should be scored.”

She compared the hiring of temporary workers to hiring preparers of tax returns. At the end of the training week, the workers are given an exam in which they are asked to score 60 actual essays. If they don’t accurately grade the essays, they’re not hired. About 25 percent are winnowed out.

“We’ve gotten a lot of phone calls from parents who are really concerned,” Schroeder said. “The misconception is if [the scorers] are part-time, they’re not qualified. These are well-qualified evaluators.”

Each essay is evaluated by two workers. If there is a major difference in their grades, a supervisor is called in.

Some legislators say they’re concerned about discrepancies in FCAT grades that can’t be explained because parents and teachers aren’t allowed to see students’ tests.

“I’ve had teachers tell me students who were failing their class aced the FCAT but when they tried to find out why, they couldn’t. A father told me his son, an A student, flunked it but he couldn’t find out why,” said Sen. Skip Campbell, D-Fort Lauderdale. “This is happening throughout the system.”

Linda Kleindienst can be reached at lkleindienst@sun-sentinel.com or 850-224-6214.

I Wonder What Kind Of Message I’m Sending To The Troops

From: The Onion

“I Wonder What Kind Of Message I’m Sending To The Troops”
By Jane Merrick
March 13, 2006 | Issue 42•11

I support the troops from the bottom of my heart. But my question is, do they know that? What if I’m somehow sending them the wrong message?

The other day I lost the magnetic yellow ribbon from my car, and I didn’t even notice until my neighbor pointed it out. Just think: It could have fallen off days or even weeks before! And there I was: driving up and down all over town just as happy as you please, all but announcing, “Jane Merrick doesn’t support our troops!”

I went to the gas station to buy another magnet right away, but they were sold out. So here I am without one. And the way everybody is around here, they’ll talk. What if this gets back to the troops somehow?

Or take the other night when my husband and I were watching Leno. He cracked this wiseacre one-liner about the president, and it just busted Ted and me up. Then suddenly, we both trailed off and stared at each other in ominous silence. I’ll admit the joke seemed harmless enough, but just imagine those poor soldiers, covered with the arid dust and sand of a foreign land, huddling for cover, engaging in pitched small-arms firefights with enemy insurgents on a daily basis. What would they think if they saw me sprawled out on the living-room sofa set, eating pretzels, cackling with irreverence at the expense of their commander in chief?

If I unwittingly sent a message to the troops that hurt their feelings, I am truly sorry. I would never knowingly make them feel that nobody back here in the homeland believed in them or thought they weren’t incredibly special, which they are. I don’t want to accidentally lower our troops’ self-esteem, especially in a time of crisis like this. Maybe after the war is over, that may be the time to raise questions about our leaders and laugh at the TV hosts, but certainly not now. Right now, we have to think about the troops. And, even more important, the messages we may or may not be sending them.

What would the troops think about our yard? And I don’t mean just about our flag. When I don’t bag our leaves, am I basically saying, “To heck with you, troops”?

Are the troops aware of all the remodeling I’ve been doing in the basement rec room? If so, what message are they getting from that?

I read in the paper that a lot of the troops are complaining about the war, and want to come home. They’re putting their lives on the line. It’s my duty to support them, but I get confused. What message am I sending the troops if I read articles like that? For that matter, what kind of a message are those troops sending themselves? They are the troops, but it almost sounds like they’re not supporting the troops!

I’m sorry. I didn’t mean that last statement to sound anti-troops.

If the troops knew what I was thinking, what would they say? “First she has it one way, then she changes it all around”? Maybe they’re saying, “Who does this lady think she is? She doesn’t know what she wants! Our morale is sapped! We’re losing our will to fight!” America would be defeated by Iraq, and terrorists would rule over us.

Oh gosh, no! I just want to clear up any possible misunderstandings over previous mixed messages I might have sent the troops.

I support them, and I implore them to provide me with any feedback they may have on how I might be adversely affecting their daily lives.

© Copyright 2006, Onion, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Onion is not intended for readers under 18 years of age.