Author Archives: kevin yau

Can Weather Affect Our Moods?

You wake up in the morning and get dressed for the day. But the sky’s overcast and you can’t even get a glimpse of the sun. It’s already pouring outside and you utter to yourself, “This day’s off to a great start.”

Picture of a Rainy Day; Source: Max Pixel

Living in a city like Vancouver, where it rains for nearly half the year, you may start to wonder whether the weather actually has an effect on your mood. Is this merely a myth? Or does the idea have some merit to it?

From this paper published in 2011, the researchers came to the conclusion that it depends. Their results show that some people’s state of mind can be influenced by the weather. While for others, there was little to no effect.

They quantified this influence by focusing on three distinct mood indicators: happiness, anxiety, and anger. To measure this, the Internet version of the Electronic Mood Device, the Daily Mood Scale was used. Klimstra, et al. defined four groups of people – each affected differently by weather. They labelled these groups as: Summer Lovers (SL), Unaffected (UA), Summer Haters (SH), and Rain Haters (RH).

Graph Showing percentage of each type of individual; adapted from Klimstra, et al.

From their results, they found that nearly half of the individuals tested were in the UA group – meaning that the weather’s influence was minimal. As suggested by the writers of the paper, this could explain why previous studies concluded that the weather had an insignificant effect. However, the rest of the participants displayed changes in happiness, anxiety, and anger in the weather conditions that were tested – weather did have an effect on them.

Correlation results from their study. Source: Klimstra, et al.

The table above shows the correlation between sunshine, temperature, and precipitation and their effects on the mood indicators. Positive numbers indicate a positive correlation, whereas negative numbers indicate the opposite. The correlation ranges from -1 to +1; a number closer to the extremities (±1) indicates a stronger link. The number of people (of each group) is indicated by n. The probability value (p) represents how statistically significant the results are – the smaller the p-value, the higher the level of significance.

Summer day in Biei, Hokkaido, Japan. Source: Reginald Pentinio

You can see why they decided on these labels for each group. For example, individuals of the Summer Lover group were characterized as being happier, being less anxious, and being less angry on higher temperature and sunny days. However, precipitation caused reduced levels of happiness and increased levels of anxiety and anger.

It’s safe to say that the weather does have an effect on at least half of us.

This blog post’s focus was mainly on the study by Dr. Klimstra. The following video mentions some other ways the weather can affect us.

The Age of Misinformation

Misinformation is false information that is spread, regardless of whether there is intent to mislead or not.

With the internet quickly gaining popularity near the turn of the century, information sharing had become easier than ever before. News traveled quickly as news-agencies could publish online and social media could spread it. Anybody could share their thoughts on websites. The Information Age was here.

Social Media Platforms that Americans use for news; adapted from American Press Institute.

Compared to the past, the internet offered a much faster medium for information. This was beneficial because plenty of info became easily accessible to the public. However, both experts and people who claimed to be the former could share their knowledge.

With the speeds at which information could now move, misinformation could also spread quickly. Take the Boston Marathon bombing incident as an example. On social media websites (like 4Chan, Reddit, and Twitter) there were internet sleuths hard at work identifying the Boston Bombers. Even credible news-agencies were racing to report the information without proper verification. This caused more harm than good; false information was given credibility. One family had to remove a Facebook page that they had put up to find their missing son.

Social Media Platforms. Source: kisspng

 

On the internet, everyone has a voice. It is simple for anybody to find a community that shares a point of view that they agree with. Sometimes, this idea may not be correct. One only needs to look at vaccines to encounter this scenario. In the past few decades, some people have begun to reject vaccinations and declare vaccines to be the cause of autism spectrum disorder. While it is true that the rate of diagnosis has increased in this time period, this is likely due to advancements in autism research.

Autism prevalency overtime (diagnosis was 8 years after year of birth); adapted from CDC.

Unfortunately, the idea of this link quickly gained traction after Andrew Wakefield published his research about the relationship between the usage of the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism. Eventually, he had his paper retracted and he was barred from practicing medicine in his country.

Vaccine Clipart. Source: Clipart Panda.

Even after many studies and investigations found no link between autism and the MMR vaccine, there were still people who believed in vaccines being the cause. Even after proof of his conflict of interest- his patent, there were still people who believed him. And at present, people who oppose vaccines can find like-minded individuals to share and cement their beliefs. Once an idea has been accepted by an individual, it becomes highly resistant to correction.

Example of misinformation and the inability to correct; Source: Chris Meserole (Law Fare Blog).

Further complicating the situation, everybody also tends to prefer to read content that relates to their narrative while ignoring other ones. Whether it be a news article, a comment, or even a blog post like this one, one must remain diligent about the content they are reading.

Hydroelectricity: A Temporary Band-aid

Global temperature averages are increasing at abnormal rates. Sea levels are rising, ice caps are melting, and nature is dying. Almost all governments and scientists worldwide have been looking for solutions to impede the fate that humanity is heading towards. One of the ways is through using a cleaner energy source such as hydroelectricity.

In the past two decades, hydroelectricity has become more popular as a substitution for fossil fuel powered energy production. Its claim to fame was that it was a clean way to generate electricity; it was a viable solution for the future as climate change started to become a mainstay in the news. Initial studies had hydroelectricity being almost emission free!

Vattenfall Study for Carbon Emissions of Fossil Fuels, Renewables, Nuclear. Source: Wikimedia Commons

However, hydroelectricity was also declared a part of the greenhouse gas problem.

When thinking about producing electricity using water, one would think of it as being a clean and renewable process. It’s water! People bathe in it and drink it. How can it be dirty?

Unlike coal, a non-renewable resource which takes millions of years to form, the water isn’t being burned or used up. However, like coal , it is not clean (albeit to a much lesser extent).

Clean water for drinking. Source: kisspng

The basics of hydro-power is that water is pumped through a turbine to induce spinning. This motion activates a generator, producing the electricity which has become so important in daily life. The dirty part comes from the carbon emissions generated during construction and passively during the hydroelectric dam’s lifetime.

Typical hydroelectric dam. Source: United States Geological Survey (USGS)

Throughout the building process, many carbon sinks will be destroyed as trees and plants will be chopped down. This reduces the overall carbon dioxide that can be stored while releasing the carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere. Not to mention the habitats and the environments near the power plants that are destroyed at the same time.

Hydroelectric dam construction by China. Source: Giorgio Taraschi / Al Jazeera

However, it’s not just during the initial construction that hydroelectric power is unclean. Plants and other living things are able to grow in these bodies of water.  All living things that die and decompose in the waters produce methane, carbon dioxide, and nutrients. The nutrients in turn help other living organisms grow, thus continuing the cycle. When thought about in this manner, the hydroelectric dams become carbon emission generators.

In its current state, hydroelectricity is not a clean source of power. Nevertheless, it is a viable alternative to fossil fuels as we transition to better solutions. There is hope in the future that hydro-power becomes one of these solutions. Companies are still innovating and working towards a setup that is gentler on the environment while still providing adequate amounts of electricity.