What would a project on traditional knowledge and climate change be with out a little politics? Incomplete by today’s standards!
This is a brief analysis by a Green member of an article about climate change. In 1999 there was an unprecedented storm in northern BC and local Elders told scientists and leaders that a storm of that magnitude had never happened before. It took 12 years for researchers at Queens and Carleton to confirm this information. The Green member wonders why this knowledge had to be confirmed scientifically and points out that the information was already there and that the money spent on research could have been spent on actually addressing the problem rather than confirming that it was actually a problem…which Elders already said it was.
This is an interesting article point to the bias of Western society towards science as opposed to other forms of knowing.
My interest in this site is to see how much the Green Party of BC actually uses traditional knowledge versus scientific. Do they strike a balance or are they biased one way or the other?