Categories
Uncategorized

A Curriculum for the Future

In his article “A Curriculum for the Future”, Gunther Kress makes a strong case for the notion of “changing with the times”. The idea of prioritising and rethinking current curriculum is incredibly important in my opinion, as it is foolish to assume that the present system is without fault. Kress’ statement about “the coming era demand[ing] an education for instability” (133) is so incredibly profound. I did my seminar presentation on e-literature, and one important aspect of that subject was the notion of thinking about and preparing for the future, as change has become so rapid today. Putting these readings together really emphasizes the notion that nothing is constant, and this definitely makes me think critically about how I will deal with curriculum in my future classroom.

At its very core, the goals of education have changed (Kress 134), and I strongly feel that we must also follow suit. What the norm was even 10 years ago is not necessarily a reality today. During my practicum, I encountered many teachers who seemed to be comfortable and settled in their methods of teaching. By this, I mean that many of them refused – and frankly didn’t see the point – of trying new, innovative ways of teaching. When talking to a teacher about wanting to utilize different forms of technology in the classroom, I was told on more than one occasion to stick to “what works”, which in this case meant giving students notes and worksheets. This, to me, seemed like such a primitive way of communicating with my students, but looking back on it now, I see why a newer way of reaching students can seem fearful to some teachers.

Changing how one has always done something, especially when the ‘newer’ way of doing it can seem daunting, is reason enough to deter one from making modifications to their instruction. To be honest, I do not do well with change, but when it comes to teaching, what makes me more willing to try new things is the idea of reaching my students on a greater level. The potential of providing my students with a deeper connection to school content is so incredibly exciting to me that the fear that comes with change disappears. I truly believe that there is so much room for improvement when it pertains to school curriculum, and the only way that this development can take place is if we make it a priority to plan not only for now, but the future. Nothing in life is stable – especially teaching – and to become comfortable with a primitive mode of doing things would be an incredible disservice to our students.

 

 

 

Works Cited

Kress, Gunther. “A curriculum for the future.” Cambridge journal of education 30.1 (2000): 133-145.

Media Project #1: “The Lottery” — A Dramatic Performance

Here’s the link to our performance information – enjoy!

The Lottery Dramatic Performance

 

—– Adam, Irene, Katarina, Natalia and Natasha 🙂

Categories
e-literature Uncategorized

New Directions for Literacy Education: E-Literature

Electronic Literature is such a fascinating topic, and during my preparation for my group’s presentation, I learned more than I ever thought I would. After reading Elizabeth Hayle’s article, an aspect of e-lit that really stood out for me was the issue of preserving and archiving work so that it would be available for future generations. What intrigued me about this topic was the fact that I had never (ever!) even thought about the importance of preserving e-lit, and really had no idea how the process would even work. This article really emphasizes the point that digital media is not something that remains stagnant, it is constantly changing, and “whereas books printed on good quality paper can endure for centuries, electronic literature routinely becomes unplayable (and hence unreadable) after a decade or even less” (Hayles). Although I am aware of the fact that both software and hardware are constantly changing and improving, I had never really thought of the fact that they can change to the point where certain programs can become completely incompatible, and thus, lost.

Today, we are so used to the constant flow of new editions of our favourite electronic items, and because they almost always support the programs of earlier editions of the same device, “losing” any type of electronic work/composition is usually not an issue. What we must keep in mind is the fact that this scenario may not ring true when there is a 20 or 30 year age gap between different editions of the same device. This fact emphasizes the point that in order to make the innovations of today available for tomorrow, preservation and archiving must seriously be considered.

Besides the issue of archiving electronic literature, something else that I am really interested in is the idea of comparing the different experiences one may have with print literature (a plain old book) and an online digital novel. I had the opportunity to read some digital novels online, and I found that while they were incredibly engaging and entertaining, I simply just prefer reading a physical book. In my case, I think a lot of this has to do with the fact that I cannot sit in front of my computer screen for very long, and also, that I equate reading with peace and quiet. I am interested in hearing what my classmates have to say, and look forward to hearing their different perspectives.

 

Works Cited

Hayles, N. Katherine. (2007). Electronic Literature: What is it? The Electronic Literature Organization. <http:eliterature.org/pad/elp.html>

 

—– Natasha Randhawa

 

 

Spam prevention powered by Akismet