Is it the work of the Flying Spaghetti Monster?…Kansas considers ditching NCLB

Lawrence Journal-World: STATE TO EXPLORE ABANDONING NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND LAW

September 15, 2006
by Scott Rothschild

Momentum is building across the political spectrum in Kansas to give No
Child Left Behind a failing grade.

President Bush’s major public school initiative is getting lambasted as
unrealistic and counterproductive.

“Certainly there are a lot of things wrong with No Child Left Behind,”
said State Board of Education Chairman Steve Abrams, a conservative
Republican from Arkansas City.

His comments came as the state department of education released figures
showing 26 schools and 11 districts with high numbers of low-income
students failed to make the required progress under NCLB. None from
Lawrence was identified.

That number would have been slightly higher, but the State Board of
Education voted to keep the target goals the same for 2006 as they were
previously.

Abrams said the board wanted to give schools a year to get acclimated to
a new testing schedule.

Previously, NCLB required testing of only three grade levels. But
starting in 2005-06, grades third through eighth and one grade in high
school had to be tested in reading and mathematics.

The test results determine whether the school made adequate yearly
progress in increasing the percentage of students who meet the
standards. Each year the target increases.

Opting out

The education board has been sharply divided between moderates and
conservatives on numerous issues, but it has agreed within the next
couple of months to take a look at what the impact would be if the state
disengaged from NCLB and refused the federal funding associated with it.
The board also will explore trying to get Congress to change the law.

Abrams said the NCLB requirement that 100 percent of school children
reach proficiency in math and reading tests by 2014 is “statistically
impossible.”

The Kansas Association of School Boards applauded the decision by the
board to hold the targets the same for the current school year.

“The board’s action will give some schools a reprieve, but if NCLB
continues in its present form, virtually all schools are expected to
‘fail’ to achieve adequate yearly progress,” the association said.

Under the law, schools and districts also are required to meet adequate
yearly progress among subgroups of students.

KASB said that a school with all major subgroups has at least 42 ways to
miss adequate yearly progress, no matter how positive its results are on
every other measure.

‘End goal’

Lawrence High School Principal Steve Nilhas said he didn’t think the
board’s action would have much impact.

“I think any way you slice it, we have to be at 100 percent
(proficiency) by 2014,” Nilhas said.

“So, it’s whether you want to take it in big steps or smaller steps, you
still have to get there. That’s the bottom line for me,” he said. “So,
I’m not losing a whole lot of sleep on where they set the targets. I’m
kind of looking at the end goal and that’s where we have to get to.”

Debbie Ridgway, president of the Pinckney School Parent Teacher
Organization, said the NCLB law might need restructuring.

“I think the concept in itself is a good concept,” Ridgway said.

But when funding is being cut so there are not enough remedial reading
and math teachers to help students, it counteracts the intent, she said.

“Someone is going to be left behind without help,” she said.

Michelle Kirk, president of the Langston Hughes School PTO who teaches
third grade at Quail Run School, said she had mixed feelings about NCLB.

She thought it had good points, but it has caused educators to “over
test” and focus their lessons so students learn only the standards on
the tests.

“Sometimes there are other things that are important too,” she said.
“But if it’s not measurable, then we don’t teach it.”

Kirk said Congress should provide funds to keep class sizes down to
about 15 to 17 students per teacher. When class sizes creep up to 21
students per teacher — and there’s no paraprofessional to assist — the
teacher can’t give as much help to students who need it, she said.

“Smaller class sizes are the absolute, most essential thing they can
do,” Kirk said.

Lawrence’s congressional representatives have voiced varying views about
NCLB.

U.S. Rep. Dennis Moore, a Democrat, voted for the measure in 2001, but
has introduced a bill that would allow a state education agency or
school district to suspend NCLB provisions until it is fully funded.
Moore said the federal government has shorted the new law by $40 billion.

U.S. Rep. Jim Ryun, a Republican, voted against NCLB, but has defended
the amount of money the federal government has provided under the
legislation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *