Category Archives: Labor

Joe Hill: The man who didn’t die

joehill.gif
From Z Net: ZNet Commentary: Joe Hill—The man who didn’t die

Joe Hill: The Man Who Didn’t Die
November 19, 2005
By Dick Meister

It’s Nov. 19, 1915, in a courtyard of the Utah State Penitentiary in Salt Lake City. Five riflemen take careful aim at a condemned organizer for the Industrial Workers of the World, Joe Hill, who stands before them straight and stiff and proud.

“Fire!” he shouts defiantly.

The firing squad didn’t miss. But Joe Hill, as the folk ballad says, “ain’t never died.” On this 90th anniversary of his execution, he lives on as one of the most enduring and influential of American symbols.

Joe Hill’s story is that of a labor martyr framed for murder by viciously anti-labor employer and government forces, a man who never faltered in fighting for the rights of the oppressed, who never faltered in his attempts to bring them together for the collective action essential if they were to overcome their wealthy and powerful oppressors.

His is the story of a man and an organization destroyed by government opposition yet immensely successful. As historian Joyce Kornbluh noted, the IWW made “an indelible mark on the American labor movement and American society,” laying the groundwork for mass unionization, inspiring the formation of groups to protect the civil liberties of dissidents, prompting prison and farm labor reforms, and leaving behind “a genuine heritage …
industrial democracy.”

Joe Hill’s story is the story of perhaps the greatest of all folk poets, whose simple, satirical rhymes set to simple, familiar melodies did so much to focus working people on the common body of ideals needed to forge them into a collective force. Songs like “The Preacher and the Slave,” which promises,”You will eat, bye and bye/In that glorious land above the sky/Work and Pray, live on hay/You’ll get pie in the sky when you die.”
Ralph Chaplain, the IWW bard who wrote “Solidarity Forever,” found Hill’s songs “as coarse as homespun and as fine as silk; full of laughter and keen-edged satire; full of fine rage and finer tenderness; songs of and for the worker, written in the only language he can understand.”

Joe Hill’s story is the story of a man who saw with unusual clarity the unjust effects of the political, social and economic system on working people and whose own widely publicized trial and execution alerted people worldwide to the injustices and spurred them into corrective action.

It’s the story of a man who told his IWW comrades, just before stepping in front of the firing squad: “Don’t waste any time in mourning. Organize!”

Hill’s comrades aimed at nothing less than organizing all workers into One Big Union regardless of their race, nationality, craft or work skills, calling a general strike and wresting control of the economy from its capitalist masters. The revolutionary message was presented in the simple language of the workplace, in the songs of Hill, Chaplain and others, in the streetcorner oratory and in a tremendous outpouring of publications, including a dozen foreign-language newspapers which were distributed among the many unskilled immigrants from European nations where unions had similar goals.

Workers were told again and again that they all had the same problems, the same needs and faced the same enemy. It was they who did the work, while others got the profit; they were members, all of them, of the working class.
To aspire to middle-class status, as the established labor movement advocated, would mean competing against their fellow workers and chaining themselves to a system that enslaved them.

Organized religion also was a tool of enslavement, to keep the worker’s eye on that “pie in the sky” while he was being exploited in this world. Patriotism was a ruse to set the workers of one nation against those of another for the profit of capitalist manipulators.

IWW organizers carried the message to factories, mines, mills and lumber camps throughout the country, and to farms in the Midwest and California.

The cause of radical unionism to which Joe Hill devoted his life was lost a long time ago. The call to revolution is scarcely heard in today’s clamorously capitalist society. Labor organizations seek not to seize control of the means of production but rather to share in the fruits of an economic system controlled by others. Yet Joe Hill’s fiery words and fiery deeds, his courage and his sacrifices continue to inspire political, labor, civil rights and civil liberties activists.

They still sing his songs, striking workers, dissident students and others, on picket lines, in demonstrations, at rallies, on the streets and in auditoriums. They echo his spirit of protest and militancy, his demand for true equality, share his fervent belief in solidarity, even use tactics first employed by Hill and his comrades.

Hill emigrated to the United States from his native Sweden in 1902, changing his name from Joel Haaglund, working as a seaman and as an itinerate wheat harvester, pipe layer, copper miner and at other jobs as he made his way across the country to San Diego, translating into compelling lyrics the hopes and desires, the frustrations and discontents of his fellow workers.

In San Diego, Hill joined in one of the first of the many “free speech fights” waged by the Industrial Workers of the World against attempts by municipal authorities around the country to silence the streetcorner oratory that was a key part of the IWW’s organizing strategy.

Not long afterward Hill hopped a freight for Salt Lake City, where he helped lead a successful construction workers’ strike and began helping organize another free speech fight. But within a month, he was arrested on charges of shooting to death a grocer and his son and was immediately branded guilty by the local newspapers and authorities alike. Ultimately, Hill was convicted on only the flimsiest of circumstantial evidence.

Hill had staggered into a doctor’s office within an hour after the shootings, bleeding from a chest wound that he said had stemmed from a quarrel over a woman. The prosecutor argued that the wound was inflicted by the grocer in response to an attack by Hill, although he did not introduce into evidence either the grocer’s gun or the bullet that allegedly was fired from it.
He did not introduce the gun that Hill allegedly used and did not call a single witness who could positively identify Hill as the killer. But he easily convinced the jury that the murders were an example of IWW terrorism and that since Hill was an IWW leader and had been arrested and charged with the crime, he was guilty.

As Hill’s futile appeals made their way through the courts, Gov. William Spry of Utah was swamped with thousands of petitions and letters from all over the world asking for a pardon or commutation. But he would not even be swayed by the pleas for mercy from the Swedish ambassador. Not even by the pleas of U.S. President Woodrow Wilson.

The governor paid much greater attention to the views of Utah’s powerful Mormon Church leaders and powerful employer interests, particularly those who controlled the state’s dominant copper mining industry. They insisted that the man they considered one of the most dangerous radicals in the country be put to death.

Joe Hill’s body was shipped to Chicago, where it was cremated after a hero’s funeral, the ashes divided up and sent to IWW locals for scattering on the winds in every state except Utah. Hill, with typical grim humor, had declared that “I don’t want to be caught dead in Utah.”

Even in death, Hill was not safe from the government. One packet of his ashes, sent belatedly to an IWW organizer in 1917 for scattering in Chicago, was seized by postal inspectors. They acted under the Espionage Act, passed after the United States entered World War I that year, which made it illegal to mail any material that advocated “treason, insurrection. or forcible resistance to any law of the United States.”

The envelope, containing about a tablespoon of Hill’s ashes, was sent to the National Archives in Washington, D.C. It remained hidden there until 1988, when it was discovered and turned over in Chicago to the men who preside over what little remains of the Industrial Workers of the World, shrunken now to only a few hundred members.

The Post Office apparently had objected to the caption beneath a photo of Hill on the front of the envelope. “Joe Hill,” it said — “murdered by the capitalist class, Nov. 19, 1915.”

Or maybe the authorities objected to Hill’s Last Will, which was printed on the back of the envelope:

My will is easy to decide,
For I have nothing to divide,
My kin don’t need to fuss or moan ­
“Moss does not cling to a rolling stone.”

My body? Oh if I could choose,
I would to ashes it reduce,
And let the merry breezes blow
My dust to where some flowers grow.

Perhaps some fading flowers then
Would come to life and bloom again.
This is my last and final will,
Good luck to all of you,
Joe Hill

Copyright (c) 2005 Dick Meister, a San Francisco-based freelance columnist. Contact him through his website, www.dickmeister.com.

UBC Roundtable on the Teachers’ Strike

UBC Roundtable on the Teachers’ Strike

WHEN: Wednesday November 9th at 4:30 pm
WHERE: Chemistry Building, room 126. CHEMISTRY BUILDING EAST WING; Also called Building C. For map, click here

SPEAKERS:
Jinny Sims, President BCTF
Catherine Evans, President BC Society for Public Education
Paul Orlowski, Vancouver Secondary Teacher
Kevin Millsip, Trustee Vancouver School Board
Larry Kuehn, Director of Research and Technology, BCTF
Charles Menzies, Parent Advisory Council member
E. Wayne Ross, Professor, Faculty of Education, UBC

THEME: A roundtable discussion on the significance of the teachers’ strike and struggle for public education in British Columbia.

FORMAT: A panel of presenters representing teachers, parents, and researchers will each speaker for 5 to 10 minutes each. This will be followed by a moderated discussion of the significance of the teachers’ strike.

Download flyer here.

SPONSORS:
UBC Department of Anthropology and Sociology
UBC Department of Curriculum Studies
UBC Department of Political Science
UBC Centre for Research in Women’s Studies and Gender Relations
Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor
New Proposals Publishing Society

This event is being organized by Charles Menzies, Stephen Petrina, and E. Wayne Ross, for further information please feel free to contact any of the organizers.

Wrapping up the BC teachers’ strike (for now)

In his article for MRZine (BC teachers go back to work—Who won the battle?), BCTF activist Bob Rosen says that the strike resulted in a “big victory for teachers.”

After seven legislated agreements in the public sector by the Campbell government, the BCTF’s courage in being willing to take on an illegal strike forced the government to appoint a mediator and to accept a mediated settlement, which broke the pattern of passive acceptance of unilateral imposed contracts. The enormous public support for teachers throughout the illegal strike was itself a very important achievement. It signaled that the public agreed that there are real problems in the schools and teachers’ concerns to have a say in how to improve learning and working conditions is valid. It strengthens the hand of the BCTF enormously in future negotiations and in the roundtable discussions, which have already begun.

I agree that these are all important outcomes from the strike, but the fact remains that teachers did not get the three main items they were fighting for [as the Surrey Teachers Association pointed out in their statement “Nine Reasons to Vote ‘No'”, which by the way, seems to have disappeared from their web site—read on for the full text of the STA’s “no recommendation.”] The goals being: (1) full, free collective bargaining for teachers; (2) a return collective agreement language on working and learning conditions; (3) a fair salary increase.

Rosen also indicates that the CUPE and the BCTF are ready to challenge Jim Sinclair’s leadership of the BC Federation of Labour after he double-crossed the teachers (and CUPE) by pulling the BCFL out of the regional walkouts in what turned out to be the last days of the strike (and while public support for the teachers was growing); butting in to announce that the teachers would vote on Ready’s recommendations before he (or anyone else) had actually seen them; then not showing up for the big rallies in Vancouver and Surrey the last day of the strike.

Eugene Plawiuk’s take on the strike is worth a read. In B.C. Teachers Grab Victory from the Jaws of Defeat he argues

“The teachers had no choice but to compromise, given the weight of the State and its Courts against them…this is a lesson for the whole labour movement, that workers rights are not given by contracts or the State, they are taken when we walk out and take the streets or when we seize our work places and put them under direct worker and community control. Such situations not only challenge the government but the very nature of capitalism.…That they mobilized mass picketing is the least they could do, given the fact that the workers in B.C. have faced over four years of neo-liberal attacks by the Campbell neo-liberal Government. But they failed again, as they did with the nurses strike last summer, to go all the way to a General Strike. At the eleventh hour they once again capitulated to the State.…ONCE AGAIN THE LABOUR MOVEMENT IN CANADA HAS SHOWN THAT IT IS THE HAND MAIDEN OF CAPITALISM AND NOT A WORKERS MOVEMENT.”

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Most of the public-sector contracts expire in March of 2006 and the maneuvering has already started. George Heyman, head of the BC Government and Service Employee’s union says the teachers have inspired public sector unions and as a result there will be no more imposed contracts. CBC reports that “Heyman says unions are in no rush to break the law. But he says if the government tries again to impose a contract on any union, it can expect labour to protest.”

According to Finance Minister Carole Taylor, the government is promising money for public workers next year (she won’t say how much) and in the wake of the teachers’ strike says it is looking to improve the bargaining process with public-sector workers. Finance Minister Carole Taylor says that

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From The Tyee:

TEACHERS’ STRIKE NEWS AND VIEWS: THE WRIGHT WAY TO DEAL WITH TEACHERS’ ANGER—Premier ignored report assigned by his own minister. By David Schreck

SCHOOL STALEMATE: HOW WE GOT HERE—Nearly two decades of wrangling in the Legislature. By Will McMartin and
David Beers

IMAGES FROM ‘A DAY OF ACTION’—Teachers and supporters rally in front of the legislature. Photos by Nick
Westover

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Meanwhile in Quebec, talks have broken down between the Charest government and teachers. The 80,000 teachers iin Quebec have been without a contract for two years and Francoise Stake, head of the Quebec Provincial Association of Teachers asked after the talks broke down, “Aside from striking, what other action is there?”

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Terrace Standard ran a story today (Oct 26) on the CUPE walkout in Northern BC on October 18, which reports that while Northwest Community College wasn’ picketed, “a number of instructors there who teach university credit and other programs and who belong to CUPE didn’t show up for work” and joined striking CUPE workers at locations around the city.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Video of the Victory march and rally (Oct 17), which shut down the city, is available on the web at WorkingTV.com.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Ready recommendations can be found here.Vince Ready’s Recommendations: Nine Reasons to Vote “No”
Surrey Teachers’ Association

The STA Executive is recommending to the membership that we vote “no.” There are two questions that you need to ask yourself. Did we achieve our three goals?

The goals being: ï Full, free collective bargaining for teachers ï A return of our stripped collective agreement language on working and learning conditions ï A fair salary increase.

None of these goals have been achieved. The next question is ìIf we stay out longer will we get anything better?î We canít gaze into the future. We donít know. Will the parents and community still be with us given the bombardment from CanWest and Global, that these are recommendations that
teachers should accept. We also have been advised that the BCTF may face criminal contempt charges on Monday, if teachers are not back at work. Each member should read the recommendations from Ready. They are available on our website at www.surreyteachers.org Each of you will make your own decision. Whatever you decide will be respected.

Please find below nine reasons to vote “No.”

1. The recommendations contain no guarantees for class size and composition limits. The one-time $20 million dollar infusion will mean 330 teachers added province wide.

2. The proposed changes to the School Act do not include any guarantees for actual limits. Nothing prevents Campbell from amending the School Act with a limit of 40.

3. Parent support was predicated on our fight for learning conditions. The public may perceive us to be ditching class-size and composition in exchange for money.

4. The $40 million for harmonization represents only an average of a 2% increase for teachers province wide. This is understood to only affect locals below the average income. We need an increase for all members. Teachers in locals above the provincial average will not receive an increase. Teachers across the province have been out for 2 weeks. We all need an increase. An injury to one is an injury to all!

5. The total money included in the recommendations ($105.2 million) is close to what we have lost in salary during job action. In Surrey, we have given up $10 million in salary over the last 2 weeks. Thus, even the small monetary gains are simply reassigning our own salaries within the school system.

6. Some of the recommendations are one time only. This includes the extra $20 million for learning conditions and the $40 million for Long Term Disability (Salary Indemnity Plan). The greatest costs of our Salary Indemnity Plan are the short term benefit costs. Teachers will continue to fund the total costs of the short term (maximum of 120 days) plan.

7. The recommendations include no improvement to our bargaining rights. Bargaining rights were one of our three principle goals in this political protest. Bill 12 stands and we have imposed working conditions, not a negotiated settlement. The Essential Services legislation stands.

8. The Learning Round Table is not a decision making body, and the increase in teacher representatives still leaves us in a small minority. We cannot expect this body to address
learning conditions meaningfully. Ready notes in his recommendations that the Round Table does not have a mandate to deal with collective agreement issues. The BCTF has been a member of EAC(Education Advisory Committee) for 15 years. This group is comprised of every education
stakeholder group, including government. The BCTF has hammered away on class size, class composition, non-enrolling specialists for years to no avail. The Round Table is nothing new!

9. Non-enrolling ratios are not addressed at all. This was one of our primary bargaining objectives: ratios to ensure adequate teacher-librarians, counselors, learning support teachers, speech and language pathologists and integration support teachers.

How the CanWest, the Liberals, Vince Ready and Jim Sinclair stuck it to the teachers

In his article The political education of the BC teachers and their leader Jinny Sims Robin Mathews says the BCTF was naive about the politics of the judicial system in BC and should have been prepared to protest the Madamn Justice Brenda Brown’s ruling.

Matthews says “the Supreme Court of British Columbia has joined forces with the Gordon Campbell government; and any organization that is going to fight the Gordon Campbell government has to turn on the B.C. Supreme Court and expose it for its prejudice, its injustice, its war against the population of British Columbia.”

The Monday morning quarterbacking with regard to how union should have responded to the contempt of court ruling is interesting, but for Mathew’s suggested strategies to have worked the BCTF would have had to be able to rely on 100% backing from the the BC Federation of Labor, which in the end it did not.

Barry O’Neil and CUPE seemed ready to go the whole nine yards on the teachers’ strike but BC Federation of Labour president Jim Sinclair, clearly wasn’t interested in pushing too hard on the Campbell government. Sinclair’s lack of enthusiasm was evident from the beginning as he was ready to crawl under a rock when the 5,000 protesters at the Vancouver rally for the teachers (Oct 11) started chanting “General Strike! General Strike!”

[Actually, if you look at the video of the Victory rally (Oct 17) on WorkingTV.com you can see Sinclair raring back laughing while the crowd calls for a general strike.]

The other, more tangle sign of how far Sinclair was willing to go, was his handling of the Hospital Workers strike…and that is not very far at all.

Mathews puts it this way: “Seasoned observers watched Jim Sinclair of the B.C. Federation of Labour some months ago sell out the Hospital Employees Union by signing a bad contract the members were not permitted to ratify. The seasoned observers were waiting for Jim Sinclair to sell out the teachers.

And he gives every appearance of having done so.

In what seems to be a staggering double-cross of the BCTF union, he announced B.C. Federation of Labour was calling off a major teacher-support shutdown of Vancouver. And he announced – in a truly dirty blow delivered to the BCTF – that the BCTF members would vote on the Vince Ready proposals (before BCTF president Ginny [sic] Sims could speak).

That clearly took BCTF by surprise. We can only imagine how the phone lines burned in the next few hours as Jim Sinclair probably told Ginny[sic] Sims he was all-but pulling his support and she’d better crumble before the Campbell government.”

It’s an old story, the mainstream media, the government, the courts, and big labor all sleeping in one big bed, but it looks like it was the BCTF that was getting screwed.

Oregon hit by first strike of teachers since 1999

Note that the strike is in part over implementation of NCLB…

Oregon hit by first strike of teachers since 1999

After 18 months of a bitter contract dispute, teachers in the sprawling Oregon Trail School District went on strike Tuesday, the first in the state to do so since 1999.

Teachers and the school board in the Oregon Trail School District remain at odds over several key issues, including salary, guidelines for teacher evaluations, implementation of federal education laws and health care costs, representatives from both sides said.

Think strikes affect students? Think again

An analysis of 28 school districts in Pennsylvania shows attendance and test scroes are impacted only slightly by teacher strikes.

The Wilkes-Barre Times Leader reviewed data for school districts in Pennsylvanic where teachers held strikes in the past five years and found no clear relation between strikes and test scores. According to Lehigh University Professor Perry Zirkel, national studies confirm these findings.

The data reviewed by the Times Leader do show that, more often than not, attendance rates sagged the year of the strike and enrollment dropped that year and the next.

The data show that 52 percent of the districts saw average test scores drop the year of the strike. But the changes were usually small. For example, of 13 districts where scores slipped, nine had single-digit drops in the verbal scores and four were in single digits in math.

It all boils down to this: Statistics don’t seem to support the contention that strikes seriously hurt student achievement.

Read the full article here.

BCTF recommends acceptance of Ready recommendations

BCTF recommends acceptance of Ready recommendations

The Executive Committee of the B.C. Teachers’ Federation will be recommending acceptance of the settlement package put forward by facilitator Vince Ready.

“We are deeply disappointed that the government did not see fit to agree to a letter that would confirm its commitment to class size limits for students in Grades 4 to 12 and to addressing class composition problems,” said BCTF President Jinny Sims.

“However, we know that parents share our determination to achieve improved learning conditions for students. So we are confident that government will enshrine in the School Act these much-needed improvements to benefit all children in B.C. schools,” Sims said.

She added that teachers throughout B.C. would be holding the Liberal government accountable for its actions in implementing the improvements it had committed to through the Ready recommendations.

This weekend teachers will attend local meetings in school districts throughout the province. They will hear detailed information about Ready’s package, will consider the recommendation from their executive committee, and will vote by secret ballot.

The result will be reported out by the BCTF as soon as votes are counted on Sunday evening. Sims will be available to the media after results have been communicated to teachers.

Facilitator declares impasse in teachers’ strike

Macleans: Facilitator declares impasse in B.C. teachers’ strike, will submit his report

October 20, 2005 – 13:32

VANCOUVER (CP) – A compromise proposal by the B.C. teachers’ union to end its illegal strike has fallen flat, with the facilitator immediately declaring an impasse and promising to write up a report.

Veteran mediator Vince Ready said it’s clear the parties are stalemated and “just too far apart to come to a facilitated agreement or any kind of a negotiated agreement.”

He came to his conclusion just one day after starting talks with public school employers and the B.C. Teachers Federation.

Ready says given the impact of the strike by 38,000 teachers, he will make non-binding recommendations within hours.

The union had proposed changes to the Schools Act on class size and staffing ratios, along with an alternative three-year agreement to replace Bill 12.

The contentious legislation that imposed a contract and two-year wage freeze on the teachers triggered the school shutdown that began Oct. 7, keeping 600,000 students out of class.

Copyright by Rogers Media, Inc.

UBC Dept of Curriculum Studies supports B.C. teachers

The Department of Curriculum Studies approved the following letter in support of the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation, and forwarded it to Premier Campbell today:

Dear Premier Campbell, Minister Bond & Minister De Jong,

The Department of Curriculum Studies in the Faculty of Education at the University of British Columbia strongly opposes the action taken against teachers by the Provincial Government in Bill 12. We fully support teachers’ rights to free collective bargaining and job action when necessary. We urge the Provincial Government to refrain from further anti-teacher action or legislation and resolve to immediately reach a fair contract with the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.

Signed,

Department of Curriculum Studies, University of British Columbia

cc. Jinny Sims, President, British Columbia Teachers’ Federation
cc. Rob Tierney, Dean, Faculty of Education
cc. Elliott Burnell, President, University of British Columbia Faculty Association