Unit Two Reflection

Standard

I have been going through some significant difficulties during Unit Two which, although unrelated to the course, have adversely affected my ability to work effectively. As such, I have become quite behind in the formal report process, and there is much work left to be done before I will be able to proceed with the report. However, I am confident in my ability to complete the remaining work necessary to proceed in the coming days, and finish with the project on schedule.

In this post, I will address the process of creating a LinkedIn account including my thoughts on the use of social media for job searches, the peer review process for both LinkedIn and the Formal Report, and some of the trials and tribulations I’m running into regarding my formal report.

On LinkedIn

I have been “on” LinkedIn for several years now, although I had never been trained on how to use it. I use the word  “on” in quotes because I had a skeleton profile with some blank work experience and a couple interests listed before this course began. This course has allowed me to take another look at the network, and potentially find better uses for it. Doing the research for LinkedIn prior to really engaging with it made me question some of the narratives we hear about how to find work in the digital age. Post a lot, but not too much; respond promptly, but write personalized responses which slow down that process. A lot of the advice I read regarding LinkedIn was contradictory and could be boiled down to a specialized online etiquette that is difficult to understand for many people. In my own social media spheres, I rarely if ever post, and use social media like Facebook and Instagram solely for their direct messaging capabilities (and memes, to be frank). Therefore I find the world of LinkedIn to be a bit jarring, and I’m unsure if I particularly like the kind of corporate culture promoted by the network. All the same, I do think that LinkedIn presents a powerful tool that we can use to find employment, especially in an ever increasingly online environment. Shortly after making my LinkedIn account, a colleague reached out to me to connect, which is a nice feeling I suppose.

The Peer Review Process

The Peer Review process is a fundamental aspect of becoming a more effective writer, and I’ve been very lucky to have a great writing team to assist me in making my work more effective. I would like to thank them for their work, and I look forward to us continuing to work together.

Meera’s LinkedIn Peer Review:

I thought that Meera’s LinkedIn profile showcased a great example of how to use the site effectively and in accordance with the advice we gathered through our research of LinkedIn. I also think that her peer review of my own LinkedIn account accurately highlighted some of its flaws and helped me to address them.

Meera’s LinkedIn Page

Meera’s Peer Review of Zachary’s LinkedIn Page

Zachary’s LinkedIn Page

Zachary’s Peer Review of Meera’s LinkedIn Page

Sydney’s Formal Report Proposal:

I was glad to see Sydney adopt a more detailed approach to her formal report proposal. Sydney’s proposal post-edits gives the project weight and presents an interesting and relevant topic regarding the use of social media in professional environments, which dovetails nicely into our discussion about LinkedIn. Her own peer review of my proposal pointed out necessary changes which I have since amended.

Sydney’s Peer Review of Zachary’s Report Proposal

Sydney’s Report Proposal (Edited)

Zachary’s Peer Review of Sydney’s Formal Report Proposal 

Zachary’s Formal Report Proposal

The Formal Report Process

As I stated in the beginning paragraph of this reflection piece, I have become quite behind on the project (although I suppose there is a kind of cruel irony in the topic I’ve chosen for the project and the reasons for why I’ve become behind). Nonetheless, I have gone ahead with the update for the project and will subsequently have survey questions ready by the week’s end which I will disseminate to willing participants. I already know some of the challenges I’ll face, and I’ll talk about each in turn.

Finding Participants

Because the entirety of my research will be conducted online, I will need to be creative in how I find participants. One group that I’ve been thinking about is students from my recent film course which finished last month. I also want to talk to some recent graduates who were caught off guard by the sudden transition to an online learning environment while they were taking lab-based courses. I will explore other options as they appear.

Developing a Survey

This is my most immediate challenge (as it was supposed to already be uploaded). I have some ideas for the kinds of questions I want to ask, but I need to sit down and think more thoroughly about what is appropriate and achievable under the time constraints I now face.

Making it All Come Together

This is actually an area where I think I am ahead (read on schedule), because I have already been engaging with some of the literature I intend to use for the report. UBC policy is easy to access, as is policy from BCCDC, and there is so much literature regarding Covid-19 that it is often overwhelming. What will be interesting is the ways my participants will reflect on their experiences regarding the equipment they’ve needed to complete their coursework.

That’s all for this reflection piece. Overall, I am perhaps not as significantly behind as I initially thought when I set out writing this piece. With a little work I can get myself back up to speed and even pull ahead in the coming weeks.


Thanks again to my fellow writing team members for their solid work.

-Zach

The Final Reflection

Standard

The process of making this film has been equally enjoyable and exacerbating. In this post I’ll go over in detail the final changes I’ve made to the film as I’ve submitted it including, the narration (or lack thereof), the garden and bread making scenes, and the credits. At the end I will also talk about what I think the final message of the film is.

With respect to the narration, I shot of a lot of takes of me talking about the message of the film, and trying to fill transition moments where there was some ambiguity. At the end though, I really didn’t feel that my narration could add the kind of thing I was really looking for, or at least I couldn’t really figure it out in a way that would be satisfying. Beyond the fact that I really couldn’t stand listening to myself talk on screen, I found that the the narration did not add anything that couldn’t be perceived just by watching the movie.

The garden scene is the best scene in the movie (in no small part because Jess was so excited to talk about their garden). At the time that I filmed this scene (yesterday, ha!) I had accumulated enough experience with the camera, and had enough control over the scene, to actually focus and get the shots that mattered. Filming that scene took maybe an hour? Less? It was painless and easy. A major reason for this scene’s success is that Jess was so eager to talk, and to talk confidently, about what she was doing and why. She was also a good sport when I asked her to repeat things or let me get a close up of her doing something (like pulling up the radishes). I think the addition of the scene helped to break the tedium of people just explaining things in a serious tone, because Jess was willing to just play along with her role in the movie. Overall, I was very happy with the scene.

The bread making scene was definitely more difficult. To begin with, the space in the kitchen of my house where I was filming is super small, and so it caters to really close up shots. This bothered Emily, who was already fairly uncomfortable being on camera. I tried to make it work, but there were some fairly awkward camera angles. Emily was also quite unsure about what she should be talking about, which was my fault for not explaining it properly, so some of her dialogue is a bit lack luster. We had made arrangements to do a more formal sit down style interview that I could use as voice over, but the time for that has passed. That being said, there was enough dialogue and sound for me to use to show the process and have her explain what she was doing. What I really liked about this scene was that it’s the only scene where we actually see the fruits of one’s labour! We get to see the loaf of bread Emily makes right at the end of the movie, so that is really satisfying (at least for me).

For the credits, I chose the easy route. Just overlay them on top of the final shot and call it a day. Nothing fancy.

Now that it’s over, I think that the final message of the film could be interpreted in a few ways. Originally, I had set out to make a movie about the kinds of knowledge needed to grow/harvest one’s own food, and there’s a lot of knowledge that went into each of these methods. The knowledge about deer, fish, growing, and baking are deep troves that deserve far more explication and exploration than I could possibly give in a 10min movie. What I really liked is how each character referred to one of the other characters present in the film. It’s a small portion of the movie, but that sense of community is definitely there and it is quite profound.

Another aspect of this film that I think deserves further exploration is the gendered element. It’s notable that Khoi and Tim were most interested in hunting and fishing, while Jess and Emily were more interested in gardening and baking. Watching the finished product I was reminded of older ethnographies about hunter/gatherer societies with rigid (and gendered) labour roles. I mean, this is an interesting topic to explore but it’s also important to remember that I am the person who asked these people to participate in the film and to illustrate what they know about each process. I don’t think that this specific film really says much or anything about gender, but I do think that the building blocks for a discussion about gender are definitely present in the film.

Shot List (Updated)

Standard

Going out for Dinner

Scene One:

Opens on car driving up a FSR and movie title fades in. Khoi is introduced via shot of him on hanging off the back.

Khoi begins speaking. We follow the people on the camping trip making their way up the mountain to look for deer signs as Khoi speaks. Shots are selected to match up with what Khoi is saying. When he talks about going up in rising elevation, a shot is shown of them hiking up the mountain, when he talks about deer rubs, a deer rub is shown, etc.

The scene ends with Khoi illustrating what a deer track looks like, and is followed by a shot on the highway.

Scene Two

We begin to hear the sound of water and it slows rises in volume. We see Tim making his way with a fishing rod down to the river.

Once at the river, Tim tells us about the location, and shows us the tools and methods he’s using to catch fish. He also talks about some of the characteristics of the fish he’s looking for. Shots are selected again based on what he’s talking about. When describing the “float”, a shot of the float in the water is shown. When describing the fish he’s looking for, a sign post with those fish is shown. Tim references that Khoi is the one that brought him to this particular fishing spot.

The scene fades out with the sound of the river and a shot of Tim casting

Scene Three

The first sequence is a series of short shots with hard cuts. We open up on a recently planted garden bed, followed by a close up of a sign which states what’s being grown. This cuts to the vegetables having grown and being ready to harvest. Cut to Jess harvesting some of the vegetables from her garden, and we begin to hear her voice introduce us to the location.

Jess shows us around her garden, going over the garden beds, the role that Tim and others have played in maintaining the garden, what they’re growing, and showing us what they’re working on. As she speaks, we see close ups of her harvesting the radishes (featured previously), and working on the trellis for the burgeoning green beans.

The scene ends with Jess talking about how they need to make the trellis’ taller.

Scene Four

We open up on someone shaping a loaf of bread which cuts to a shot of Emily going over her sourdough recipe. Emily introduces us to the process of feeding sourdough starter and the subsequent process of making sourdough bread. We get close-ups of each of the ingredients that go into the process. We see her methodically add the water and flour to the starter, and we cut to the risen starter being added in to the flour and water mixture. Emily talks about how she maintains her sourdough starter, and we see her mixing everything and shaping it to form the loaf of bread we saw previously.

We finish with a shot of the finished loaf of bread ready to be sliced.

Roll credits

Last minute changes and finishing the film

Standard

It’s going to be a long night.

I was able to complete the rest of the filming today and am going through the process of editing the footage now.

I’ve removed the narration. I couldn’t stand listening to myself talk, nor do I think the script ultimately helped me get the message across. The film will have to stand on its own or fall flat, but I’m confident that there is enough footage to suggest common themes throughout the locations and characters.

I feel good (mostly) about the film now that the end is finally in sight, and I can focus on putting it all together in a nice and hopefully succinct way.

As far as sound goes, I think I solved most of it. The scene at the river is still noisy but I managed to make it a bit more palatable.

 

A Reflection on adding Narration

Standard

Well, I hate listening to myself on camera. In this post I’ll talk about the difficulties I’m going through with this movie, and how I intend to address them.

As noted in my last post a few weeks ago, I intended to add in a narration to make the story clearer to the viewer, part of which I’ve now done. I finally got to use my lavalier mic, which was great, but frankly I think I got better sound from just the camera itself. It’s hard to tell.

I sat on my film for about a week without really doing anything because frankly, I got sick of watching it. That’s not to say I don’t like my own movie, but constantly watching the same 5 minutes of footage was mind-numbing and I needed a break. Taking a break though is a double-edged sword, because I’m facing a bunch of problems with the film, and quite frankly it’s nearly too late in the term to really do much about it. We’re kicking it into high gear for this last weekend.

Problem #1: The sound of the river

In the second draft that I posted, there is a long sequence about a minute long where Tim is showing me the bait he is using, and he’s talking. There are two problems with this sequence, one is that the sound of the river is overwhelmingly loud, and the second problem is that the camerawork is shoddy. I opted to take out this scene because it really fell flat for what I wanted it to convey.

My issue though is that the entire scene from start to finish has the sound of the river in it, and the river is very, very loud. I can’t go back and re-shoot it for a myriad of reasons, but chiefly because Tim is away for the weekend.

My answer to this problem is to use b-roll footage during phases where Tim finishes speaking. I can get shots of birds, of trees, of nature etc. and just cut those shots into the movie so that it breaks up the tedium of the river. I’m not entirely sure if it will work because it could just make the river sound more jarring.

Problem #2 There is still a lot left to film

I haven’t been able to set up a time with my gardening friends, and this is very lamentable. The sheer amount of work left to do for this film is actually insane, and because of my ‘break’, I feel like I really shot myself in the foot.

 

Unit One Reflection Blog

Standard

Zachary Goldman

Dr. Erika Paterson

June 13, 2020

Subject: Unit One Reflection

 

This introductory unit for our technical writing course required us to create a set of definitions for a term we selected, to edit the definitions with the assistance of our peers, and to incorporate those edits into our original posts. My partner throughout this process was Matthew De Rose, who greatly assisted me in writing the final version of my definitions. In this post I’ll go over my own editing process related to Matthew’s work, and then dive into what I learned when Matthew reviewed my work.

I reviewed Matthew’s definition for GUI first by engaging with it piecemeal. I looked at each paragraph separately and wrote down editorial suggestions on a piece of paper. After a few readings going through each paragraph, I moved on to engaging with the document as a whole which allowed me to get a better idea of the flow for Matthew’s definition. Matthew’s writing was detail laden but concise, which made the work on my end much easier. By far my most pertinent suggestion for Matthew’s work was altering the way they engaged with the question/answer format of their expanded definition. I was glad to see that this suggestion was well received.

For my own definition, I found myself struggling to come to a conclusion regarding the level of detail I needed. In Matthew’s suggested edits, they wrote that I needed more clarity in my sentence definition, and when I went over this I realized that they were correct. I tried to alter the definition to make it clearer, but am still unsure if I succeeded in that effort. Another area they suggested I look at was where I used the negation strategy in my expanded definition. Trying to separate Ethnography from more standard travelogue writing is something that even skilled ethnographers struggle with, and I found myself arguing with myself aloud about whether or not some travelogue writing could be counted as Ethnographic.

I have always found it easier to edit other peoples’ writing instead of my own, and I want to thank Matthew for teaching me something new, and for making the work on my end more bearable by being clear and concise with their writing style. Through this process I also learned a lot about how my own writing is perceived by others, which was illuminating, and informative.

As this unit ends I feel thankful that I have good writing partners, and I think I have a good handle on where I my own writing is at, so I feel confident about going forward into Unit Two.

Yours,

Zachary Goldman

Links to work in Unit One:

Original Definition Post: Ethnography

Original Definition Post: Graphic User Interface

Peer Review of GUI Definition

Peer Review of Ethnography Definition

Final Definition Post Edits: Ethnography

 

 

Update 2 of Draft Ethnographic Film

Standard

I’ve made a lot of progress since I last updated here, and have overcome a number of issues I was having previously, while also encountering new ones that need to be solved. In this post I’ll talk about the progress I’ve made through the narrative and technical issues I’ve solved and discovered, and where the next portion of the film will hopefully go.

Narrative Issues

In my last update I wrote how I was struggling to insert a narrative into the footage I had edited. After watching that footage, I realized that no one would know why I was showing this footage without directly knowing the characters or the motivations for why we were on that journey. I also never introduced the characters, so no one even knew who these people were and while Khoi gave a nice voice over for what we were doing, there was no explanation for why, and so the whole thing fell flat.

In this update, I added a third video track and used it to add text to a shot of Khoi riding in the back of the truck. I used this same video track with text later to add an introduction for Tim to enter on screen. I hope that the text gives the film some of the structure that it needs.

I added about two more minutes of footage that I shot this morning with my friend Tim who took me fishing on the Capilano river. This was a great opportunity to film because it was just the two of us, which gave me greater control of what kind of film I could get. It helped that Tim was incredibly enthusiastic about sharing his knowledge with me, because I got some amazing footage that I was able to put voice over.

I was fooling around a little bit with the kinds of shots I was taking. Tim was really eager to talk to me about his fishing knowledge and his equipment, so a lot of the footage I took included long recordings with shifting camera positions. Some of these shifting angles were fairly successful, others were not.

I do have a pretty significant regret though about this morning, which is that I left my lavallier microphone at home. A lavallier is a wired mic that transmits sound to a receiver attached to the camera. I bought one because I wanted to use it during this project, but of course I forgot it this morning.

The loss of the lavallier microphone basically meant that the camera was picking up the sound of the river the whole time. At first, I actually liked that. I’ve been using the sound of the river as a bridge to connect scenes. The only problem is that the river is super loud (obviously). The lavallier microphone would’ve narrowed in on Tim’s voice instead of picking up every sound in existence.

The footage is still good and usable, but using the lavallier would’ve been better so I’m kicking myself a little bit.

As for the question of why I chose to show this footage, and as to the why of the story; I’ve decided to add a narration at the beginning to give the story some context. I was discussing with Dr. Menzies the idea of using narrative “bookends” to frame the stories that are being shown on screen. One of the major issues I was facing in my last update was that I didn’t know how to tie all the stories in the film together in a way that would be visually and narratively satisfying. In this, you’ll notice that I used footage of rain on a highway to act as a bridge between the hunting and fishing trips which took place a few weekends apart.

This draft video doesn’t yet have the narrative bookends because adding these bookends presents some technical difficulties which brings to me to the next part of this reflection.

Technical Difficulties

Well you don’t know what you don’t know.

Right now my only working computer is a Google Chromebook, which I bought out of necessity for school, and which has been invaluable for my assignments.

The only issue with Chromebook is that it runs on a different operating system that is incompatible with software meant for Mac or Windows. This means that I don’t have access to Final Cut Pro, or Adobe Premiere, or other programs which are the market standard for video editing.

As such, I’ve been using a subscription based program available to Google Chromebook called WeVideo, and up until now it has worked perfectly well! I’ve really enjoyed using it and found it really accessible.

The issue with WeVideo though, is that as your movie gets longer, the less the editing features function properly.

As a result, after importing the footage I took this morning to my original draft version, the video tracks got all messed up, the audio was out of sync, and the preview playback feature completely stopped working.

This meant that I had to restitch all the footage I had for the film back together from the beginning, undoing and then re-doing all the work I already done.

It turns out that WeVideo is mostly used for short company featurettes to be used in conferences and the like. It’s not exactly meant to be processing the amount of footage I’m trying to put together.

I did find a work around however! The work around is to restart my computer and delete the cache of files and cookies whenever the preview playback function starts to lag.

Nothing says “I know what I’m doing” like turning it off and back on again.

What happens from here

So far I think I’ve done a decent job of getting the footage I need to make a decent ethnographic film. Honestly at this point I could add the narration at the beginning, tie it all together at the end with a few shots of folks sitting around a campfire having a good time, and call it a day!

Really though I want to practice with more filming techniques, learn how to properly do sit-down interviews and frankly, I want to put that damn Lavallier microphone to use. I feel really good about where I am with the project overall given the constraints forced upon the class by Covid-19.

Going out for Dinner Draft 3 (Working Title)

 

Email to Sydney Dunn Cc: Meera Patel

Standard

To: sydney.dunn@alumni.ubc.ca

cc: meerapatel049@gmail.com

From: zdavgoldman@gmail.com

Subject: Invitation to join an ENGL 301 Writing Team

 

Hello Sydney,

We would like to formally invite you to join a writing team for ENGL 301.

We thoroughly enjoyed reading your application letter and looking through your blog more broadly. Your writing skills and history as a student representative on the Policy Review Committee are exactly the kinds of skills Meera Patel and I are looking for in our team members.

Attached to this email you’ll find both our letters of application and links to our blogs. I sincerely hope that you will consider joining our team for the remainder of the course.

Meera Patel’s Blog link

Zachary Goldman’s Blog link

Thank you for your time,

Zachary & Meera

Response to Meera Patel

Standard

From: Meerapatel049@gmail.com

To: zdavgoldman@gmail.com

Subject Re: Email to Zachary Goldman

 

Hello Meera,

Thank you for reaching out.

I enjoyed reading your letter of application and have decided to join your writing team for the remainder of the course. I particularly enjoyed reading about your academic interests, and with our combined experiences I think that we will work well together.

Sincerely,

Zachary Goldman

Draft Intro Scene to Ethnographic Film

Standard

For this video, I took the footage that I had already shot, my shot list, and my knowledge about the video editing program I’m using to create the first couple scenes of my film. This first portion isn’t finished (by a long shot) but it does illustrate the direction I’d like to take the rest of the film. I’ll go over how it relates to the central question of my treatment, the technical elements I used in the editing process, and what I think will happen next in the movie.

The central question of my film is: What kinds of knowledge do people need to produce their own food?

In the opening shots, you see the car going up the mountain, with a voice over by one of my main participants talking about how they’re on “a recon mission” to look for signs of animals. The scene shows the effort of getting to the location, and we enjoy some shots of people hiking, looking over the terrain, and examining some deer tracks, all while Khoi (the voice actor) is talking about the species composition as we climb higher up the mountain. I may need to have Khoi sit down for a more formal interview so that we can explore the kinds of knowledge needed more explicitly, but for now I think this is a good start.

I found that the technical elements of the editing process were really exciting. First I was able to figure out how to add a title to the shots, which was a breakthrough for me cause I had a hard time figuring it out. I definitely enjoyed that small victory. Then I had to figure out how to have the voice over work because when Khoi was talking to me, he was quite far away. I cranked up the volume on that recording to 500%, and reduced the volume of the shots being shown by varying degrees, but usually to about 30-50% of its initial volume. In the transition shot from the music to the car pulling the log I used a one second fade on the music just so that when the music ended it wasn’t an abrupt end.

I did have some trouble however with the program I was using. Some of the playback features weren’t working properly and I couldn’t figure out why the playback was using sound which I had cut out of the clips, and why it wasn’t displaying the overlain scenes in the way that I wanted. I’m still not sure what caused this issue, but I think that the program I’m using isn’t meant to be for larger file sizes, only for short videos. So this may be an issue I encounter in the future.

That being said, when I “finished” these scenes those issue were not present, and all the sound came through exactly as I had intended.

For the next scenes I think I need a couple things:

I need a sit down interview with Khoi so I can get him talking more explicitly about hunting, and the kinds of knowledge one needs to have in order to be successful at it. I also want to include some actual footage of deer (which I don’t have and will need to get).

One major issue I have is the length. Initially I thought that this film was going to be around 3 minutes in length, which is not very long. This section of film is already a minute long and we haven’t even explored the central question yet! Either I need to extend the length of the film (probably in the range of 5-10 minutes) or significantly cut back on these scenes.

From where I finished the video I want to transition to another form of food production like vegetable gardening, and get some footage of that process. Some of the same participants who were present in this portion of the film will make a reappearance in that section.

So that’s where I’m at with this project.

Here is the footage: Going out for Dinner: An Ethnographic Film Scene 1 Draft 1