Oh No, Not a Brownfield!

With the average 1 bedroom home in Vancouver starting at $200,000 to $300,000, it is shocking to see that there are various lots sitting empty and unproductive right here in our city.

These sites, known as urban brownfields, are not only an eyesore to Vancouver citizens but they also limit the potential for development that exists within our city. They could serve a number of purposes such as community parks, local farms, economic centers, and housing developments, all of which are much safer options.

Image by: Kimberly Tan

In fact, we have interviewed experts on the subject of brownfields and have gotten their insights on how best we can reclaim these forgotten lands and make them into useful areas.

We used Granville Island as a frame of reference since it is the most successful brownfield reclamation project that exists within Vancouver and we thought about how best we, as a community, can duplicate that success.

 

Watch this video for more examples of brownfields in Vancouver and the cleaning methods that are considered to revitalize these lands!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PogLdM9vjNg

Based on testimony from both Nicci Theroux and Emma Holmes, the two scientists currently working on brownfield remediation, it seems that the potential for reclamation and redevelopment of these brownfields depends on the previous uses of the sites and what the community can see as being the most economically feasible.

Check out this podcast for some insights from Emma Holmes on her ideas for land remediation.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Photo by: Joongi Kim

However, Vancouver is replete with buildings. Homes, shopping malls, boutiques, and restaurants occupy almost every square inch of the city, especially the downtown core. Vancouver is in desperate need of some green space. A little bit of nature to contrast the grey concrete and mirrored high rises.

Although local farming is sustainable and an economical idea, reclaimed brownfields may not be the most suitable place for growing crops. If we want to maximize the use of the land, community parks would probably be the best solution. Not only do they allow all of the Vancouver residents to use, they also showcase the Vancouver environmental plan of being the greenest city in the world by 2020.

Extraterrestrial Life – A Farfetched Possibility?

Image by: Earth Observatory

Have you ever gazed up at the Earth’s sky on a cloudless night? It is as if you are peering through a vast looking glass into a realm much greater than anything imaginable. Although at times forgettable, Earth is but a mere morsel of our solar system. Many planets and moons of varying size and environments occupy outer space, none of which resemble our green and blue globe.

For centuries it has been thought that Earth was the only planet that could possibly contain living organisms. Extraterrestrial environments were deemed too extreme to inhabit any life forms. It is known that the unique characteristics of our globe give rise to life as we know it – insects, amphibians, and mammals with protruding limbs and highly developed body systems. However, it is this common misconception of defining “life” on a large broadband scale that leads to the unaccepted notion of life existing in space. Surely, birds and fish do not occupy their skies and waters. But what about infinitesimal, single-celled organisms invisible to the naked eye?

If microbial units could thrive in environments present on Earth that mimicked the extreme nature of those found in space, could this serve as a model for potential extraterrestrial life?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Image by: Bestourism

A recent study by a UBC microbiologist may be the missing piece to the multifaceted puzzle. Dr. Steven Hallam conducted an experiment at Pitch Lake, Trinidad, where its unique liquid-asphalt composition provided a strikingly similar atmosphere to that found on Saturn’s moon, Titan. If life forms could thrive in such an extreme environment like Pitch Lake, could there be a possibility of life in outer space? Samples from Pitch Lake were extracted, frozen, and shipped to UBC laboratories to be tested. The results were extraordinary – unique Archaeal groups thrived deep in the sediments of this hydrocarbon lake.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Em0MZ39SLXk&feature=youtu.be

 

To many, the plausibility of life forms existing outside of planet Earth seems farfetched, even impossible. Undoubtedly, as expressed by Dr. Hallam, the results of this single experiment cannot provide concrete conclusions for life forms present on other planets. However, it does provide a basis for possible future studies. As researches continue to investigate types of life forms and their abilities to strive in altering environments, we gain a better understanding of the definition of “life”.

Acknowledgements:

We would like to extend our deepest gratitude to Dr. Steven Hallam, for his generosity in volunteering his time to share his amazing research and knowledge. We would also like to thank Eric Jandciu and the Scie300 team for the chance to indulge in such an inspiring project, and for their constant guidance and support.

References:

 

Global Warming: Good News or Bad for Allergy Patients?

Photo by David Sky

Spring is the season symbolizing life and rebirth. This is a time when the flowers bloom, the birds start to sing, and when we can finally save some money by turning off the furnace. However, for many people, this is also the time of year when their troubles begin.

Photo by aspidoscelis

Springtime is when the majority of allergy patients experience symptoms such as coughing, itchy-eyes, runny-noses, and more. These symptoms are a response to our immune system fighting off allergens. Our immune system recognizes foreign objects, called antigens, in the body and react to them by producing specific antibodies, or immunoglobulin. These antibodies will attach to antigens to help destroy them. However, sometimes we develop antibodies that attach to harmless antigens, such as cat dander or pollen, and we become sensitized to these allergens and develop allergic reactions.

According to the Environment Canada weather data, the temperature in British Columbia has been on the rise. The Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change reported that the temperature has increased by more than 0.13 degrees Celsius per decade, from 1956 to 2005. With an increase in temperature, this means that winter ends sooner, while spring starts earlier. The earlier spring allows plants to pollinate earlier than usual. Furthermore, the hotter temperatures will cause plants to release more pollen in a shorter period of time, creating an intense season where the air is saturated with pollen.

On the other hand, the pollen is released in a shorter period of time, which means a shorter time of suffering for allergy patients. Also, some allergy patients may be affected less in the warmer weather. A warmer winter means less mold in the spring, and this would be better for patients with affected by mold allergens.

Overall, I believe that it is better to have less intense allergic reactions over a longer period of time, than having severe reactions over a shorter season. To all the allergy patients out there, which would you prefer? Maybe you will make your decision while you enjoy The Allergy Song, from TheWigglesPtyLtd:

YouTube Preview Image

References:

Wikipedia

Warm Winter Could Create Allergy Woes

Warmer Weather in B.C. Threatens Waterfront, Forests

What Causes Allergies

 

Carcinogenic Ingredient Found in Coca-Cola and Pepsi

Image by Jason Means

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) recently contacted Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ban 4-methylmidazole (4-MEI) found in soft drinks which is a carcinogenic ingredient. Coca-Cola and Pepsi use 4-MEI to give their product it’s distinct caramel color everyone knows. 4-MEI is formed when sugar is mixed with ammonia and sulfite to be used as a colouring substance. It can also be found in dark beers and other brands of cola drinks, which contain more than 100 ug per 12-ounce serving of 4-MEI.

Companies using this compound would have to change their formula or print cancer-warning labels on their products. Even though companies challenged CSPI’s decision, they decided to change their recipes to avoid having cancer warnings on all of their products. The organization wants the ban of this compound everywhere not just in the U.S.

A Coca-cola representative responded to CSPI, saying their data is inclusive and stated

“While we believe that there is no public health risk that justifies any such change, we did ask our caramel suppliers to take this step so that our products would not be subject to the requirement of a scientifically unfounded warning,”

FDA has yet to make a ruling on this issue.  I tried looking for any studies linking 4-MEI to cancer in humans but came up empty. Only came across one study that found high doses of 4-MEI to cause lung and liver cancer to rodents. You would need to drink more than 1,000 cans a day to reach lethal doses that have shown links to cancer in rodents

The change of 4-MEI is only be rolled out through out the U.S because of the new mandate.  In the case of Canada, the change will come but there is no timeline yet. In Canada Cola products meet food safety standards and is not a concern. They have approved the use of 4-MEI in their products.

Following video below briefly explains the issue on hand.

YouTube Preview Image

Personally, I don’t think this will stop me from drinking Coca-Cola. CSPI is just over-reacting and there is no need to slap a cancer warning labels on products containing 4-MEI. There is not enough evidence supporting 4-MEI causing cancer in humans; even then you will need to drink cola in high doses. One thing that comes to my mind is if they were to put a cancer-warning label on the drinks, would it impact sales? Cigarette cartons have similar warning signs but that doesn’t stop consumers from purchasing them. If a product tastes good, people over look the side effects.

What do you think? Would you stop drinking soft drinks with 4-MEI?

 

 

A Radical Change in Perspective

I apologize in advance for the pun but I feel that this accurately describes the situation (at least for me). As always, this news comes from our good friends at MIT. Dr. JoAnne Stubbe, professor of chemistry and biology wish to remove the “bad rep” associated with free radicals. Before getting into her explanation, free radicals are molecules or atoms that are unstable due to an unpaired electron or unfilled valence shell (the outermost electron shell of an atom). These factors give free radicals the property of being unstable and are able to react readily with several molecules with little predictability. This reactivity means that radicals can cause unwanted reactions such as with DNA and have been suspected by scientists to be a factor in aging for humans and other living beings.

Dr. JoAnne Stubbe presents the 40th Annual James R. Killian Jr. Faculty Achievement Award Lecture. Photo: Dominick Reuter

With this bad publicity on free radicals in the human body, many companies and scientists have promoted in the consumption of antioxidants to react with the free radicals instead of important molecules such as DNA. In our SCIE300 blog, there are also several posts regarding the consumption of a lot of free radicals to improve health.

However, Dr. Stubbe suggests that free radicals are a misunderstood bunch in the eyes of society. She gives the analogy of free radicals to protestors against the Vietnam War. According to her, the protesters to society, the “radicals,” are “highly reactive […] and wreaked havoc on everything they interacted with.” But to her, the “radicals” were merely acting in reaction to their hostile environment, like the riot police with “guns raised, masks on.” To her, the free radicals react with DNA because DNA happen to be in their way and not letting them contribute to good pathways present in many enzymes.

“This is textbook material” – Mary Fuller, Associate Chair, MIT

There is a good reason for this view: Dr. Stubbe’s research on the enzyme Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR). RNR is an enzyme that converts nucleotides into deoxynucleotides which are incorporated into DNA which means the RNR is essential to all living beings. But what does RNR has to do with free radicals? It turns out that according to Dr. Stubbe, the RNR’s require free radicals for the conversion of nucleotides to work with “exquisite specificity.” The reactivity of radicals is used to form chain reactions into an enzymatic mechanism that ultimately form the deoxynucleotides. With this new information, several possibilities are opened up such as cancer treatment since we can possibly stop RNR to stop uncontrolled DNA and cell replication.

With this new information on free radicals, let’s hope to see more articles on radicals that shine them on a more positive light since according to Dr. Stubbe, “Your life is in their hands.”

Source:
Freeing radicals from their negative connotations.

Berries vs. the Brain

Why do many of us wait for the summer desperately?

Strawberries slow down the progression of age-related diseases! Photo by: Bahman Farzad

There might be different reasons as to why people look forward to summer such as: taking a stroll in park, going to the beach, and enjoying the sun. Although, it’s a long wait for summer here in Canada, we would all agree that the biggest payoff for the long haul is the fresh berries that we devour during the summer.

However, most of us might not be aware of the new research which shows that eating berries can be beneficial to the brain. It can slow or prevent the progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.

Scientists in a new article in the, ACS’ Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, report that eating blueberries, blackberries, strawberries and other types of berries has many beneficial effects on the brain and it may help prevent the on-set of age-related diseases. To further analyze the effect of berries on the brain Dr. Shukitt-Hale and Marshall G. looked at cellular animal and human studies. First of all, this review explained that berries benefit people because they produce high levels of antioxidants, which are compounds that help the cell fight off free radicals that cause damage to the cell. Second of all, berry fruits cause a change in the communication between neurons. Furthermore, these communication changes halt the inflammation of the brain which prevents neuronal damage and prevention of neuronal damage improves motor control and cognition.

Although, mechanisms which explain the behavioural deficits during aging are not known, it is understood that oxidative stress and inflammation are seen as the contributing factors of neurodegenerative diseases. Oxidative stress may contribute to neurodegenerative diseases because the brain is vulnerable to the deleterious effects of free radicals, so antioxidants need to be taken to reduce the effects of oxidative stress on the brain.

“The good news is that natural compounds called polyphenolics found in fruits, vegetables and nuts have an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effect that may protect against age-associated decline,” said Poulose, who is with the U. S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging in Boston.

Recent research shows that rats that were fed a two percent diet high in strawberries and blueberry for two months showed less age-related deficits in the nerve function, learning and remembering.

Raspberries! Photo by: Alex

Moreover, Poulose determined that nerve function reduces with age because of microglia, cells that remove and recycle any biochemical debris that would interfere with the brain’s function. During aging microglia do not do their job properly leading to the build up of debris. Poulose explains that berries contain polyphenolics which restore the normal housekeeping function of microglia which slows down or prevents the progression of neurodegenerative diseases.

After knowing the benefits of berries we can all look forward to summer for the same reason!!

(Video created by: chappellwellness)

YouTube Preview Image

21st Century Holocaust

Imagine you are walking your dog, and as you pass a certain building, you see a woman looking out the window. As you look closer, you see her about to drop her newborn baby out on the street. Would you just turn around and pretend you didn’t see, thinking to yourself that that’s her choice? [1]

Well what do you think abortion is?

Every year, abortion takes 42 million lives. (3)

[Image taken from: here.]

Take for example a hunter. He is hunting out in the wilderness, and spots something moving in the bush. If he is not certain that it is a deer, he cannot shoot, for it might as well be a person that he’s killing [1]. It is a simple moral principle.

This means that the thing inside a mother’s womb is a potential baby. If so, then Ray Comfort asks us to “finish this sentence for [him]: ‘It is ok to kill a baby when…’” The argument goes much further. It is not simply a question of the development stages of a human person. A woman would be guilty of murder if she killed her prematurely born infant at five months after conception. However, if a woman aborts her child at a later stage of development, she commits no crime [1]. Isn’t this twisted?

Just because something is legal, doesn’t make it moral. During WWII, it was perfectly legal “to kill ‘unwanted’ retarded children and ‘undesirable’ races like the Jews” [1]. In the opinion of Adolf Hitler, these people were “non- human” [2]. So if we declare a baby to be non-human, in whose footsteps are we following?

People will argue that in certain situations, the baby will have a poor quality of life if it’s born into a certain family. But how can people make that judgement even before the baby is born? On the same principle, Hitler “killed the people with Down’s Syndrome[2]. However, their condition of life has nothing to do with the quality of life they have, since most of them report to be perfectly happy.

Our society needs to open its eyes to this ironical fact that medicine has advanced so far, as to take lives instead of save them.

YouTube Preview Image

To learn more, watch this 30-minute movie on the issue of the 21st Century holocaust… on abortion.

References:

[1] Burnham J, Chacon F. Beginning Apologetics 5: How to answer tough moral questions. 3rd ed. Farmington, NM: San Juan Catholic Seminars; 2008.

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y2KsU_dhwI

[3] http://abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html