Author Archives: nikola

21st Century Holocaust

Imagine you are walking your dog, and as you pass a certain building, you see a woman looking out the window. As you look closer, you see her about to drop her newborn baby out on the street. Would you just turn around and pretend you didn’t see, thinking to yourself that that’s her choice? [1]

Well what do you think abortion is?

Every year, abortion takes 42 million lives. (3)

[Image taken from: here.]

Take for example a hunter. He is hunting out in the wilderness, and spots something moving in the bush. If he is not certain that it is a deer, he cannot shoot, for it might as well be a person that he’s killing [1]. It is a simple moral principle.

This means that the thing inside a mother’s womb is a potential baby. If so, then Ray Comfort asks us to “finish this sentence for [him]: ‘It is ok to kill a baby when…’” The argument goes much further. It is not simply a question of the development stages of a human person. A woman would be guilty of murder if she killed her prematurely born infant at five months after conception. However, if a woman aborts her child at a later stage of development, she commits no crime [1]. Isn’t this twisted?

Just because something is legal, doesn’t make it moral. During WWII, it was perfectly legal “to kill ‘unwanted’ retarded children and ‘undesirable’ races like the Jews” [1]. In the opinion of Adolf Hitler, these people were “non- human” [2]. So if we declare a baby to be non-human, in whose footsteps are we following?

People will argue that in certain situations, the baby will have a poor quality of life if it’s born into a certain family. But how can people make that judgement even before the baby is born? On the same principle, Hitler “killed the people with Down’s Syndrome[2]. However, their condition of life has nothing to do with the quality of life they have, since most of them report to be perfectly happy.

Our society needs to open its eyes to this ironical fact that medicine has advanced so far, as to take lives instead of save them.

YouTube Preview Image

To learn more, watch this 30-minute movie on the issue of the 21st Century holocaust… on abortion.

References:

[1] Burnham J, Chacon F. Beginning Apologetics 5: How to answer tough moral questions. 3rd ed. Farmington, NM: San Juan Catholic Seminars; 2008.

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y2KsU_dhwI

[3] http://abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html

The Secret for an Incorruptible Skin …attainable only after death

Is there a woman out there who does not want her skin to look radiant and always fresh? Dry skin is a sign of aging. In today’s society, the average woman would do anything to circumvent this phenomenon and retain her beauty. The numerous surgical procedures that are offered, such as plastic surgery as well as liposuction, attest to this. As a result, dermatologists around the world compete for the magic formula for a healthy-looking skin. The decades of research show that they are getting close. But will they ever be able to reach the goal?

We can look at this issue from another spectrum. If we cannot retain our skin in its youthful glow while we’re still alive, why not do it in the next life?

Science already found ways to preserve dead bodies from corruption. Procedures such as cryonics, plastination andembalming the body have all been proposed.

Cryonics uses extreme low temperatures to freeze the individual. This was a dream idea of Benjamin Franklin in 1773, who wished to use this method in hope to be resurrected in the next century to witnessAmerica’s advancement. Plastination is a procedure in which certain body parts are filled with plastics in order to preserve them. Today, embalming is used at funerals to preserve the bodies for the time being.

Other than for preservation purposes, all of these procedures have something in common. They do not last. The process of decomposition always takes the winning place. It seems that perfect perseverance would only be possible by a miracle.

However, this is not impossible when it comes to religion. Within the Roman Catholic Church, there are dozens of cases where exhumed bodies have been found to be incorrupt. These were not just any people. They were the bodies of saints.

 

AThis is a picture of Saint Bernadette, who after more than 130 years after her death still appears as if only asleep.

(Image source: here)

Mysteriously, these saints have been prevented from decaying. However, not all candidates have to pass the test of incorruptibility in order to be canonized as saints.

Another image of a saint. This time, it is Saint Pio who died in 1968. However, because he has been embalmed, it is not fitting to group him with the incorruptibles.

(Image source: here)

So what is the secret to having a skin that will not fall apart even after you’re dead?

The answer is simple: become a saint!

REFERENCES:

http://gkupsidedown.blogspot.com/2008/05/incorruptible-so-what.html

http://people.howstuffworks.com/incorruptible2.htm

 

Weather Bug

Have you ever gone camping while the chirping sound of crickets lulled you to sleep? Not only do these small invertebrates produce a pleasant sound on a warm summer evening, but they also have the ability to act as natural thermometers. The species Oecanthus fultoni has an amazing thermometric ability.

When the male cricket rubs one wing against the other, he produces the chirping sound. The frequency of this sound is directly proportional to temperature where the cricket is located.

Every day folk can calculate the outside temperature in degrees Fahrenheit simply by counting the number of chirps in 14 seconds, and adding 40.

The University of California has a more sophisticated formula for those that wish to calculate the temperature more precisely. “Count the chirps per minute, subtract 40, divide by 4, add 50 and that will be the temperature in degrees Fahrenheit.” Yet another study defines the equation as the number of chirps in 15 seconds, added to 37.”

So why are there all these variations? One possible reason is that the actual function is not supposed to be linear.

 

Figure 1: Linear fit of the number of chirps per 13s versus outside temperature.

 

Figure 2: Exponential fit of the number of chirps per 13s versus outside temperature.

 

A group of scientists in the early in the 20th century gathered the data points on these graphs. They prove that the equation for determining the temperature from a cricket chirp is not linear. All the variations in the proposed equations are therefore only due to the differences in the best line fit of the actual curve.

The equation for the line in figure 2 is:

Chirps per 13 seconds = 5.63 x 1010 exp[–(6290 K) / T ]

This equation does have a couple of setbacks to it. First of all, it may scare the general public. Apart from this, the real question is who would actually care to memorize it? Even more so, what percentage of the population would bring with them calculators to a campsite?

While it may be a quick and easy way to determine the outside temperature, the simple linear equations are only useful for campers who do not need a precise measurement.

YouTube Preview Image