Category Archives: Issues in Science

Two New Blood Types Found?

YouTube Preview Image

 

Blood bath salts in Japan. Photograph: kenleewrites

Humans have various blood types, which have various classes. There are 30 known major blood group systems which help classify a person’s blood type, and each one is defined by the presence or absence of a certain glycoprotein, glycolipid, protein, carbohydrate, or other such molecules in the blood.  All around the world, two of the most common blood group systems are ABO and Rhesus systems.

However, in February 2012, Ballif and his colleagues identified two more proteins on the red blood cells which are responsible for two more blood types.  Although their existence was known many years ago, the genetic basis hadn’t been known until now.  An international effort between Vermont, Paris and Hokkaido resulted in the identification of the two proteins: the protein ABCB6, which corresponds with the blood type Langereis, and the protein ABCG2, which corresponds with the blood type Junior.

Ballif says, “it’s pretty remarkable to have two [blood types] identified this year,” as the last one was discovered almost a decade ago.

Blood on finger. Photograph: Ollie Crafoord (flickr.com)

Very few people know if they are Langereis or Junior positive or negative, and even when it is known, obtaining blood of the same type is extremely difficult as there was a lack of reliable reagents to screen the blood.  With this discovery, there would be lesser complications and rejections in blood and organ transfusions, as it would be easier to identify which specific blood type a person needs and respond accordingly.  It has also been found that these proteins may be connected to treatment with anticancer drugs, which will help create more efficient treatments for certain types of cancer.

References:
1. Forbes
2. Nature Genetics – ABCB6
3. Nature Genetics – ABCG2
4. Science Daily
5. Wikipedia

Ancient martial arts fights Parkinson’s disease

Man performing tai chi

Man performing tai chi (Photo by Ponto de Cultura Vila Buarque on Flickr)

A new study published in The New England Journal of Medicine shows that tai chi helps improve strength, balance, and physical function of those that suffer from Parkinson’s disease.

Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease in which nerve cells in the brain that produce the chemical dopamine begin to die. The decrease in the production of dopamine results in movement impairments, loss of postural stability and many more problems that affect function and quality of life. According to Parkinson Society Canada, nearly 100, 000 Canadians have Parkinson’s disease and 1 in 300 people in Canada and the United States has Parkinson’s.

Tai chi is an ancient martial art that is characterized by slow, flowing movement and meditation that is practiced for both defense training as well as many health benefits.

The latest research recruited 195 patients who suffered movement and balance problems caused by Parkinson’s disease from four Oregon cities and randomly assigned them into three groups: tai chi, resistance training, or stretching. All patients in all three groups underwent two 60-minute sessions twice a week for 24 consecutive weeks. After 24 weeks, the patients in the tai chi group performed much better than the other two groups in many measures related to strength, balance, movement control, stride length, and functional reach.

What makes this finding more significant is that tai chi improves what current medications do not. Fuzhong Li, the study’s lead author, quoted in an interview with the New York Times, “Current medications do not work well in terms of providing impaired balance or postural instability.” Li added, “In fact, patients suffer a great deal of medication side effects which may lead to further deterioration in balance control.”

Tai chi may help your walks last longer. Photo by C. Frank Starmer

For those of you that are interested and have a few minutes of extra time, you may want to take a look at the short video of instructor Dr. Fuzhong Li, taken from “Tai Chi: Moving for Better Balance”, posted below.

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

 

Water: The Healthiest Beverage?

There is no harm in drinking water, right?

Most of us would probably not think twice about the contents of our drinking water. The water that we get out of the tap actually contains added fluoride to help prevent tooth decay by protecting tooth enamel against acids. However, we can obtain fluoride naturally through eating various foods. Many of us may also use fluoride containing products, such as toothpastes, mouth gels, dental floss, and dietary supplements.

http://youtu.be/tSKToTFitd0

The Government of Canada first introduced water fluoridation in 1968. However, since then, the government has reduced the optimum level of fluoride four times. The most recent cutback was in 2008, where the optimum level was lowered to almost half the initial recommended amount in 1968.

Larger doses of fluoride may causes serious health issues, including dental fluorosis, weakened bones, or even bone cancer. Too much fluoride causes bone structure disturbances, decreases fertility, and accumulates in certain areas of the brain, which will affect behaviour and learning.

Browning and marked wear on biting surfaces. CREDIT: FINALGAMER

There is an ongoing debate about whether or not water fluoridation is the cause of the decline in tooth decay. However, many studies have shown that tooth decay have actually started to decline before the fluoridation of water. Furthermore, tooth decay in children who have used fluoridated water all their lives continues to decline, which means that there is probably another factor involved.

The safety level of fluoride in our drinking water remains questionable, and with so many health risks associated with excess levels of fluoride, as well as the exposure of so many fluoridated products, I believe that water fluoridation is both unnecessary and risky. Although fluoride does help prevent tooth decay, the possibility of excess fluoride intake outweighs the benefit.

References:

Faster Than the Speed of Light?

The fastest known speed has always been the speed of light, ever since Albert Einstein’s theory of special relativity.  His famous formula E = mc2 has been a familiar equation since the earliest of our physics classes.  However, on September of 2011, scientists in Italy discovered that neutrinos, subatomic particles that are a fundamental part of the universe, travel sixty billionths of a second faster than the previously established c = 3.0 x 108 m/s, the speed of light in a vacuum.


Neutrinos. Photograph: Cern/Science Photo Library

The experiment was conducted in the Gran Sasso laboratory in Italy, which received neutrinos sent from a CERN beam in Switzerland (720 km away).  Over three months, the test was repeated 15,000 times to search for any possible error, before the positive results were finally announced.

As you can imagine, this caused quite a stir in the scientific world.  The experiment was immediately under the scrutiny of a wide variety of physicists, because if proven, it would rock the core of innumerable concepts of science as we know it.

YouTube Preview Image

One small flaw has been discovered in the methods so far, which was immediately rectified, before the tests were replicated a further 20 times.  However, the results still showed a speed faster than that of light, and comparable to the previously obtained results.

Numerous physicists have tried to explain or disprove this controversial phenomenon.  Dr. Carlo Contaldi of Imperial College London says that the varied gravitational effects at the different regions might have affected the clocks that were used to measure the neutrinos’ speed.  Susan Cartwright of Sheffield University suggested that as neutrino-based experiments have historically not been very reliable, it would be wise not to jump to conclusions at too early a stage.

If, however, it is concluded that the speed of the neutrinos is in fact greater than the speed of light in a vacuum, the ramifications would be massive.  Einstein’s theory will be disproven, and there would be a lot of revision of many basic physics concepts.  Possibly the most significant impact would be on our understanding of the fundamental idea of time – it could be concluded that we might theoretically be able to send information back in time.

References: Neutrinos still faster than light in latest version of experiment, Faster than light particles found, claim scientists, Speed of light broken again as scientists test neutrino result

Levitation… a possibility?

Photo by: Natsumi Hayashi, a resident of Tokyo who makes it a hobby to take levitation photos. (source: yowayowacamera.com)

I’m sure we are all somewhat familiar with the concept of levitation. For those who are not, levitation is basically the ability to remain suspended in the air against the force of gravity. I don’t know about you, but whenever I watch those cool sci-fi movies or even Harry Potter and see people floating in air like it’s no big deal, I do catch myself wishing I could do that. I always thought levitation would remain as a fancy magic trick or movie effect, but could it actually be a possibility? Research regarding the properties of levitation have been underway, bringing this seemingly impossible phenomenon closer to reality.

A more scientific approach to the magic of levitation, is something called diamagnetic levitation. This is not a new process, as it has been around, in theory, since the 19th century. The concept that an object can create a magnetic field to counter an externally applied magnetic field to cause a repulsion was first observed by a scientist by the name of Anton Brugmans in 1778. This property was later coined diamagnetism by the British scientist Michael Faraday in 1845.

So, how does this theory reflect in the real world? Diamagnetic levitation was first demonstrated in 1932 by a German physicist named Werner Braunbek. He was able to levitate small objects such as tiny pieces of bismuth or graphite. The largest object he could levitate was a piece of coal that weighed about 75mg. A simple search of other examples of diamagnetic levitation shows a multitude of similar practices on inaminate objects, but what of the animate?

Diamagnetic levitation on live subjects was actually first achieved by Andre Geim and Michael Berry in 1997. The procedure involved a live frog being placed inside a solenoid with a magnetic field resonating through it. Amazingly, the frog was observed to essentially be suspended or levitating within the tube.

A short clip of the levitating frog:
YouTube Preview Image

Most recently, Douglas G.J.M, Marshall D.A., Griffiths I. and Hands T.O. were able to calculate that a 70.6T magnet would be required if one was to levitate an average human via diamagnetic levitation. Although at this point in time, there are magnetic fields that are this strong it is currently not feasible to pack into a levitation device. However, with the extraordinary advancements in technology, perhaps it is only a matter of time before humans can experience levitation.

References