Tag Archives: Biology

Evolution Can Be More Random Than You Think

Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species postulated that evolution takes a directed approach toward increasing fitness. A recent discovery suggests that evolution doesn’t always need to have a direction. Dr. Matthew Pennell’s findings suggest that evolution on a chromosomal level can have a high degree of randomness.

Dr. Matthew Pennell, an evolutionary biologist specializing in Computational Biology at the University of British Columbia, recently wrote a paper that gives more insight on evolution, entitled Y-Fuse? Sex Chromosome Fusions in Fishes and ReptilesIn this paper, Dr. Pennell uses software and algorithms to determine the factors that drive sex chromosome fusions. Unlike traditional biologists, Dr. Pennell does all of his work on his MacBook instead of using pipettes and microscopes.

Source: Wikimedia Commons, Dr.Pennell uses computational approaches, such as Mathematica for his research.

Source: Wikimedia Commons, Dr.Pennell uses computational approaches, such as Mathematica for his research.

This video, courtesy of universityofbc via Youtub, introduces UBC Killam and NSERC postdoctoral fellow, Dr. Matthew Pennell and talks about his research

YouTube Preview Image

“The simple fact that Y autosome fusions are way more common than W or X or Z, suggests it’s probably just random, which is a kind of interesting and cool result that this huge thing in our genome and across all genomes is just random chance, and this random chance explanation is the most consistent with our data.”

 -Dr. Matthew Pennell

During his graduate studies, Dr.Pennel was part of a team that integrated chromosomal information of thousands of species into an electronic database called The Tree of Sex, which we describe in further detail in our podcast below.

YouTube Preview Image

Now that we know randomness is involved in sex chromosome evolution another question arises: Is sex determination an absolute process? 

As we will soon see there are species, such as the Stickleback fish that change their sex determination system from XY, to ZW, to temperature controlled and so on. However, does this mean that we humans might experience such a change in the future?  

Source: Flickr Commons, Huamns have 22 pairs of autosomes and 1 pair of sex chromosome

Source: Flickr Commons, humans have 22 pairs of autosomes and 1 pair of sex chromosome

“They keep reinventing how they make males and females and this is really interesting and crazy because making males and females is the most basic thing animals do….But they keep switching around how they make males and   females, which I think is pretty cool.”

-Dr. Matthew Pennell

In addition, we were fortunate enough to have the opportunity to interview Dr. Pennell:

https://youtu.be/9obgQ7mI5Ac

Before the interview with Dr. Pennell, our group had a lot of difficulty understanding the premise and messages of the paper. Dr. Pennell provided us with simple insights on the different facets of the evolution of sex chromosomes – from the creative variety of ways that nature determines sex in species, to the mechanisms which drive sex chromosome fusions. Although a lot of these concepts were hard to understand at first, the premise of the paper is very simple to understand – computational biologists often work with real world data sets (ie. “The Tree of Sex”, and try to fit their models to them to determine the relationships between the scientists’ predictions and what’s really happening. In this specific paper, Dr. Pennell and his team concluded that the different models did not relate to the given dataset and the explanation for the real data is attributed to randomness.

 

We would like to give a special thanks to Dr. Matthew Pennell for his time and explanation of his paper.
Authors: Justin Yoon, Julia He, Radu Nesiu, and Matt Golf (Group 2)

The CRISPRs Fever

You may remember from biology textbook that we can edit genetic material using restriction enzymes, a DNA-cutting protein structure. Using this we can learn about gene functionalities, search for disease treatments or increase yields of crops. Controversially, it also made unnatural creations possible. However, different gene targets require different enzyme structures, just like to open different doors you need different keys, and making these “keys” turns out to be complicated, expensive and time-consuming, which might have kept most of the “fantasies”, such as “super human” or other wired things, away from reality for now for better or worse.

by PuraVida_Fotografie from Google Image "genetic mutation" Labeled for reuse

by PuraVida_Fotografie from Google Image search “genetic mutation”, labeled for reuse.

However, what if all the “doors” also have the same type of “digital locks”, and all you need to change is the password? CRISPRs (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) turns out to be this “lock”. It contains repeated sequences sandwiched with spacers (unique genetic information) in between. The spacers are external virus genes kept in bacterias and served as the “criminal records” so that when invasion happens again, the bacteria can send an “army” of gene-cutting enzymes, called Cas9, to cut the recognized viruses’ DNA apart.

"Crystal Structure of Cas9 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA" by Hiroshi Nishimasu, F. Ann Ran, Patrick D. Hsu, Silvana Konermann, Soraya I. Shehata, Naoshi Dohmae, Ryuichiro Ishitani, Feng Zhang, and Osamu Nureki - Crystal Structure of Cas9 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Commons

“Crystal Structure of Cas9 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA” by Hiroshi Nishimasu, F. Ann Ran, Patrick D. Hsu, Silvana Konermann, Soraya I. Shehata, Naoshi Dohmae, Ryuichiro Ishitani, Feng Zhang, and Osamu Nureki – Crystal Structure of Cas9 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Commons

In 2012, scientists have proven that instead of making restriction enzymes for different genes, we can simply replace these “criminal records” and use the same Cas9 “armies” to cut desired genes with much less time and cost. You can find the details in this following video.

YouTube Preview Image[by McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT]

Nature , Science and many major media have unanimously deemed CRISPRs to be a revolution. Radiolab has discussed its ethical controversies as if the realization of the technology is right around the corner. It has been portrayed as such a simple and approachable method that people even claim to provide CRISPR DIY kit for experiments at home.

However, I think despite these attentions,  the reality is that we are still far from ready to harness CRISPRs. Although many researches has already been using it to edit genes in a variety of bacterias, plants, and animals within a short 3-year period, few studies focused on the limitations and functions of CRISPR itself. Some research was done too early without waiting for the technology to mature, such as the research using human embryos, which has resulted in a less satisfactory result. Some researchers commented that CRISPR can be less accurate than expected and may not be the most efficient and cost-effective solution for certain problems on Quora. Scientist Konstantin Severinov on Quanta Magazine also pointed out that it is still unknown whether defending invaders is the major usage of CRISPRs since many of these spacers appear to be genes of viruses that are long gone. It might be a good time now to slow down and maybe build the technique from ground up concretely first.

by Sainan Liu

On Wasps and Matricide

First, think of a wasp colony as a monarchy, where workers diligently provide for their queen.  Assume the queen is unsatisfactory, what would happen? A violent revolution perhaps?  This article on a study done by Kevin J. Loope explains how wasps are fully capable of committing matricide under the right conditions.

Matricide is not particularly uncommon in the insect world.  Many species such as crab spiders take part in matriphagy, or mother eating.  Wasps, on the other hand, depend on the queen to forage for food to feed their larvae.  Normally, fully grown workers are the ones that turn on their mother.

Source: Marjan Smeijsters on Flickr Commons

New wasp nests are formed in the spring after fertilized queens have finished hibernating.  Solitary queens construct the nest, lay eggs, and care for her larvae.  Only after the larvae have matured into workers, all of which are female, do the queen focus on reproduction and leave the other duties to her offspring.

An average wasp queen lays around 100 eggs each day.  Some workers are capable of laying eggs, but only for drones, or male wasps, and are discouraged by the queen through attacks or egg eating.   While in most cases wasps let their mother be responsible for passing on their genetic data, workers may get rid of the queen if being able to produce their own offspring outweighs the loss of new siblings.

wasp2

The queen’s mating practices are an important factor.  Queens normally only mate once or twice, but that does not imply an even distribution of full siblings.  In single-father colonies or colonies skewed to have many full siblings, workers are more closely related to their nephews than their brothers.  Loope noticed that because workers are willing to take care of closely related nephews, females will kill the queen to have the colony raise their young instead.  Wasps are believed to be capable of identifying its relatives.

Past research also reference low queen productivity or queens producing only males as reasons for matricide.  From this we can hypothesize that while wasps may work for the greater good on the colony, the queen is not necessarily vital to the continued welfare of the collective.  It puts a new light on what some would believe to be mindless workers.

Here is a basic video on the various stages of a yellow jacket wasp’s life:

YouTube Preview Image

credit to ScienceOnline on Youtube

blog by Ivan Lan

 

 

 

The Promising Near Future of Blood Transfusions

rbc

Rendering of red blood cells. Source: Flickr Creative Commons – Nocturnal lust

Have you ever donated blood? Canadian Blood Services is always looking for more blood, because they need lots of it. For example, here’s a table of the required donations per single procedure.

Required amount of blood donors per case. Source: Canadian Blood Services – Who does my donation help?

As you can see, a single car crash can require blood from up to 50 donors. Such events can cause a shortage of blood. In fact, just last year, Canadian Blood Services issued an appeal for more blood donations, as blood supplies hit an all-time low, especially for type O universal donors.

What are universal donors? Donors of blood type O can donate to every other blood type, because they have no antigens (molecules that can cause severe and harmful responses by immune system on the recipient of the transfusion). The video below explains the concept of blood types and why some people can flexibly donate to all others blood types. Credit for this video goes to user nafis A on Youtube.

The problem with blood donations is that we can’t simply take many donations and stop worrying about blood reserves. This is because, just like milk, blood is perishable. Blood Centers Organization states that red blood can only be stored for 42 days before going bad. This creates a need for a continuous supply of blood donations to account for any emergencies.

On the bright side, the future of blood supplies look promising due to a recent publication by a research group at the University of British Columbia (UBC) at the Centre for Blood Research. They discovered a method to genetically enhance an enzyme which removes the antigens from blood. To do this, they used a genetic manipulation method called directed evolution.

David Withers’ Research Group at the Centre for Blood Research. Source: UBC Centre for High-Throughput Biology

This process introduces step-wise mutations in the DNA that encodes the enzyme. They use a multi-pronged approach by introducing many random mutations to the gene, and select the best performing mutants and do this for multiple rounds. The researchers at UBC claim that after five rounds of directed evolution, the enzyme which removes antigens from red blood cells is 170 times faster than the original enzyme. The original enzyme, although functional, was never fast enough to be a feasible way of removing antigens from blood. This genetically enhanced enzyme, however, can be used practically in the medical setting.

This discovery could potentially eliminate the shortage of antigen-specific blood by converting all donated blood to donor types! I think this has great potential for saving lives. From what I know about Biology, once the DNA of this hyper-enzyme has been sequenced, it can be easily generated from protein farms – where bacteria produce large quantities of the protein which can be purified and extracted for clinical use. I think it’s amazing to hear that my university is at the frontier of such impactful discoveries!

Blog by Justin Yoon

Commented on the following blogs:

Electronic cigarettes by Brian Cheng

Bioethics dilemma by Paul Yi

Imposter syndrome by Luxi Xu

Image

Kidneys Grown in Petri Dishes Claimed to Be Functional When Transplanted in Animals

 

WEB_mouse-kidney-stem-cells

Source: Flickr Commons. Credit to: Alpha

This past decade has been an exciting time for regenerative science. Developmental biologists have been striving to discover new methods to grow organs such as hearts, brains, muscles, and even a hamburger patty from stem cells. As of only this September, kidneys grown in Petri dishes have been shown to be functional in animal studies!

Japanese researcher Dr. Shinya Yokote and his team have come across a scientific breakthrough within the stem cell research field in their recent early edition paper published on September 21st, 2015.

The early edition paper claims that transplant of lab-grown kidneys from stem cells are fully functional – in the sense that they can generate and excrete urine – in their animal studies with rats and pigs. Other groups in the past have generated half functioning kidneys that could generate urine when transplanted into animals, but not excrete it – a disorder known as hydronephrosis.

Dr. Yokote’s group managed to overcome hydronephrosis by inventing a new system within the rat’s body for the stem cell-generated kidneys to excrete their waste in to prevent hydronephrosis. They biologically engineered a persistent drainage tube to the kidney and connected it to a temporary bladder which was transplanted along with the kidney. This new system would empty its waste to the animal’s real bladder when it became full. The scientists named this system the “stepwise peristaltic ureter,” (SWPU) and believe that this could be the future of kidney transplantation.

kidney

A picture of the SWPU system that were used to transplant into rats. Source: Yokote, S., Matsunari, H., Iwai, S., Yamanaka, S., Uchikura, A., Fujimoto, E., Matsumoto, K., Nagashima, H., Kobayashi, E., Yokoo, T. (2015). Urine excretion strategy for stem cell-generated embryonic kidneys. PNAS Early Edition September 21, 2015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507803112

Although this discovery could impact millions with kidney failures in the future, readers should be warned that this is only an early access article. The researchers have not shown any empirical data to support their claims in their early access article. Those interested should keep a keen eye open for the full paper to be released!

By Justin Yoon