Ollanta Humala 30.24%
Alan García 24.93%
Lourdes Flores 24.03%
Fellow bloggers coverage:
Los 67 mil
9:15 P.M. ONPE Presidential Results at 80.30% – Valid Votes
Ollanta Humala 30.25%
Alan García 24.87%
Lourdes Flores 24.09%
ONPE Presidential Results at 79.84% – Valid Votes
Ollanta Humala 30.18%
Alan García 24.86%
Lourdes Flores 24.16%
Martha Chávez 6.99%
Valentín Paniagua 5.87%
Humberto Lay 4.35%
8:00 P.M. ONPE Results at 79.11% – Valid Votes
Ollanta Humala 30.14 %
Alan García 24.87 %
Lourdes Flores 24.20%
Alan García aumenta ventaja sobre Lourdes Flores
El Comercio online, 10 de abril del 2006
El ex presidente Alan García continúa aumentando levemente su ventaja sobre Lourdes Flores, según los últimos resultados de la Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales (ONPE) en la dramática definición para determinar cuál de los dos disputará la segunda vuelta con Ollanta Humala. El informe actualizado hasta 79,11% señala que Humala obtiene el 30,14 % de votos válidos, seguido por García con 24,87 %. Lourdes Flores está tercera posición con 24,20%. Cuando el escrutinio estaba al 70.8%, Flores superaba a García por 0,31%
Unidad Nacional confía en remontar con votos del exterior
El Comercio on line, 10 de abrild el 2006. Actualizado a las 7:59:46 PM
Absoluto silencio al interior de la vivienda de la candidata presidencial por Unidad Nacional, Lourdes Flores Nano, ubicada en la cuadra 11 de la avenida Guardia Civil, en el distrito de San Isidro.
Según reportó la emisora RPP, el congresista de UN, Xavier Barrón, personero legal de la alianza, refirió a los medios de comunicación apostados en las inmediaciones que acaba de exigir a la ONPE que incorpore a los actuales resultados las cinco mil actas de votos de los compatriotas que residen en el exterior.
Según Barrón Cerberos, estas boletas todavía no habrían sido tomadas en cuenta por la entidad electoral, por lo que podría haber variaciones en el cómputo final. De otro lado, señaló que si alguien quiere festejar antes de tiempo “mejor que espere”.
Alan García aumenta ventaja sobre Lourdes Flores
El Comercio Online, 10 de abril del 2006
El ex presidente Alan García continúa aumentando levemente su ventaja sobre Lourdes Flores, según los últimos resultados de la Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales (ONPE) en la dramática definición para determinar cuál de los dos disputará la segunda vuelta con Ollanta Humala. El informe actualizado hasta 77,75% señala que Humala obtiene el 29,94 % de votos válidos, seguido por García con 24,95 %. En la tercera posición se ubica Lourdes Flores con 24,37%. Cuando el escrutinio de votos estaba al 70.8%, Flores superaba a García por 0,31%.
35 replies on “10:00 P.M.: ONPE Presidential Results at 80.68% – Valid Votes”
Seems like the Garcia trend continues; with him getting about 30% of the votes since 50% of the valid votes. I gather it will be Garcia vs Humala in second round. Who is considered the stronger canidate against Humala? I would Garcia is more center, but given how his last term ended have trouble seeing to much enthusiasum for him amongst the more free market types.
Please with thanks in advance, some analysis from folks here about what might happen if there is a runoff between:
1. Humala and Garcia
2. Humala and Flores
I thought I had caught a bug of some kind but the knot in my stomach comes from a very different place!!!
A la vida!
Sasha
Sabemos cuales son las mesas que aun falta incluir? Sabemos si ya se contabilizo las mesas del extranjero? He tratado de encontrar esta informacion en la pagina de la Onpe, pero no he tenido exito. Es que nadie mas esta buscando esta informacion, o es que la Onpe no la esta entregando? Gracias por el excelente trabajo Max y Fabi!
I have checked the ONPE Website and it seems that most results from outside Peru have not yet been added up.
However a National Unity Government would be very week in congress, it would have to make many concessions to APRA. I an sure how good that would be.
Al parecer nos tocara elegir entre Humala y Garcia. Entre el sarten y el fuego. Dejenme decirles que votare en blanco. No quiero darle mi apoyo a ninguno de ellos. Si todos los que creyesemos asi, gane quien gane sabra que no cuenta con el suficiente apoyo popular. Deberiamos aprender de Ecuador y tener el valor para salir a las calles y sacar al mandatario en caso no cumpla con sus promesas.
Looks like it will be Garcia and Humala. Whatever it is, it is sure that the people want change. It’s outrageous that Peru has this upperclass of less than 15% who control the money, the land and the media and none of this trickles down to the 50% living in poverty. Especially since the upper class has enriched itself so much on mineral rights. That wasn’t an upperclass value add. Once the economy is integrated with everyone participating, Peru will take off.
El votar en blaco o viciado en la segunda vuelta lo unco que hace es ayudar a Humala!!!
Hay que votar por el menos peor!!!
Según el Comercio de hoy día los extranjeros han votado por Lourdes (57,6%). La pagina oficiál de ONPE es muy lento y actualizado muy poco. Espero que al fin podemos leer los estadisticas detaillidas allá tambien.
Max, I’d prefer if you left your comments to something you acutally know about. If you didn’t live here when Velasquez and Garcia pushed Peru back centuries with their policies, then you have no right to comment. They and their parties destroyed this country, not the so called upper class rich you seem to blame.
In fact, if so many upper class rich hadn’t left back in the 70s and 80s, and taken their money with them, it probably wouldn’t be as bad as it is now. Not only did the rich leave, but also the doctors, lawyers, engineers, authors, etc that could have made this country great.
You don’t even know me, so who the heck are you. I have every right to comment. This is the internet you moron. Your attitude is what got Peru into trouble in the first place. Obviously if so many professional types hadn’t left they would have had enough votes to put Lourdes in office now. No one pushed Peru back centuries, it was never up centuries. Who cares what happened in the past, this is all about the future. In a democracy, the majority rules, and they’re ruling now. If you’re one of the 15% with money, good for you. Book your flight. Peru is going in a different direction and long term it will be better for the majority rather than the 15% who have robbed it blind for generations and played shell games with it’s successes to keep the indigenous people behind.
Cuando Alan Garcia fue presidente yo estaba trabajando en el Peru, me acuerdo que Abel Salinas dio su mensaje a la nacion “el salinazo” y ordeno a los empleadores pagar un extra sueldo a los empleados para poder afrontar el incremento de ese mes; como todos sabemos la situacion siguio empeorando despues de ese dia y no hubieron otros pagos para compensar a los afortunados que por lo menos tenian un trabajo. Saber que hay la posibilidad que Alan Garcia sea presidente otra vez, me da nauseas y me da mucha pena por la cantidad de peruanos que no tienen otra opcion pero ser optimistas por el nuevo gobierno, cualquiera que sea.
Max, thank goodness I don’t know you. You can yap all you want, it still doesn’t mean you know anything about what you’re talking about. Sure its the internet, but I come here to be informed, not listen to useless BS.
My attitude has nothing to do with Peru’s troubles. Also, I’m not the 15% rich. When I was younger, Garcia won the election because he came to my town and gave everybody a chicken, just like every other little town in Peru. Voting in Peru is obligatory, so those who give a chicken, get the vote.
After 7000% inflation, nacionalization and subsequent collapse of industries that had 100+ year histories, etc, etc, etc, we had to wait in line 1 hour for a liter of milk and bread. Why would I want to go back to that life? Where do you think the money will come from if not a business friendly environment and foreign investment? This isn’t Venezuela with billions of barrels of oil in reserve and outrageous oil prices.
“15% who have been robbing it for generations”????? is that what your social studies professor at UC Hippy told you? Wake up.
Max and Javier,
Cool down gentlemen, its been a long couple of days. You both have valid points…i believe that Peruvians have made their voice heard loud and clear; they are fed up with living in poverty and want drastic change. What have the poor and marginalised got to lose? Keep in mind also that this sticks to the regional pattern that is building, the anti-globalisation movement in Latin America that is being stoked by millions of oil-fuelled Venezuelan dollars. Bolivia, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, all left leaning…maybe there is hope yet for a new paradigm of development. Lets wait and see, but lets not fight, please.
@ Max…
one little thing… How would you like to get the money when there would be no rich. I’m originally not from Peru so I can see quite well what it is all about. The people that are rich now, are those that fought fot that. The average Peruvian works and works and doesn’t get any further. They don’t have the mind of being rich ever. They don’t look for new oppurtunities to climb up. They just keep on selling their candies for all their life and then they dye. It’s sad to see but it’s like that.
One little thing more to everybody that reads this: don’t vote blanco. That’s helping your enemy. Vote for the one that is the best.
Hey Max, yes we don’t know you but we as well have every right to comment on your ideas. Yes Peru was indeed pushed back centuries; I agree Peru needs change but neither Humala nor Garcia will bring that needed change, they will bring misery, authoritarism; their good intentions will dilute in their lack of vision and poor and rich will pay a high price for their mistakes, the worst part is that it will be at the expense of civil rights violations and opression.
I am saddened to see my forgetful country vote for the bastard that brought bombs to our houses, violence among the forgotten, misery to all (even more to the poor). I don’t support the right wing, but the other two choices are unthinkable.
Abrazos to Javier and Pepe. I have been fortunate not have had to go through what you and others experienced under Alan Garcia and understand why you would not want to go back *there*.
You have every right to mourn the losses experienced by Peruvians and to be concerned for the future of your country.
You also have every right to stand up to someone who thinks he knows it all. Enough of know it alls, especially those who call others “moron”. Peruvians have had enough of being called names when they speak truth to power, perceived or otherwise.
A la vida!
Claire
I personally think that if provided with one more opportunity, Alan Garcia will positively prove to be a good president for Peru.He has matured and must have learned from his past mistakes and most importantly his party is one of the most organized political party in Latin America.
The margin between Garcia and Flores is so small. I really think the overseas vote can overcome it. My parents voted in Miami, Florida, USA. They told me there was overwhelming support for Flores there.
I’m definitely with you, Javier, Pepe and Peruvian.
Your specific house had a bomb brought to it? What century was Peru in? The average Peruvian does not have the mind to being rich? How do you know? Many of them obviously have the internet. And many of them are smart enough to wire up electricity in shantytowns outside of Lima. And when they come to the U.S., many of them make a ton of money. What’s been keeping them down is the patrician attitudes like yours that says they’ll never be successful or the academic system that is reserved for the wealthy. If Peru is so bad why the heck are you there? We’ll find out the difference in the next 5 years. It will not be Flores.
Peru isn’t impacted by anti-globalization. It’s being impacted by globalization. For the first time in years, there are secondary forces competing with the U.S. for South American natural resources such as Venezuelan oil and Peruvian copper in a big way. Peru would be right to take advantage of this and renegotiate it’s agreements in particular with the U.S. for the benefit of everyone including the 82% mestizo / indian population. This is all happening on the internet. This is globalization.
I notice from recent ONPE statements that a little over 10% of Peruvians of voting age did NOT vote in Sundays elections. Is this figure consistent with historical trends on abstention? Does anyone have the figures? And what fines are levied for non voting?
I just want to say something about our critique of the top 15% in Peru– I don’t see any middle class or rich Americans/Canadians prepared to give up their suburban houses, their suvs, their dinners out or their credit cards to go live in Peru, with insecurity, bad schools, bad health service, etc. It is very easy to blame the Peruvian ‘blancos’ as more evil, or more responsible than us Americans/Canadians/Europeans for the state of the world and the mess that countries like Peru find themselves in. I would ask gringos to take a hard look at their own prosperity before they go accusing others of being evil for not sacrificing a middle class life style. If you want to have a political commitment with the world (which is just another kind of imperialistic attitude in my opinion) you need to go beyond “che” guevarra’s image and motor cycle diaries movies or just paying lip service to the fact that you are liberal or progressive, shopping at Whole Foods and buying your fair trade coffee. When you talk about the ‘petucos’ in Peru, the top 15%, we are not talking rich people like Bill Gates or the Bush family in most cases. They have a middle class lifestyle like you and me. It is very different to think about the masses when the masses are in other country and do not challenge your way of living, because in case you didn’t notice — gringolandia makes up the top 15% of the world.
Humala has just declared that if elected, he will take control of television and radio. This is not good at all. Furthermore, I predict another exodus of professionals from Peru because of this. It will be left in the hands of the poor and uneducated. Basically, if Humala (or Garcia) is elected Peru will recede into the stone age.
Juan, if would help if you could you give us the source. Where did you hear that Humala will take control of TV and radio.
Thanks
Fabi
Another comment for Max. The majority of Peru is poor, the majority vote won every election since we have been a democracy, therefore the poor has controlled the country. I still can’t see how the 15% rich are responsible.
Every president won because he united the poor with statements that he would squeeze more out of the rich. Most of the rich left and most of the money was lost. Whatever was left was stolen by Garcia, Fujimori, Montesinos, etc, etc.
So now we blame anti-globalization as the new rallying cry?
To Max and others:
People should know that Ollanta is an ex-alumni of the infamous “school of the americas”.
He even placed this in his public CV available at the ONPE.
All discussions are kind of pointless when we have doubts who is behind each candidate
Javier
Humala also did a maestria in political science at La Catolica, hardly vanguardia
The follwowing is a recent article by reuters news agency with regard to the macro economic position of presidential candidate Ollanta Humala.
http://today.reuters.com/investing/financeArticle.aspx?type=bondsNews&storyID=2006-04-10T194031Z_01_N10339502_RTRIDST_0_PERU-ELECTION-HUMALA-PICTURE.XML
Also a person who made a comment about Mr. Humala’s anti-semitic leanings did not support their argument. Humala after such criticisms early on met with leaders of the country’s jewish community and even obtained their support. Also Islamic people are semetic and we all know that their is a palestinian in Humala’s congressional contingency.
Thanks you
Victor E. Ramos
Humala is part of an anti-globalisation movement in the region. Peru has been affected by globalisation up to now, and not in a positive way. GLobalisation is not only about being connected to the Internet! It is mainly about countries becoming closer together through economic ties and trade. THe Internet helps this happen, but the Internet is not the definition of globalisation alone.
So to repeat, if Humala wins the election, he WILL be, in the FUTURE, part of a widening anti-globalisation movement.
There are two critiques of the current candidates who are leading the polls who represent what some might deem the corrupt left and the authoritarian left. Between the two and perhaps other remnants of splinter center left groups the tally is that the majority of the population is a candidate who represents a particular economic model.
Also again taking into account a well organized campaign by the socialist party and the humanrights NGOs, which collected signatures that were affirmed by the JNE to give rise to a call for a referendum on free trade to be convoked by conress, and marched along with small scale agricultural producers and other sectors of the working class against an agreement as it now stands and for revision for consistency with the needs or interest of non export led sectors of peruvian society, it would seem that the majority is again challenging neoliberal economics.
Again the conclusion is that the market has one no group deemed leftist, save for the sanguinary and seriously misled remnants of the PCP SL, call for full on socialistic or communistic adaptation of the economy. What these groups are calling for under different parties is for a greater regulatory role in assessing the benefits and detriments of exchange with an increasingly multi global, and some might say multi-polar world.
This is not to say, that export led growth should suffer or be constricted for it is one engine of an economy but if the nation seeks to build alternative engines, not dependent a particularly uneven unipolar model, this era appears to be the correct time to undergo such experimentation. This may be the direction the south will head wether under APRA or PNP/UPP.
Also a last point I acknowledge the affinity many peruvians have for Ms. Flores Nano, she is an accomplished person, a law professor, an accomplished lawyer, a woman who has made considerable advances, even if some might say this has been arrived at through her class status.
However, there has been a democratically elected technocrat with impressive credentials, and an atuhoritarian president democratically elected surrounded by neo-liberal technocrats and neither has been able to shift the gains to those sectors who are in need of it most. What is to say that the present technocrat will not do likewise is anybodys guesse. However, I will not entertain conjecture as some on this site do. What I do know is that both as an accomplishment and as a potential yellow flag Ms. Flores Nano was also one of the youngest person at the 1992 Davos World Economic Forum, which is described by many social justice activist around the world as sort of a who’s who of the most powerful corporations meeting to discuss economic policies that have been and are beeing challenged world wide for their effects on teh environment reduction in health and safety standards for workers worldwide. Additionally one of the companies often at teh Davos Forum is Bechtel a corporation which under severl names attempted to privatize water services in Bolivia but which was kicked out of that country. Candidate of the Oligarchs? I don’t know?
Only the future will tell with any of these three who are leading the polls.
Lastly Glorisa was a smashing success at getting Alvaro Uribe elected under a similar “manos firmes” platform. Ask the peasants smashed by what many human rights and NGO’s deem the sixth division of the columbian army, the right wing paramilitaries who Uribe worked alongside with in his native state ofAntioquia, how they appreciate thos “manos firmes.” Now a right wing technocrat there also seeks to go beyond that country’s constitutional limit of one term in office. Violence from either side is very unfortunate. I hope the UN supporters who talk about “fe y serenidad” who tried to lynch a presidential candidate agree with me here. But by their acts on sunday I doubt it since these are probably the same people who attacked the Nisseis in Peru when Fujimori was galvanizing his campaign against the closet racist MVL.
I hope there is an article here on the aftermath of the elections and what strategies parties such as the socialist party of descentralization party assess after these elections.
Thank you,
Victor E. Ramos
I can not believe what I am reading, Max, get your ideas right, I am Mexican married to a Peruvian and I know more that what you do, My Husband did have a car bom blow up infront of his home and many friends died during the time that Garcia was in office, do you think that terrorisim only happens in the middle east, this happened in Peru less than little bit over 15 years ago, and you think that bringing someone like Ollanta is going to change and having Garcia back will be better, you are WRONG!!!!, I hate the fact that you can not understand what being poor is, I bet you shower every day and with hot water, I have been in Peru and not be able to take a shower because there is no water that day, and forget about having a hot shower during the winter, you need to warm up the water in the stove if you can’t take it.
You need to really spend some time in Peru and learn what people want, they will vote for whom ever brings them more, and I wonder where did Ollanta got all that money to pay for all the presents he gave the people in the little towns in Peru, could it be from dear Mr. Chavez, since they are really good compatriotas.
He calls him self a Comandante and he is a civilian now, WHY DO PEOPLE STILL LISTEN TO LIES!!.
I worry about this guy becoming the president since it is becoming a trend in latin America, and Mexico does not need that, since there is a future candidate that has the same ideas, lets brake the bad cicle and kick this idiot to the curve, I can’t do much since I am not Peruvian, but all of you that are, PLEASE do something and stop complaning when the wrong person is in office.
The failure to produce a well reasoned argument in promotion of ones point of view is often reflected in persons who use CAPS!
Also terrorism was nurtured in the bosom of a country that turned its back on persons in the interior and in some part lashed out against them at the outset under the initial perception that it was a dreaded “indian uprising.” Think about the different terms used by peruvians with regard to shanty towns, migrants from the interior call them “pueblos jovenes,” whereas acriollized peruvians call them “invasions.” I dislike cowards like the shining path who use terror on people as much as the next person but apathy of the needs and desolation of the interior is a source of such afflictions. And in terms of combating terrorism, I have no opinion of Alan Garcia’s presidencey but Humala had worked in various provinces working with quechuas, aymaras, and ashaninkas, and organized ronderos. He does has fought on the fronts where terrorism. And if you want to know my kins village was occupied by those sendero dilenquents and my lucanas indian girlfriends kin were dissapeared by sendero. So I also share the pain many peruvians feel towards that tragic epoch in our history but I also yearn for a day that the people in the interior are treated with teh same dignity and respect that affluent people in teh posh suburbs of Lima receive.
I have also been to Oaxaca and Chiapas Mexico as a person who is also of indigenous roots the stories told to me by ethnic indians of Chiapas tzotzil, zoque was of a society before the uprising that held no repect for the Mayan people who inhabit that part of the country but after the emergence of the zapatista movement a sense of empowerment and a revindication of ethnic dignity emerged. I will not say this leads to the conclusion that PNP/UPP also represents this but I will say it is heart warming to see the wiphala, if you don’t know what it is then look it up, and the rainbow flag of an oppressed people raised with pride.
Thank you
preuanukuna runakuna kashkanki!
Estimado Victor,
No es coherente que un ex-Comandante militar, con escaso entrenamiento de posGrado dirija una nacion de mas de 25 millones de habitantes.
Sabes quien le ha escrito su plan de gobierno? yo no lo se exactamente, pero si se que estuvo en Wisconsin (EEUU) por dos anios. Eso en su curriculum.
Mucha discusion idealista, y muy buenos deseos, pero con solo buenos deseos no se logra nada.
Ollanta va a pedir ayuda tecnica, y cuando cometa errores va a decir como Alan: no tenia experiencia, todos nos equivocamos…
Y vas a tener que aceptar la disculpa luego del vomito en la cara.
Para mi es mejor estar de oposicion contra UN, que estar en oposicion contra UPP.
Toledo se aprovecho del mismo discurso para lograr votos: yo soy cholo! Simplemente no es tan sencillo.
Pon un negocio y experimenta lo que es manejar empleados. Manejar soldados es diferente porque nadie te discute.
Yo solo espero que alguien capaz, ademas de honesto venga en el 2011. Vamos a seguir perdiendo hasta que se aparezca un candidato que realmente quiera el desarrollo de los peruanos.
A menos que tu sepas quien esta detras de Humala y tengas tu alguito escondido y asegurado
Javier
Hi, Barry. Yes, the abstention figure is pretty consistent with past election results. The fine is steep. About 140 Soles I believe. — Max
NO debemos de olvidarnos lo sucedido cuando Goberno Alan Garcia tiene varias cosas pendientes
1.- Dejo que se prescriban los delitos que cometio no se sometio a la justicia Peruana como lo hara Fujimori solo lo van a extraditar por tres cosas por abandono del, cargo, por no poder sustentar el pago del colegio de sus hijosy por emitir disposiciones administrativas de pago de CTS a Montesinos
2.- La matansa de los penales
3.- la superinflacion de la cual todavia estamos pagando
4.- el ingreso a la administracion publica solo con carnet del APRA
EL nacionalismo es bueno acaso los que estan fuera del pais no sienten como son rechazados por las leyes de los paises donde estan que protejen a su industria nacional a su capital de trabajo que son sus compatriotas
entonces dejense de tonterias no dejea que otra vez un ladron nos gobierna