Weekly Book Blog

The Old Gringo Review

For this weeks book, I read The Old Gringo, by Carlos Fuentes. To be honest with you, I found this book to be a little bit confusing, but for a few different reasons. 

At the beginning of my reading, I found the old gringo’s motivation to be a bit strange; he has come to Mexico to die? Once I got more into the reading, I found myself affirming that Bierce (the old gringo) has very little to live for. It’s even exemplified on page 45 of my copy, in which the main character says, “To the earth and sky alike, to the vegetation of the desert, to whatever took form in sense or consciousness, this incarnate suffering addressed that silent plea: ‘I have come to die. Give me the coup de grace’ “ (Fuentes, 45). I did not know what a ‘coup de grace’ was until looking it up, but it actually refers to the final blow given to a wounded person or animal in order to kill them. Even the main character acknowledges that this is the final thing he wants to finish his life off. That really speaks to the characters life, Bierce seems relatively well thought out in his actions and decisions, and it’s interesting that Arroyo finds that within Bierce too. The Old Gringo’s reasoning as to why he’s come to die is gone into depth later in the novel, but I found it really telling, and a bit of a sad reveal into Bierce’s life.
Now, to discuss Harriet Winslow, who is another interesting character in this novel. Originally when I was introduced to her, I found her to be sort of naive; she spent her time thinking that the Miranda’s would come back to their burning hacienda (the Miranda’s being her employers). There was also a line in the novel in which Winslow said that coming to Mexico was her ‘duty’, and that sort of made me think about what her motivation was; why did she choose Mexico, to teach the children who were going to be a ‘challenge’ for her? I know we receive quite a decent amount of her backstory (with her beau Mr. Delaney, the death of her father), but I want to know exactly why this American girl made this decision. It sort of reminds me of Bierce’s motivation; Bierce comes to die, to fight in the Mexican revolution. Harriet comes to Mexico as a new thrill (or ‘cheap thrill’ as a line in the book puts it); could that also be a motivator for Bierce? 

Another aspect I found to be a little confusing was the relationships between Harriet and Bierce, and Harriet and Arroyo. I did not know if Harriet and Bierce’s relationship was one of a father and daughter, or a romantic one. Furthermore, I found that Harriet and Arroyo’s relationship was very confusing, because I did not know if she felt affection, anger, hatred (or a mixture of all) towards him. After some thinking, I wonder if the bit of confusion I was feeling about these relationships was intentional, and Fuentes knew how he was setting these connections up. 

Something that I found when I was doing a bit of research on the book was that Fuentes wrote this book over about 20 years; I don’t know if it is just the effects of a good book and author, but there were some lines that I found were very wise and seemed to be the reflection of someone with life experience. One that particularly stood out to me was spoken by the old gringo, in which he says: “the only way you escape corruption is to die young.” I know that’s spoken by an older character in the novel, but it feels so enriched with Fuentes’ life experience. A question I would like to leave you is this: Do you think that The Old Gringo would be able to exist as a novel if Bierce’s motivations were different? To further elaborate upon this question, do you think that it would be possible for this novel to exist if Bierce did not want to die? 

Standard
Weekly Book Blog

The Time of the Doves Review

The Time of the Doves by Mercé Rodoreda is definitely a heart-wrenching book, and challenging to read at times (well, I mean basically all of the time). There is little to be happy about in this book, and the times that are happy, you can probably count on two hands. Nevertheless, I think that the complexity and layers that the book has are a lot to unpack. This book left me with so many questions that I think discussions would be very helpful to clear up. I enjoyed reading from Natalia’s perspective the effects the war had on a woman living through the revolution; that is not something you often read in war-centered books. It made me think a lot about the significance of conflict on civilians, people of different classes, and a mother to two children.

One of the first sadnesses I identified in the book was how Natalia decided to leave her fiancé for Quimet; it really hurt me when she found her ex-fiancé and they talked for a little and he had nothing but well wishes for her. Quimet was once charming, lovely, and intriguing. However, over the course of the novel, it basically fades into nothingness, and creates more pains for him, his family, and for Natalia. I believe that there is a reason for this choice to write him this way, but its still difficult because Natalia had a choice and upon reflecting on her decisions, she might have regretted getting with Quimet. 

While reading, I continually found myself thinking ‘wow. Natalia truly is a hard-working woman whom I cannot begin to understand.’ Well, Im attempting to do so now, but I suppose you know what I mean; she works until she can barely stand, takes care of her two children who were painstakingly difficult to raise, deal with her husband who moans and groans til the cows come home, and look after a ton of doves which she soon grows to despise. I remember her ‘last straw’ moment with the doves, and as violent as she was, I sort of understood why she acted as she did. I interpreted her feelings as being sick and tired of Quimet’s actions, especially with the doves and towards her. I feel like Natalia is so under appreciated by her husband. It seems as if Natalia once was very fearful of changing in front of Quimet, but the amount of time they have spent together, she was just done. I think that the use of doves within the novel is a massive metaphor; the exact meaning, I am still grappling with. But there is no way that the use of doves was this heavy and there is no significance to them. Originally when reading, I thought that the use of doves could be a metaphor for Quimet and Natalia’s dreams and hopes, but I don’t know if that would make sense due to Natalia absolutely destroying the doves. Unless that is actually what was intended…

The Time of the Doves is packed with symbolism, metaphors, and references. I constantly found myself taking note of them. For example, the constant use of flowers to describe Antonio and Rita, while also mentioning them when Quimet’s mother died, and the jonquil’s that his mother planted in her flashback about the boys uprooting them. Even the rose of Jericho that she had kept since Quimet was born (p. 59). So much thought and meaning went into the intentions of the symbols that Rodoreda used throughout the story. I also found that the consistent use of foreshadowing to be intriguing. Similar to the flower example, Quimet’s mother makes a remark about boys being difficult; we then see how Antonio is born, and he clearly is not an easy child. The employment of symbolism. Metaphors, and foreshadowing enrich the story and make it extra enjoyable to read. It felt slightly like a puzzle, in which if I went over it again, I would find things I missed the first time around. 

A question I sort of brought up before that I would like to discuss is ‘what exactly is the significance of the doves within the context of the story?’ Maybe it was clear and I misunderstood it, but I’m a little confused about it. 

I feel like this meme is from a super insignificant part of the book, but I thought of it anyways lol.

Standard