Category Archives: Social Studies

District gives teacher a black mark

The Vancouver Sun: District gives teacher a black mark

A letter of discipline goes into educator’s file for refusing to administer test
Published: Friday, September 28, 2007

VICTORIA – A Langford elementary teacher won’t be suspended but has been issued a letter of discipline for refusing to give a required reading comprehension test to her Grade 3 class last spring.

A notice to Kathryn Sihota from the Sooke school district said the letter will be placed in her personnel file and the B.C. College of Teachers will be informed

.

The district also said her refusal to follow her principal’s direction to issue the test constituted insubordination, and that further misconduct could mean more discipline “up to and including dismissal.”

Kathryn Sihota, who refused to give her Grade 3 class a reading test, has been told to administer the test next year.

The district said it expects Sihota, who teaches at Millstream elementary, to administer the disputed test — called the District Assessment of Reading Team or DART test — when it comes up again next year.

The decision by the Sooke board of education followed a hearing Tuesday, in which more than 100 teachers from Victoria and other parts of the province staged a rally.

While district officials would not discuss the decision, the information was released by the Sooke Teachers’ Association, a local affiliate of the B.C. Teachers’ Federation. The association is filing a grievance about the disciplinary action.

Sihota, co-president of the Sooke teachers’ group, said she was still considering her options with respect to the test.

“Spring’s a long way away. I haven’t decided what I’ll do next. I’m kind of hoping that the support that was here the other day from across the province may sway the board’s decision about making the test mandatory.”

In many other districts using DART, the test is not required, Sihota said. “It’s a tool that’s available for teachers, but it’s not a mandatory test.”

The teachers’ association has said it is concerned about how the district uses information gathered from DART. The district maintains the test yields valuable data on how students are faring and how the education system can respond to their needs.

Sihota said she did what she felt was best for her students. “I feel that I’m standing up to protect my kids.”

ZNet Commentary: Canadian Foreign Policy and Iran

ZNet Commentary
Canadian Foreign Policy and Iran
September 27, 2007
By Yves Engler

It appears that the US is planning an attack against Iran and Ottawa is pitching in to help.

Earlier this year, then Foreign Affairs Minister Peter McKay said, “Canada is deeply concerned with the direction that Iran is headed. The regime in Tehran cannot be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons.” McKay’s comment was made in Israel, a regional rival of Iran that already possesses nuclear weapons.

Referring to “genocidal” Iran a few months later, Jason Kenny (a federal cabinet minister) told a pro-Israel conference that Canada “will pursue every possible avenue in concert with our allies to ensure that [Iran] does not come into possession of nuclear weapons, which could unleash unimaginable violence.” Kenny concluded that, “He [Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad] must be stopped by the civilized world.”

Later MacKay released a statement claiming that “maintaining a relationship with Iran tests the bounds of diplomacy…peace is Canada’s goal and we support the United States’ effort to engage all regional partners in supporting the Iraqi government’s attempts to bring safety and security to the area.”
http://www.turning.ca/
Canada has also worked to de-legitimate Iran at the UN, putting forward a resolution condemning Iran’s human rights record. In an embarrassing outcome for Canadian officials, the motion barely passed (77-75). Iran’s UN representative responded to the resolution by saying, “Canada and other sponsors of this resolution [against Iran] are themselves implicated in serious rights violations for which they must be held accountable.” He specifically cited Canada’s horrendous treatment of Aboriginal people.

Canada has also been accused of spying for the US. Late last year, members of the Iranian parliament claimed the Canadian embassy in Tehran was a “den of spies.”

While progressives should oppose Iran’s human rights violations, its role in Iraq and its desire to develop nuclear energy or weapons, it is hypocritical for the Canadian government to use this as a justification for supporting a US attack.

Canada hasn’t opposed the US invasion/occupation of Iraq, which is certainly a war crime under international law, and the main cause of the current instability in that country. In fact, Canadian forces provided logistical support for the American-led invasion and relieved US troops from Afghanistan so they could redeploy to Iraq. In addition, Canadian companies continue to supply armaments for the US war.

At least the hypocrisy has been consistent.

Throughout the 1970s, the Canadian government’s Defence Programs Bureau had a representative in Tehran, which sold about $60 million worth of arms to Iran during the decade. This was during the same period that Amnesty International reported “no country in the world has a worse record in human rights than Iran.” The Shah’s brutal SAVAK intelligence forces killed tens of thousands, which prompted no condemnations from Canadian officials.

Nor did Canada protest when in 1953 the US and Britain overthrew Mohammed Mossadegh, Iran’s elected prime minister. Instead, it followed the lead of the UK and the US in doing business with a dictator and Canada opened an embassy six years later. By the time the Shah was overthrown in 1979, there were 850 Canadians in Iran (along with thousands of Americans), most working for foreign owned oilrigs, power projects etc. Not happy with the Shah’s departure, Canada closed its embassy in 1980 and did not reopen it until 1988.

Canadian hypocrisy is on full display regarding Iran’s drive to develop nuclear energy or atomic weapons. When the Shah was in power, Canada was prepared to sell Iran nuclear reactors. More broadly, after selling (or attempting to sell) nuclear reactors or uranium to at least 25 countries from Argentina to Romania, Canada has no right to criticize a country’s desire for nuclear power.

Some say that Iran’s push to get the bomb dates back to 1974 when India exploded a nuclear bomb. Canada provided the reactor that India, Iran’s regional competitor, used to develop the bomb. And Canada aided another of Iran’s regional rivals, Pakistan, in its successful program to build nuclear weapons.

In fact, Canadian uranium from Great Bear Lake was used in the only two nuclear bombs ever to be dropped on a human population. After Hiroshima and Nagasaki Prime Minister Mackenzie King declared: “It gives me pleasure to announce that Canadian scientists played an important role, having been intimately connected, in an efficient manner, to this great scientific development.” By 1959, Canada had sold $1.5 billion worth of uranium to the US bomb program. Today, Canada is the world’s largest exporter of uranium.

If Canada is to have any credibility regarding nuclear non-proliferation perhaps it should begin by getting its own house in order. Then, it would make sense to criticize its allies when they build weapons of mass destruction or break international laws and treaties. Only after doing all that would Ottawa have the authority to condemn Iran’s nuclear program.

Yves Engler is the author of two books: Canada in Haiti: Waging War on the Poor Majority (with Anthony Fenton) and Playing Left Wing: From Rink Rat to Student Radical. Both books are published by RED/Fernwood and available at www.turning.ca