A new trend: Students abandon private schools for (suburban) public schools

The Wall Street Journal: Opting Out of Private School

Opting Out of Private School
By NANCY KEATES
September 15, 2006; Page W1

It’s the lurking fear of every private-school parent: The kid next door is getting just as good an education at the public school — free of charge.

Ben and Courtney Nields of Norwalk, Conn., agonized over the issue last year when they moved their daughter Annie from the New Canaan Country School, set on a 72-acre campus, to a public school for first grade. The move was primarily economic — they have twins entering kindergarten this year and faced tuition bills of $22,500 per child.

“It was like taking your child out of the Garden of Eden,” says Mrs. Nields. But Annie thrived at the school. Her confidence grew and the teacher, say the Nieldses, was phenomenal.

Across the country, some schools and education professionals report a growing movement from private to public. Among the possible reasons: Private-school tuition has grown sharply, while some colleges are boosting the number of students they take from public schools. New studies have suggested that public-school students often tested as well or better than their private school peers. And increasingly, public schools are enriching their programs by holding the same kinds of fund-raisers often associated with private schools, such as auctions and capital campaigns.

A select group of public schools say they’re seeing a growing share of new students coming from private schools. At Highland Park High School in Dallas, 74% of the new students came from private schools this fall, compared with 61% a year ago. Over the past three years, the proportion has doubled at Thomas S. Wootton High School in Rockville, Md. At Homestead Elementary School in Centennial, Colo., the number of kids coming from private school tripled in the past year.
“It’s a significant shift here,” says Laurie Conlon, guidance chairman at Cold Spring Harbor Junior/Senior High School in Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. This fall, all 17 of the new entrants for grades eight through 12 are from private schools, compared with five students last year. The school scheduled its first-ever information sessions to help the newcomers adjust.

Not all public schools are seeing these transfers: Top-scoring schools in affluent areas tend to get the highest influxes from private schools. In fact, the shift serves to highlight the gap between well-funded schools and their underfunded counterparts, often inner-city schools.

Jonathan Thielman at Jefferson County IB, a public school in Birmingham, Ala. He switched from private school last year.
While the shift isn’t reflected in recent national aggregate statistics, a number of educational consultants and academics interviewed say they’re beginning to see more parents opting in to public schools. “Most people agree there’s always been some movement between private and public school,” says Jeffrey Henig, a professor of political science and education at Columbia University. “But lately there’s strong anecdotal evidence of frequent movement from private schools to public schools. There are more choices for parents now.”

Interest in private schools shows signs of waning. The number of private-school enrollments in kindergarten through grade 12 increased at a slower rate than the number of enrollments in public schools between 1989 and 2001, according to the U.S. Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics. Last year, the approximately 1,200 schools that belong to the National Association for Independent Schools received 8.5 inquiries for each student who enrolled, down from 9.7 inquiries in the 1998-99 school year. (The group has added more member schools in that period.) While competition for admission in many areas of the country remains intense, the percentage of students accepted at member schools rose to 53.4% last year, from 49.7% in 1998.

Higher costs are a big factor in the switch. The median tuition for private schools nationally was $16,970 in 2005-06, up 16% from five years earlier. In some parts of the country, tuition is now as high as $30,000 a year. Even as the number of families able to easily shoulder full tuition continues to rise — in 2005, the number of households in the U.S. with a net worth of $1 million or more rose 11%, to 8.3 million, over the previous year, according to the Spectrem Group, a wealth-research firm in Chicago — the NAIS is warning member schools that rising tuitions may cause some families to look for alternatives. “The schools are getting some pushback they haven’t seen before,” says NAIS President Pat Bassett.

The 9% rise in annual tuition, to $10,890 a student, at St. Mary’s Academy in Englewood, Colo., prompted Elizabeth Maloney to start researching the local elementary school. The mother of five enrolled her kids at St. Mary’s — alma mater of U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice — after moving to the area last year. She didn’t know much about the public schools, and going private felt safer. “My kids had always gone to private school,” she says.

Abbey Maloney at her old private school.
But when Mrs. Maloney spoke with the principal at the public school, she learned that it offered a similar curriculum to St. Mary’s, including identical vocabulary and math programs. “I was blown away,” she says. Plus, her kids could walk or ride their bikes to school. Now, four of her kids are there. Mrs. Maloney doesn’t rule out a return; she misses perks like the foreign language program and the extra arts activities. Deirdre V. Cryor, the head of St. Mary’s, says what makes the school different is its strong values.

Beyond tuition, educational advisers say more parents are worrying that the competition at private schools might hurt their kids’ chances of getting into a selective college. As the number of applications reached record levels at some colleges this year (at Harvard University, applications were up 15% over 2005, with nearly 23,000 students competing for about 1,650 slots in the freshman class) they fear the colleges are placing quotas on how many kids they take from each elite private school. Some also believe their child will have a better chance of standing out at public school.

The College Connection

In our own sampling of 20 selective colleges, 11 had slightly higher percentages of enrolled freshmen from public schools in the class of 2010 compared with 2005. Five were down, and four were roughly flat. At Dartmouth College, the percentage of first-year students from public school grew to 66% this year, from 62% five years ago. Dean of Admissions Karl Furstenberg says that though the change is subtle, it reflects a growing applicant pool, as well as the school’s efforts to reach more students who might not have thought of applying.

“There’s no point in spending all that money if your kid is going to be in the middle of the class,” says Robert Shaw, a partner at IvySuccess, an educational consulting firm in Garden City, N.Y. He counsels students to consider switching if they aren’t in the top 10%. However, advisers note that some elite public schools — such as Edgemont High School in Scarsdale, N.Y., or New Trier High School in Winnetka, Ill. — can be just as competitive.

Claire Straty, a 16-year-old in Dallas, hoped to leave some of the pressure behind when she switched from the Hockaday School, an independent college-preparatory school for girls, to the public Highland Park High School. “If you weren’t brilliant you’d fall to the middle of the pack,” she says of Hockaday. “At Highland Park I felt I’d have a better chance to stand out.” She also thought she would have more time for extracurriculars.

Her mother, Laurie-Jo Straty, had a hard time letting her daughter leave Hockaday, which she believes is an extraordinary school. Mrs. Straty also struggled with leaving the community she’d developed with other parents there. But so far, she’s pleased. She recently received an email from Claire’s English teacher complimenting her daughter’s performance on a test, and Claire’s Spanish teacher has been coming to school early to help her catch up on language requirements.

Two studies that came out in the past year showed that public-school students often tested the same or better than private-school students, after accounting for certain socio-economic variables and background characteristics. One, from the National Center for Education Statistics, compared fourth- and eighth-grade reading and math scores in 2003 from nearly 7,000 public schools and more than 530 private schools. The results: Public-school fourth-graders did as well in reading as the kids in private school and somewhat better in math. In eighth grade, public-school children did the same in math but somewhat worse in reading. A study from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign that looked at the same data found similar results in the math scores. “It’s quite eye-opening for a lot of people,” says Christopher Lubienski, a professor of education who co-authored the report.

Still, the studies are contentious: Harvard University researchers came to the opposite conclusion after evaluating the data with different methodology.

Kathy Allcock had other reasons for moving her daughter Christy from an 830-student independent school in Portland, Ore., to a 1,500-student public school for ninth grade last year. Though Mrs. Allcock loved the smaller school — she still has her two younger children there — she worried her daughter would be academically but not socially prepared for college.

At first, Christy objected. But she quickly grew to like the greater number of people, clubs and activities. “I realized how sheltered I was and how much I was missing,” she says. Initially scared that the teachers wouldn’t help, Christy has been surprised at the one-on-one time she’s received. She’s now aiming for Stanford University, and figures her experience in big classes is good preparation.

Some public schools are actively recruiting private-school students. At Torrey Pines Elementary in La Jolla, Calif., Principal Jim Solo began holding monthly tours and meetings for private-school families four years ago. Many students had left for private or charter schools. While he says it was not a main motivator, having students return to the school increased state funding, as the district is paid on a per-pupil basis.

Mr. Solo has since led a charge to raise more private funding — $100,000 a year, mostly from parents — to pay for more teachers, and students’ average test scores have grown. The school gets 75% of its students from the neighborhood now, compared with 50% four years ago. The rest come from out of district.

Palm Desert High School in Palm Desert, Calif., started inviting parents and students from private schools to information sessions three years ago. “I had a ton of friends confiding in me their trepidation about moving from private to public,” says Jan Hawkins, a parent who arranged the events; they said they had heard stories about impersonal teachers and pranks like “trash canning” new freshmen. The percentage of new students coming from private schools was 9% this year, up from 6% three years ago.

Schools are also offering more Advanced Placement classes to prove academic rigor. The number of all U.S. schools with those classes has jumped 36% over the past decade, to over 15,000, according to the College Board, the nonprofit association that administers the program. Nearly a quarter of public-school seniors now take at least one Advanced Placement exam in high school, up from 16% in 2000.

A range of Advanced Placement classes and other college-level courses was one draw for Frank Thielman, a divinity professor in Birmingham, Ala., when he investigated the local high schools for his son Jonathan. Mr. Thielman had been hesitant at first, fearing inadequate funding and safety issues. But after more research, he enrolled his son, who had spent nine years at Briarwood Christian School, where tuition this year would have run about $5,000. “It turns out we have a very good academic option right here,” says Mr. Thielman. Kids coming from private school to Jefferson County IB have jumped to 15% of new students from 7% three years ago, the school says.

The image of public schools has been slowly evolving. In the latest Phi Delta Kappa/ Gallup annual poll called the Public’s Attitudes Toward the Public Schools, 49% of respondents gave their local schools a grade of A or B. The number has steadily increased every year from the 36% recorded in 1978.

Growing Options

Some attribute the shifting sentiment to students having more choice in deciding which public school to attend — whether it’s charter, magnet or out of district. The percentage of public-school students enrolled in a chosen school was 15% in 1999, up from 11% in 1993, according to the Department of Education.

Any movement toward public schools could be short-lived. With the “baby bust” generation now following the baby boomers, there will be fewer school-age children overall, and public schools are forecast to have sharper declines in enrollment growth nationwide than private schools through 2013.

Going from private to public isn’t right for everyone, says Steven Roy Goodman, an admissions strategist in Washington who has had three clients switch to public schools in the past two years. Transferring can be difficult emotionally and some kids do better in smaller schools. Public schools have advantages, he says, but usually can’t offer classes that are as small. The average student-teacher ratio in most public schools is about 16 to 1, according to the Department of Education. At NAIS schools, the average is about 9 to 1.

Parents should evaluate their children to see whether they would thrive in a place with small classes or with more extracurricular activities, consultants say. Learning approaches can vary greatly from school to school and what may work for one student may not for another.

After a tough eighth-grade year at the all-girl’s Winsor School in Boston, Maddie Pannell decided to try Weston High School. The public school was renowned for its academics and Maddie thought she might like a change. Her father, Saul Pannell, an investment adviser, was opposed but agreed to let her give it a try.

The experiment lasted three weeks. Maddie missed the teachers and students at Winsor and found she preferred the private school’s discussion-based method of learning. “I didn’t realize how important that was to me,” she says. The moral, says Mr. Pannell: “No situation is ideal.”

Write to Nancy Keates at nancy.keates@wsj.com1

Is it the work of the Flying Spaghetti Monster?…Kansas considers ditching NCLB

Lawrence Journal-World: STATE TO EXPLORE ABANDONING NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND LAW

September 15, 2006
by Scott Rothschild

Momentum is building across the political spectrum in Kansas to give No
Child Left Behind a failing grade.

President Bush’s major public school initiative is getting lambasted as
unrealistic and counterproductive.

“Certainly there are a lot of things wrong with No Child Left Behind,”
said State Board of Education Chairman Steve Abrams, a conservative
Republican from Arkansas City.

His comments came as the state department of education released figures
showing 26 schools and 11 districts with high numbers of low-income
students failed to make the required progress under NCLB. None from
Lawrence was identified.

That number would have been slightly higher, but the State Board of
Education voted to keep the target goals the same for 2006 as they were
previously.

Abrams said the board wanted to give schools a year to get acclimated to
a new testing schedule.

Previously, NCLB required testing of only three grade levels. But
starting in 2005-06, grades third through eighth and one grade in high
school had to be tested in reading and mathematics.

The test results determine whether the school made adequate yearly
progress in increasing the percentage of students who meet the
standards. Each year the target increases.

Opting out

The education board has been sharply divided between moderates and
conservatives on numerous issues, but it has agreed within the next
couple of months to take a look at what the impact would be if the state
disengaged from NCLB and refused the federal funding associated with it.
The board also will explore trying to get Congress to change the law.

Abrams said the NCLB requirement that 100 percent of school children
reach proficiency in math and reading tests by 2014 is “statistically
impossible.”

The Kansas Association of School Boards applauded the decision by the
board to hold the targets the same for the current school year.

“The board’s action will give some schools a reprieve, but if NCLB
continues in its present form, virtually all schools are expected to
‘fail’ to achieve adequate yearly progress,” the association said.

Under the law, schools and districts also are required to meet adequate
yearly progress among subgroups of students.

KASB said that a school with all major subgroups has at least 42 ways to
miss adequate yearly progress, no matter how positive its results are on
every other measure.

‘End goal’

Lawrence High School Principal Steve Nilhas said he didn’t think the
board’s action would have much impact.

“I think any way you slice it, we have to be at 100 percent
(proficiency) by 2014,” Nilhas said.

“So, it’s whether you want to take it in big steps or smaller steps, you
still have to get there. That’s the bottom line for me,” he said. “So,
I’m not losing a whole lot of sleep on where they set the targets. I’m
kind of looking at the end goal and that’s where we have to get to.”

Debbie Ridgway, president of the Pinckney School Parent Teacher
Organization, said the NCLB law might need restructuring.

“I think the concept in itself is a good concept,” Ridgway said.

But when funding is being cut so there are not enough remedial reading
and math teachers to help students, it counteracts the intent, she said.

“Someone is going to be left behind without help,” she said.

Michelle Kirk, president of the Langston Hughes School PTO who teaches
third grade at Quail Run School, said she had mixed feelings about NCLB.

She thought it had good points, but it has caused educators to “over
test” and focus their lessons so students learn only the standards on
the tests.

“Sometimes there are other things that are important too,” she said.
“But if it’s not measurable, then we don’t teach it.”

Kirk said Congress should provide funds to keep class sizes down to
about 15 to 17 students per teacher. When class sizes creep up to 21
students per teacher — and there’s no paraprofessional to assist — the
teacher can’t give as much help to students who need it, she said.

“Smaller class sizes are the absolute, most essential thing they can
do,” Kirk said.

Lawrence’s congressional representatives have voiced varying views about
NCLB.

U.S. Rep. Dennis Moore, a Democrat, voted for the measure in 2001, but
has introduced a bill that would allow a state education agency or
school district to suspend NCLB provisions until it is fully funded.
Moore said the federal government has shorted the new law by $40 billion.

U.S. Rep. Jim Ryun, a Republican, voted against NCLB, but has defended
the amount of money the federal government has provided under the
legislation.

Homework, it’s a waste of time

206_big.jpgMore homework is being assigned by teachers and demanded by parents, but has Harris Cooper, professor at Duke University, points out in a Washington Post article elementary school students get no real academic benefit from homework.

And high school students are likely wasting their time because Harris’s research shows that there is no academic benefit after two-hours a night (and one 1/2 hours for middle schoolers).

And what’s perhaps more important, he said, is that most teachers get little or no training on how to create homework assignments that advance learning.

In the 1930’s the American Child Health Association labeled homework and child labor as leading killers of children who contracted tuberculosis and heart disease.

Alfie Kohn’s new book, The Homework Myth, points to family conflict and stress as a reason for eliminating homework and draws on Cooper’s research to argue for developing students’ minds and bodies after school by doing something other than the boring, tedious assignments that are typically assigned.

Here’s my basic rule: if it can be done in school then do it there. Homework ought be reserved for assignments that engage students in activities that are distinct from the typical school assignments.

But, we also desperately need to transform the typical school assignments from individually completed, convergent thinking tasks into what Elizabeth Cohen, in her book Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom has labeled as “multi-task activities,” which foster the development of complex or higher order thinking and equal access to instruction through cooperative group work.

No duh!: Study indicates public school classes on Bible are faulted

Does this surprise anyone?

San Antonio Express-News: Study indicates public school classes on Bible are faulted

he majority of Bible courses offered as electives in Texas high schools are devotional and sectarian in nature, not academic, as required by a host of rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court on down, a study says.

“With a few notable exceptions, the public school courses currently taught in Texas often fail to meet minimal academic standards for teacher qualifications; curriculum, and academic rigor; promote one faith perspective over all others; and push an ideological agenda that is hostile to religious freedom, science and public education,” states a yearlong study by the Austin-based Texas Freedom Network that will be made public today.

The 76-page report, titled “Reading, Writing and Religion: Teaching the Bible in Texas Public Schools,” is one of the most ambitious looks ever at the Bible courses that have sprouted up in the nation’s public high schools.

Regarding penis size, SAT scores, and intelligence

J. Phillippe Rushton—eugenicist, professor at the University of Western Ontario, and president of the Pioneer Fund, which funded the research of Charles Murray and Richard J. Herrnstein (authors of The Bell Curve)—is claiming his most recent research proves men are more intelligent than women. His study is based on analysis of 100,000 SAT scores. Below is my letter in response to a CanWest News Service article published inThe Vancouver Sun, which describes Rushton’s study.

Wednesday » September 13 » 2006

Study linking SAT scores and intelligence gets failing grade

Letter

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Re: Men smarter than women, professor says, Sept. 8

I was dismayed to see The Vancouver Sun give credibility to pseudo-scientist J. Phillipe Rushton.

Rushton maintains, based upon a study of teenagers’ SAT (formerly known as the Scholastic Aptitude Test) scores, that men are more intelligent than women. Previously, Rushton has claimed the evolution of intelligence is inversely related to the evolution of penis size, saying, “It’s more brain or more penis. You can’t have everything.” Obviously, Rushton can’t even keep his pseudo-scientific claims straight.

More importantly, Rushton makes a major mistake in equating SAT scores with intelligence levels. The SAT is a descendant of the racist, anti-immigrant U.S. Army Mental Tests of the 1920s. The SAT is validated for just one purpose: Predicting first-year university grades. It doesn’t even do that very well, accounting for a mere four per cent of the variance in student grades.

Research shows that the SAT consistently underpredicts the performance of females in university and overpredicts the performance of males. Any uses of the SAT that treat scores as precise measures are seriously flawed: The testmakers admit two students’ scores must differ by at least 125 points before they can reliably be said to be different, due to measurement error in the test.

After years of describing the SAT as a “common yardstick,” the test’s maker has flip-flopped, claiming “it is a myth that a test will provide a unitary, unequivocal yardstick for ranking on merit.” This is why more than 400 universities have stopped using the SAT to make admissions decisions.

Earlier this month, a Washington State University study showed that for private universities in the U.S., Ultimate Frisbee team rankings were a better predictor of academic excellence than SAT scores.

E. Wayne Ross
Professor
Department of Curriculum Studies
University of B.C.

Keep reading to see the CanWest News Service article on Rushton’s study.Men smarter than women, professor claims
Psychologist says it could be why females have harder time rising to top of their careers

Lance Crossley
CanWest News Service

Friday, September 08, 2006

OTTAWA — A recent study proves it is “very likely” that the reason women have difficulty rising to the top in their careers is because they are less intelligent than men, according to controversial University of Western Ontario psychologist J. Philippe Rushton.

The professor — already criticized for claiming that whites are intellectually superior to blacks, and that higher AIDS rates in Africa are due to a more insatiable sexual appetite in the black community — believes the “glass ceiling” phenomenon is probably due to innate ability rather than discrimination.

“We have to find the truth about the normal distribution in society,” said the professor, whose study is published in the September issue of the academic journal Intelligence. “It’s not right to simply say, ‘it must be discrimination and don’t dare say anything else.’ One should really look at the facts.”

Rushton co-authored a study that analysed 100,000 scholastic aptitude tests (SATs) written by American teens, age 17 and 18. Researchers focused on the general intelligence factor — which relates to how quickly an individual can grasp a concept and is widely considered the most crucial ingredient for high IQ scores — and discovered males scored the equivalent of 3.63 IQ points greater than their female counterparts.

Rushton, who was surprised by the findings, said the results reinforce similar studies carried out by Richard Lynn at the University of Ulster, in Northern Ireland, and Helmut Nyborg at Aarhus University in Denmark.

“We still have to be cautious, but it’s difficult to believe this is wrong. But it would very nice to be confirmed by additional teams before we can be 100 per cent certain.”

Rushton said the male-female differences were present at every socio-economic level and across several ethnic groups.

It’s only in late adolescence that the IQ advantage becomes apparent, he said, which he attributes to the difference in early maturity levels.

“It looks like up until late adolescence, the females have the advantage over males because they mature faster, which masks the underlying difference.”

For the last century, the consensus among scientists has been that there is no difference in intelligence levels between the sexes, other than perhaps men’s and women’s respective strengths in spatial and verbal functions.

While the bulk of Rushton’s work has pertained to race differences, he also published a study in 1992 with zoologist Davison Ankney that claimed men’s brains weighed, on average, 100 grams more than women.

© The Vancouver Sun 2006

Atlanta Braves finally respond

Well I finally got a response from the Atlanta Braves regarding my protest of the Faith Nights promotion. It’s pretty lame, as you can see:

From: Braves.Web@turner.com
Subject: RE: atl – Other – None – Faith Nights
Date: September 13, 2006 6:45:27 AM PDT (CA)
To: wayne.ross@mac.com

Dear Wayne:

Thank you for your recent letter regarding the Atlanta Braves Faith
Days. We appreciate feedback from our fans and while we understand your
opposition, we would like to explain our position.

These particular post game events are targeted towards the Christian
community. However, fans who aren’t interested in the post game event
will not see anything different during the game since the events take
place following the game, after fans have left the ballpark and
re-entered if they have a separate ticket.

Our intention is to not offend our fans who are not interested in
attending, while satisfying our fans who find this type of event and
added bonus to coming to Turner Field for a Braves game.

We also have been pursuing doing similar nights for other faiths and
groups and are confident you will see them in the future.

Again thank you for your comments.

Regards,
Atlanta Braves

—–Original Message—–
From: wayne.ross@mac.com [mailto:wayne.ross@mac.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:33 AM
To: fanfeedback@braves.mlb.com
Subject: atl – Other – None – Faith Nights

E-mail From: Wayne Ross

I have been a long time Braves fan (since before the team moved to
Atlanta) and as an Atlanta resident in the 1980s I attended many games.

I wanted to let you know that I am deeply offended by the Braves “Faith
Night” promotion. This promotion is blatantly exclusive of religious
faiths outside of evangelical Christianity and it links the Atlanta
Braves with and organization that is anti-gay and anti-Semitic.

Ostensibly a collaboration with Third Coast Sports this promotion is
apparently (according to the Third Coast Sports website) actually a
partnership between the Atlanta Braves and James Dobson’s Focus on the
Family and evangelical Christian group that is anti-choice, anti-gay,
against sex education, and the leading proponent of the bogus notion of
“reparative therapy” for homosexuality.

I find the very notion of “Faith Nights” at the ball park disheartening
as baseball has (and should remain) a game that brings diverse people
together, however, this crass marketing campaign to bring bus loads of
church goers to the park actually works to build barriers between
people. Personally, as die-hard Braves fan all my life, your
collaboration with religious hate-mongers deeply saddens me.

E. Wayne Ross, Ph.D.

Detroit: Monstrous Sellout in the Works Tomorrow

Rich Gibson on the Detroit teachers strike:

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

The leadership of the Detroit Federation of Teachers (AFT) engaged in a systematic effort to demolish the strike which the DFT rank and file made possible.

Now, after two and one half weeks of heroic efforts by school workers who defied court orders, the Governor and Mayor, and attacks from the city’s mainstream press, the union bureaucrats announced a tentative agreement (TA) with “Non-wage concessions.” There is no such thing as a non-wage concession, that’s a terrible lie; all things are interrelated in a contract, but read the Detroit News report (below) for yourself.

The package the DFT bosses have accepted, and hope to ram down the throats of the teachers, is in essence the same package that could have easily been accepted before the strike began. It is very close to the sellout that I predicted in Counterpunch two weeks ago.

Just as the AFT has worked hard with the Business Roundtable and the US Chambers of Commerce to organize the racist decay of urban education all over the US, and has backed the high-stakes standardized tests that now propel that wreckage, so the DFT is working closely with Detroit Democratic party elites, who have controlled the city for decades, and economic powers in the Detroit City Club, to systematically ruin kids’ education in a city where much of schooling is simply pre-prison and pre-military training. Once, Detroit was the finest education system in the US.

What did the DFT do to prepare for this strike, which was easy to foresee? Nothing, but they did buy a $5 million building, in 2006, while thousands of their members were being laid off.

This has been a vicious struggle, though the battle is veiled by (probably true) claims of civility between the DFT bosses and the Administration.

Principals were instructed to make enemies lists of activist teachers, and have done so. The press threatened teachers with bad MEAP scores (the state test that measures race and parental income) as MEAP time is soon. DFT supports high-stakes testing, and says nothing about the layoffs that are attached to the scores. Honest and brave educators were urged to picket empty buildings, wearing them down, while they could have been walking door to door with talking points about the strike. The vaunted power of the Michigan AFL-CIO, the UAW, and the Michigan Education Association (which represents the suburbs) did nothing at all when, with a single stroke, they could have shut down “Union Town” for a day, and won the strike.

At base, elites from all sides, the Democrats (Granholm, Levin, Kilpatrick, etc), the rich, and the DFT, conspired to deal a near death blow to educators, parents and kids. Every branch of government operated as a weapon of wealth.

Public education in Detroit is truly balancing on a tight-rope. Yet the DFT is going to try to mislead school workers to focus on an upcoming vote to make change in their lives. The educators have already shown that the center of their power is at work, taking control of their workplaces, proving that the value in school is created collectively by the rank and file. The Democratic party has already shown their loyalties.

The DFT has a meeting scheduled tomorrow. One can only hope it gets out of hand, that the DFT bosses are thrown from the platform and the TA with them. That, however, requires organization and a system of communications, which only exists in fledgling form. The 1999 wildcat, though, was inspired by a similar move.

An injury to one really does just precede an injury to all. If this contract is ratified in Detroit, not only are other urban educators going to see it on their bargaining tables; it will become a model for the suburbs as well. If health benefits are eroded in Detroit, everyone else is sure to follow.

There are many lessons to be learned from the Detroit strike, particularly that the law pales in the face of direct action from masses of people who withdraw their labor and, on the other hand, that the leadership of the unions is simply another tier of opposition to the interests of not only kids, and parents, and all school workers, but reason itself.

And we can learn that justice demands organization, which is why the Rouge Forum was organized.

However, right now, it is critical that this criminal sellout not be allowed to stand, nor the people who created it.

Spread the word, please.

best r

The false path to 9/11

Salon.com: The false path to 9/11

Despite a few tweaks, ABC stands by its deceptive miniseries, and in tonight’s episode, all the lies make Bush look better.

By Joan Walsh

Sep. 11, 2006 | Despite right-wing claims that ABC edited the series to make it easier on Bill Clinton, the worst distortions went uncorrected — and there are plenty more to come.

“ABC bows to Bill & friends,” the New York Daily News blared Monday. But that’s only the latest media distortion of the dishonest docudrama “The Path to 9/11.” As everyone knows by now, the two-part miniseries is an anti-Clinton hit job written by a conservative Iranian-American, Cyrus Nowrasteh, a friend of Rush Limbaugh, that lards blame for the tragedy on President Clinton and his cabinet and airbrushes the culpability of George W. Bush and friends.

Although ABC has been widely depicted as caving to Clinton administration veterans by editing the movie in the days before it aired, in fact, the changes in Sunday night’s Part 1 were minimal, and didn’t fix the biggest falsehoods. And Monday night’s installment is arguably more unfair and inaccurate, ignoring the Bush administration’s own missteps around al-Qaida and propagating a well-debunked 9/11 lie — that the president gave Vice President Dick Cheney the order to shoot down hijacked airliners.

In Sunday night’s segment, one of the biggest distortions was that the CIA and Northern Alliance fighters had a clear shot at bin Laden in early 1998, but the Clinton Cabinet dithered. (In fact, the 9/11 Commission report found widespread doubt about the U.S. capacity to actually get its target at the time.) In the original version of “Path to 9/11,” the situation is drained of ambiguity — we’ve got bin Laden in our sights — and National Security Advisor Sandy Berger is the clear bad guy, insisting, “I don’t have that authority” to OK the operation, and hanging up the phone on CIA director George Tenet.
In the final version aired Sunday, there’s still no doubt that we can get bin Laden. Berger says the very same line, but doesn’t hang up on Tenet. Instead, he passes the buck to him, and Tenet whines that he’ll get all the blame if the operation goes awry, like Attorney General Janet Reno after she authorized a move on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas. The scene stands as a monument to Clinton-era impotence, with Northern Alliance leader Ahmed Shah Massoud intoning darkly, “Are there no men in Washington?” Soon thereafter we see shots of a bouncy Monica Lewinsky as the president intones, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman…”

Arguably the worst distortion in Part 1 of “The Path to 9/11” went utterly uncorrected. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, depicted as a high-WASP bitch on wheels, neutralizes what little testosterone the Clinton men have (at least when it comes to bin Laden rather than interns) any time she’s on the screen. She hectors and lectures, but a Tomahawk assault on a bin Laden campsite is authorized despite her reservations. When it misses the al-Qaida leader by a few hours, it’s clear he was warned by Pakistan (in fact, U.S. officials did warn Gen. Pervez Musharraf, for fear he’d see missiles in his airspace and suspect India had launched an attack.) The film clearly fingers Albright as having warned the Pakistanis, and in fact she seems downright proud of blowing the operation. But it was (Republican) Defense Secretary William Cohen who asked vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Henry Hugh Shelton to warn Pakistan.

What does Monday night hold? Another big ABC lie has been that the second half of the film apportions blame more fairly, laying out the mistakes of the Bush administration as well. That’s only true if you think Condoleezza Rice is the president. Like Albright, she comes off as a schoolmarmy, hierarchy-obsessed smarty-pants more interested in protecting the president — who is described as really, really wanting to get bin Laden — than protecting Americans. But Bush himself gets off unbearably easy.

There’s no reference to his monthlong vacation after receiving the Presidential Daily Briefing “Bin Laden determined to strike in the United States.” There’s no scene showing Rice or Cheney ignoring the warnings of former Sens. Gary Hart and Warren Rudman’s terrorism commission, as they did. There’s certainly no scene of the president reading “The Pet Goat” for many painful minutes after he’s informed of the attack on our soil the morning of Sept. 11.

Maybe the worst lie I haven’t seen critiqued has to do with whether Bush gave the go-ahead for American fighter jets to shoot down hijacked airliners. In fact, though Cheney bragged he and Bush made that decision, the NORAD tapes acquired by the makers of “United 93” and published in Vanity Fair showed that never happened. Military officials waited in vain for such an order, but it never came.

The liberal blogosphere is either blamed or credited with getting ABC to at least slightly alter the docudrama. (One important change is that it no longer presents the fictionalized work as representing the findings of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission.) In fact, despite the howls of bloggers and Clinton administration officials, the network hung fairly tough. I’m always a little uncomfortable when public pressure forces a media company to edit a piece of work because of politics — certainly I wouldn’t want Salon edited by a team of Pat Robertson and Harry Reid. But in this case, given the number and seriousness of the inaccuracies and the distortion of the 9/11 Commission’s work, the network should have listened to its critics. ABC’s decision to stand behind a damaging, distorted version of Sept. 11 makes a sad day that much sadder.

— By Joan Walsh