Category Archives: Science in the News

AI vs Humans

“Siri, please write my SCIE 300 blog post for me.” Unfortunately, Siri does not yet have the capability to form conscious thought and respond with an engaging response…but this idea may not be so far-fetched.

In recent studies, Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems from Alibaba and Microsoft performed better than humans on reading comprehension tests. Although this AI innovation threatens to displace some human jobs, the practical applications of this technology in customer service and other professional sectors show extraordinary potential in saving time and human efforts.

Source: https://cumanagement.com/sites/default/files/2018-09/AI-human-heads.jpg

In the study, AI machines were subjected to Stanford University’s SQuAD, a reading comprehension test based on Wikipedia articles. Humans scored an average of 82.304, while Alibaba’s machine learning model scored 82.44 and Microsoft’s scored 82.65. I found this innovation interesting because reading comprehension is a complex task involving language understanding, critical thinking, and problem solving. The thought of computers surpassing humans in these areas both scares and fascinates me.

Alibaba’s AI software is a deep neural network model based on Natural Language Processing (NLP) using the Hierarchical Attention Network. It can read in order to identify phrases that could contain potential answers. Currently, the model only works well with questions that have clear answers. If inquiries are too vague, or if there are no clearly prepared solutions, the system may not work. Despite these hiccups, the impact of this underlying technology is incredibly widespread. It is already being expanded and utilized in customer service jobs, such as call-centers, food service, retail, and online inquiry management. Alibaba has already employed this technology in its AI-powered customer service chatbot which answers millions of online shoppers’ questions.

After Alibaba and Microsoft announced the ability of their AIs, there has been a looming fear that machines will take over human jobs. This new technology could indeed mean that we could codify routine jobs, even those that require social interaction (like answering customer inquiries) into a series of machine-readable instructions.

As this technological automation occurs, companies may deploy more bot technology, potentially displacing human jobs. However, with the current technology, AIs are not yet capable of fully understanding and responding to customers as a human could, and are thus unable to fully replace most jobs. Entirely new job sectors will also arise as technology develops and grows, especially in fields such as data science and computer engineering. Looking further, this innovation could lead to more advanced bots capable of solving more complex problems, including social and political issues such as climate change or resource allocation.

– Angela Wei

Can one brain have two minds?

Imagine a knife slicing down right in the middle of your brain and splitting it into two separate halves. This is the result of a corpus callosotomy.

Picture

A summary of the functions for the left brain and right brain

The brain is commonly believed to be split into the left hemisphere, the logical side, and right hemisphere, the artistic side. These two halves are usually joined together by the corpus callosum, a fibre tissue that allows internal communication between the halves. However, people with refractory epilepsy or some traumatic accidents have the corpus callosum removed as a treatment and this creates a split brain.

There have been researches such as the one conducted by Roger Sperry that have proven the isolation of each half of the brain. This led to the proof that each hemisphere will have its own perception and impulses to act. Additionally, there have been cases where people with a split brain have reported conflicts in their lives. For instance, when one split-brain patient dressed, he sometimes pulled his pants up with one hand and down with the other due to the conflicting actions in each half of the brain. Luckily, conflicts like this seldom occur and even if a conflict does appear, one hemisphere usually takes control over the other half.

These results leave a lot of researchers questioning, do split-brain patients have two minds? Imagine having the one side of the brain deciding to punch someone with your left hand and the half of the brain controlling the right-hand tries to stop the action.

A study in 2017 found strong evidence against the split conscious theory. Yair Pinto and his team conducted a series of tests on two patients. In one of the tests, the patients were placed in front of a screen and shown various objects displayed in several locations. The patients were then asked to confirm whether an object appeared and to indicate its location. In another test, they had to correctly name the object they had seen, a notorious difficulty among spit-brain patients.  One of the patients went through all the tests using only his right visual field and the other patient only used his left visual field. Shockingly, the results have proven the unity of the two brains since the patients were able to respond correctly by using their left hand, right hand, or verbally. However, the experiment has not been replicated yet due to the difficulty in finding participants.

This new finding led to a new debate between the scientists regarding the existence of two separate minds in one brain. Here is a full video of the long debate on September, 18,2018 between Elizabeth Schechter, who stands for the two-mind view starts her explanation at 9:26, Yair Pinto, who debates for the one-mind view starts his point of view at 25:00, and Joseph Ledoux, who has an intermediate view starts at 47:27, (uploaded by NYU Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness).

In all, even though the answer to this question is still undetermined. If the existence of two minds in one brain is proven, this leads to the question of, are we really the individual we think we are or is there someone else living within us?

– Eric Ma

Global Warming and Mountain living species Extinction. No place to live!

Scientists believe that the global temperature will continue to rise for future decades due to climate change and global warming, which will impact the whole ecosystem severely. One big issue that scientists found in recent years is called “Elevational Range Shift”. Each species that lives in a different range and altitude of mountains, together form a balance in mountain ecosystem. As the temperature continuously increase, many species, especially those living in the mid and high elevation of mountains, seek to escape from the warming original habitats and move towards higher ground. However, the living space in mountaintops is limited. What will happen to those creatures that have already lived at the highest levels and cannot go any higher? The only ending is the extension. In recent several years, more evidence have shown that species’ geographic range shift had arose and constituted an elevational extinction to species that live in mountains.

In November 2018, Dr Benjamin Freeman, from the University of British Columbia, published an article showing evidence about impacts of recent temperature warming on high-elevation birds species abundance declination and extinction in Peruvian Andes Mountains. Peruvian Andes is a tropical mountain located in the western edge of South America, with an average height of about 4,000m and host abundant types of species. Tropical species, especially birds, born and live within one particulate section of woods and don’t migrate.

A scarlet-breasted bird lives at high elevations on the Cerro de Pantiacolla in Peru. Source: BBC News

“It is only got a little bit warmer in the tropics and tropical animals seen to live a bit higher now than they used to,” told by Dr. Freeman to BBC News report.

The research team conducted a survey in 2017 of bird species that lived on a mountain peak by using same methods and at same time of year as a pervious survey carried out in 1985. They compared the results and found that the average living range had shifted upwards of the slope and most bird species that are found at the highest elevation had already declined in population and range significantly. Of the 16 species of tropical birds that had been recorded living at high elevation of the study area in previous survey, 8 had disappeared in the new survey in 2017.

Comparative species richness patterns for recent and historical. Source: PLOS

In contrast, scientists found that low elevation living bird species of the mountain get benefits from climate change by expanding their habitats range as they shift their upper living limits upslope. But current increasing in abundance still cannot guarantee that these birds will not face to the problem of run out of habitats.

What about the non-mobile species, like plants? Scientists believe that plants may be unable to shift according to the data showing that about 88% plant species show weak to no evidence of range shift. The main reason is due to plants’ dispersal limitation. Plant need other species, such as birds, or external force like wind to disperse seeds, which may not be quickly enough to keep peace with climate change.

In conclusion, the escalator to extinction will be even worse in the future if temperature continuously rising. “The way to deal with it is to maintain protected habitat corridors that stretch across large elevational gradients.” told by Dr. Freeman to BBC News.

– Jingyi Cheng

New Wireless Pacemaker Offers Treatment for Parkinson’s Disease

In Canada, over 10,000 people are currently living with Parkinson’s disease with an additional 6,600 new cases being diagnosed every year. The disease is caused by a loss of dopamine producing nerve cells. Without this vital neurotransmitter the nerves are unable to control body movements efficiently. As Parkinson’s advances, movements such as walking and talking become heavily affected. Due to the complexity of this disease, the reason behind the nerve damage is very difficult to determine. Thus, researchers are focusing on ways to alleviate patients’ difficulty in movement. Most recently, UC Berkeley scientists have discovered a new neurostimulator, WAND, that could change the course of neurological disorder treatment, especially Parkinson’s.

The most effective method of Parkinson’s treatment is the implantation of a neurostimulator device to the brain. This is very similar to a cardiac pacemaker; in which it is able to maintain appropriate circuits in the brain. The dysfunctional areas of the brain are targeted by electrical signals that block any irregular brain waves.

The most used neurostimulator is the deep brain stimulation (DBS) device. As seen in the video below, the DBS electrode is implanted near target areas, with wires passing under the skin down to the shoulders and connected to the neurostimulator in the chest. The patient after recovery is provided with a remote or magnet that allows for the stimulator to be turned on and off at home. While this treatment has been seen to be mostly effective, the surgery process and control of the device can be very strenuous, especially considering the advanced age of most Parkinson’s patients. Therefore, UC Berkeley researchers have developed a new neurostimulator, called WAND, that is smaller and much more advanced in capabilities.

WAND or wireless artifact-free neuromodulation device, contains wireless and autonomous capabilities. This means that the device once trained to recognize signs of tremors or seizures, is able to adjust the stimulation parameters and apply electrical signals on its own. WAND is also able to record brain wave activity while applying the treatment. These recordings would allow doctors to see how the patient is reacting during and after the treatment. This is a large advancement from the typical DBS treatments which either stop recording or record away from the target region.

Newly Developed WAND Device. Source: Rikky Muller, UC Berkeley

To test its effectivity, researchers applied the device in a study that taught subjects to use a joystick to move a cursor. WAND was able to detect the neural signatures that preceded the joystick motion, and delay it by applying electrical stimulation. Thus, showing that the closed-loop system and neurological recordings worked more effectively in a demonstration done by previous DBS devices.

In all, WAND is a brilliant new technology that is cost-effective, time-effective, and saves patient’s the worry of having to apply their own electrical stimulations. The device is able to treat and record simultaneously, which builds an up-to-date record of treatment. While there is still much research needed to look at potential side effects, this technology gives hopes to Parkinson’s patients of returning to their former, healthy selves.

          Arrthy Thayaparan

I agree to all terms and conditions … Or do I?

In this day and age so much of what we do is shared on different platforms of social media that the notion of privacy is limited to having a private account. We open an account by providing a name and a picture and once we are in the system, one by one we begin adding more insight into who we are and what we do. We snap a picture of our outfit, take google recommendations for where to dine out and post a story of the meal we eat. Our urge to participate so actively on social media isn’t solely rooted in our desire to share but stems from us being innately social creatures who are inherently curious.
It didn’t take long for corporation to cultivate our curiosity and take data collection to a whole new level. Genealogy and ancestry companies, in the name of providing us with medical information and lineage tracing, now have access to what’s most personal to us, the code to our being.
It has now become posh and trendy to pay $100 to companies such as 23andme to find out what diseases we are prone to and where we have originated from. What we get as a result may not necessarily add much significance to our lives, but it provides those companies with pools of golden data. I stress the word “necessarily” as tendencies do not translate to definite diagnosis and a long list of places we get, does not provide us with much insight of where we originate from. On the other hand, companies like 23andme now have access to data that once took researchers years to gather.

How it works by 23andme

One might argue that having a DNA bank has in fact facilitated research by providing more detailed data. Additionally, DNA banks have revolutionized solving of murder and rape crimes. It is also illegal in Canada for such companies to sell this data to insurance and employment companies. However, the controversy does not lie in what is done to the data once collected, but whether or not the selling of it is considered an invasion of our privacy. We might have quickly scrolled down to check the “agree with the terms” button; or have even read the terms fully and agreed- which I highly doubt- but does that provide them with jurisdiction to use such personal knowledge in a research I did not consent to? How does DNA sequencing deidentifies a subject and how is my anonymity preserved? I can delete my Facebook account, get a new credit card, change my name, but I can never reclaim my DNA data.

Combating Climate Change with Robotic Jellyfish

The backbone of any diverse ecosystem is a healthy coral reef. Image from Wikimedia Commons

A quick dive beneath the ocean’s surface can reveal a completely different world. Our ocean’s coral reefs house some of nature’s most complex, diverse, and lively aquatic life. Alas, with global warming increasing our ocean’s temperatures, most of this coral is actually dying at an alarming rate.

Be that as it may, within this bustling community you might come across a robotic jellyfish or two. Have no fear, these ones don’t sting! In fact, these devices may be our solution to combating climate change.

What are robotic jellyfish?

The robotic jellyfish is a device that was developed by Erik Engeberg and his team of mechanical engineers at Florida Atlantic University. This robot mimics the gentle movements of a real jellyfish and collects data on ocean temperatures via built-in sensors. Ultimately, this allows for the study of the hidden impacts of climate change at sea.

The robotic jellyfish propelling itself gently through the ocean. Image from JENNIFER FRAME, NICK LOPEZ, OSCAR CURET AND ERIK D. ENGEBERG/IOP PUBLISHING

Can this robot save our reefs?

Yes! In fact, the Great Barrier Reef recently experienced a widespread death of coral (a process known as “bleaching”). Consequently, the death of aquatic life whom depended on coral as shelter to protect themselves from predators followed suit. With that being said, the creation of the robotic jellyfish has allowed scientists to develop better measures to protect these reefs from further damage.

Coral reefs become lacklustre and dull after dying in a process known as “bleaching”. The bleaching of coral reefs no longer provide shelter for aquatic life. Image from Wikimedia Commons

How were coral reefs studied before?

In the past, drones were deployed to collect data on marine life; however, they were very destructive. For instance, drones produced a lot of noise which can scare off marine life. On top of that, their propellers take in ocean water quite forcibly, tearing off the coral which is an essential habitat for these animals.

The soft movements of wild jellyfish were what inspired Engeberg and his team to develop quieter technology to monitor coral reefs. The robotic jellyfish has allowed us to collect data without posing as a threat to animals or potentially destroying the reef.

Underwater drones were used in the past. However, their propellers were quite noisy and posed as a threat to the coral reefs. Image from Wikimedia Commons

The Future of the Robotic Jellyfish

Though the robotic jellyfish is still a work in progress, it has given scientists a better understanding of how to tackle the ongoing fight with climate change. To give you a better visual and understanding of the robotic jellyfish, this Youtube video summarizes the robot and all its technicalities:

-Christina Rayos

Recording the Cell? New technologies further uncover the mystery of the cell

Does anyone really know what life is like inside of a cell? Sure, we can all say that the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell, and we’ve learned mitosis more time than we can count, but do we really know about the intricacies of day to day cellular processes? Historically, answer has been an overwhelming no, but that is something the researchers behind CAMERA are hoping to change.

CAMERA, or CRISPR-mediated analog multievent recording aperture is a tool developed by David Liu and Weixin Tang of Harvard university to record the molecular interactions within a cell, all of which are stored on the cell’s DNA. This new discovery allows scientists to observe and therefore clarify the processes that contribute to such things as the emergence of cancer, aging, environmental damage, and even embryonic development. CAMERA is only one of the many developments based off of the gene cutting technology known as CRISPR-Cas9.

Thyroid Cancer Cell Line. Courtesy of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Centre and Flickr Commons.

What is CRISPR-Cas9 you ask? CRISPR-Cas9, or CRISPR for short, is a technology based off of the natural defense mechanisms found in bacteria that have been reengineered for editing genomes. It has the ability to cut the double helix strand of DNA allowing for researchers to easily alter DNA sequences and modify gene expression. Some of the major implications of this include the possible correction of genetic defects, and the treatment and prevention of cancer and other diseases.

So how did scientists develop a cellular recording device from this cutting tool? When CRISPR cuts a DNA strand to alter the sequence, the strand will naturally repair itself but in doing so can occasionally add in errors that make the targeted gene inactive. These random errors can sometimes be used as markers, mapping out the cell’s pattern of differentiation. Liu and Tang took this information and set out to regulate it thereby creating a more detailed, continuous record of a cell’s life, documenting not only its responses to external factors but the severity of the response and how long it lasts.

CRISPR mediated DNA splitting. Courtesy of Flickr Commons.

At this point in time, CAMERA, is able to document cellular responses to light exposure, antibiotics, viral infections, and internal molecular interactions in as few as 10 cells. As well, it can record multiple events at once making it an impressive candidate for future medical technologies involved in screening embryos for a wide variety of mutations during development. Despite these impressive feats, Liu and Tang are still working towards pinpointing the recording down to one cell, allowing scientists to one day observe the processes of each cell individually and efficiently isolating any mutations. Another big step is proving it works to the same detailed extent when placed in the body of a living mammal as it does in a small cell group in a petri dish. There is still a lot to be done before we can confidently say we know how cells operate but CAMERA is a step in the right direction.

-Tenanye Haglund

Wired and Tired: Detrimental Effects of Blue Light on Sleep

You have to wake up early tomorrow, however, you don’t feel tired, so you go on your phone to quickly check Instagram or Facebook and suddenly its 2 or 3 a.m. before you can finally fall asleep. According to the National Sleep Foundation, 95% of people in the U.S. admit to using an electronic device within the hour before slumber. This not only causes you to sleep later, but also substantially lowers the quality of sleep, leaving you feeling tired throughout the day. This can interfere with various aspects of your life including work, school, or driving. Poor sleep has also been linked to obesity, growth hormone imbalance, chronic illness… the list goes on and on.

Brain Activity Credit: Saad Faruque

Using your phone, watching television, or using any electronic device before bed delays the circadian rhythm, which is a 24-hour internal clock that cycles between sleepiness and alertness. Dr. Charles Czeisler from Harvard Medical School showed that daylight helps to keep your body’s circadian rhythm aligned with the environment. Therefore, when exposed to the blue light emitted from these electronic devices, your body perceives it as daylight, and as a result, your body will suppress the secretion of the sleep-inducing hormone melatonin and remain in a state of alertness. This shifts your circadian clock later and later, making it harder and harder for you to fall asleep.

Phone before Sleep Credit: Courtesy Photo

According to researchers at Harvard Medical School, blue light is the most effective at altering the body’s circadian rhythm. However, it was found that other sources of light, such as green light, can also alter the body’s circadian rhythm under certain conditions. This is because the photoreceptor system in the human eye is responsible for resetting the internal circadian body clock through the detection of light. These photoreceptors are very responsive to blue light; however, new research shows that the another set of photoreceptors in the human eye, which are sensitive to green light, also have an impact the internal circadian body clock. The researchers found that when exposed to dim light, green light is equally as effective as blue light in delaying circadian rhythm, however, the effects of green light die off more quickly and hence blue light suppresses melatonin for about twice as long as green light.

Morning Alarm Credit: Pixabay

To conclude, blue light exposure before bedtime can negatively harm your sleep and health by being physiologically and psychologically stimulating. So next time you are lying in bed and can’t fall asleep you should think twice about checking your phone.

-Jonathan Raj