Skip navigation

Category Archives: Jan 2014

The push and pull between Hyland’s bird’s-eye-view of research in every field (with the possible exceptions of digital literacy and a/r/tography, the two topics most of the class are focusing upon) and Giltrow’s down-on-the-ground specificity gets examined today with the interactive features of text, the points where the author is signalling for the reader to do something. Some of these cues are subtle or even innocuous, as if the hand could pluck the readers back while shoving them on (how’s that for a Shakespearean gloss?). When it gets to the point of the not-so-shy “I” intruding on what should be neutral and objective flow of ideas, the learned peer becomes a bossy show-off, or at least that how I see it (Emphasis in the original).

Found another article related to my research proposal, Patrick Howard (2014)’s Affinity Spaces and Ecologies of Practice which not only quotes extensively from Dobson and Willinsky (2009) and James Paul Gee, but features a young pre-service teacher named Kyle who uses digital tools to make a pirate-themed video. Ah, the path not taken, as it seems like this was me in another lifetime. Seems as good a time as any to reflect on the truism Kedrick famously exclaimed yesterday: “F*ck you, Frost!”

Here is One Laptop Per Child* according to American media: One Laptop Per Child on 60 Minutes – Thanks for the “cadre of geeks” comments, Lesley, really selling the idea of digital literacy :-S

*Terms and conditions apply: for residents of the United States and Canada, just holding one of these green-and-white computer will stigmatize you, your family and reflect poorly on your school. Other children will have something fancier, be able to do more things on their portable devices and look cool while doing it. Besides, who uses laptops anymore? It is an unfortunate thing that this otherwise noble and egalitarian operating system will face its greatest challenge in the free market nearly cornered by Apple iPads (which unlike the OLPC, are less durable and will eventually be obsolete in four years). The OLCP website contains mostly photo images with brief, caption-sized stories about what they can do, how they are a boon to under-privileged children in hard-luck schools. There are hyperlinks to blog posts, and for the Walmart shoppers news of the XO Tablet appears to top the list. It is an engine for social justice, and this is perhaps its biggest drawback for countries still promoting the American dream, something affordable and “ambitious” as the OLPC gets looked down upon: proof that not enough dreamers are living up to the nation’s potential of becoming rockstar presidents (or in Canada, I dunno, an athlete who gets traded to an American team?). This is the main reason why the digital divide persists.

With the small print out of the way, I admire the innovation and simplicity of design the One Laptop represents. Along the same humanitarian reach of Hole in the Wall and other programs to increase computer exposure to children. Their website lets the pictures do the talking, great for children seeking the inspiration to get connected. The 60 Minutes video does a soft sell of its potential to at least level the playing field in countries where poverty, lack of infrastructure and challenging climate conditions pose a threat to average computers. One of the most intriguing aspects of these laptops is the button that let’s the child see the code for any of the screens they are looking at, enabling children to explore and experiment with the behind-the-curtain aspects of computing. On the OLPC wiki, there is a page on constructionism, citing a few familiar theorists (otherwise known as constructist like Piaget, Vygotsky and Papiert) and the belief that children working together will create social change. Of course, leave it to the adults to mess things up, as 60 Minutes close their report (or at least this segment) on Intel’s attempt to undercut OLPC’s altruism, but perhaps with more netizens worldwide, The Man will have less of a deterimental effect on digital connectivity.

One way to measure the level of success is to hear from the children themselves, rather than the designers and educators speak its praises: here is one child in Bhutan answering his teacher’s questions, but it won’t be long before they are demonstrating their own ideas. I like that LEGO and Stratch have teamed up with the One Laptop, and look forward to seeing more from around the world.


Bhutan olpc video 2013

Reading week was a productive break: not only did I get caught up with my weekly readings (staring fixedly at my iPad for six days while also flipping actual pages to find the 101 variations on the “What kind of person is Dee?” question in Bloome et al.‘s (2008) On discourse analysis in classrooms), but also had some extra time to work as a substitute teacher. Since earning my Bachelor of Education at UBC in 2009, I was fortunate enough to start work as a Teacher On Call for the North Vancouver School District that same year. My cohort was in the Fine Arts and New Media Education program, and many FAME grads found work in North Van as well. Last Friday I ran into two of my classmates who just recently got semi-permanent contracts in the primary grades. It was a long wait for many on the often bumpy TOC list, with long stretches of not enough work and occasional flurries of not enough TOCs. During the past four year, I have begun to feel a bit like the “andys” featured in Philip K. Dick’s (1968) Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? that have a four-year lifespan built into their design. Perhaps more familiar as a Replicant in Ridley Scott’s (1982) eye-candyland film Blade Runner, one particular speech must be on a constant loop in the minds of long-term TOCs.


Blade Runner (1982) Tears in Rain

Of course, none of us are planning to go out like Rutger Hauer, symbolically releasing a dove at the end of our TOC careers, as most of us will get permanent jobs as teachers. Yet there are many moments I have seen while working on call, all the discourse that has yet to be analyzed and most likely never will due to meaningful yet hindering ethical requirements. Not knowing where I will be teaching from one day to the next is one of the challenges to conducting research in classrooms, and while I am aware that I could have gone through the proper channels to conduct an ethnographic study during my Master degree, the catch would have been that I was taking away from much needed calls to work as sub (and therefore afford to study educational technology, a program that didn’t need a research thesis in any case). All of this is to say that I understand why I cannot share discourse very similar to what Mökkonen observes in a Finnish primary classroom. Inspired by her study of socialization and subteaching in a multilingual classroom, I had to share a story that might have happened to me earlier last week, when I could have been TOCing at an école.

Firstly, in a certain school district, there are several elementary schools that are partially French Immersion. The schools are typically bilingual, and depending on their size, might have equal numbers of French and English classrooms for each grade. Split classrooms are common when there is not enough students to make up a full class in one or the other language. When a TOC like myself gets called into a French classroom, it can generally be assumed that all of the French-speaking TOCs are already booked (or found full-time position!) and even before the morning bell rings the students know that there won’t be much French spoken all day. The scene in my story takes place, however, in an English split K/1 classroom. The incident of subteaching arose when a student chided another for asking yet another to say something in this child’s native language. The student’s censure was captured in the command “No, English only!” As the TOC is usually the last person in the room to know about classroom procedures (doubly so in primary grades when it is Calendar time), the TOC in this K/1 asked the class “Whose rule is that? I thought this was an French and English school.” When gently provoked to provide details, none of the students could say who told them to speak only English in the classroom, but most were assured that “those are the rules” and further discussion quickly ceased. Situations like these seem to be crying out for a proper discourse analysis, but like Hauer’s line “tears in rain” I could just be making it all up!

Here is the latest draft of my review assignment:

Down the Digital Rabbit-hole.

Here I am again, and it turns out to keep on track with other classes for the rest of the week (both of them had last week off for reading week) I will simply label this post as Week 7 again, despite not having to post anything on the UBC Connect site for this current week. Author Cynthia Nugent will be a guest speaker for today’s class, and I can also post a link to the the class wiki (link coming soon) on rating DL apps for the somewhat shiny new iPad Minis that belong to the Digital Literacy Centre.

Guy Merchant strikes again, and instead of posting my reflection on his virtual world research (Merchant, 2009), I made a brief video that captures some of the points he raises, but also connects one of my projects from my Master of Educational Technology program from 2010 to 2012.


YouTube URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcbKui_L39Q

And here is the venture pitch for the Virtual Globe 3.0 that I recorded a few years back, with a link to the UBC blog where it was posted. Now that I am inspired by Guy Merchant (again) I really want to start making this virtual project a reality.

UBC Blogs: ETEC 522: Virtual Globe 3.0

Since the dodgy website doesn’t always have the videos embedded, it looks like I will have to start over with a new model for performing Shakespeare in a virtual space. Look forward to more on this topic in the coming weeks.

Looking for the Monty Python traces in Knight of the Burning Pestle, Beaumont may have invented the pepperpot!

On the Case with Natalia, Victoria and Akira Kurosawa!

Family Day – no class

Merchant of Venice and Two Gentlemen of Verona

Plus Honest Fishmonger’s staging of Measure for Measure

Monster University

Spam prevention powered by Akismet