Category Archives: Miscellaneous

Call me Wayne. Please

Kenneth Wayne Riley has articulated well the bane (or at least an irritant) of my existence—even though it comes after my first name, my second name is still a name. Wayne.

I’m sure this is problem for all the folks who happen to go by their middle name, but it seems particularly problematic when, as an ex-pat, every form I sign requires me to list my name exactly as is appears on my passport. So it’s “Welcome Eddie” when I sign on to expedia.ca to buy airline tickets, “Hello Eddie” at the bank, etc.

Thanks to (Kenneth) Wayne Riley for sharing my pain (and articulating it so well).

The Globe and Mail
Facts & Arguments: THE ESSAY

Call me Wayne. Please
Even though it comes after my first name, my second name is still a name. Wayne. It means wagon maker

WAYNE RILEY

June 18, 2007

When I was a kid, Clint Eastwood was the Man with No Name. You would think that would be a problem, having no name, but in the Italian wild west nobody really seemed to be too hung up about it.

I am the Man With the Middle Name. I’m beginning to believe that is worse than having no name at all. It’s not that I have no identity. I just usually have the wrong identity.

My name is Kenneth Wayne Riley. I go by Wayne. You wouldn’t think that would be a problem. Even though it comes after my first name, my second name is still a name. Wayne. It means wagon maker. I looked it up.

But on certificates, notices that I’ve won a million dollars, unsolicited return-address stickers and almost anything else that has a name on it, I’m Kenneth Riley.
Print Edition – Section Front

Section L Front Enlarge Image
The Globe and Mail

In today’s world, everyone is on a first-name basis.

Over time, I’ve learned to adapt. I’ve trained myself to stand up in waiting rooms when someone calls for Kenneth.

I give money to charities asking for Kenneth’s help.

I sign for Kenneth’s parcels.

As you can see, I live under an assumed name.

Not that I’ve given up.

When I fill out a form, and they ask for my first and middle name, I always underline Wayne, sometimes twice. It never seems to help. Usually, the people who devise these forms don’t even want to know my middle name. In the line of little boxes across the top, they will ask for my first and last name and my middle initial.

I always draw a line out from the box for my middle initial and spell out Wayne. That doesn’t help either. Computers do not like people thinking outside the box.

I asked my mom once why, if she liked Wayne more than Kenneth, she didn’t simply name me Wayne Kenneth Riley.

“I just thought Kenneth Wayne sounded better,” she said.

It was much simpler as a kid. There were no computer forms to fill out, no mailing lists to be on, no telemarketers calling me at home. People either knew my name or asked me what my name was.

Sure, there were some other names along the way, like Stretch and Wiener and … well, just go to the thesaurus and look up other words for skinny. But Kenneth stayed nicely tucked in the background.

I don’t even remember exactly when Kenneth Riley came to life. It was around the time I started getting identification and credit cards. One day I looked in my wallet and realized that it belonged to a spy who didn’t like to stray too far in the alias department. There were cards for K. Wayne Riley, Kenneth W. Riley, Kenneth Riley and Wayne Riley.

And what’s with the Kenneth anyway? It’s awfully formal. If you are going to write to tell me that I’ve won an instant prize of a million dollars in a contest I didn’t even know about, hey, call me Ken.

Of course, being a little unique has its fun side, too.

I love it when my insurance agent, who has looked at my computer file while I’m in the waiting room, comes out with great familiarity, pumps my hand, and says, “Great to see you again, Kenneth.”

And this is after I’ve corrected him the past 12 years.

But one recent incident left me feeling like I had a split personality.

I have medical coverage that allows me to get a chunk of my medical expenses back when I submit a claim.

In this particular instance, when I opened what I thought would be a cheque from the insurance company, it turned out to be a note saying that my claim had been turned down.

I phoned to find out why. I gave the person at the other end of the line my coverage number and he reviewed my computer file.

“Wayne Riley doesn’t have a plan with us,” he said.

“But I’m Wayne Riley,” I said.

“The file name for this plan is Kenneth Riley,” he said.

“I’m Kenneth Riley,” I said, and quickly added, afraid that this was going to become an Abbott and Costello routine, “and Wayne Riley, too. Kenneth Wayne Riley.”

I eventually got the cheque but I know that guy on the other end of the line thought I was trying to pull a fast one.

I was talking about this stuff to a friend of mine one day and she laughed at me.

“You want me to have sympathy for you? I have five names and I go by my third. Talk to me about identity crisis.”

Another friend asked me the obvious question.

“Why prolong the headache?” he asked. Why don’t you just fill out the form as Wayne Kenneth Riley or Wayne K. Riley.

I shrugged.

“I just think it sounds better the other way.”

Wayne Riley lives in York, PEI. So does Kenneth Riley

How to write consistently boring scientific literature

youtoocanmakewine.JPG“Hell – is sitting on a hot stone reading your own scientific publications”
Erik Ursin, fish biologist

Here’s a great resource for all you aspiring scientists out there that is sure you help you along your way to gaining tenure. “How to write consistently boring scientific literature” by Kaj Sand-Jensen, an academic at the University of Copenhagen.

Sand-Jensen says that “although scientists typically insist that their research is very exciting and adventurous when they talk to laymen and prospective students, the allure of this enthusiasm is too often lost in the predictable, stilted structure and language of their scientific publications.”

In his article, published last month in the journal Oikos: Synthesising Ecology, Sand-Jensen presents a top-10 list of recommendations for how to write consistently boring scientific publications. And then discusses how scientists could make these contributions more accessible and exciting.

Here’s how to turn a gifted writer into a dull scientist (works for natural and social scientists, by the way):

1. Avoid focus
2. Avoid originality and personality
3. Write long contributions
4. Remove most implications and every speculation
5. Leave out illustrations, particularly good ones
6. Omit necessary steps of reasoning
7. Use many abbreviations and technical terms
8. Supress humor and flowery language
9. Degrade species and biology to statistical elements
10. Quote numerous papers for self-evident statements

No foolin’…here are my picks for MLB 2007

patchs.gif
NATIONAL LEAGUE

East
New York Mets
Philadelphia Phillies*
Atlanta Braves
Florida Marlins
Washington Nationals

Central
Milwaukee Brewers
Chicago Cubs
St. Louis Cardinals
Cincinnati Reds
Houston Astros
Pittsburgh Pirates

West
Los Angeles Dodgers
Arizona Diamondbacks
San Diego Padres
San Francisco Giants
Colorado Rockies

AMERICAN LEAGUE

East
Boston Red Sox
Toronto Blue Jays
New York Yankees
Baltimore Orioles
Tampa Bay Devil Rays

Central
Cleveland Indians
Detroit Tigers*
Minnesota Twins
Chicago White Sox
Kansas City Royals

West
Oakland Athletics
L.A. Angels of Anaheim
Texas Rangers
Seattle Mariners

* = Wild Card


PLAYOFFS:

NL Champs: New York Mets
AL Champs: Boston Red Sox
World Series Champs: New York Mets

Player Awards

CY YOUNG AWARD
AL: Johan Santana, Minnesota Twins
NL: Carlos Zambrano, Chicago Cubs

MVP
AL: Travis Hafner, Cleveland Indians
NL: Chase Utley, Philadelphia Phillies

ROLAIDS RELIEF AWARD
AL: Mariano Rivera, New York Yankees
NL: Jason Isringhausen, St. Louis Cardinals

HANK AARON AWARD

AL: Derek Jeter, New York Yankees
NL: Ryan Howard, Philadelphia Phillies


COMEBACK PLAYER

AL: Rich Harden, Oakland Athletics
NL: Derrick Lee, Chicago Cubs

MANAGER OF THE YEAR
AL: Eric Wedge, Cleveland Indians
NL: Lou Pinella, Chicago Cubs

ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
AL Rookie of the Year: Daisuke Matsuzaka, Boston Red Sox
NL Rookie of the Year: Scott Thorman, Atlanta Braves

HOME RUN CHAMP
AL: Dave Ortiz, Boston Red Sox
NL: Ryan Howard, Philadelphia Phillies

Bonds does NOT break Aaron’s HR record

New issue of Cultural Logic

Cultural Logic, an electronic journal of Marxist theory and practice, has just launched its latest issue.

This issue includes:

An edited version of Theodore W. Allen’s “Class Struggle and the Origin of Racial Slavery: The Invention of the White Race” with an introduction by Jeffrey B. Perry.

A cluster of articles on utopia by Maryam El-Shall (“Salafi Utopia: The Making of the Islamic State”), Christopher Kendrick (“Tendencies of Utopia: Reflections on Recent Work in the Modern Utopian Tradition”), and Michael David Szekely (“Rethinking Benjamin: The Fuction of the Utopian Ideal”).

Other articles include:

Tom Crumpacker, “Democracy and the Multiparty Political System”
Jason Del Gandio, “Bush’s S20 and the Re-routing of American Order”
Simon Enoch, “The New Right Frankenstein? Culture War and the Abnegation of Class”
Rich Gibson, “The Torment and Demise of the United Auto Workers Union as Performed by the Auto Bosses, the Labor Leaders, Counterfeit Radicals, Fictional Revolutionaries, and All Those Who Know They Are Not Innocent Either”
Stephano Harney, “Governance, State, and Living Labour”
Venessa Raney, “Gramsci Outside of Marx?: Defining Culture in Gramscian Terms”
Fengzhen Wang and Shaobo Xie, “Displacement, Differentiation, Difference: The Reproduction of Culture and Space in Globalized China”
Robert W. Williams, “Democracy, Cyberspace, and the Body”

Reviews
Samuel Fassbinder reviews:
Peter McClaren, Capitalists and Conquerors: A Critical Pedagogy Against Empire; Red Seminars: Radical Excursions into Educational Theory, Cultural Politics, and Pedagogy; Peter McLaren and Ramin Farahmandpur, Teaching Against Global Capitalism and the New Imperialism; and Marc Pruyn and Luis M. Huerta-Charles, eds., Teaching Peter McLaren

Mathew A. Hale reviews: Mary Pardo, Mexican American Women Activists

Tom Mayer reviews: Michael D. Yates, Naming the System: Inequality and Work in the Global Economy

And poetry by Nancy Scott.

Kegs banned; no one happy (Of course, not)

Beermats-Photo-of-pile-of-empty-steel-beer-kegs.jpgiPods might be more popular than beer on campuses these days, but when Fairfield University decided to ban all kegs and beer balls from campus they upset everybody…students and townies alike.

The new policy, spelled out in Fairfield University’s 2006-07 student handbook, states: “No student, regardless of age, is permitted to be in possession of kegs, beer balls, common containers over 64 ounces or equivalent quantities of liquor anywhere on campus.”

The Connecticut Post reports that residents of Fairfield Beach, an off-campus neighborhood where many students live, are now concerned about raucous student parties in the hood.

And Fairfield student Dan Stanczyk, summed up the student side of the problem saying, “We’re not in favor of it. A keg is easier than carrying many 30-packs and cheaper.”

Hard to argue with that!

Atlanta Braves finally respond

Well I finally got a response from the Atlanta Braves regarding my protest of the Faith Nights promotion. It’s pretty lame, as you can see:

From: Braves.Web@turner.com
Subject: RE: atl – Other – None – Faith Nights
Date: September 13, 2006 6:45:27 AM PDT (CA)
To: wayne.ross@mac.com

Dear Wayne:

Thank you for your recent letter regarding the Atlanta Braves Faith
Days. We appreciate feedback from our fans and while we understand your
opposition, we would like to explain our position.

These particular post game events are targeted towards the Christian
community. However, fans who aren’t interested in the post game event
will not see anything different during the game since the events take
place following the game, after fans have left the ballpark and
re-entered if they have a separate ticket.

Our intention is to not offend our fans who are not interested in
attending, while satisfying our fans who find this type of event and
added bonus to coming to Turner Field for a Braves game.

We also have been pursuing doing similar nights for other faiths and
groups and are confident you will see them in the future.

Again thank you for your comments.

Regards,
Atlanta Braves

—–Original Message—–
From: wayne.ross@mac.com [mailto:wayne.ross@mac.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:33 AM
To: fanfeedback@braves.mlb.com
Subject: atl – Other – None – Faith Nights

E-mail From: Wayne Ross

I have been a long time Braves fan (since before the team moved to
Atlanta) and as an Atlanta resident in the 1980s I attended many games.

I wanted to let you know that I am deeply offended by the Braves “Faith
Night” promotion. This promotion is blatantly exclusive of religious
faiths outside of evangelical Christianity and it links the Atlanta
Braves with and organization that is anti-gay and anti-Semitic.

Ostensibly a collaboration with Third Coast Sports this promotion is
apparently (according to the Third Coast Sports website) actually a
partnership between the Atlanta Braves and James Dobson’s Focus on the
Family and evangelical Christian group that is anti-choice, anti-gay,
against sex education, and the leading proponent of the bogus notion of
“reparative therapy” for homosexuality.

I find the very notion of “Faith Nights” at the ball park disheartening
as baseball has (and should remain) a game that brings diverse people
together, however, this crass marketing campaign to bring bus loads of
church goers to the park actually works to build barriers between
people. Personally, as die-hard Braves fan all my life, your
collaboration with religious hate-mongers deeply saddens me.

E. Wayne Ross, Ph.D.