More on Katrina

Guy Dinmore’s report from NOLA for the Financial Times is a vivid description of the current conditions there, but it is also notable for a couple of other reasons. It is the first mention I’ve seen of the conditions in the eastern burb of Chalmette (outside of media in BC, which is covering the urban search and rescue teams from BC working in St. Bernard parish).

In addition, Dinmore’s article is the first I’ve read that uses the great Mississippi River flood of 1927 as a backdrop of analysis of the current situation.

Geraldine Lavy said her son protected four Australian tourists from rapists in the convention centre. “Can you imagine? Four white women on their own?”

And then she cursed her government, asking how the Australian embassy had been able to evacuate its citizens and she was still caught in hell, now separated from her son after being bussed to the airport.

Ms Lavy echoed the thoughts and words of many black Americans we spoke to over the weekend who, while often heroic or stoic in the face of the death and depravity around them, were deeply bitter and angry at the rich white people who run their country.

“They opened the levees to save the whole neighbourhood to protect their investments,” declared Larry Crawford, 34, believing, as many sincerely do, that some districts were deliberately flooded to relieve the pressure on the dykes protecting others.

Inconceivable today, yet this is what happened in 1927 with the great Mississippi flood that made a million people homeless. Not only that, as John Barry documents in his social history Rising Tide, black work gangs were held as virtual prisoners in squalid “concentration camps” while shoring up the levees to protect plantations. Many black Americans living in the north are descended from those who abandoned the Delta that year, after the landowners escaped the floods on a steamer to the music of “Bye, Bye Blackbird”.

This week almost nothing has been said in the news or by officials about the poor eastern suburb of Chalmette. Many of the houses – said by officials to number 27,000 – are totally under water. Here the death toll is thought to be greatest, possibly running well into the thousands, said police. Several hundred corpses are reported to have been gathered by locals in one school alone.

Senior officials, who have no bodies to count because there are no orders to collect any, say they have no idea how many people have died. One told a press conference on Saturday it could be one or two thousand.

Cheer up everybody!

By way of Tony Whitson:

President George W. Bush, departing from the NO airport (Sept 2, 2005):

Here’s what I believe. I believe that the great city of New Orleans will rise again and be a greater city of New Orleans.

I believe the town where I used to come from, Houston, Texas, to enjoy myself, occasionally too much, will be that very same town, that it will be a better place to come to. That’s what I believe.
________________________________________________________________________

Being There (Jerzy Kosinski, 1979):

Chance the Gardener [Peter Sellers, a/k/a “Chauncey Gardner”]: As long a the roots are not severed, all is well. And all will be well in the garden.

President “Bobby” [Jack Warden]: In the garden.

Chance the Gardener: Yes. In the garden, growth has it seasons. First comes spring and summer, but then we have fall and winter. And then we get spring and summer again.

President “Bobby”: Spring and summer.

Chance the Gardener: Yes.

President “Bobby”: Then fall and winter. …

Chance the Gardener: Yes! There will be growth in the spring! …

President “Bobby”: Hm. Well, Mr. Gardner, I must admit that is one of the most refreshing and optimistic statements I’ve heard in a very, very long time.
————
Louise [Ruth Attaway, With other poor black seniors, watching Chance on TV]: It’s for sure a white man’s world in America. Look here: I raised that boy since he was the size of a piss-ant. And I’ll say right now, he never learned to read and write. No, sir. Had no brains at all. Was stuffed with rice pudding between th’ ears. Shortchanged by the Lord, and dumb as a jackass. Look at him now! Yes, sir, all you’ve gotta be is white in America, to get whatever you want. Gobbledy-gook!

Keep the “labor” in Labor Day

TimeTableoftheLowellMills488.jpgMickey Z has a nice piece in MRZine remembering the “Lowell Mills Girls” and the movement for a ten-hour workday. Be sure to check the links.

“In vain do I try to soar in fancy and imagination above the dull reality around me but beyond the roof of the factory I cannot rise.” — anonymous Lowell Mill worker, 1826

Lowell, Massachusetts was named after the wealthy Lowell family. They owned numerous textile mills, which attracted the unmarried daughters of New England farmers. These young girls worked in the mills and lived in supervised dormitories. On average, a Lowell Mill Girl worked for three years before leaving to marry. Living and working together often forged a camaraderie that would later find an unexpected outlet.

What had the potential to become a relatively agreeable system for all involved was predictably exploited for mill owners’ gain. The young workers toiled under poor conditions for long hours only to return to dormitories that offered strict dress codes, lousy meals, and were ruled by matrons with an iron fist.In response, the Lowell mill workers — some as young as eleven — did something revolutionary: the tight-knit group of girls and women organized a union. They marched and demonstrated against a 15 percent cut in their wages and for better conditions . . . including the institution of a ten-hour workday. They started newspapers. They proclaimed: “Union is power.” They went on
strike.

As the movement spread through other Massachusetts mill towns, some 500 workers united to form the Lowell Female Labor Reform Association (LFLRA) in 1844 . . . the first organization of American working women to bargain collectively for better conditions and higher pay. Sarah Bagley was named the LFLRA’s first president and she promptly led a petition-drive that forced the Massachusetts legislature to investigate conditions in the mills. Bagley not only fought to improve physical conditions, she argued that the female workers “lacked sufficient time to improve their minds,” something
she considered “essential for laborers in a republic.”

As with many revolutionary notions, the LFLRA met much opposition in their efforts. Despite their inability to secure the specific changes they demanded, the Lowell Mill Girls laid a foundation for female involvement and leadership in the soon-to-explode American labor movement and they continue to inspire those who stand against injustice today.

Mickey Z. is the author of several books including the soon-to-be-released There Is No Good War: The Myths of World War II (Vox Pop) and 50 American Revolutions You’re Not Supposed to Know: Reclaiming American Patriotism (Disinformation Books). This essay was excerpted from 50 American Revolutions You’re Not Supposed to Know. He can be found on the Web at .
Comment | Trackback

Prof reports from the road as hurricane refugee

Eric Luce, a long time social studies education colleague of mine and a professor at University of Southern Mississippi in Long Beach, Miss., is posting reports to eSchool News on his days on the road as a hurricane refugee well as his thoughts on how the hurricane has affected his life and his workplace.

In this first report, Eric recounts his flight from Mississippi as the hurricane approached.

Eric filed his second report from Macon, Georgia and he tells me via email he’s on his way to Atlanta to catch an Amtrak train to Philadelphia, PA.

The evolving stories of ID and FSMism

Christian schools sue U of California

Inside Higher Ed reports that a group of Christian schools sued the University of California in federal court last week, charging that the university engages in religious discrimination by refusing to certify certain high school courses at religious schools that teach alternatives to evolution, including creationism and so-called “intelligent design.”

The lawyer for the Association of Christian Schools Internation, which is the group suing UC, told Inside Higher Ed he did not know what books are used in the schools whose courses are being rejected, the school that brought the issue to the Christian schools’ group’s attention is the Calvary Chapel Christian School, whose Web site says that it uses for its high school curriculum materials from such publishers as Abeka and Bob Jones University Press.

Abeka publishes science material that “presents the universe as the direct creation of God and refutes the man-made idea of evolution.”

Iowa State U profs reject claims that ID is science

After a professor at Iowa State University voiced support for “intelligent design” theories as an alternative to evolution, 120 professors signed a statement that they “reject all attempts to represent Intelligent Design as a scientific endeavor.” The ISU profs’ statement is a succinct description of how views regarding a supernatural creator are, by their very nature, claims of religious faith, and not within the scope or abilities of science, the hallmark of which is “methodological naturalism” or the view that natural phenomenon can be explained without reference to the supernatural.

ID a “hoax”

Tufts University prof Daniel C. Dennett’s “Show Me The Science” op-ed in The New York Times last week called intelligent design a “hoax.” Dennett rebuts many of the arguments put forward by its supporters, saying that in the end, there is no science of substance behind the challengers to evolution.

FSMism update

Pastafarianism makes The New York Times.

Evangelical scientists refute gravity with new “intelligent falling” theory

And finally, “America’s Finest News Source” reports on a new controversy over the science curriculum…the refutation of the gravity. (I think I blogged this a couple of weeks ago, but it’s worth a repeat.)

Mayday Mississippi Delta

The folks at Truthout.org have set up a MAYDAY Mississippi Delta web page with round-the-clock information support for everyone impacted by Katrina. They also have lot’s of good sources available for the most up-to-date and expansive coverage possible.

126530main1_no_flooding.jpg These images from NASA’s Terra spacecraft show the effects of flooding in the New Orleans area (Before (left) and after (right)) (Photo: NASA/GSFC/MODIS)

Michael Parenti: “How the free market killed New Orleans”

Here’s a ZNet commentary by Michael Parenti that illustrates why free market logic doesn’t work in any situation and especially in the case of the disaster that is the Gulf Coast right now.

Znet

ZNet Commentary
How the Free Market Killed New Orleans
by Michael Parenti
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2005-09/03parenti.cfm

The free market played a crucial role in the destruction of New Orleans and the death of thousands of its residents. Armed with advanced warning that a momentous (force 5) hurricane was going to hit that city and surrounding areas, what did officials do? They played the free market.

They announced that everyone should evacuate. Everyone was expected to devise their own way out of the disaster area by private means, just as the free market dictates, just like people do when disaster hits free-market Third World countries.

It is a beautiful thing this free market in which every individual pursues his or her own personal interests and thereby effects an optimal outcome for the entire society. This is the way the invisible hand works its wonders.

There would be none of the collectivistic regimented evacuation as occurred in Cuba. When an especially powerful hurricane hit that island last year, the Castro government, abetted by neighborhood citizen committees and local Communist party cadres, evacuated 1.3 million people, more than 10 percent of the country’s population, with not a single life lost, a heartening feat that went largely unmentioned in the U.S. press.

On Day One of the disaster caused by Hurricane Katrina, it was already clear that hundreds, perhaps thousands, of American lives had been lost in New Orleans. Many people had “refused” to evacuate, media reporters explained, because they were just plain “stubborn.”

It was not until Day Three that the relatively affluent telecasters began to realize that tens of thousands of people had failed to flee because they had nowhere to go and no means of getting there. With hardly any cash at hand or no motor vehicle to call their own, they had to sit tight and hope for the best. In the end, the free market did not work so well for them.

Many of these people were low-income African Americans, along with fewer numbers of poor whites. It should be remembered that most of them had jobs before Katrina’s lethal visit. That’s what most poor people do in this country: they work, usually quite hard at dismally paying jobs, sometimes more than one job at a time. They are poor not because they’re lazy but because they have a hard time surviving on poverty wages while burdened by high prices, high rents, and regressive taxes.

The free market played a role in other ways. Bush’s agenda is to cut government services to the bone and make people rely on the private sector for the things they might need. So he sliced $71.2 million from the budget of the New Orleans Corps of Engineers, a 44 percent reduction. Plans to fortify New Orleans levees and upgrade the system of pumping out water had to be shelved.

Bush took to the airways and said that no one could have foreseen this disaster. Just another lie tumbling from his lips. All sorts of people had been predicting disaster for New Orleans, pointing to the need to strengthen the levees and the pumps, and fortify the coastlands.

In their campaign to starve out the public sector, the Bushite reactionaries also allowed developers to drain vast areas of wetlands. Again, that old invisible hand of the free market would take care of things. The developers, pursuing their own private profit, would devise outcomes that would benefit us all.

But wetlands served as a natural absorbent and barrier between New Orleans and the storms riding in from across the sea. And for some years now, the wetlands have been disappearing at a frightening pace on the Gulf? coast. All this was of no concern to the reactionaries in the White House.

As for the rescue operation, the free-marketeers like to say that relief to the more unfortunate among us should be left to private charity. It was a favorite preachment of President Ronald Reagan that “private charity can do the job.” And for the first few days that indeed seemed to be the policy with the disaster caused by Hurricane Katrina.

The federal government was nowhere in sight but the Red Cross went into action. Its message: “Don’t send food or blankets; send money.” Meanwhile Pat Robertson and the Christian Broadcasting Network—taking a moment off from God’s work of pushing John Roberts nomination to the Supreme Court—called for donations and announced “Operation Blessing” which consisted of a highly-publicized but totally inadequate shipment of canned goods and bibles.

By Day Three even the myopic media began to realize the immense failure of the rescue operation. People were dying because relief had not arrived. The authorities seemed more concerned with the looting than with rescuing people. It was property before people, just like the free marketeers always want.

But questions arose that the free market did not seem capable of answering: Who was in charge of the rescue operation? Why so few helicopters and just a scattering of Coast Guard rescuers? Why did it take helicopters five hours to get six people out of one hospital? When would the rescue operation gather some steam? Where were the feds? The state troopers? The National Guard? Where were the buses and trucks? the shelters and portable toilets? The medical supplies and water?

Where was Homeland Security? What has Homeland Security done with the $33.8 billions allocated to it in fiscal 2005? Even ABC-TV evening news (September 1, 2005) quoted local officials as saying that “the federal government’s response has been a national disgrace.”

In a moment of delicious (and perhaps mischievous) irony, offers of foreign aid were tendered by France, Germany and several other nations. Russia offered to send two plane loads of food and other materials for the victims. Predictably, all these proposals were quickly refused by the White House. America the Beautiful and Powerful, America the Supreme Rescuer and World Leader, America the Purveyor of Global Prosperity could not accept foreign aid from others. That would be a most deflating and insulting role reversal. Were the French looking for another punch in the nose?

Besides, to have accepted foreign aid would have been to admit the truth—that the Bushite reactionaries had neither the desire nor the decency to provide for ordinary citizens, not even those in the most extreme straits. Next thing you know, people would start thinking that George W. Bush was really nothing more than a fulltime agent of Corporate America.

——-Michael Parenti’s recent books include Superpatriotism (City Lights) and The Assassination of Julius Caesar (New Press), both available in paperback. His forthcoming The Culture Struggle (Seven Stories Press) will be published in the fall. For more information visit: www.michaelparenti.org.