The activists’ MC: An interview with Son of Nun

From MRZine: “The activists’ MC: An interview with Son of Nun”

Most progressive-minded hip-hop fans and culturally-inclined activists have not heard of Baltimore rapper Son of Nun. After listening to the Son’s first album, “Blood and Fire,” I can only say this: they will.

Despite this being his first album, Nun — a high school teacher, activist, and organizer from Baltimore — is clearly a superb, smart lyricist who is on his way up. The fact that he is able to successfully use his skills to express intelligent, radical politics in a style that ranges from poetic to in-your-face is one reason I recommend hip-hop fans get this album.
“Blood and Fire” is united thematically by the Son’s vicious vitriol against capitalism, imperialism, war, poverty, sexism and racism. It also touches on the Son’s own personal struggles. One of the songs on the album — the antiwar head-banger, “Fight back” — was chosen from over 500 submissions to appear on a recently-released antiwar compilation alongside Sonic Youth, Jane’s Addiction, Paris, and many more. Another one of Nun’s songs, “Free Palestine,” was voted the best song of the week on NPR’s Open Mic site. Son of Nun has performed and appeared on releases with the likes of Ani DiFranco and Jurassic 5, and he frequently performs at rallies, underground clubs, activists conferences, and universities.

While the current underground political hip-hop scene is extraordinarily vibrant, most artists that fall within this scene have some weakness that leaves one a little hungry: too much posturing, weak beats, amateurish lyrical skills, misogynist and/or anti-gay lyrics. In Blood and Fire, Son of Nun avoids these pitfalls, producing one of the best underground political albums in recent years. With diverse beats, sophisticated and powerful lyrics, a mature flow, and just the right amount of swagger, Son of Nun is a rising star, and it’s only a matter of time until more people begin to notice.

I had a chance to interview Son of Nun through e-mail. To get a taste of the Son, listen to the samples below. You can purchase “Blood and Fire” at .

MP3s

Fight Back

(Lyrics to “Fight Back”:
)

One Solution

(Lyrics to “One Solution”:
)

Free Palestine

(Lyrics to “Free Palestine”:
)

Interview with Rapper Son of Nun

By Derek Seidman

Seidman: “Blood and Fire” is your first album. Clearly you use hip-hop as a way to express your politics. When did you start rapping, and why did you choose hip-hop as a way to express your political ideas?

Son of Nun: I started rapping back in 1997 when a friend asked me to jam with his band. Up to that point I’d only written poetry, so I wrote a little piece for the session and I haven’t put the mic down since. Before that I messed around a little in high school from about 1991 to 1995, trying to write rhymes that sounded like whatever I was listening to — you know, Cypress Hill, Biggie, Onyx, Mobb Deep — but I wasn’t serious about it and probably only wrote a total of three rhymes.

Towards the end of high school I started getting real frustrated with hip hop because I was starting to look at it in the context of how my consciousness around America was beginning to change, the struggles that blacks had endured, and just the overall redundancy that you couldn’t avoid noticing in mainstream hip hop itself. There used to be balance on the radio in terms of the content you’d hear from artists. But I think by the end of high school that had all pretty much vanished — and so did my interest in hip hop. I think early Wu Tang, Tribe Called Quest, and Digable Planets (Blow Out Comb) held the flame till I found out about The Roots, Labtekwon, Black Star, and Common.

Overall, I think Bob Marley, conscious dance hall reggae, and Rage against the Machine had more to do with me expressing my ideas in hip hop than hip hop did. Even though my first two tapes were Run DMC’s Raising Hell and Salt N Pepa’s Get Up (I think that’s the title), I didn’t know about KRS-ONE until he dropped “Rapture” off I Got Next, and I didn’t know about Rakim till after that — even though I had seen Juice and was into the song. I know, I know, it’s sad but it’s true.

I also got into drum n bass in college and knew it was the next level for hip hop (yeah, I said it.) Around that time some of my friends started DJ-ing and one was spinning drum n bass, so we got together and I started writing and freestyling over it. Another friend in the crew got us residencies at a couple clubs and it was on. I honed my skills and got to play with and open for some of the greats: Roni Size & Reprazent, Adam F, Diesel Boy, and others.

Then I started feeling like, drum n bass was great but most of the folks who came to the shows were just into dancing, not listening. Hip hop would obviously be the best way to get a point across musically, so now I’m paying dues all over again, this time in hip hop. It’s great, because I’m at a point where I’ve learned a lot more about it as an art form and politics through study and activism. I feel like I can bring something unique for this time instead of the same ol’ same ol’.

You said that you started getting real frustrated with where hip-hop was at. What’s your take on the state of mainstream hip-hop?

Man, that shit is weak. Thank god for the underground and hip hop overseas. Again homes, balance. It’s not the fault of the artists that the companies in control only want to invest in one sound. At one point in my life I used to be a purist and hate mainstream rap with a passion until I realized that the criminal and materialistic styles have always been there and America itself has an infatuation with gangsters (oh sorry, I mean gangstas) and materialism. How can I like Goodfellas, Casino, and Scarface and then attempt to reject the same qualities embodied in these films when they appear in hip hop by saying that mainstream hip hop isn’t really hip hop? In the underground there are hundreds if not thousands of 50 Cents — so I’d have to say that the underground isn’t truly hip hop either.

Now does that mean that I condone what the artists say and do? Hell no — sometimes I feel like I’m listening to Klan propaganda — I sure as hell don’t approve of what they do in those movies I mentioned either. Do I understand that for some of them hip hop is their ticket out of the debilitating manifestations of institutionalized racism? Of course I do. But does that mean that they can’t use the brains in their head to write songs that question why things are the way they are? I feel like when you have that much influence you can save a few spots on your album to shake shit up for real. I mean let’s be honest and rational for a moment . . . if on my album all I talk about is committing crimes against other black people, who the fuck am I threatening with my “hard ass” alpha male persona? No one in any position of power anywhere considers them threatening in any way, shape, or form that can’t be handled with a parental advisory sticker. People in power consider “gangsta rap” to be about as dangerous to them as an R-rated movie is to a minor. They’re a fucking joke to these people, not because of what they’re saying but because of the position of influence they have but predictably fail to use.

I don’t know, man. Maybe these rappers think that’s what they’re doing in the world of hip hop. Maybe they think that their style is revolutionizing the face of rap and shit will never be the same because of them and the new way they’re talking about guns, misogyny, and materialism. Maybe I’m the one who’s out of touch and missing the boat because there is no interest in politically relevant hip hop. I doubt it.

Seriously, though, when I do my lesson at school on 9/11 and drop the lyrics from Mr. Lif’s home of the brave, 90% of my students ask if they can keep the copy of the rhyme I gave them to follow along. And they listen to Three 6, and 50 Cent, and all the popular shit. And these aren’t kids of privilege, these are students in a school system that was found to be underfunded by $400 – $800 million dollars by the state of Maryland. At my school more than 90% of the kids get free or reduced lunch and the drop-out rate is greater than 70%. We had plenty of fires, fights, a stabbing, a rape, a couple lock downs because of weapons, and of course some military recruiters. These kids ARE getting left behind.

So if Lif can get props in the hood and everyone else follows that trend, then there is plenty of room for politics in the mainstream which means that companies and artists (especially established ones) share in the blame. And if you don’t think the Lif example is real, look at Jada Kiss and the success of “Why?”.

What do you feel are the main themes connecting the tracks on “Blood and Fire”? What are you trying to get across to the listener?

Struggle and skills, man. On the album struggle comes through politically and personally because those are the struggles I know, and if I’m putting out something with my name on it, it had better represent who I am and what I know in a realistic way. I wanted to make music that talked about the issues I was interested in and organizing around. I wanted to get people off their ass, contribute to a soundtrack that vindicated and emboldened those already active, and I wanted to get some shit off my chest.

Politically, the album touches on war, Palestine, racism, and capitalism — these were some of the issues I wanted to speak about. I didn’t write a blueprint for the CD or anything like that. I just selected the songs I liked the most and called it a day. Countless books have been written on each of these topics, but I guess my ego was big enough to feel that I could weigh in on the debates . . . hmmm. Seriously though, they’re much more than abstract topics for discussion, their unforgiving realities that people endure across the globe.

Is a song or a compilation going to solve all our problems? Probably not. Does music resonate with people in a way that can challenge and/or galvanize their beliefs and help move them to action? Hell yes. I’m living proof. When Bob [Marley] said, “Get up, Stand up,” I took that shit seriously.

I also think it would be a big mistake to get your set of politics from a recording artist. Political musicians, just like charismatic leaders, emerge from movements, not the other way around. I think artists can and do help inspire people to action — and once people get involved I think they should do their own research and draw their own conclusions about how their efforts can be most effective. Personally I’m a socialist and I’m a member of the International Socialist Organization.

The alienation caused by the way our society is run is unavoidable. Everyday people get up and go to jobs they hate and it crushes their souls. The best part of their day is taken from them in exchange for some ridiculous wage and when they get home they don’t feel like doing shit, let alone doing something about it and/or pursue their dreams which have often been relegated to “hobbies.” Then we have kids and bequeath to them this sorry existence with the hope that they can somehow “make it” if they just work really hard, which is crap. If hard work determined your wealth in this society people like the president would be broke as shit.

Personally, I love my job but I hate that I don’t have what I need to do it as well as I could. Not only is our school system under-funded, but teachers are, as if I need to say it, underpaid.

So if you take this dynamic created by exploitation at work, a false American dream, racism, sexism, etc., what do you think the outcome is on the personal lives of everyday people? Lots of alienation, escapism, self doubt and self blame for not having more money, friends, and beautiful women, and on and on and on you know. More specifically and personally, racism fucking hurts, man, and it’s important and empowering and therapeutic to organize and rally against it in its many forms — but it still hurts. Growing up without a father and seeing your mom bust her ass to provide for you so much that you hardly get to see her fucking hurts, and when you know the sexism, racism, and immigrant discrimination she endured in and out of the black community that hurts too.

Growing up is hard enough by itself but when you add all this other stuff to the mix that you can feel the effects of but can’t always directly identify at the time, one’s experience can be pretty rough. I wanted to add some of that to the album, to inject hip hop with an alternative to the alpha-male/super hero “I-ain’t-never-scared-or-hurt” perspective. I don’t care what anyone says, nobody’s hard all the time.

So that’s what I wanted to get across on the album.

“Fight back” is one of the best songs on your album, I think. What is the background of this song?

Thanks. I guess I’d say that the background for the song was this thinly veiled imperialist power grab sold to the American people as a pack of lies that we and the Iraqi people would have to pay for in our blood. The background was being a part of the largest pre-war antiwar movement in the history of the world, watching Bush give us the middle finger-watching the antiwar movement shrivel up and get hamstrung by the Kerry campaign — and saying fuck no! Now is precisely the time when we need to be standing up and saying no to war as loudly and clearly and often as possible.

My producer and roommate at the time (yeah, real convenient), DJ Krimson, put the beat together and we recorded the track around late spring or early summer of 2004. It sounded like it was missing something so I thought the samples would just make it all the more real. The first one of the man speaking was from an impromptu interview I did at an antiwar demo in DC before the invasion of Iraq. The second sample of the people chanting “that’s bullshit get off it, the war is for profit, war and occupation will never bring liberation, that’s bullshit. . . ” was from a DC demo after the invasion.

The timing of the song was pretty clutch, too, because we completed it just before the submission deadline for Peace Not War 2, the definitive antiwar compilation with Jurassic 5, Sonic Youth, Paris, Ani DiFranco, Lyrics Born, Jane’s Addiction, and more. I was looking for labels to release the CD and came across like two days before the deadline. I sent my song through Fedex, emailed an mp3 version of it, and crossed my fingers. A couple days later I get an email from Mudge in the UK and he’s like, “talk about cutting it close.” Turns out Fedex screwed up the delivery, so if it weren’t for the mp3. . . .

I have to say a little more about Mudge though because he put all of himself into this and the previous “Peace Not War” compilation. We got to meet up in DC and he broke it down for me — he put it all on the line and he’s giving half the loot to antiwar groups while he’s living in the red. He’s organized benefits with major artists against the war and the ‘authorities’, at the last minute, deny the permit they already approved for the show and he takes the hit. But he still does it.

Before you mentioned your students, and how they could relate to politics through hip-hop. Can you talk about this — how hip-hop can serve as a way of expressing things in a way that might be able to resonate or connect with certain people more deeply?

Man, I think it’s a matter of respecting the craft and speaking to each other in a language we already appreciate and understand. When it comes to respecting the craft I mean caring enough about hip hop to learn about how it came to be and why it looks the way it does today, as well as seeing it as a source for information that’s just as valid as any editorialist, pundit, or expert with an axe to grind. My students see it that way already because they reference hip hop songs as evidence when they’re supporting their statements. And when discussions take us into the history of hip hop everyone’s interested and engaged because we’re getting into something that’s a part of their everyday life.

I was an assistant debate coach this year and earlier this summer I taught at a debate camp that’s a part of the urban debate league which is a program designed to get inner city middle school and high school students involved in debate throughout the year. The camp is rigorous, demanding, fun, and mind-blowing. I know adults who haven’t even considered the complex concepts that these kids were wrapping their heads around and then arguing both sides of competitively. This year, as part of their evidence and argument materials, they included a compilation CD featuring the music of various political artists that’s relevant to this year’s resolution. Why? Because experience has shown them that validating hip hop and exposing students to artists who use hip hop as a political weapon is not only empowering but it can attract students to their program which does a better job at preparing them scholastically and financially for college than their schools often do.

Hip hop is music and music strikes chords within us that words alone can’t. To me, hip hop is the youth of an oppressed group saying “I’ve got something to say and I’m gonna say it the way I wanna say it, and if you don’t like it… fuck you!” That’s inherently attractive, especially to young people, and especially to young people whose experience is directly being expressed in hip hop. If you’re a young person in an oppressed minority in our society, wouldn’t an art form built around your experience, expressed by other young people like you, be attractive?

To give another example I wrote a song called “Free Palestine” which I submitted to National Public Radio’s (NPR) Open Mic website where it received a record number of votes earning it the title — best song of the week. Those votes were cast by people around the world who stand in solidarity with Palestine. Haithem El-Zabri, the owner of the , encouraged people on countless Palestine solidarity listservs (like Al-Awda) to vote and word spread to Indy Media Centers from Vancouver to Italy. I received emails of encouragement and invitations from the occupied territories and the song, lyrics, and the contest were even referenced in the Jordan Times. Now this was NPR’s Open Mic website where over the history of the program many songs had been voted for and against but for the people who voted in support of “Free Palestine” it wasn’t about my song — rather it was about their desire for justice for the people of Palestine. Expressing that through a vote, particularly on NPR, resonated deeply with all involved.

You also mentioned the underground. It’s funny, a lot of the great underground rappers — from Black Star, to Common, to The Roots — aren’t really so underground anymore. What’s the underground rap scene looking like these days, and how would you define “the underground” as opposed to mainstream hip-hip?

The underground is diverse and thank god! The underground, as far as I’m concerned, stretches from U.S. school cafeteria battles and ciphers to the Palestinian hip hop of the Philistines, Life Convicts, or Iron Sheik. For me the mainstream is heavy rotation on MTV and major radio.

Who are some of the artists you most respect?

Bob Marley (need I explain?), Burning Spear (his voice strikes dangerous chords in the soul), Fela Kuti (suffering and smiling, he’s a razor), Nina Simone (I don’t know if it gets any more real), Zap Mama (extremely creative, very empowered), Last Poets (nobody can fuck with them), Jimi Hendrix (again, no explanation necessary), James Brown (I know, but music was never the same), Saul Williams (he’s putting it down for real), The Doors (they got the guns but we got the numbers and some times you feel like music is your only friend), Cannibal Ox with el-p as the third member (listen to the cold vein, compare it to Vast’s and Vordul’s solo joints and you’ll know), Black Star, Common Sense (cuz that’s his real name), The Roots (because it was about time), Nas (yeah, I know, but his talent and creativity are undeniable), Labtekwon (Baltimore’s most prolific, skilled, and dedicated emcee), Steel Pulse (tribute to the Martyrs son), Buju Banton (changed from “Boom Bye Bye” to “Circumstances” — not that rastas aren’t homophobic), Capleton (reachin’, teachin’ the people fi sure), Rage Against The Machine (because we can do something), The Clash (when they kick in your front door, how ya gonna come?), Radiohead (their sound is tangible), Portishead (the pain in her voice is beautiful), System of a Down (their sound is as schizophrenic as U.S culture).

And many, many more. Can’t forget Public Enemy, and mf doom & mad lib on Madvillain — sick!

That’s funny that you didn’t mention Tupac Shakur. He seems to embody more than anyone this paradox of hip-hop (though maybe it’s not a paradox). On the one hand, he’s was totally righteous — militant, political, radical, rooted in the Black Panther tradition, really able to articulate the experience of post-industrial black oppression in a powerful way. On the other hand, his lyrics could also be incredibly misogynistic. What do you think of Pac?

I know I’ll probably get a lot of shit for this but I never really got into Pac. Maybe it was the freedom and confidence with which he expressed his own contradictions as a human being that I wasn’t ready to hear at the time because I wasn’t able to accept them in myself (no, not in terms of being misogynistic) or maybe I just wasn’t feeling his music, or both. It’s been a long time since I’ve listened to any of his stuff but I’m definitely open to checking it again now with some more years under my belt.

What artists have been most influential for you — on your style, and just generally?

Bob Marley, Burning Spear, Public Enemy, Rage — all of them never let me forget that injustice must be confronted and things don’t get better unless you do something about it. They also entrenched in my heart the significance of history as one of the most important tools in our arsenal, a mirror to the present.

As far as my style? Well, anyone who doesn’t say Rakim is a goddamn liar — unless your doing one of the “I’m the only one who understands what I’m saying style” styles. I’m definitely still aspiring to the awe inspiring skills (which are different from content) of hip hop’s prodigal son, Nas. Zack De La Rocha’s undeniably left his mark on my brain and Saul Williams is certainly knockin’ around in there too, and so is Mr. Lif.

What are your upcoming plans? Tours? Another album?

Man, I’m just trying to rock all the shows I can. I’ve sent kits out to clubs and college radio with no feedback, so I’m just like fuck it, I’ll make them come to me. I know what my potential is so I’m going to do it my way and create a grassroots following among the people I’m organizing with. I’m relying on people who believe in the music enough to help support it in whatever way they can, you know, from writing a review to organizing a show to having me perform at a political event. Ultimately, I want to take this around the world, and I know it’s possible, so that’s what I’m working towards. Folks can always check my website for show dates — SonOfNun.

The next album is coming along, just met a producer from the U.K. who I’m going to collaborate with on a bunch of tracks, and there are some cats around the way I’m going to work with too so. . . . I don’t want to put any dates out yet because there’s still a good amount of work that needs to be done.

Derek Seidman lives in Providence, RI. He can be reached at . Seidman is a co-editor of the radical youth journal Left Hook.

WIKIMAINIA

Several stories on wikimainia from MediaChannel.org:

WIKIMANIA
Ground Zero, at least last week, was Frankfurt, Germany, site of Wikimania, the first global gathering of the self-styled ‘wikipedians’ who collectively are well on their way to the goal of providing free online encyclopedias in every language on earth. MediaChannel.org’s Rory O’Connor was there and reports on the Big Bang of the next information revolution.

BEYOND AN ENCYCLOPEDIA: WHAT’S NEXT FOR WIKIMANIA?
In just 10 years Wikimedia has evolved into a phenomenon, spawning a worldwide community that has created a brand potentially worth hundreds of millions of dollars and a website now in the top 50 that gets more traffic than USA Today and The New York Times put together. And it all happened through the efforts of volunteers, without a bureaucratic top-down organization, staff structure or marketing budget. News Dissector Danny Schechter was at the Wikimedia Conference and reports on the Wikipedia phenomenon.

WIKIPEDIA TO TIGHTEN GRIP
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales says the Wiki web encyclopaedia written and edited by internet users from all over the world plans to impose stricter editorial rules to prevent vandalism of its content.

Report: US high schools may not adequately prepare dropouts for unemployment

From “America’s Finest News Source” a report on the latest crisis in education:

Report: Our highs may not adequately prepare dropouts for unemployment

WASHINGTON, DC–A Department of Labor report released Monday finds that America’s high schools are not sufficiently preparing emerging dropouts for the demands of unemployment.

In a letter introducing the report, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao explained that schools routinely fail to impart dropouts with the critical lying- and sitting-around skills they need to thrive in today’s jobless market.

“Our public high schools place too much focus on preparing kids for professional careers,” Chao said. “This waste of resources leaves our dropouts, the majority of whom have no chance of ever finding a job, wholly unprepared to sleep till 1 p.m., or watch daytime television while eating ramen noodles out of an upturned Frisbee.”

According to the study, America’s weakest academic performers also drop out of high school without ever having learned to steal beer money from their housemates’ change jars or wash their hair with bar soap.

“This oversight cannot continue if our kids are to become unproductive citizens,” Chao said. “The future dregs of society are not being served.”

Despite massive cuts in recent decades, some remnants of math and science instruction continue to plague many school districts. These courses, Chao argued, waste valuable time and money.

Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings defended the nation’s public-school system.

“Educators do a lot to ensure that the most hopeless students slip through the cracks,” Spellings said. “Arbitrary rules, irregularly enforced discipline, and pointless paperwork are just the first things that come to mind.”

She added: “Easy grading encourages students to be sloppy and late handing in homework–a skill that makes future deadbeats very competitive in stonewalling landlords and bill collectors.”

Chao said educators need to think outside the classroom and give kids some real off-the-job experience.

“Increasing suspensions and expulsions is a good start,” Chao said. “Furthermore, scoliosis exams should be made more routine, so students learn to adapt to the all-underwear wardrobe typical of the non-working class.”

Chao also suggested that schools hold more blood drives, which would prepare dropouts for visits to their local blood-plasma donation centers for quick and easy cash.

Some educators say the report paints too bleak a picture of schools’ efforts to instill students with a lack of ambition.

“We are doing a terrible, terrible job,” said James Dunham, the principal of HS 445 in New York. “We literally could not be doing any worse.”

Dunham highlighted the fact that the hallways of his school are lined with vending machines that sell nothing but unhealthy snack products such as soda and potato chips, both of which acclimate students to the diet of a jobless lowlife.

Susan French, a spokesperson for the National Education Association, the nation’s largest teachers’ union, said educators are superb role models for the unemployed dropouts of tomorrow.

Said French: “Students spend seven hours a day surrounded by adults who despise their low-paying jobs. If the critics out there know a better way to discourage a young person from entering the work force, I’d like to see it.”

Busting the minimum wage myth

Ellen Dannin’s two part article in MRZine on the minumum wage is a great example of how RWTT use dubious “research” to back policies that hurt the many to help the few.
What right-wing think tanks say about the minimum wage

Anyone interested in politics should at least occasionally read what Right-Wing Think Tanks (RWTTs) are proposing, for what they advocate shows up as Administration policies. Reading the RWTTs enables us to identify and respond to the same ideas that eventually trickle out of the mouths of Administration spokespeople.

Right-Wing Think Tanks want to eliminate the minimum wage. RWTTs arguments against the minium wage often mention studies and their findings, but rarely provide sufficient information to track down and assess them. Below are some of the most common arguments made by RWTTs.

Challenging right-wing think tank’s “economics-lite”

When arguments turn to economics, most of us (a) flee, (b) fall asleep, or (c) give up and figure it’s just too hard to understand.

But you can stand your ground, even if you have never taken an economics course. What it takes is being curious and willing to ask questions and challenge claims. It also helps to know that most of the pundits of Right-Wing Think Tanks (RWTTs) who fall back on economic claims base them on economics-lite. They use a few facile and sterile ideas and stretch them to fit all situations. These ideas are mere theories (in the pejorative sense of the word), and, unlike scientific theories, they have no evidence to support them. Indeed, when put to the test, these ideas tend to be falsified. That is, the evidence does not support them (more on that below). When your common sense tells you that they seem to be over-simplifying, you are probably right, er, correct.

Bush says teach ID

In a not so surprising move George W. Bush endorses teaching religion as science

WASHINGTON — President Bush waded into the debate over evolution and ”intelligent design” yesterday, saying schools should teach both theories on the creation and complexity of life.

In a wide-ranging question-and-answer session with a small group of reporters, Bush essentially endorsed efforts by Christian conservatives to give intelligent design equal standing with the theory of evolution in the nation’s schools.

The rich get (much) richer

Business Week: The Rich Get (Much) Richer

AUGUST 8, 2005

IDEAS — OUTSIDE SHOT
By Steven Rattner

The Rich Get (Much) Richer
The top 1% take a fatter slice now than at any time since the 1920s

Hooray for The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal for returning the problems of class in America to the front page. Shame on the rest of us, passive witnesses to the emergence of a second Gilded Age, another Roaring Twenties, in which the fruits of economic success have gone not to the broad populace but to a slim sliver at the top. For this handful, life is a sweet m

Military recruiters teaching high school classes

Military Recruiters Teaching High School Classes

Military Classes are Off Course

By Danny Westneat
The Seattle Times

Friday 29 July 2005

In Seattle, the public schools are hostile territory for the military, as parents shoo away recruiters and are pushing to bar them entirely.

In the suburbs, though, the armed forces are welcomed for more than just visits. They’re teaching some of the classes. Two high schools in Federal Way will debut Air Force courses this fall. Students as young as 14 will wear uniforms, march in drills with decommissioned guns and get schooled in military history, customs and technology.

Course materials are mostly created by the Air Force, and the classes taught by retired officers. Costs will be split between the Air Force and the school district.

Federal Way is the third King County school district to ask the military to set up shop as part of the Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC). Kentwood High in Covington has a program taught by the Marines; two Issaquah high schools have courses taught by the Navy.

JROTC is a fixture in schools across the South and is rapidly expanding in the North.

“We applied for them to come here, and they looked at the general attitude of the community before they agreed,” said Debra Stenberg, spokeswoman for Federal Way schools, explaining why there’s been no controversy about it.

Seattle is overly viperous toward the military. It’s a vital institution, as well as a major source of jobs, and Seattle’s schools ought to educate kids about both. Let the Army set up a booth at career day. It’s better they buttonhole kids there, where they can be supervised.

But ensconcing the military inside school walls, and subsidizing it with school dollars, is over the line the other way.

Backers say JROTC is mostly about citizenship and discipline, with military subject matter secondary. They also insist it’s not about recruiting.

Federal Way officials were drawn to it because it features courses in aerospace technology, a subject the schools couldn’t offer otherwise.

I can see the allure, especially for a school district on Boeing’s doorstep.

But what other government agency, corporation or special-interest group gets to design what is taught in a public-school classroom, and then run the classes themselves?

Take this fall’s first course. It features the role of the military in history, taught by an officer using material provided by the military. That’s like having a course on environmental policy taught by Greenpeace.

It’s also clear that a goal of JROTC is to groom future enlistees. Students are given information on how to sign up. The Defense Department testified to Congress in 2000 that JROTC is one of its premier recruiting devices.

Armed-forces recruiting is essential. Without it, we’d have a draft. Schools must by law allow it, but it’s their duty to supervise it, not subsidize it.

There’s a war on. Education devoted to exploring diverse points of view about war ought to include bringing the armed forces into our classrooms.

They shouldn’t, however, be handed the keys.

Don’t Know Much About (Black) History

ZNet Commentary
“Don’t Know Much About (Black) History” July 25, 2005
By Tim Wise

Recently, Philadelphia became the first American city to require its high school students to complete a course in African American history as a condition of graduation. And predictably, in the “City of Brotherly Love,” there is already an outcry of opposition from certain whites, who comprise less than 20 percent of the city’s public school students.

Though the white CEO of the school system has spoken forcefully to the effect that one cannot really understand American history without understanding black history, some less enlightened souls feel decidedly otherwise. Their complaints are nothing if not unoriginal.

Requiring African American history will be “divisive” they claim, further tearing the city apart, rather than uniting it. But what kind of argument is this? Are we to believe that standard American history has been unifying? The kind of history that largely ignores the contributions and struggles of persons of color in the U.S.? The history that too often paints an image of Africa suggesting there were no signs of civilization there before whites arrived, and thus that black history doesn’t begin until slavery? The kind of history that relegates black folks to one month out of the year, and even then only teaches about a few prominent figures: Dr, King, Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, and perhaps Rosa Parks?

Could it be that such a “standard” history has only been unifying for whites by and large, seeing as how it has presented history in a way that typically glorifies white leaders, European cultural contributions and traditions, and white perspectives on various historical events?

How unifying has it been for black folks to read about their history as if it were only a compendium of victimization narratives? To learn nothing of early African cultures and the ways in which many of their existing traditions stem from those longstanding folkways? To be given the impression that Africa is a vast jungle of uncivilized brutes, as contrasted with the ostensibly superior European nation-states that colonized and dominated it for so long? This, in spite of the rather overwhelming evidence that many African lands were far more advanced than those of Europe, well into the recently completed millennium.

And what is more divisive? The addition of African American history to the curriculum, or the exodus of white families from the Philadelphia schools in the first place, in large part to escape integrated environments and to run instead to whiter suburban systems or private schools? That this re-segregation has been far more divisive than black history could ever be, should be obvious, but will certainly be missed by those white folks who think our perspectives are somehow independent of racial considerations or biases.

Of course, white folks often misunderstand what is and is not unifying. To many of us, whatever makes us feel good is seen as a source of unity: like July 4th. Back in 1987, during the 200th anniversary celebration of the Constitution, Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall’s observation that the nation’s history was not merely the resplendent menagerie of greatness perceived by most whites, brought down shit storms of outrage upon his head. He had injected “divisiveness” it was said, into a celebration that, in the absence of his own big mouth, would have been enjoyed by all.

Indeed, whites throw the unity concept around, absent any real understanding of what it means. So after 9/11, for example, millions of whites (and pretty much only whites) slapped bumper stickers on their cars that read “United We Stand.” The lack of such automotive adornment on the vehicles of persons of color owes less to differences in patriotism per se, or shock and outrage over the events of that day, than it does to a recognition on the part of such persons that disunity is more common in this nation than unity, and a terrorist attack didn’t change that.

Wide racial gaps in income, wealth, and housing, along with persistent bias in the justice system makes a mockery out of white pronouncements of unity, and renders utterly specious the notion that teaching black history (as opposed to merely living the white version) is what divides us.

Other voices in Philly claim that black history is too narrow a topic to be required. Presumably the themes therein won’t be sufficiently broad to appeal to all students or offer them important historical lessons.

The same argument was heard several years ago in San Francisco. At the time, a push for diversifying the literature curricula in schools was met with howls of protest, even from liberal whites, who insisted the addition of “too many” authors of color would crowd out “the classics.” That the classics were only “classic” because white scholars had deemed them so-and not due to some objective scientific standard by which great literature can be judged-escaped notice. That many of these classics were once considered junk fiction (like the works of Mark Twain for example) also went unremarked upon during the uproar.

White critics of the plan complained that black and brown authors’ stories wouldn’t be “universal” enough in the themes they discussed, signifying the way in which Eurocentric thinking supplants rational thought. Such an argument assumes that white folks’ perspectives are sufficiently broad to stand in as the generic “human” experience, while persons of color have experiences which are only theirs, and from which whites can learn nothing. This is, truth be told, the essence of white supremacist thinking.

Related to the idea that black history is too narrow a subject matter, critics like Pennsylvania Speaker of the House John Perzel argue it is unfair to focus only on blacks. What about other groups? Perzel himself recently complained that when he–a Czech descended American–came through the Philadelphia schools, there was no class about his people’s homeland: an argument that ignores the fundamentally larger role blacks have played in the development of the U.S. as compared to Czech immigrants. To reduce the black experience to just one of many, as if it were no different from any other immigrant group either in quantity or quality, is all the evidence one should require of the need for such a class to be mandated (and for some adults to be required to re-enroll so as to take it as well.)

Of course American History classes should strive to tell the stories of those from all ethnic and national origin groups. But black history is especially important given the unique ways in which the black struggle for equality has defined the contours of American freedom (or the lack thereof) in every generation since the nation’s founding.

Perzel then argues Philly students should focus on reading, writing and arithmetic before dabbling in such extraneous classes as Black History. But this posits a false choice: as if one cannot learn to read, write or compute and gain an historical grounding at the same time. Indeed, engaging the school’s two-thirds black majority in an exploration of a history that has largely been invisible to them (and which directly relates to their lives) may result in more achievement in other areas, precisely by engaging them in a more relevant pedagogical frame than the one currently offered.

This is not to deny that literacy and broad-based achievement are the most important goals. Of course they are, and other initiatives underway in Philadelphia (like the expansion of accelerated and honors programs in all the city’s schools so as to reach more capable but currently underperforming kids) can help that process along. But one boosts achievement best, not by offering drill-and-kill standardized tests to kids, or teaching them outdated and monocultural history, but rather by engaging them where they are, with curricula that speaks to their lives.

Even the students in the Philadelphia schools who aren’t black may find the new material on African American history more interesting than having to rehash the material they’ve been fed since birth. This will be especially likely if the new course teaches, as it should, the ways in which non-black folks have often worked with African Americans to forge a more equitable society: in the abolitionist movement, the civil rights movement, and in contemporary justice struggles.

In other words, Black History need not be a history only of black folks, but a history of the ways in which the black experience has defined all of our lives: politically, culturally, and otherwise. That is, by definition a multicultural history, albeit one told through the predominant lens of a particular group whose voices have long been ignored.

While some of the more thoughtful critics contend black history should be integrated throughout the existing history classes (and in this they surely have a point), the fact remains that it isn’t, and there is no evidence to suggest it will be anytime soon. The choice at present is not between a well-integrated, multiple-perspective history curricula on the one hand, and African American history on the other. Rather it is between a largely Eurocentric history on the one hand (with occasional smatterings of “other” folks’ narratives thrown in like an afterthought), or an attempt at a more honest and complete course offering on the other: one that can break down the white perspectivism that too often sullies our understanding of history and miseducates everyone’s kids in the process.

Given that choice, the path ahead should be clear.

Tim Wise is an antiracist essayist, activist and father. He is the author of White Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son (Soft Skull Press: 2005), and Affirmative Action: Racial Preference in Black and White (Routledge: 2005). His website is www.timwise.org and he can be reached at timjwise@msn.com.

Moore on Mix Tapes

Thurston Moore–founding member of the rock group Sonic Youth and head honcho of EcstaticPeace.com, a music, art, and literature website–has a new book, Mix Tape: The Art of Cassette Culture, which inspired me to dig out some old mix tapes buried in boxes deep in the basement.

[See my entry for April 26 for more on Moore’s book.]

Here’s a mix tape I made for Sandra about a decade ago:

I Love You, Yes I Do

Side A
Barry White “Can’t Get Enough of Your Love Baby”
Johnnie Taylor ” I Found a Love”
Mose Allison “Your Molecular Structure”
Shaver “Honey Bee”
Smokin’ Joe Kubek “She’s It”
John Lee Hooker “Dimples”
Dalton Reed “Keep on Lovin Me”
Stevie Ray Vaughn “Pride & Joy”
Muddy Waters “I Want You To Love Me”
Johnnie Taylor “Ain’t That Lovin’ You”
Dean Martin “That’s Amore”
Marvin Gaye & Tammi Terrell “Nothing Like The Real Thing”
Four Tops “Can’t Help Myself”
Bobby Rush” I Wanna Get Close to You”
Tommy Ridgley “All My Love Belongs to You”

Side B
John Lee Hooker “Big Legs, Tight Skirt”
James Brown “For You, My Love”
Robert Cray “Do That For Me”
Meters “Just Kissed My Baby”
Irma Thomas “Hold Me While I Cry”
Luther Allison “Love String”
Merle Haggard “Let’s Chase Each Other Around the Room”
Aretha Franklin “Dr. Feelgood”
Slim Harpo “I’m A King Bee”
Gladys Knight “For Once In My Life”
Howlin’ Wolf “Howlin’ For My Darlin'”
Squeeze “Take Me I’m Yours”
George Jones “Walk Through the World With Me”
Fats Domino “Whole Lotta Lovin'”
Little Walter “You’re So Fine”
Tommy Ridgley “I Love You, Yes I Do”